Project-based learning principles: Insights from the development of large infrastructure

Yan LIU, Erik-Jan HOUWING, Marcel HERTOGH, Hans BAKKER

PDF(856 KB)
PDF(856 KB)
Front. Eng ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3) : 501-515. DOI: 10.1007/s42524-024-3113-z
Technology and Innovation Management
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Project-based learning principles: Insights from the development of large infrastructure

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In recent decades, interest in project-based learning within organizational learning has grown significantly. This study synthesizes principles that facilitate learning at the project level. Through a cross-case analysis of the Gaasperdammer Tunnel project in the Netherlands and the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge in China, and validation via focus group discussions, we have identified five key principles: Owner Commitment, Social Environment Approach, Collaboration Vision, Value Orientation, and Open Mindset. These principles highlight the mindsets that guide the behavior and thinking of project practitioners beyond prescriptive processes and routines. Our research enhances the understanding of how project participants can learn from their involvement in unique, complex projects and improve their capabilities for future endeavors. We emphasize the critical role of learning in the development of project capabilities and suggest it be a focal point in future research on infrastructure development projects.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

organizational learning / project-based learning / principles / project capabilities / infrastructure development

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yan LIU, Erik-Jan HOUWING, Marcel HERTOGH, Hans BAKKER. Project-based learning principles: Insights from the development of large infrastructure. Front. Eng, 2024, 11(3): 501‒515 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-024-3113-z

References

[1]
Ahern T, Byrne P, Leavy B, (2015). Developing complex-project capability through dynamic organizational learning. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 8( 4): 732–754
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Alerasoul S A, Afeltra G, Hakala H, Minelli E, Strozzi F, (2022). Organisational learning, learning organisation, and learning orientation: An integrative review and framework. Human Resource Management Review, 32( 3): 100854
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
AlSaied M K, Alkhoraif A A, (2024). The role of organizational learning and innovative organizational culture for ambidextrous innovation. Learning Organization, 31( 2): 205–226
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Ayas K, Zeniuk N, (2001). Project-based learning: Building communities of reflective practitioners. Management Learning, 32( 1): 61–76
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Bakker R M, Cambré B, Korlaar L, Raab J, (2011a). Managing the project learning paradox: A set-theoretic approach toward project knowledge transfer. International Journal of Project Management, 29( 5): 494–503
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Bakker R M, Knoben J, De Vries N, Oerlemans L A, (2011b). The nature and prevalence of inter-organizational project ventures: Evidence from a large scale field study in the Netherlands 2006–2009. International Journal of Project Management, 29( 6): 781–794
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
BhattacherjeeA (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices. USA
[8]
Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F, (2016). Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation. Qualitative Health Research, 26( 13): 1802–1811
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
BlampiedNButtrick RJucanGPineyCStevensC VioletteDMax Wideman R (2023). In search of project management principles. Project management journal
[10]
Brady T, Davies A, (2004). Building project capabilities: from exploratory to exploitative learning. Organization Studies, 25( 9): 1601–1621
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Bronte-Stewart M, (2015). Beyond the iron triangle: Evaluating aspects of success and failure using a project status model. Computing and Information Systems, 19( 2): 19–36
[12]
Brown J S, Duguid P, (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2( 1): 40–57
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Cacciatori E, (2008). Memory objects in project environments: Storing, retrieving and adapting learning in project-based firms. Research Policy, 37( 9): 1591–1601
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Cao X, Ali A, Pitafi A H, Khan A N, Waqas M, (2021). A socio-technical system approach to knowledge creation and team performance: evidence from China. Information Technology & People, 34( 7): 1976–1996
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Chan P, Cooper R, Tzortzopoulos P, (2005). Organizational learning: conceptual challenges from a project perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 23( 7): 747–756
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Chesbrough H, (2004). Managing open innovation. Research Technology Management, 47( 1): 23–26
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
CreswellJ WCreswell J D (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications
[18]
Davies A, Brady T, (2000). Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: Towards repeatable solutions. Research Policy, 29( 7–8): 931–953
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Davies A, Brady T, (2016). Explicating the dynamics of project capabilities. International Journal of Project Management, 34( 2): 314–327
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Davies A, Mackenzie I, (2014). Project complexity and systems integration: Constructing the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics Games. International Journal of Project Management, 32( 5): 773–790
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
De Groot B, Leendertse W, Arts J, (2020). Building adaptive capacity through learning in project-oriented organisations in infrastructure planning. Urban Planning, 5( 1): 33–45
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
DeFillippiR J (2001). Introduction: Project-based learning, reflective practices and learning. Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA. 32: 5–10
[23]
DeFillippi R J, Arthur M B, (1998). Paradox in project-based enterprise: The case of film making. California Management Review, 40( 2): 125–139
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Dodgson M, (1993). Organizational learning: A review of some literatures. Organization Studies, 14( 3): 375–394
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Dowson J, Unterhitzenberger C, Bryde D, (2024). Facilitating and improving learning in projects: Evidence from a lean approach. International Journal of Project Management, 42( 1): 102559
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Duryan M, Smyth H, (2018). Cultivating sustainable communities of practice within hierarchical bureaucracies: the crucial role of an executive sponsorship. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 12( 1): 400–422
[27]
Easterby-Smith M, Prieto I M, (2008). Dynamic capabilities and knowledge management: An integrative role for learning. British Journal of Management, 19( 3): 235–249
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
EdmondsonA C (2012). Teaming: How organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy. John Wiley & Sons
[29]
EdmondsonA C (2018). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. John Wiley & Sons
[30]
Eisenhardt K M, Graebner M E, (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50( 1): 25–32
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Eisenhardt K M, Martin J A, (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they. Strategic Management Journal, 21( 10–11): 1105–1121
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Eltigani A, Gardiner P, Kirkham R, Williams T, Ou L, Calabrese A, (2020). Learning in and from projects: the learning modes and a learning capability model. Production Planning and Control, 31( 10): 786–798
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Eriksson P E, Leiringer R, Szentes H, (2017). The role of co-creation in enhancing explorative and exploitative learning in project-based settings. Project Management Journal, 48( 4): 22–38
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
FerresG MMoehler R C (2024). Running the codification gauntlet: why intent alone cannot afford the codification of project learnings. Project Management Journal
[35]
Garud R, Dunbar R L, Bartel C A, (2011). Dealing with unusual experiences: A narrative perspective on organizational learning. Organization Science, 22( 3): 587–601
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Grabher G, (2004). Temporary architectures of learning: Knowledge governance in project ecologies. Organization Studies, 25( 9): 1491–1514
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Grant R M, (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7( 4): 375–387
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Guest G, Namey E, Taylor J, Eley N, McKenna K, (2017). Comparing focus groups and individual interviews: findings from a randomized study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20( 6): 693–708
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Haesli A, Boxall P, (2005). When knowledge management meets HR strategy: an exploration of personalization-retention and codification-recruitment configurations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16( 11): 1955–1975
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Hartmann A, Dorée A, (2015). Learning between projects: More than sending messages in bottles. International Journal of Project Management, 33( 2): 341–351
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Hartmann A, Vinke-de Kruijf J, van Weesep R, (2023). Asking the right questions: The role of reflection for learning in and between projects. International Journal of Project Management, 41( 5): 102494
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
He Q, Xu J, Wang T, Chan A P, (2021). Identifying the driving factors of successful megaproject construction management: Findings from three Chinese cases. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 8( 1): 5–16
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Iftikhar R, Ahola T, Butt A, (2022). Learning from interorganizational projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 15( 1): 102–120
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Iftikhar R, Wiewiora A, (2022). Learning processes and mechanisms for interorganizational projects: Insights from the Islamabad–Rawalpindi metro bus project. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69( 6): 3379–3391
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Ika L A, Donnelly J, (2017). Success conditions for international development capacity building projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35( 1): 44–63
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Irani Z, Sharif A M, Love P E, (2009). Mapping knowledge management and organizational learning in support of organizational memory. International Journal of Production Economics, 122( 1): 200–215
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Keegan A, Turner J R, (2001). Quantity versus quality in project-based learning practices. Management Learning, 32( 1): 77–98
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
King W R, Ko D G, (2001). Evaluating knowledge management and the learning organization: An information/knowledge value chain approach. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 5( 14): 1–26
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Kivrak S, Arslan G, Dikmen I, Birgonul M T, (2008). Capturing knowledge in construction projects: Knowledge platform for contractors. Journal of Management Engineering, 24( 2): 87–95
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Klessova S, Thomas C, Engell S, (2020). Structuring inter-organizational R&D projects: Towards a better understanding of the project architecture as an interplay between activity coordination and knowledge integration. International Journal of Project Management, 38( 5): 291–306
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Koskinen K U, (2012). Organizational learning in project-based companies: A process thinking approach. Project Management Journal, 43( 3): 40–49
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
KostkaG (2016). Large infrastructure projects in Germany. Springer
[53]
Levitt B, March J G, (1988). Organizational learning. Annual review of sociology, 14( 1): 319–338
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Lindner F, Wald A, (2011). Success factors of knowledge management in temporary organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 29( 7): 877–888
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Liu Y, Amini-Abyaneh A, Hertogh M, Houwing E J, Bakker H, (2021). Collaborate to learn and learn to collaborate: A case of exploitative learning in the inter-organizational project. Engineering, Construction, and Architectural Management, 28( 3): 809–830
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Liu Y, Houwing E J, Hertogh M, Yuan Z, Liu H, (2022). Explorative learning in infrastructure development megaprojects: the case of the Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macao Bridge. Project Management Journal, 53( 2): 113–127
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Love P E, Smith J, Ackermann F, Irani Z, (2019). Making sense of rework and its unintended consequence in projects: The emergence of uncomfortable knowledge. International Journal of Project Management, 37( 3): 501–516
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Lundvall B-ä, Johnson B, (1994). The learning economy. Journal of industry studies, 1( 2): 23–42
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Lyu W, Liu J, (2021). Soft skills, hard skills: What matters most? Evidence from job postings. Applied Energy, 300: 117307
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
McClory S, Read M, Labib A, (2017). Conceptualising the lessons-learned process in project management: Towards a triple-loop learning framework. International Journal of Project Management, 35( 7): 1322–1335
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
McKelvey B, (2006). Van De Ven and Johnson’s “engaged scholarship”: Nice try, but···. Academy of Management Review, 31( 4): 822–829
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Morgan D L, (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22( 1): 129–152
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Newell S, Edelman L F, (2008). Developing a dynamic project learning and cross‐project learning capability: Synthesizing two perspectives. Information Systems Journal, 18( 6): 567–591
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Nyumba T, Wilson K, Derrick C, Mukherjee N, (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9( 1): 20–32
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Oyegoke A, (2011). The constructive research approach in project management research. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 4( 4): 573–595
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Pahl-Wostl C, Sendzimir J, Jeffrey P, Aerts J, Berkamp G, Cross K, (2007). Managing change toward adaptive water management through social learning. Ecology and Society, 12( 2): 30–48
CrossRef Google scholar
[67]
Papadonikolaki E, van Oel C, Kagioglou M, (2019). Organising and managing boundaries: A structurational view of collaboration with Building Information Modelling (BIM). International Journal of Project Management, 37( 3): 378–394
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Parker A, Tritter J, (2006). Focus group method and methodology: Current practice and recent debate. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 29( 1): 23–37
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
Prencipe A, Tell F, (2001). Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms. Research Policy, 30( 9): 1373–1394
CrossRef Google scholar
[70]
Schindler M, Eppler M J, (2003). Harvesting project knowledge: A review of project learning methods and success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 21( 3): 219–228
CrossRef Google scholar
[71]
Senaratne S, Malewana C, (2011). Linking individual, team and organizational learning in construction project team settings. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 7( 1): 50–63
CrossRef Google scholar
[72]
SengeP M (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Currency
[73]
Spall S, (1998). Peer debriefing in qualitative research: Emerging operational models. Qualitative Inquiry, 4( 2): 280–292
CrossRef Google scholar
[74]
Sydow J, Braun T, (2018). Projects as temporary organizations: An agenda for further theorizing the interorganizational dimension. International Journal of Project Management, 36( 1): 4–11
CrossRef Google scholar
[75]
Szulanski G, (2000). The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82( 1): 9–27
CrossRef Google scholar
[76]
Turner N, Maylor H, Swart J, (2015). Ambidexterity in projects: An intellectual capital perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 33( 1): 177–188
CrossRef Google scholar
[77]
Wang R, Lu W, Wei Y, (2022). Project-based organizations’ pursuit of production efficiency and legitimate power: An institutional perspective. Project Management Journal, 53( 3): 295–308
CrossRef Google scholar
[78]
Wasko M M, Faraj S, (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 29( 1): 35–57
CrossRef Google scholar
[79]
Weick K E, (1991). The nontraditional quality of organizational learning. Organization Science, 2( 1): 116–124
CrossRef Google scholar
[80]
Wiewiora A, Chang A, Smidt M, (2020). Individual, project and organizational learning flows within a global project-based organization: exploring what, how and who. International Journal of Project Management, 38( 4): 201–214
CrossRef Google scholar
[81]
Williams T, (2008). How do organizations learn lessons from projects—And do they. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55( 2): 248–266
CrossRef Google scholar
[82]
Winch G, Leiringer R, (2016). Owner project capabilities for infrastructure development: A review and development of the “strong owner” concept. International Journal of Project Management, 34( 2): 271–281
CrossRef Google scholar
[83]
Winter S G, (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24( 10): 991–995
CrossRef Google scholar
[84]
YinR (1984). Case study research. Beverly Hills. In: ca: Sage
[85]
Zhou Q, Deng X, Wang G, Mahmoudi A, (2022). Linking elements to outcomes of knowledge transfer in the project environment: Current review and future direction. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 9( 2): 221–238
CrossRef Google scholar
[86]
Zollo M, Winter S G, (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13( 3): 339–351
CrossRef Google scholar

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(856 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/