Does e-hailing perform better than on-street searching? An investigation based on the temporal-spatial distributions of idle vehicles

Juwen GUAN, Yue BAO

PDF(1891 KB)
PDF(1891 KB)
Front. Eng ›› DOI: 10.1007/s42524-024-3109-8
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Does e-hailing perform better than on-street searching? An investigation based on the temporal-spatial distributions of idle vehicles

Author information +
History +

Abstract

This paper investigates whether e-hailing performs better than on-street searching for taxi services. By adopting the Poission point process to model the temporal-spatial distributions of idle vehicles, passengers’ waiting time distributions of on-street searching and e-hailing are explicitly modeled, and closed-form results of their expected waiting time are given. It is proved that whether e-hailing performs better than on-street searching mainly depends on the density of idle vehicles within the matching area and the matching period. It is proved that given the advantage of e-hailing in rapidly pairing passengers and idle vehicles, the expected waiting time for on-street searching is always longer than that of e-hailing as long as the number of idle vehicles within a passenger’s dominant temporal-spatial area is lower than 4/π. Moreover, we extend our analysis to explore the market equilibria for both e-hailing and on-street searching, and present the equilibrium conditions for a taxi market operating under e-hailing versus on-street searching. With a special reciprocal passenger demand function, it is shown that the performance difference between e-hailing and on-street searching is mainly determined by the ratio of fleet size to maximum potential passenger demand. It suggests that e-hailing can achieve a higher capacity utilization rate of vehicles than on-street searching when vehicle density is relatively low. Furthermore, it is shown that an extended average trip duration improves the chance that e-hailing performs better than on-street searching. The optimal vehicle fleet sizes to maximize the total social welfare/profit are then analyzed, and the corresponding maximization problems are formulated.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

taxi services / on-street searching / e-hailing service / passenger waiting time

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Juwen GUAN, Yue BAO. Does e-hailing perform better than on-street searching? An investigation based on the temporal-spatial distributions of idle vehicles. Front. Eng, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-024-3109-8

References

[1]
AlleyJ K (2016). The impact of uber technologies on the new york city transportation industry. Available at the website of the university of Arkausas
[2]
Bai J, So K C, Tang C S, Chen X, Wang H, (2019). Coordinating supply and demand on an on-demand service platform with impatient customers. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 21( 3): 556–570
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Bond A, (2015). An App for that: local governments and the rise of the sharing economy. Notre Dame Law Review, 90( 2): 77–96
[4]
ChiuS NStoyanDKendallW SMeckeJ (2013). Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications. Akademie-Verlag
[5]
Cramer J, Krueger A B, (2016). Disruptive change in the taxi business: the case of Uber. American Economic Review, 106( 5): 177–182
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Daganzo C F, Ouyang Y, (2019). A general model of demand-responsive transportation services: From taxi to ridesharing to dial-a-ride. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 126: 213–224
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Diao M, Kong H, Zhao J, (2021). Impacts of transportation network companies on urban mobility. Nature Sustainability, 4( 6): 494–500
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Guo X, Caros N S, Zhao J, (2021). Robust matching-integrated vehicle rebalancing in ride-hailing system with uncertain demand. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 150: 161–189
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Harding S, Kandlikar M, Gulati S, (2016). Taxi apps, regulation, and the market for taxi journeys. Transportation Research Part A, Policy and Practice, 88: 15–25
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
He F, Shen Z J, (2015). Modeling taxi services with smartphone-based e-hailing applications. Transportation Research Part C, Emerging Technologies, 58: 93–106
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Ke J, Yang H, Li X, Wang H, Ye J, (2020). Pricing and equilibrium in on-demand ride-pooling markets. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 139: 411–431
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Kong H, Zhang X, Zhao J, (2020). Is ride sourcing more efficient than taxis. Applied Geography, 125: 102301
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
LiXKeJYangHWangHZhouY (2021). A general matching function for ride-sourcing services. Available at SSRN 3915450
[14]
Nie Y, (2017). How can the taxi industry survive the tide of ridesourcing? Evidence from Shenzhen, China. Transportation Research Part C, Emerging Technologies, 79: 242–256
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
RayleLShaheenSChanNDaiDCerveroR (2014). App-based, On-Demand Ride Services: Comparing Taxi and Ridesourcing Trips and User Characteristics in San Francisco University of California Transportation Center. University of California, USA
[16]
Salanova J M, Estrada M, Aifadopoulou G, Mitsakis E, (2011). A review of the modeling of taxi services. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20: 150–161
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
SchallerB (2017). Empty seats, full streets: Fixing manhattan’s traffic problem. Available at: Infrastructure USA 2017–12-26
[18]
Schaller B, (2021). Can sharing a ride make for less traffic? Evidence from Uber and Lyft and implications for cities. Transport Policy, 102: 1–10
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Shang W L, Gao Z, Daina N, Zhang H, Long Y, Guo Z, Ochieng W Y, (2023a). Benchmark analysis for robustness of multi-scale urban road networks under global disruptions. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24( 12): 15344–15354
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Shang W, Chen Y, Yu Q, Song X, Chen Y, Ma X, Chen X, Tan Z, Huang J, Ochieng W, (2023b). Spatio-temporal analysis of carbon footprints for urban public transport systems based on smart card data. Applied Energy, 352: 121859
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Shang W, Lv Z, (2023). Low carbon technology for carbon neutrality in sustainable cities: A survey. Sustainable Cities and Society, 92: 104489
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Taylor T A, (2018). On-demand service platforms. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 20( 4): 704–720
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Tirachini A, Gomez-Lobo A, (2020). Does ride-hailing increase or decrease vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT)? A simulation approach for Santiago de Chile. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14( 3): 187–204
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Vega-Gonzalo M, Aguilera-García Á, Gomez J, Vassallo J M, (2023). Traditional taxi, e-hailing or ride-hailing? A GSEM approach to exploring service adoption patterns. Transportation, 51( 4): 1–40
[25]
Vignon D, Yin Y, Ke J, (2023). Regulating the ride-hailing market in the age of uberization. Transportation Research Part E, Logistics and Transportation Review, 169: 102969
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Wang H, Yang H, (2019). Ridesourcing systems: A framework and review. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 129: 122–155
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Wang X, Liu W, Yang H, Wang D, Ye J, (2020). Customer behavioural modelling of order cancellation in coupled ride-sourcing and taxi markets. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 132: 358–378
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
WigandK MBrandtTNeumannD (2020). The effect of autonomous vehicles on consumer welfare in ride-hailing markets. Available at SSRN 3664415
[29]
Xu Z, Yin Y, Zha L, (2017). Optimal parking provision for ride-sourcing services. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 105: 559–578
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Yang H, Leung C W Y, Wong S C, Bell M G H, (2010). Equilibria of bilateral taxi–customer searching and meeting on networks. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 44( 8-9): 1067–1083
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Yang H, Qin X, Ke J, Ye J, (2020). Optimizing matching time interval and matching radius in on-demand ride-sourcing markets. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 131: 84–105
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Yang H, Wong S, (1998). A network model of urban taxi services. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 32( 4): 235–246
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Yang H, Yang T, (2011). Equilibrium properties of taxi markets with search frictions. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 45( 4): 696–713
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Yu H, Liu P, Li Z, Zhang G, Pu Z, (2020). Quantifying significance of young traveler characteristics in travel mode choices impacted by e-hailing services. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 146( 3): 04020002.1–04020002.9
[35]
Zha L, Yin Y, Yang H, (2016). Economic analysis of ride-sourcing markets. Transportation Research Part C, Emerging Technologies, 71: 249–266
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Zhang K, Chen Y, Nie Y, (2019). Hunting image: Taxi search strategy recognition using Sparse Subspace Clustering. Transportation Research Part C, Emerging Technologies, 109: 250–266
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Zhu Z, Ke J, Wang H, (2021). A mean-field Markov decision process model for spatial-temporal subsidies in ride-sourcing markets. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 150: 540–565
CrossRef Google scholar

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1891 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/