Supporting factors model for the sustainable step development of supply chain: An empirical study from China with grounded theory

Abstract

The ongoing stability of supply chains faces significant challenges from trade protectionism, anti-globalization trends, and the COVID-19 pandemic. To remain resilient in this dynamic market environment, supply chains must evolve through iterative upgrades and transition to a higher level of sustainability, a process termed “step development.” The current literature, however, offers limited insights into achieving such step development in supply chain sustainability and its critical supporting elements. This study, grounded in theory, involved interviews with representatives from eight diverse Chinese enterprises. We introduce a model delineating supporting factors and a roadmap for Sustainable Step Development of Supply Chains (SSDSC). Our findings highlight three pivotal categories of support for SSDSC: institutional, technological, and social factors. Additionally, we observed that external influences in these categories positively modulate their internal counterparts. The study identifies industrial technology, digital intelligence technology, corporate responsibility, and stakeholder needs as key elements in this process. We conclude by offering theoretical and practical recommendations to foster SSDSC.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

supply chain / sustainable development / supporting factors / grounded theory

References

[1] Amann, M K Roehrich, J K Eßig, M Harland, C (2014). Driving sustainable supply chain management in the public sector: The importance of public procurement in the European Union. Supply Chain Management, 19( 3): 351–366

[2] Amini, M Bienstock, C (2014). Corporate sustainability: An integrative definition and framework to evaluate corporate practice and guide academic research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 76: 12–19

[3] Berente, N Yoo, Y (2012). Institutional contradictions and loose coupling: Postimplementation of NASA’s enterprise information system. Information Systems Research, 23( 2): 376–396

[4] Bhardwaj, B R (2016). Role of green policy on sustainable supply chain management. Benchmarking, 23( 2): 456–468

[5] Boddy, C R (2016). Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research, 19( 4): 426–432

[6] Carter, C R Rogers, D S (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38( 5): 360–387

[7] Chen, S Zhang, Q Zhou, Y P (2019). Impact of supply chain transparency on sustainability under NGO scrutiny. Production and Operations Management, 28( 12): 3002–3022

[8] Chen, X H He, C C Chen, Y Xie, Z Y (2023). Internet of Things (IoT)–blockchain-enabled pharmaceutical supply chain resilience in the post-pandemic era. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 10( 1): 82–95

[9] Correia, E Carvalho, H Azevedo, S G Govindan, K (2017). Maturity models in supply chain sustainability: A systematic literature review. Sustainability (Basel), 9( 1): 64–90

[10] Costanza, C (2023). When the business is circular and social: A dynamic grounded analysis in the clothing recycle. Journal of Cleaner Production, 382: 135–216

[11] Edgeman, R Eskildsen, J (2014). Modeling and assessing sustainable enterprise excellence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23( 3): 173–187

[12] Eisenhardt, K M Graebner, M E (2007). Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50( 1): 25–32

[13] Erhun, F Kraft, T Wijnsma, S (2021). Sustainable triple-A supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 30( 3): 644–655

[14] Fischer-Kreer, D Brettel, M (2022). Accentuate the positive? Sustainable entrepreneurs’ framing of positive and negative impacts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 376: 134319

[15] Gao, D Xu, Z Ruan, Y Z Lu, H Y (2017). From a systematic literature review to integrated definition for sustainable supply chain innovation (SSCI). Journal of Cleaner Production, 142( 4): 1518–1538

[16] Gimenez, C Sierra, V Rodon, J (2012). Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Economics, 140( 1): 149–159

[17] GlaserB G (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity. Mill Valley, USA: Sociology Press

[18] GlaserB GStrauss A L (1999). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York, USA: Routledge

[19] Hamel, G Prahalad, C (1991). Corporate imagination and expeditionary marketing. Harvard Business Review, 69( 4): 81–92

[20] Kumar, D Rahman, Z (2017). Analyzing enablers of sustainable supply chain: ISM and fuzzy AHP approach. Journal of Modelling in Management, 12( 3): 498–524

[21] Lee, L H (2004). The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Business Review, 82( 10): 102–157

[22] Liu, W H He, Y Dong, J X Cao, Y N (2023a). Disruptive technologies for advancing supply chain resilience. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 10( 2): 360–366

[23] Liu, W H Liu, X Y Shi, X R Hou, J H Shi, V Dong, J X (2023b). Collaborative adoption of blockchain technology: A supply chain contract perspective. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 10( 1): 121–142

[24] Robinson, H S Anumba, C J Carrillo, P M Al-Ghassani, A M (2006). STEPS: A knowledge management maturity roadmap for corporate sustainability. Business Process Management Journal, 12( 6): 793–808

[25] Saeed, M A Kersten, W (2019). Drivers of sustainable supply chain management: Identification and classification. Sustainability (Basel), 11( 4): 1104–1137

[26] Sandelowski, M (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18( 2): 179–183

[27] Sarkis, J (2020). Supply chain sustainability: learning from the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41( 1): 63–73

[28] ShiXLiuW LimM K(2023). Supply chain resilience: new challenges and opportunities, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, doi:10.1080/13675567.2023.2262396

[29] Srai, J S Alinaghian, L S Kirkwood, D A (2013). Understanding sustainable supply network capabilities of multinationals: A capability maturity model approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part B, Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 227( 4): 595–615

[30] Wei, W Y Liu, W H Tang, O Dong, C W Liang, Y J (2023). CSR investment for a two-sided platform: Network externality and risk aversion. European Journal of Operational Research, 307( 2): 694–712

[31] Yin, R K (1994). Discovering the future of the case study method in evaluation research. American Journal of Evaluation, 15( 3): 283–290

[32] Zijm, H Klumpp, M (2016). Logistics and supply chain management: developments and trends. Logistics and Supply Chain Innovation, 1–20

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press