A taxonomy of built asset information coupling

Abstract

The digital transformation of the built asset industry is moving toward closer integration of physical and digital assets and resources. Within the framework of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) and Digital Twins (DTs), an increasing number of studies focus on the technical aspects of CPS and DT. However, a unified framework describing the dimensions and characteristics essential for integrating lifecycle information remains elusive. To leverage these concepts effectively, it is necessary to develop new frameworks to classify and put into relationship various components that comprise the lifecycle information integration of physical and digital assets and resources. This paper addresses these gaps by proposing a taxonomy of Built Asset Lifecycle Information Couples, which outlines the dimensions and characteristics crucial for the lifecycle information integration of built assets and resources. The proposed taxonomy contributes to the efforts aimed at organizing the knowledge domain of lifecycle information management in the built environment.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

asset coupling / taxonomy / digitalization / lifecycle information management / built environment

References

[1] Akanmu, A Anumba, C Ogunseiju, O (2021). Towards next generation cyber-physical systems and digital twins for construction. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 26: 505–525

[2] Al-AzriS (2020). Digital Culture for Optimization. Springer Inter-national Publishing

[3] AliM (2020). Big data and machine intelligence in software platforms for smart cities. Software Architecture, 1269: 17–26 Springer International Publishing

[4] Alnaggar, A Pitt, M (2019). Lifecycle exchange for asset data (LEAD): A proposed process model for managing asset data-flow between building stakeholders using BIM open standards. Journal of Facilities Management, 17( 5): 385–411

[5] Bailey, D E Leonardi, P M Barley, S R (2012). The lure of the virtual. Organization Science, 23( 5): 1485–1504

[6] BaileyK D (1994). Typologies and taxonomies: An introduction to classification techniques. Sage Publications

[7] BIMdictionary (2023). Degree of automation (DoA)

[8] Blueprint (2022). The benefits of using a digital twin in automation Available at: Blueprint

[9] Boje, C Guerriero, A Kubicki, S Rezgui, Y (2020). Towards a semantic construction digital twin: Directions for future research. Automation in Construction, 114: 103179

[10] BorangiuTTrentesaux DLeitãoPGiretBoggino ABottiV eds. (2020). Service Oriented, Holonic and Multi-agent Manufacturing Systems for Industry of the Future: Proceedings of SOHOMA 2019 (Vol. 853). Springer Interna-tional Publishing

[11] BoschertSRosen R (2016). Digital Twin—The Simulation Aspect. In Hehenberger P Bradley D, eds. Mechatronic Futures (59–74). Springer International Publishing

[12] Brandín, R Abrishami, S (2021). Information traceability platforms for asset data lifecycle: Blockchain-based technologies. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 10( 3): 364–386

[13] BrockhoffTHeithoff MKorenIMichaelJPfeifferJ RumpeBUysal M S Van Der Aalst (2021). Process Prediction with Digital Twins. 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C), 182–187

[14] Burton-Jones, A Grange, C (2013). From use to effective use: A representation theory perspective. Information Systems Research, 24( 3): 632–658

[15] CamposanoJ CSmolanderKRuippoT (2021). Seven metaphors to understand digital twins of built assets. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 9: 27167–27181

[16] CDBB (2020). Uncovering value of digital twins in infrastructure business models. Construction management and economics.

[17] Chen, Z Huang, L (2020). Digital twin in Circular Economy: Remanufacturing in Construction. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 588( 3): 032014

[18] Çimen, Ö (2021). Construction and built environment in circular economy: A comprehensive literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 305: 127180

[19] Costin, A Pradhananga, N Teizer, J (2014). Passive RFID and BIM for real-time visualization and location tracking. Construction Research Congress, 2014: 169–178

[20] CovanichWMcFarlane DFaridA M (2008). Guidelines for evaluating the ease of reconfiguration of manufacturing systems. In: 2008 6th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, 1214–1219

[21] DawoodNMarasini RDeanJ (2009). VR - Roadmap: A vision for 2030 in the built environment. Virtual Futures for Design, Construction & Procurement? (pp. 259–277). Scopus

[22] De RoureDPage K RRadanlievPVan KleekM (2019). Complex coupling in cyber-physical systems and the threats of fake data. Living in the Internet of Things

[23] Edwards-Jones, A (2014). Qualitative data analysis with NVIVO. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40( 2): 193–195

[24] Ekbia, H R (2008). The consequences of information: Institutional implications of technological change. Information Society, 24( 2): 121–122

[25] El Saddik, A (2018). Digital twins: The convergence of multimedia technologies. IEEE MultiMedia, 25( 2): 87–92

[26] ElattarS (2008). Automation and robotics in construction: Opportunities and challenges

[27] Farnsworth, C B Beveridge, S Miller, K R Christofferson, J P (2015). Application, advantages, and methods associated with using BIM in commercial construction. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 11( 3): 218–236

[28] FoidlHFelderer M (2016). Research challenges of Industry 4.0 for quality management. Springer International Publishing

[29] GrievesM (2015). Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence through Virtual Factory Replication, MICHAEL W. GRIEVES, LLC, Cocoa Beach, Florida, USA

[30] GrievesMVickers J (2017). Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems. In F.-J. Kahlen, S. Flumerfelt, & A. Alves (Eds.), Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems (85–113). Springer International Publishing

[31] HaßeHMöller FArbterMHenningJ (2020). A Taxonomy of Digital Twins

[32] HeinrichMLang W (2019). Materials Passports - Best Practice

[33] Hu, W Zhang, T Deng, X Liu, Z Tan, J (2021). Digital twin: A state-of-the-art review of its enabling technologies, applications and challenges. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing and Special Equipment, 2( 1): 1–34

[34] Hubbard, G (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Beyond the triple bottom line. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18( 3): 177–191

[35] Jahan, S Khan, K Thaheem, M Ullah, F Alqurashi, M Alsulami, B (2022). Modeling profitability—Influencing risk factors for construction projects: A system dynamics approach. Buildings, 12( 6): 701

[36] Jenkin, T Chan, Y E (2010). Is project alignment – A process perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 25( 1): 35–55

[37] Jraisat, L Jreisat, L Hattar, C (2016). Quality in construction management: An exploratory study. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 33( 7): 920–941

[38] Juarez, M G Botti, V J Giret, A S (2021). Digital twins: Review and challenges. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 21( 3): 030802

[39] Karlsen, K Dreyer, B Olsen, P Elvevoll, E (2013). Literature review: Does a common theoretical framework to implement food traceability exist?. Food Control, 32( 2): 409–417

[40] KatenbayevaAGlassJAnvuurA GhumraS (2016). Developing a theoretical framework of traceability for sustainability in the construction sector

[41] KimG YFlores-García EWiktorssonMDoNoh S (2021). Exploring Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustain-ability Impact of Digital Twin-Based Services for Smart Production Logistics. Springer International Publishing

[42] Kim, J (2020). Visual analytics for operation-level construction monitoring and documentation: State-of-the-art technologies, research challenges, and future directions. Frontiers in Built Environment, 6: 575738

[43] Kritzinger, W Karner, M Traar, G Henjes, J Sihn, W (2018). Digital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51( 11): 1016–1022

[44] Kuster, C Rezgui, Y Mourshed, M (2017). Electrical load forecasting models: A critical systematic review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 35: 257–270

[45] Labuschagne, C Brent, A C (2008). An industry perspective of the completeness and relevance of a social assessment framework for project and technology management in the manufacturing sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16( 3): 253–262

[46] Lawrenz, S Nippraschk, M Wallat, P Rausc, A Goldmann, D Lohrengel, A (2021). Is it all about Information? The role of the information gap between stakeholders in the context of the circular economy. Procedia CIRP, 98: 364–369

[47] Lee, R Fielding, N (1996). Qualitative data analysis: Representations of a technology: A comment on coffey, holbrook and atkinson. Sociological Research Online, 1( 4): 15–20

[48] Lu, Q Parlikad, A Woodall, P Don Ranasinghe, G Xie, X Liang, Z Konstantinou, E Heaton, J Schooling, J (2020). Developing a digital twin at building and city levels: Case study of west cambridge campus. Journal of Management Engineering, 36( 3): 05020004

[49] LuQParlikadA K WoodallPRanasinghe G DHeatonJ (2019). Developing a dynamic digital twin at a building level: Using Cambridge campus as case study. International Conference on Smart Infrastructure and Construction 2019 (ICSIC), 67–75

[50] Lu, Q Xie, X Parlikad, A K Schooling, J M (2020). Digital twin-enabled anomaly detection for built asset monitoring in operation and maintenance. Automation in Construction, 118: 103277

[51] Lv, Z Shang, W Guizani, M (2022). Impact of digital twins and metaverse on cities: History, current situation, and application perspectives. Applied Sciences, 12( 24): 12820

[52] Madubuike, O Anumba, C Khallaf, R (2022). A review of digital twin applications in construction. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 27: 145–172

[53] Maheshwari, P Kamble, S Belhadi, A Mani, V Pundir, A (2022). Digital twin implementation for performance improvement in process industries—A case study of food processing company. International Journal of Production Research, 1–23

[54] March, S Smith, G (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15( 4): 251–266

[55] Miller, J Roth, A (1994). A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies. Management Science, 40( 3): 285–304

[56] MilliganT (2022). Digital twin capabilities periodic table. Digital Twin Consortium

[57] MirarchiCTrebbi CLupica SpagnoloSDaniottiBPavanA TripodiD (2020). BIM methodology and tools implementation for construction companies (GreenBIM Project). In Daniotti B, Gianinetto M, Della Torre S, eds. Digital Transformation of the Design, Construction and Management Processes of the Built Environment Springer International Publishing, (201–208)

[58] Moselhi, O Bardareh, H Zhu, Z (2020). Automated data acquisition in construction with remote sensing technologies. Applied Sciences, 10( 8): 2846

[59] Müller, R Turner, R Andersen, E Shao, J Kvalnes, Ø (2014). Ethics, trust, and governance in temporary organizations. Project Management Journal, 45( 4): 39–54

[60] Nickerson, R C Varshney, U Muntermann, J (2013). A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 22( 3): 336–359

[61] Niu, Y Anumba, C Lu, W (2019). Taxonomy and deployment framework for emerging pervasive technologies in construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145( 5): 04019028

[62] OberländerALösserBRauD (2019). Taxonomy research in information systems: A systematic assessment. In: Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Inforamtion Systems (ECIS)

[63] Østerlie, T Monteiro, E (2020). Digital sand: The becoming of digital representations. Information and Organization, 30( 1): 100275

[64] Pang, T Pelaez Restrepo, J Cheng, C Yasin, A Lim, H Miletic, M (2021). Developing a digital twin and digital thread framework for an ‘Industry 4.0’ Shipyard. Applied Sciences, 11( 3): 1097

[65] Papadonikolaki, E (2018). Loosely coupled systems of innovation: Aligning BIM adoption with implementation in dutch construction. Journal of Management Engineering, 34( 6): 05018009

[66] Parmar, R Leiponen, A Thomas, L D W (2020). Building an organizational digital twin. Business Horizons, 63( 6): 725–736

[67] PinheiroF (2004). REQUIREMENTS TRACEABILITY. Perspectives on Software Requirements, 23

[68] Pinheiro, F Goguen, J (1996). An object-oriented tool for tracing requirements. IEEE Software, 13( 2): 52–64

[69] PriceS (2008). A representation approach to conceptualizing tangible learning environments. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Interna-tional Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction

[70] Qi, Q Tao, F Hu, T Anwer, N Liu, A Wei, Y Wang, L Nee, A (2021). Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 58: 3–21

[71] Ramesh, B Jarke, M (2001). Toward reference models for requirements traceability. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 27( 1): 58–93

[72] SacksRBrilakis IPikasEXieH SGirolamiM (2020). Construction with digital twin information systems. Data-Centric Engineering

[73] Sertyesilisik, B (2017). Building information modeling as a tool for enhancing disaster resilience of the construction industry. TRANSACTIONS of the VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava. Safety Engineering Series, 12( 1): 9–18

[74] Shen, X Cheng, W Lu, M (2008). Wireless sensor networks for resources tracking at building construction sites. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 13( S1): 78–83

[75] ShubinskiISchäbe H (2013). On the definition of functional reliability. In Steenbergen R, van Gelder P, Miraglia S, Vrouwenvelder V, eds. Safety, Reliability and Risk Analysis (pp. 3021–3027). CRC Press

[76] Singh, A Berghorn, G Joshi, S Syal, M (2011). Review of life-cycle assessment applications in building construction. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 17( 1): 15–23

[77] Singh, V Willcox, K E (2018). Engineering design with digital thread. AIAA Journal, 56( 11): 4515–4528

[78] Stein, A Moser, C (2014). Asset planning for climate change adaptation: Lessons from Cartagena, Colombia. Environment and Urbanization, 26( 1): 166–183

[79] StojanovicV (2021). Digital twins for indoor built environments, Universität Potsdam

[80] Succar, B (2009). Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Automation in Construction, 18( 3): 357–375

[81] SuccarB (2023). Asset coupling. BIM Dictionary

[82] Succar, B Poirier, E (2020). Lifecycle information transformation and exchange for delivering and managing digital and physical assets. Automation in Construction, 112: 103090

[83] Tao, F Cheng, J Qi, Q Zhang, M Zhang, H Sui, F (2018). Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 94( 9–12): 3563–3576

[84] Umeda, Y Takata, S Kimura, F Tomiyama, T Sutherland, J W Kara, S Herrmann, C Duflou, J R (2012). Toward integrated product and process life cycle planning—An environmental perspective. CIRP Annals, 61( 2): 681–702

[85] Upstill-Goddard, J Glass, J Dainty, A R J Nicholson, I (2015). Analysis of responsible sourcing performance in BES 6001 certificates. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Engineering Sustainability, 168( 2): 71–81

[86] USIBD (2016). USIBD Level of Accuracy (LOA) Specification Guide. U.S. Institute of Building Documentation

[87] Van der ValkHHunkerJRabeM OttoB (2020). Digital twins in simulative applications: A taxonomy. In: 2020 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), 2695–2706

[88] Wang, S H Wang, W C Wang, K C Shih, S Y (2015). Applying building information modeling to support fire safety management. Automation in Construction, 59: 158–167

[89] Wang, T Liang, Y Yang, Y Xu, G Peng, H Liu, A Jia, W (2020). An intelligent edge-computing-based method to counter coupling problems in cyber-physical systems. IEEE Network, 34( 3): 16–22

[90] Wieser, A Scherz, M Maier, S Passer, A Kreiner, H (2019). Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals in construction industry—A systemic consideration of synergies and trade-offs. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 323( 1): 012177

[91] Woods, M Paulus, T Atkins, D Macklin, R (2016). Advancing qualitative research using qualitative data analysis software (QDAS) reviewing potential versus practice in published studies using ATLAS. ti and NVivo, 1994–2013. Social Science Computer Review, 34( 5): 597–617

[92] XiaoFMin XZhangWFanHDonghuiW MinC (2012). On the research of data flow uncoupling in integrated multidisciplinary design process management. International Information Institute

[93] Xue, X Shen, Q Ren, Z (2010). Critical review of collaborative working in construction projects: Business environment and human behaviors. Journal of Management Engineering, 26( 4): 196–208

[94] Yang, Q Z Zhang, Y (2006). Semantic interoperability in building design: Methods and tools. Computer Aided Design, 38( 10): 1099–1112

[95] Yaqoob, I Salah, K Uddin, M Jayaraman, R Omar, M Imran, M (2020). Blockchain for digital twins: Recent advances and future research challenges. IEEE Network, 34( 5): 290–298

[96] YouZFengL (2020). Integration of Industry 4.0 related technologies in construction industry: A framework of cyber-physical system. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 8: 122908–122922

[97] Zegarra, O Alarcón, L F (2019). Coordination of teams, meetings, and managerial processes in construction projects: Using a lean and complex adaptive mechanism. Production Planning and Control, 30( 9): 736–763

[98] Zhang, J Cheng, J Chen, W Chen, K (2022). Digital twins for construction sites: Concepts, LoD definition, and applications. Journal of Management Engineering, 38( 2): 04021094

[99] Zhang, L Zhou, L Horn, B (2021). Building a right digital twin with model engineering. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 59: 151–164

[100] Zheng, Y Yang, S Cheng, H (2019). An application framework of digital twin and its case study. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10( 3): 1141–1153

[101] ZhongYMarteau BHornbackAZhuYShiW GiusteFKrzak JGrafAChafetzRWangM (2022). IDTVR: A novel cloud framework for an interactive digital twin in virtual reality. In: 2022 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Reality (ICIR), 21–26

[102] ZhouBWang PWanJLiangYWangF ZhangDLei ZLiHJinR (2022). Decoupling and recoupling spatiotemporal representation for RGB-D-based motion recognition

[103] Zhu, Z Ren, X Chen, Z (2017). Integrated detection and tracking of workforce and equipment from construction jobsite videos. Automation in Construction, 81: 161–171

Acknowledgements

We wish to express our sincere appreciation to Dr. Bilal Succar for his significant contributions and expert insights. His dedication to the meticulous review of our manuscript has been invaluable, ensuring its academic rigor and enhancing its overall quality.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 Higher Education Press