Manufacturer encroachment and carbon reduction decisions considering cap-and-trade policy and retailer investment

Pengpeng YUAN , Jiasen SUN , Dmitry IVANOV

Front. Eng ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2) : 326 -344.

PDF (2400KB)
Front. Eng ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2) : 326 -344. DOI: 10.1007/s42524-024-0301-9
Logistics Systems and Supply Chain Management
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Manufacturer encroachment and carbon reduction decisions considering cap-and-trade policy and retailer investment

Author information +
History +
PDF (2400KB)

Abstract

Low-carbon regulation and market competition present new opportunities and challenges for supply chain firms, emphasizing the significance of carbon reduction and channel encroachment in enhancing competitiveness. This study formulates various game models to evaluate manufacturers’ encroachment strategies (with or without encroachment) under different conditions of low-carbon investment by retailers. It investigates the operational decisions and carbon abatement strategies of firms under various scenarios. The findings reveal that encroachment elevates unit abatement levels but decreases wholesale prices and retailer profits when unit encroachment costs are below certain thresholds. In contrast, the manufacturer consistently benefits from channel encroachment. Retailer-initiated low-carbon investments can motivate manufacturers to reduce emissions. A lower carbon price potentially offers financial advantages to retailer engaging in such investments. Additionally, the likelihood of reduced environmental damage postchannel encroachment, compared to preprofessional encroachment, increases when the retailer invests in low-carbon initiatives. The retailer’s profit is inversely related to the carbon price, and a higher carbon price can strengthen the incentive effect of low-carbon investment on the manufacturer’s abatement endeavors.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

carbon cap-and-trade / channel encroachment / emission reduction / low-carbon investment

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Pengpeng YUAN, Jiasen SUN, Dmitry IVANOV. Manufacturer encroachment and carbon reduction decisions considering cap-and-trade policy and retailer investment. Front. Eng, 2024, 11(2): 326-344 DOI:10.1007/s42524-024-0301-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Anand, K S Giraud-Carrier, F C (2020). Pollution regulation of competitive markets. Management Science, 66( 9): 4193–4206

[2]

Arya, A Mittendorf, B Sappington, D E (2007). The bright side of supplier encroachment. Marketing Science, 26( 5): 651–659

[3]

Bai, Q Geng, Y Y Jin, M Xu, X (2019). Effects of carbon emission reduction on supply chain coordination with vendor-managed deteriorating product inventory. International Journal of Production Economics, 208: 83–99

[4]

Deng, L Cao, C Dai, J (2023). How do the carbon emission trading prices affect the financing decision of the supply chain considering carbon neutrality?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30( 30): 76171–76191

[5]

Ha, A Long, X Nasiry, J (2016). Quality in supply chain encroachment. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 18( 2): 280–298

[6]

He, P Wang, Z Shi, V Liao, Y (2021). The direct and cross effects in a supply chain with consumers sensitive to both carbon emissions and delivery time. European Journal of Operational Research, 292( 1): 172–183

[7]

Hosseini-Motlagh, S M Ebrahimi, S Jokar, A (2021). Sustainable supply chain coordination under competition and green effort scheme. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72( 2): 304–319

[8]

Huang, S Guan, X Chen, Y J (2018). Retailer information sharing with supplier encroachment. Production and Operations Management, 27( 6): 1133–1147

[9]

Huang, X Tan, T Toktay, L B (2021). Carbon leakage: The impact of asymmetric regulation on carbon-emitting production. Production and Operations Management, 30( 6): 1886–1903

[10]

Ji, J Zhang, Z Yang, L (2017). Comparisons of initial carbon allowance allocation rules in an O2O retail supply chain with the cap-and-trade regulation. International Journal of Production Economics, 187: 68–84

[11]

Jiang, Y Ji, X Wu, J Lu, W (2023). Behavior-based pricing and consumer fairness concerns with green product design. Annals of Operations Research, 1–27

[12]

Li, G Wu, H Xiao, S (2020). Financing strategies for a capital-constrained manufacturer in a dual-channel supply chain. International Transactions in Operational Research, 27( 5): 2317–2339

[13]

Li, J Hu, Z Shi, V Wang, Q (2021a). Manufacturer’s encroachment strategy with substitutable green products. International Journal of Production Economics, 235: 108102

[14]

Li, Z Pan, Y Yang, W Ma, J Zhou, M (2021b). Effects of government subsidies on green technology investment and green marketing coordination of supply chain under the cap-and-trade mechanism. Energy Economics, 101: 105426

[15]

Li, J Liang, J Shi, V Zhu, J (2021c). The benefit of manufacturer encroachment considering consumer’s environmental awareness and product competition. Annals of Operations Research, 1–21

[16]

Liu, B Guan, X Wang, Y (2021). Supplier encroachment with multiple retailers. Production and Operations Management, 30( 10): 3523–3539

[17]

Liu, J Ke, H (2021). Firms’ preferences for retailing formats considering one manufacturer’s emission reduction investment. International Journal of Production Research, 59( 10): 3062–3083

[18]

Liu, J Lyu, Y Wu, J Wang, J (2022). Adoption strategies of carbon abatement technologies in the maritime supply chain: impact of demand information sharing. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 1–28

[19]

Liu, M Huang, R Ji, X Zhao, Z (2023). Strategic interactions between product line design and carbon tax regulation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 109351

[20]

Lu, W Wu, J Ji, X (2023). Consumer environmental preference information sharing with green manufacturer’s short video platform-selling. Annals of Operations Research, 1–23

[21]

Luo, Z Chen, X Wang, X (2016). The role of co-opetition in low carbon manufacturing. European Journal of Operational Research, 253( 2): 392–403

[22]

Mondal, C Giri, B C (2022). Analyzing a manufacturer-retailer sustainable supply chain under cap-and-trade policy and revenue sharing contract. Operational Research, 22( 4): 4057–4092

[23]

Murali, K Lim, M K Petruzzi, N C (2019). The effects of ecolabels and environmental regulation on green product development. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 21( 3): 519–535

[24]

PengX M (2011). The retail industry in China has ignited a trend toward “green and low-carbon” practices. http://green.sohu.com/20110411/n305601092.shtml, Accessed date: 01 November 2023

[25]

Plambeck, E L (2012). Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through operations and supply chain management. Energy Economics, 34: S64–S74

[26]

Qin, M Wang, J Chen, W M Wang, K (2023). Reducing CO2 emissions from the rebalancing operation of the bike-sharing system in Beijing. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 10( 2): 262–284

[27]

Sabzevar, N Enns, S T Bergerson, J Kettunen, J (2017). Modeling competitive firms’ performance under price-sensitive demand and cap-and-trade emissions constraints. International Journal of Production Economics, 184: 193–209

[28]

Shi, J Liu, D Du, Q Cheng, T C E (2023a). The role of the procurement commitment contract in a low-carbon supply chain with a capital-constrained supplier. International Journal of Production Economics, 255: 108681

[29]

Shi, S Wang, C Cheng, T E Liu, S (2023b). Manufacturer encroachment with an e-commerce division. Production and Operations Management, 32( 6): 2002–2019

[30]

Su, C W Liu, F Stefea, P Umar, M (2023). Does technology innovation help to achieve carbon neutrality?. Economic Analysis and Policy, 78: 1–14

[31]

Sun, J Yuan, P Li, G (2023). Reducing supply chain carbon emissions in consideration of energy service companies under the cap-and-trade mechanism. Annals of Operations Research, 1–28

[32]

Tong, Y Lu, T Li, Y Ye, F (2023). Encroachment by a better-informed manufacturer. European Journal of Operational Research, 305( 3): 1113–1129

[33]

Wang, N Li, Z (2021). Supplier encroachment with a dual-purpose retailer. Production and Operations Management, 30( 8): 2672–2688

[34]

Wang, X Sethi, S P Chang, S (2022). Pollution abatement using cap-and-trade in a dynamic supply chain and its coordination. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 158: 102592

[35]

Wang, Z Wu, Q (2021). Carbon emission reduction and product collection decisions in the closed-loop supply chain with cap-and-trade regulation. International Journal of Production Research, 59( 14): 4359–4383

[36]

Wang, Z Brownlee, A E Wu, Q (2020). Production and joint emission reduction decisions based on two-way cost-sharing contract under cap-and-trade regulation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 146: 106549

[37]

Xia, J Niu, W (2021). Carbon-reducing contract design for a supply chain with environmental responsibility under asymmetric information. Omega, 102: 102390

[38]

Xia, L Guo, T Qin, J Yue, X Zhu, N (2018). Carbon emission reduction and pricing policies of a supply chain considering reciprocal preferences in cap-and-trade system. Annals of Operations Research, 268: 149–175

[39]

Xia, T Wang, Y Lv, L Shen, L Cheng, T C E (2023). Financing decisions of low-carbon supply chain under chain-to-chain competition. International Journal of Production Research, 61( 18): 6153–6176

[40]

Xiao, W Gaimon, C Subramanian, R Biehl, M (2019). Investment in environmental process improvement. Production and Operations Management, 28( 2): 407–420

[41]

Xu, X Chen, Y He, P Yu, Y Bi, G (2023). The selection of marketplace mode and reselling mode with demand disruptions under cap-and-trade regulation. International Journal of Production Research, 61( 8): 2738–2757

[42]

Xu, R Zhang, T Zhang, Q (2022). Investigating the effect of online and offline reputation on the provision of online counseling services: A case study of the Internet hospitals in China. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 9( 4): 563–576

[43]

Yang, R Tang, W Zhang, J (2021). Technology improvement strategy for green products under competition: The role of government subsidy. European Journal of Operational Research, 289( 2): 553–568

[44]

Yang, D Xiao, T Huang, J (2019). Dual-channel structure choice of an environmental responsibility supply chain with green investment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210: 134–145

[45]

Yang, L Hu, Y Huang, L (2020). Collecting mode selection in a remanufacturing supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation. European Journal of Operational Research, 287( 2): 480–496

[46]

Yoon, D H (2016). Supplier encroachment and investment spillovers. Production and Operations Management, 25( 11): 1839–1854

[47]

Yu, W Wang, Y Feng, W Bao, L Han, R (2022). Low carbon strategy analysis with two competing supply chain considering carbon taxation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 169: 108203

[48]

Zhang, L H Yao, J Xu, L (2020). Emission reduction and market encroachment: whether the manufacturer opens a direct channel or not?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269: 121932

[49]

Zhang, S Zhang, J Zhu, G. (2019). Retail service investing: An anti-encroachment strategy in a retailer-led supply chain. Omega, 84: 212–231

[50]

Zhang, T Dong, P Chen, X Gong, Y (2023). The impacts of blockchain adoption on a dual-channel supply chain with risk-averse members. Omega, 114: 102747

[51]

Zheng, B Yu, N Jin, L Xia, H (2019). Effects of power structure on manufacturer encroachment in a closed-loop supply chain. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 137: 106062

[52]

Zhou, Z Hu, F Xiao, D (2020). Optimal pricing strategy of competing manufacturers under carbon policy and consumer environmental awareness. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 150: 106918

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (2400KB)

1982

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/