Geological risk prediction under uncertainty in tunnel excavation using online learning and hidden Markov model

Limao ZHANG , Ying WANG , Xianlei FU , Xieqing SONG , Penghui LIN

Front. Eng ›› 2025, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3) : 447 -466.

PDF (4971KB)
Front. Eng ›› 2025, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3) : 447 -466. DOI: 10.1007/s42524-024-0082-1
Construction Engineering and Intelligent Construction
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Geological risk prediction under uncertainty in tunnel excavation using online learning and hidden Markov model

Author information +
History +
PDF (4971KB)

Abstract

The accurate estimation of geological risks is essential for preventing geohazards, and ensuring efficient and safe construction processes. This study proposes a method, the online hidden Markov model (OHMM), which combines online learning with the hidden Markov model to estimate geological risks. The OHMM is tailored for the continuous nature of observational data, allowing it to adaptively update with each new piece of data. To address the challenge of limited data in the early stages of construction, we use pre-construction borehole samples as additional data. This approach extends the short sequence of observed data to match the length of a complete sequence through an observation extension mechanism. The effectiveness of the OHMM, equipped with this observation extension mechanism, is demonstrated in a case study that models geological risks for a tunnel excavation project in Singapore. The OHMM outperforms traditional methods, including the hidden Markov model, long short-term memory network, neural network, and support vector machine, in predicting geological risks ahead of the tunnel boring machine. Notably, the OHMM can accurately forecast geological risks in areas yet to be constructed, using limited observational and site investigation data. This research advances geological risk prediction models by offering an online updating capability for tunnel excavation and construction projects. It enables early-stage risk prediction and provides long-term forecasts with minimal historical data requirements, maximizing the use of site investigation data.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

geological risk prediction / machine learning / online learning / hidden Markov model / borehole logging

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Limao ZHANG, Ying WANG, Xianlei FU, Xieqing SONG, Penghui LIN. Geological risk prediction under uncertainty in tunnel excavation using online learning and hidden Markov model. Front. Eng, 2025, 12(3): 447-466 DOI:10.1007/s42524-024-0082-1

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Arieli O, Denecker M, Bruynooghe M, (2007). Distance semantics for database repair. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 50( 3): 389–415

[2]

Bietti A, Bach F, Cont A, (2015). An online em algorithm in hidden (semi-)Markov models for audio segmentation and clustering. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 1881–1885

[3]

Blum A, (1998). On-line algorithms in machine learning. Online Algorithms: The State of the Art, 306–325

[4]

CaoB TSaadallah AEgorovAFreitagSMeschkeG MorikK (2021, 2021). Online geological anomaly detection using machine learning in mechanized tunneling. Paper presented at the Challenges and Innovations in Geomechanics, Cham

[5]

Chadza T, Kyriakopoulos K G, Lambotharan S, (2020). Analysis of hidden Markov model learning algorithms for the detection and prediction of multi-stage network attacks. Future Generation Computer Systems, 108: 636–649

[6]

Chis T, Harrison P G, (2015). Adapting hidden Markov models for online learning. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 318: 109–127

[7]

Cho S H, Kim J, Won J, Kim M K, (2017). Effects of jack force and construction steps on the change of lining stresses in a TBM tunnel. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 21( 4): 1135–1146

[8]

Dakir I, Benamara A, Aassoumi H, Ouallali A, Ait Bahammou Y, (2019). Application of induced polarization and resistivity to the determination of the location of metalliferous veins in the Taroucht and Tabesbaste areas. International Journal of Geophysics, 2019: 5849019

[9]

Einstein H H, (2004). Decision aids for tunneling. Update., 1892( 1): 199–207

[10]

EreminaOKozliakova IAnisimovaNKozhevnikovaI (2018). Assessment of exogenous geological hazards in Moscow, Russia. 55(1): 133–140

[11]

Erharter G H, Marcher T, (2020). MSAC: Towards data driven system behavior classification for TBM tunneling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 103: 103466

[12]

Erharter G H, Marcher T, Reinhold C, (2020). Artificial neural network based online rockmass behavior classification of TBM data. Information Technology in Geo-Engineering, 178–188

[13]

Fu X, Zhang L, (2021). Spatio-temporal feature fusion for real-time prediction of TBM operating parameters: A deep learning approach. Automation in Construction, 132: 103937

[14]

Gandhi S M, Sarkar B C, (2016). Chapter 5 - Geophysical exploration. In: Essentials of Mineral Exploration and Evaluation, 97–123

[15]

Golpasand M B, Do N A, Dias D, Nikudel M R, (2018). Effect of the lateral earth pressure coefficient on settlements during mechanized tunneling. Geomechanics and Engineering, 16( 6): 643–654

[16]

Hoi S C H, Sahoo D, Lu J, Zhao P, (2021). Online learning: A comprehensive survey. Neurocomputing, 459: 249–289

[17]

Huang X, Li J, Liang Y, Wang Z, Guo J, Jiao P, (2017). Spatial hidden Markov chain models for estimation of petroleum reservoir categorical variables. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 7( 1): 11–22

[18]

Langfield-Smith K, Wirth A, (1992). Measuring differences between cognitive maps. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43( 12): 1135–1150

[19]

Li K, Qiu C, Zhou X, Chen M, Lin Y, Jia X, Li B, (2022). Modeling and tagging of time sequence signals in the milling process based on an improved hidden semi-Markov model. Expert Systems with Applications, 205: 117758

[20]

Li S, Liu B, Xu X, Nie L, Liu Z, Song J, Sun H, Chen L, Fan K, (2017). An overview of ahead geological prospecting in tunneling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 63: 69–94

[21]

Lin B, Zhou L, Lv G, Zhu A X, (2017). 3D geological modelling based on 2D geological map. Annals of GIS, 23( 2): 117–129

[22]

Liu Z, Li L, Fang X, Qi W, Shen J, Zhou H, Zhang Y, (2021). Hard-rock tunnel lithology prediction with TBM construction big data using a global-attention-mechanism-based LSTM network. Automation in Construction, 125: 103647

[23]

Lu C, Liu J, Liu Y, Liu Y, (2019). Intelligent construction technology of railway engineering in China. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 6( 4): 503–516

[24]

Mahmoodzadeh A, Mohammadi M, Daraei A, Farid Hama Ali H, Ismail Abdullah A, Kameran Al-Salihi N, (2021). Forecasting tunnel geology, construction time and costs using machine learning methods. Neural Computing & Applications, 33( 1): 321–348

[25]

Mishra S, Rao K S, Gupta N K, Kumar A, (2017). Damage to shallow tunnels under static and dynamic loading. Procedia Engineering, 173: 1322–1329

[26]

Mongillo G, Deneve S, (2008). Online learning with hidden Markov models. Neural Computation, 20( 7): 1706–1716

[27]

Peng S, Li Q, (2021). Research on 3D geological modeling method of tunnel engineering computer based on geological cross-section. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1992( 2): 022112

[28]

ReddiL NJain A KYunH B (2012). 6 - Soil materials for earth construction: properties, classification and suitability testing. In Hall M, Lindsay R, Krayenhoff M. eds. Modern Earth Buildings, Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy: 155–171

[29]

RekatsinasTChu XIlyasI FC (2017). HoloClean: Holistic data repairs with probabilistic inference. arXiv:1702.00820

[30]

Savenok O V, Povarova L V, Kusov G V, (2020). Application of superdeep drilling technology for study of the earth crust. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 459( 5): 052066

[31]

Sheil B B, Suryasentana S K, Mooney M A, Zhu H, (2020). Machine learning to inform tunnelling operations: Recent advances and future trends. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Smart Infrastructure and Construction, 173( 4): 74–95

[32]

SickingJPintz MAkilaMWirtzT (2020). DenseHMM: Learning hidden Markov models by learning dense representations. arXiv:2012.09783

[33]

Stoner O, Economou T, (2020). An advanced hidden Markov model for hourly rainfall time series. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 152: 107045

[34]

Sundell J, Haaf E, Norberg T, Alén C, Karlsson M, Rosén L, (2019). Risk mapping of groundwater-drawdown-induced land subsidence in heterogeneous soils on large areas. Risk Analysis, 39( 1): 105–124

[35]

Thalund-Hansen R, Troldborg M, Levy L, Christiansen A V, Bording T S, Bjerg P L, (2023). Assessing contaminant mass discharge uncertainty with application of hydraulic conductivities derived from geoelectrical cross-borehole induced polarization and other methods. Water Resources Research, 59: e2022WR034360

[36]

Vereecken H, Amelung W, Bauke S L, Bogena H, Brüggemann N, Montzka C, Vanderborght J, Bechtold M, Blöschl G, Carminati A, Javaux M, Konings A G, Kusche J, Neuweiler I, Or D, Steele-Dunne S, Verhoef A, Young M, Zhang Y, (2022). Soil hydrology in the Earth system. Nature Reviews. Earth & Environment, 3( 9): 573–587

[37]

Wan F, Guo H, Li J, Gu M, Pan W, Ying Y, (2021). A scheduling and planning method for geological disasters. Applied Soft Computing, 111: 107712

[38]

Wang B, Sun D, Chen Q, Lin W, Li A W, Cao H, (2020a). Stress-state differences between sedimentary cover and basement of the Songliao Basin, NE China: In-situ stress measurements at 6–7 km depth of an ICDP Scientific Drilling borehole (SK-II). Tectonophysics, 777: 228337

[39]

Wang X, Lai J, Qiu J, Xu W, Wang L, Luo Y, (2020b). Geohazards, reflection and challenges in mountain tunnel construction of China: A data collection from 2002 to 2018. Geomatics, Natural Hazards & Risk, 11( 1): 766–785

[40]

Wang Z, Zhang B, (2023). Key technical innovations in the construction of Baihetan Hydropower Station Project. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 10( 2): 367–372

[41]

Wolfsberg A, (1997). Rock Fractures and fluid flow. Contemporary Understanding and Applications, 78( 49): 569–573

[42]

Xiang Y, Zeng Z, Xiang Y, Abi E, Zheng Y, Yuan H, (2021). Tunnel failure mechanism during loading and unloading processes through physical model testing and DEM simulation. Scientific Reports, 11( 1): 16753

[43]

Xiong Z, Guo J, Xia Y, Lu H, Wang M, Shi S, (2018). A 3D multi-scale geology modeling method for tunnel engineering risk assessment. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 73: 71–81

[44]

Xu Z, Liu F, Lin P, Shao R, Shi X, (2021a). Non-destructive, in-situ, fast identification of adverse geology in tunnels based on anomalies analysis of element content. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 118: 104146

[45]

Xu Z H, Wang W Y, Lin P, Nie L C, Wu J, Li Z M, (2021b). Hard-rock TBM jamming subject to adverse geological conditions: Influencing factor, hazard mode and a case study of Gaoligongshan Tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 108: 103683

[46]

Yazdani N, Garcia E C, Riad M, (2018). Field assessment of concrete structures rehabilitated with FRP. Eco-Efficient Repair and Rehabilitation of Concrete Infrastructures, 171–194

[47]

ZhangASong SWangJYuP S (2017). Time series data cleaning: from anomaly detection to anomaly repairing. 10(10%J Proc. VLDB Endow.), 1046–1057

[48]

Zhang L, Lin P, (2021). Multi-objective optimization for limiting tunnel-induced damages considering uncertainties. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 216: 107945

[49]

Zhang P, Lu D, Du X, Qi J, (2021). A division method for shallow tunnels and deep tunnels considering soil stress path dependency. Computers and Geotechnics, 135: 104012

[50]

Zhou Y, Chen X, Wu M, Cao W, (2021). Modeling and coordinated optimization method featuring coupling relationship among subsystems for improving safety and efficiency of drilling process. Applied Soft Computing, 99: 106899

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (4971KB)

1583

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/