Decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: A literature review

Hui WANG, Yafei YANG

PDF(5866 KB)
PDF(5866 KB)
Front. Eng ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (4) : 625-639. DOI: 10.1007/s42524-023-0270-4
Energy and Environmental Systems
REVIEW ARTICLE

Decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: A literature review

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Decomposition analysis has been widely used to assess the determinants of energy and CO2 emissions in academic research and policy studies. Both the methodology and application of decomposition analysis have been largely improved in the past decades. After more than 50 years’ developments, decomposition studies have become increasingly sophisticated and diversified, and tend to converge internally and integrate with other analytical approaches externally. A good understanding of the literature and state of the art is critical to identify knowledge gaps and formulate future research agenda. To this end, this study presents a literature survey for decomposition analysis applied to energy and emission issues, with a focus on the period of 2016–2021. A review for three individual decomposition techniques is first conducted, followed by a synthesis of emerging trends and features for the decomposition analysis literature as a whole. The findings are expected to direct future research in decomposition analysis.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

index decomposition analysis / structural decomposition analysis / production decomposition analysis / energy / CO2 emissions

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hui WANG, Yafei YANG. Decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: A literature review. Front. Eng, 2023, 10(4): 625‒639 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-023-0270-4

References

[1]
Ang, B W (2004). Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: Which is the preferred method?. Energy Policy, 32( 9): 1131–1139
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Ang, B W (2015). LMDI decomposition approach: A guide for implementation. Energy Policy, 86: 233–238
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Ang, B W Goh, T (2019). Index decomposition analysis for comparing emission scenarios: Applications and challenges. Energy Economics, 83: 74–87
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Ang, B W Su, B Wang, H (2016). A spatial-temporal decomposition approach to performance assessment in energy and emissions. Energy Economics, 60: 112–121
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Ang, B W Zhang, F Q (2000). A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies. Energy, 25( 12): 1149–1176
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Boyd, G A Hanson, D A Sterner, T (1988). Decomposition of changes in energy intensity: A comparison of the Divisia index and other methods. Energy Economics, 10( 4): 309–312
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Chang, N Han, C H (2022). Regional CO2 emissions and cross-boundary mitigation potential in China. Economic Systems Research, 34( 3): 367–382
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Chen, J Xu, C Shahbaz, M Song, M (2021). Interaction determinants and projections of China’s energy consumption: 1997–2030. Applied Energy, 283: 116345
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Chen, L Duan, Q (2016). Decomposition analysis of factors driving CO2 emissions in Chinese provinces based on production-theoretical decomposition analysis. Natural Hazards, 84( S1): 267–277
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Chen, X Liu, Y Mcelroy, M (2022). Transition towards carbon-neutral electrical systems for China: Challenges and perspectives. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 9( 3): 504–508
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Cheng, S Fan, W Chen, J Meng, F Liu, G Song, M Yang, Z (2020). The impact of fiscal decentralization on CO2 emissions in China. Energy, 192: 116685
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
de Boer, P Rodrigues, J F D (2020). Decomposition analysis: When to use which method?. Economic Systems Research, 32( 1): 1–28
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
de Vries, G J Ferrarini, B (2017). What accounts for the growth of carbon dioxide emissions in advanced and emerging economies? The role of consumption, technology and global supply chain participation. Ecological Economics, 132: 213–223
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Dennehy, E R Ó, Gallachóir B P (2018). Ex-post decomposition analysis of passenger car energy demand and associated CO2 emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 59: 400–416
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Dietzenbacher, E Kulionis, V Capurro, F (2020). Measuring the effects of energy transition: A structural decomposition analysis of the change in renewable energy use between 2000 and 2014. Applied Energy, 258: 114040
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Dietzenbacher, E Los, B (1998). Structural decomposition techniques: Sense and sensitivity. Economic Systems Research, 10( 4): 307–324
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Duarte, R Miranda-Buetas, S Sarasa, C (2021). Household consumption patterns and income inequality in EU countries: Scenario analysis for a fair transition towards low-carbon economies. Energy Economics, 104: 105614
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Duarte, R Serrano, A (2021). Environmental analysis of structural and technological change in a context of trade expansion: Lessons from the EU enlargement. Energy Policy, 150: 112142
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
EmeleLGraichenJMendelevitchR (2022). Decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions in the European cement sector: Identifying drivers of emission trends between 2005 and 2018. Berlin: German Environment Agency
[20]
European CommissionJRC (2020). Regional Input-Output Data for Europe. Dataset. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC) Data Catalogue
[21]
Fan, Y Fang, C (2020). Insight into carbon emissions related to residential consumption in Tibetan Plateau: Case study of Qinghai. Sustainable Cities and Society, 61: 102310
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Fetanat, A Shafipour, G (2017). A hybrid method of LMDI, symmetrical components, and SFA to estimate the distribution of energy-saving potential with consideration of unbalanced components in decomposition analysis. Energy Efficiency, 10( 4): 1041–1059
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Fragkos, P Tasios, N Paroussos, L Capros, P Tsani, S (2017). Energy system impacts and policy implications of the European Intended Nationally Determined Contribution and low-carbon pathway to 2050. Energy Policy, 100: 216–226
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Goh, T Ang, B W (2018). Quantifying CO2 emission reductions from renewables and nuclear energy: Some paradoxes. Energy Policy, 113: 651–662
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Goh, T Ang, B W (2021). Integrating combined heat and power in index decomposition analysis of the power sector. Energy Efficiency, 14( 7): 76
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Goh, T Ang, B W Xu, X Y (2018). Quantifying drivers of CO2 emissions from electricity generation: Current practices and future extensions. Applied Energy, 231: 1191–1204
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Guevara, Z Domingos, T (2017). Three-level decoupling of energy use in Portugal 1995–2010. Energy Policy, 108: 134–142
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Guevara, Z Rodrigues, J F D (2016). Structural transitions and energy use: A decomposition analysis of Portugal 1995–2010. Economic Systems Research, 28( 2): 202–223
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Hang, Y Wang, F Su, B Wang, Y Zhang, W Wang, Q (2021). Multi-region multi-sector contributions to drivers of air pollution in China. Earth’s Future, 9( 6): e2021EF002012
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Harmsen, R Crijns-Graus, W (2021). Unhiding the role of CHP in power & heat sector decomposition analyses. Energy Policy, 152: 112208
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Hoekstra, R Michel, B Suh, S (2016). The emission cost of international sourcing: Using structural decomposition analysis to calculate the contribution of international sourcing to CO2-emission growth. Economic Systems Research, 28( 2): 151–167
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Hoekstra, R van den Bergh, J C (2003). Comparing structural decomposition analysis and index. Energy Economics, 25( 1): 39–64
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Huang, Y H (2020). Examining impact factors of residential electricity consumption in Taiwan using index decomposition analysis based on end-use level data. Energy, 213: 119067
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
IEA (2022). Energy Efficiency 2022. Paris: International Energy Agency (IEA)
[35]
IPCC (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
[36]
Jiang, X Guan, D (2017). The global CO2 emissions growth after international crisis and the role of international trade. Energy Policy, 109: 734–746
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Kaltenegger, O Löschel, A Pothen, F (2017). The effect of globalisation on energy footprints: Disentangling the links of global value chains. Energy Economics, 68: 148–168
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
KeramidasKFosseFDiaz-VazquezASchadeBTchung-MingSWeitzelMVandyckTWojtowiczK (2021). Global Energy and Climate Outlook 2020: A New Normal Beyond COVID-19. European Commission, Joint Research Centre Science for Policy Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union
[39]
Kesicki, F (2013). Marginal abatement cost curves: Combining energy system modelling and decomposition analysis. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 18( 1): 27–37
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Kobayakawa, T (2022). The carbon footprint of capital formation: An empirical analysis on its relationship with a country’s income growth. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26( 2): 522–535
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Kone, A C Buke, T (2019). Factor analysis of projected carbon dioxide emissions according to the IPCC based sustainable emission scenario in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 133: 914–918
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Lan, J Malik, A Lenzen, M McBain, D Kanemoto, K (2016). A structural decomposition analysis of global energy footprints. Applied Energy, 163: 436–451
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Lenzen, M (2016). Structural analyses of energy use and carbon emissions: An overview. Economic Systems Research, 28( 2): 119–132
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Lenzen, M Kanemoto, K Moran, D Geschke, A (2012). Mapping the structure of the world economy. Environmental Science & Technology, 46( 15): 8374–8381
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Lenzen, M Moran, D Kanemoto, K Geschke, A (2013). Building Eora: A global multi-region input–output database at high country and sector resolution. Economic Systems Research, 25( 1): 20–49
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Li, J S Wei, W D Zhen, W Guo, Y Chen, B (2019). How green transition of energy system impacts China’s Mercury emissions. Earth’s Future, 7( 12): 1407–1416
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Li, J S Zhou, H W Meng, J Yang, Q Chen, B Zhang, Y Y (2018). Carbon emissions and their drivers for a typical urban economy from multiple perspectives: A case analysis for Beijing city. Applied Energy, 226: 1076–1086
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Liu, X Hang, Y Wang, Q Chiu, C R Zhou, D (2022). The role of energy consumption in global carbon intensity change: A meta-frontier-based production-theoretical decomposition analysis. Energy Economics, 109: 105968
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Liu, X Zhou, D Zhou, P Wang, Q (2017). What drives CO2 emissions from China’s civil aviation? An exploration using a new generalized PDA method. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 99: 30–45
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Luo, Y Zeng, W Wang, Y Li, D Hu, X Zhang, H (2021). A hybrid approach for examining the drivers of energy consumption in Shanghai. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 151: 111571
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Ma, J Du, G Xie, B (2019). CO2 emission changes of China’s power generation system: Input–output subsystem analysis. Energy Policy, 124: 1–12
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
MariasinghamJ (2015). ADB multi-region input–output database: Sources and methods. Online Views
[53]
Mathy, S Menanteau, P Criqui, P (2018). After the Paris Agreement: Measuring the global decarbonization wedges from national energy scenarios. Ecological Economics, 150: 273–289
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Mi, Z Meng, J Guan, D Shan, Y Song, M Wei, Y M Liu, Z Hubacek, K (2017). Chinese CO2 emission flows have reversed since the global financial crisis. Nature Communications, 8( 1): 1712
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Mohlin, K Bi, A Brooks, S Camuzeaux, J Stoerk, T (2019). Turning the corner on US power sector CO2 emissions: A 1990–2015 state level analysis. Environmental Research Letters, 14( 8): 084049
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Moran, D Giljum, S Kanemoto, K Godar, J (2020). From satellite to supply chain: New approaches connect earth observation to economic decisions. One Earth, 3( 1): 5–8
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Natural Resources CanadaOEE (2016). Energy Efficiency Trends in Canada 1990–2013. Natural Resources Canada’s Office of Energy Efficiency (OEE)
[58]
Olanrewaju, O A Mbohwa, C (2017). Assessing potential reduction in greenhouse gas: An integrated approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141: 891–899
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Palmer, K Paul, A Keyes, A (2018). Changing baselines, shifting margins: How predicted impacts of pricing carbon in the electricity sector have evolved over time. Energy Economics, 73: 371–379
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Pasurka Jr, C A (2006). Decomposing electric power plant emissions within a joint production framework. Energy Economics, 28( 1): 26–43
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Qian, H Xu, S Cao, J Ren, F Wei, W Meng, J Wu, L (2021). Air pollution reduction and climate co-benefits in China’s industries. Nature Sustainability, 4( 5): 417–425
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Roinioti, A Koroneos, C (2017). The decomposition of CO2 emissions from energy use in Greece before and during the economic crisis and their decoupling from economic growth. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76: 448–459
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
RørmoseP (2010). Structural Decomposition Analysis Sense and Sensitivity. Statistics Denmark
[64]
Shahiduzzaman, M Layton, A (2017). Decomposition analysis for assessing the United States 2025 emissions target: How big is the challenge?. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67: 372–383
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Shan, Y Guan, Y Hang, Y Zheng, H Li, Y Guan, D Li, J Zhou, Y Li, L Hubacek, K (2022). City-level emission peak and drivers in China. Science Bulletin, 67( 18): 1910–1920
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Shigetomi, Y Ohno, H Chapman, A Fujii, H Nansai, K Fukushima, Y (2019). Clarifying demographic impacts on embodied and materially retained carbon toward climate change mitigation. Environmental Science & Technology, 53( 24): 14123–14133
CrossRef Google scholar
[67]
Södersten, C J Wood, R Hertwich, E G (2018). Environmental impacts of capital formation. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 22( 1): 55–67
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Su, B Ang, B W (2012). Structural decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: Some methodological developments. Energy Economics, 34( 1): 177–188
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
Su, B Ang, B W (2016). Multi-region comparisons of emission performance: The structural decomposition analysis approach. Ecological Indicators, 67: 78–87
CrossRef Google scholar
[70]
Su, B Ang, B W (2017). Multiplicative structural decomposition analysis of aggregate embodied energy and emission intensities. Energy Economics, 65: 137–147
CrossRef Google scholar
[71]
Su, B Ang, B W (2022). Improved granularity in input-output analysis of embodied energy and emissions: The use of monthly data. Energy Economics, 113: 106245
CrossRef Google scholar
[72]
Su, B Thomson, E (2016). China’s carbon emissions embodied in (normal and processing) exports and their driving forces, 2006–2012. Energy Economics, 59: 414–422
CrossRef Google scholar
[73]
Sueyoshi, T Li, A Liu, X (2019). Exploring sources of China’s CO2 emission: Decomposition analysis under different technology changes. European Journal of Operational Research, 279( 3): 984–995
CrossRef Google scholar
[74]
Tan, R Lin, B (2018). What factors lead to the decline of energy intensity in China’s energy intensive industries?. Energy Economics, 71: 213–221
CrossRef Google scholar
[75]
Timmer, M P Dietzenbacher, E Los, B Stehrer, R de Vries, G J (2015). An illustrated user guide to the world input-output database: The case of global automotive production. Review of International Economics, 23( 3): 575–605
CrossRef Google scholar
[76]
Tukker, A de Koning, A Wood, R Hawkins, T Lutter, S Acosta, J Rueda Cantuche, J M R Bouwmeester, M Oosterhaven, J Drosdowski, T Kuenen, J (2013). EXIOPOL: Development and illustrative analyses of a detailed global MR EE SUT/IOT. Economic Systems Research, 25( 1): 50–70
CrossRef Google scholar
[77]
UNFCCC (2021). Technical analysis of the third biennial update report of Malaysia submitted on 31 December 2020. Technical Analysis Summary Report. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
[78]
US EIA (2022). US Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions, 2021. US Energy Information Administration (EIA)
[79]
van den Berg, N J Hof, A F van der Wijst, K I Akenji, L Daioglou, V Edelenbosch, O Y van Sluisveld, M A E Timmer, V J van Vuuren, D P (2021). Decomposition analysis of per capita emissions: A tool for assessing consumption changes and technology changes within scenarios. Environmental Research Communications, 3( 1): 015004
CrossRef Google scholar
[80]
Wang, B Wang, Q Wei, Y M Li, Z P (2018a). Role of renewable energy in China’s energy security and climate change mitigation: An index decomposition analysis. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 90: 187–194
CrossRef Google scholar
[81]
Wang, H Ang, B W Zhou, P (2018b). Decomposing aggregate CO2 emission changes with heterogeneity: An extended production-theoretical approach. The Energy Journal, 39( 1): 59–79
CrossRef Google scholar
[82]
Wang, H Ang, B W Su, B (2017a). Assessing drivers of economy-wide energy use and emissions: IDA versus SDA. Energy Policy, 107: 585–599
CrossRef Google scholar
[83]
Wang, H Ang, B W Su, B (2017b). A multi-region structural decomposition analysis of global CO2 emission intensity. Ecological Economics, 142: 163–176
CrossRef Google scholar
[84]
Wang, H Ang, B W Su, B (2017c). Multiplicative structural decomposition analysis of energy and emission intensities: Some methodological issues. Energy, 123: 47–63
CrossRef Google scholar
[85]
Wang, H Li, R Zhang, N Zhou, P Wang, Q (2020). Assessing the role of technology in global manufacturing energy intensity change: A production-theoretical decomposition analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160: 120245
CrossRef Google scholar
[86]
Wang, H Pan, C Ang, B W Zhou, P (2021a). Does global value chain participation decouple Chinese development from CO2 emissions? A structural decomposition analysis. Energy Journal, 42( 2): 183–204
CrossRef Google scholar
[87]
Wang, H Zhou, P (2018). Multi-country comparisons of CO2 emission intensity: The production-theoretical decomposition analysis approach. Energy Economics, 74: 310–320
CrossRef Google scholar
[88]
Wang, H Zhou, P Xie, B C Zhang, N (2019a). Assessing drivers of CO2 emissions in China’s electricity sector: A metafrontier production-theoretical decomposition analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 275( 3): 1096–1107
CrossRef Google scholar
[89]
Wang, M Feng, C (2020). The impacts of technological gap and scale economy on the low-carbon development of China’s industries: An extended decomposition analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157: 120050
CrossRef Google scholar
[90]
Wang, Q Wang, Y Hang, Y Zhou, P (2019b). An improved production-theoretical approach to decomposing carbon dioxide emissions. Journal of Environmental Management, 252: 109577
CrossRef Google scholar
[91]
Wang, Y Wang, Q Hang, Y Zhou, D (2021b). Decomposition of industrial pollution intensity change and reduction potential: A two-stage meta-frontier PDA method. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28: 472–483
CrossRef Google scholar
[92]
Wang, Z Li, Y Cai, H Yang, Y Wang, B (2019c). Regional difference and drivers in China’s carbon emissions embodied in internal trade. Energy Economics, 83: 217–228
CrossRef Google scholar
[93]
Wei, L Li, C Wang, J Wang, X Wang, Z Cui, C Peng, S Liu, Y Yu, S Wang, L Shi, Z (2020). Rising middle and rich classes drove China’s carbon emissions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 159: 104839
CrossRef Google scholar
[94]
Wood, R Neuhoff, K Moran, D Simas, M Grubb, M Stadler, K (2020). The structure, drivers and policy implications of the European carbon footprint. Climate Policy, 20( sup1): S39–S57
CrossRef Google scholar
[95]
World Bank (2015). Sustainable Energy for All: Global Tracking Framework. Washington, DC: World Bank
[96]
WrightP (2014). Drivers of industrial carbon dioxide emissions and energy use: A decomposition analysis. Report for the Committee on Climate Change
[97]
Wu, F Ji, D J Zha, D L Zhou, D Q Zhou, P (2022). A nonparametric distance function approach with endogenous direction for estimating marginal abatement costs of CO2 emissions. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 7( 2): 330–345
CrossRef Google scholar
[98]
Wu, F Zhou, P Zhou, D Q (2020). Modeling carbon emission performance under a new joint production technology with energy input. Energy Economics, 92: 104963
CrossRef Google scholar
[99]
Xie, X Lin, B (2019). Understanding the energy intensity change in China’s food industry: A comprehensive decomposition method. Energy Policy, 129: 53–68
CrossRef Google scholar
[100]
Xu, X Y Ang, B W (2013). Index decomposition analysis applied to CO2 emission studies. Ecological Economics, 93: 313–329
CrossRef Google scholar
[101]
Xu, X Y Ang, B W (2014). Multilevel index decomposition analysis: Approaches and application. Energy Economics, 44: 375–382
CrossRef Google scholar
[102]
Yang, Y Wang, H Löschel, A Zhou, P (2022). Energy transition toward carbon-neutrality in China: Pathways, implications and uncertainties. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 9( 3): 358–372
CrossRef Google scholar
[103]
Yeh, S Mishra, G S Fulton, L Kyle, P McCollum, D L Miller, J Cazzola, P Teter, J (2017). Detailed assessment of global transport-energy models’ structures and projections. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 55: 294–309
CrossRef Google scholar
[104]
Yu, D Shi, S (2015). Researching the development of Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy set: Using a citation network analysis. Applied Soft Computing, 32: 189–198
CrossRef Google scholar
[105]
Yue, X Deane, J P O’Gallachoir, B Rogan, F (2020). Identifying decarbonisation opportunities using marginal abatement cost curves and energy system scenario ensembles. Applied Energy, 276: 115456
CrossRef Google scholar
[106]
Zhang, D Wang, H Löschel, A Zhou, P (2021). The changing role of global value chains in CO2 emission intensity in 2000–2014. Energy Economics, 93: 105053
CrossRef Google scholar
[107]
Zhang, H Lahr, M L Bi, J (2016). Challenges of green consumption in China: A household energy use perspective. Economic Systems Research, 28( 2): 183–201
CrossRef Google scholar
[108]
Zhang, L Ma, X Wang, Y Song, R Li, J Yuan, W Zhang, S (2020a). The increasing district heating energy consumption of the building sector in China: Decomposition and decoupling analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 271: 122696
CrossRef Google scholar
[109]
Zhang, X Zhao, X Jiang, Z Shao, S (2017). How to achieve the 2030 CO2 emission-reduction targets for China’s industrial sector: Retrospective decomposition and prospective trajectories. Global Environmental Change, 44: 83–97
CrossRef Google scholar
[110]
Zhang, Z Guan, D Wang, R Meng, J Zheng, H Zhu, K Du, H (2020b). Embodied carbon emissions in the supply chains of multinational enterprises. Nature Climate Change, 10( 12): 1096–1101
CrossRef Google scholar
[111]
Zhao, X Zhang, X Shao, S (2016). Decoupling CO2 emissions and industrial growth in China over 1993–2013: The role of investment. Energy Economics, 60: 275–292
CrossRef Google scholar
[112]
Zhao, Z Shi, X Zhao, L Zhang, J (2020). Extending production-theoretical decomposition analysis to environmentally sensitive growth: Case study of Belt and Road Initiative countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161: 120289
CrossRef Google scholar
[113]
ZhongS (2015). Structural decompositions of energy consumption, energy intensity, emissions and emission intensity: A sectoral perspective, empirical evidence from WIOD over 1995 to 2009. United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology Working Papers 2016–015
[114]
Zhou, H Yang, Y Chen, Y Zhu, J (2018). Data envelopment analysis application in sustainability: The origins, development and future directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 264( 1): 1–16
CrossRef Google scholar
[115]
Zhou, P Ang, B W (2008). Decomposition of aggregate CO2 emissions: A production-theoretical approach. Energy Economics, 30( 3): 1054–1067
CrossRef Google scholar
[116]
Zhou, P Gao, S Lv, Y Zhao, G (2022). Energy transition management towards a low-carbon world. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 9( 3): 499–503
CrossRef Google scholar
[117]
Zhou, X Kuosmanen, T (2020). What drives decarbonization of new passenger cars?. European Journal of Operational Research, 284( 3): 1043–1057
CrossRef Google scholar

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-023-0270-4 and is accessible for authorized users.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 The Author(s). This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(5866 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/