Resilience strategies for sustainable supply chains under budget constraints in the post COVID-19 era

Jiaguo LIU, Yumeng XI, Junjin WANG

PDF(1050 KB)
PDF(1050 KB)
Front. Eng ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 143-157. DOI: 10.1007/s42524-022-0236-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Resilience strategies for sustainable supply chains under budget constraints in the post COVID-19 era

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The COVID-19 outbreak has caused uncertainty risk surges, increased sustainable supply chain vulnerabilities, and challenges to sustainable supply chain resilience (SSCR) management. Therefore, improving SSCR is necessary to alleviate vulnerabilities, and SSCR management must generate large capital investments. However, the economic downturn brought about by the COVID-19 epidemic has made some companies have limited budgets that can be used to improve SSCR. Therefore, the design of resilience solutions needs to fully consider the constraints of budgetary costs. Most of the existing related literature only discusses optimal resilience solutions under certain cost constraints, so such resilience solutions cannot be applied to most enterprises. In this study, we set the cost constraint as a variable quantity, using resilience efficiency and customer satisfaction as indicators, to determine the changing laws of optimal resilience strategies when cost constraints change. These rules can be applied to enterprises with different budgeted costs. Our findings suggest that companies should prioritize sacrificing resilience measures (RMs) related to adaptive capacity when budget costs gradually decline, and RMs related to absorptive capacity are indispensable at all budget levels. Furthermore, the pursuit of environmental and social sustainability cannot be abandoned, no matter how limited the flexible budget may be.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

sustainable supply chain / customer requirement / resilience efficiency / customer satisfaction / budget constraint

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jiaguo LIU, Yumeng XI, Junjin WANG. Resilience strategies for sustainable supply chains under budget constraints in the post COVID-19 era. Front. Eng, 2023, 10(1): 143‒157 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-022-0236-y

References

[1]
Bastas, A Liyanage, K (2018). Sustainable supply chain quality management: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181: 726–744
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Berger, C Blauth, R Boger, D (1993). Kano’s methods for understanding customer-defined quality. Center for Quality Management Journal, 2( 4): 3–35
[3]
Blackhurst, J V Scheibe, K P Johnson, D J (2008). Supplier risk assessment and monitoring for the automotive industry. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38( 2): 143–165
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Blos, M F Quaddus, M Wee, H M Watanabe, K (2009). Supply chain risk management (SCRM): A case study on the automotive and electronic industries in Brazil. Supply Chain Management, 14( 4): 247–252
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Bode, C Wagner, S M Petersen, K J Ellram, L M (2011). Understanding responses to supply chain disruptions: Insights from information processing and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 54( 4): 833–856
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Büyüközkan, G Berkol, Ç (2011). Designing a sustainable supply chain using an integrated analytic network process and goal programming approach in quality function deployment. Expert Systems with Applications, 38( 11): 13731–13748
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Büyüközkan, G Çifçi, G (2013). An integrated QFD framework with multiple formatted and incomplete preferences: A sustainable supply chain application. Applied Soft Computing, 13( 9): 3931–3941
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Carnevalli, J A Miguel, P C (2008). Review, analysis and classification of the literature on QFD: Types of research, difficulties and benefits. International Journal of Production Economics, 114( 2): 737–754
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Chan, L K Wu, M L (2002). Quality function deployment: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 143( 3): 463–497
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Chowdhury, M M H Quaddus, M (2016). Supply chain readiness, response and recovery for resilience. Supply Chain Management, 21( 6): 709–731
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Chowdhury, M M H Quaddus, M (2017). Supply chain resilience: Conceptualization and scale development using dynamic capability theory. International Journal of Production Economics, 188: 185–204
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Chowdhury, M M H Quaddus, M A (2015). A multiple objective optimization based QFD approach for efficient resilient strategies to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities: The case of garment industry of Bangladesh. Omega, 57: 5–21
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Christopher, M Peck, H (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 15( 2): 1–14
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Colicchia, C Dallari, F Melacini, M (2010). Increasing supply chain resilience in a global sourcing context. Production Planning and Control, 21( 7): 680–694
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Cristiano, J J Liker, J K White, III C C (2001). Key factors in the successful application of quality function deployment (QFD). IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48( 1): 81–95
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Faisal, M N (2013). Managing risk in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) supply chains’ using quality function deployment (QFD) approach. International Journal of Operations Research and Information Systems, 4( 1): 64–83
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Fennell, M L Alexander, J A (1987). Organizational boundary spanning in institutionalized environments. Academy of Management Journal, 30( 3): 456–476
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Florez-Lopez, R Ramon-Jeronimo, J M (2012). Managing logistics customer service under uncertainty: An integrative fuzzy Kano framework. Information Sciences, 202: 41–57
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
González, M E Quesada, G Picado, F Eckelman, C A (2004). Customer satisfaction using QFD: An e-banking case. Managing Service Quality, 14( 4): 317–330
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Haq, A N Boddu, V (2017). Analysis of enablers for the implementation of leagile supply chain management using an integrated fuzzy QFD approach. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28( 1): 1–12
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
He, L Wu, Z Xiang, W Goh, M Xu, Z Song, W Ming, X Wu, X (2021). A novel Kano-QFD-DEMATEL approach to optimise the risk resilience solution for sustainable supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 59( 6): 1714–1735
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Heckmann, I Comes, T Nickel, S (2015). A critical review on supply chain risk: Definition, measure and modeling. Omega, 52: 119–132
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Holling, C S (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4( 1): 1–23
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Jüttner, U Peck, H Christopher, M (2003). Supply chain risk management: Outlining an agenda for future research. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 6( 4): 197–210
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Kano, N Seraku, N Takahashi, F Tsuji, S (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control, 14( 2): 147–156
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Kapranos, P Young, K P (1998). Manufacturing for value-customer satisfaction. Metallurgia, 65( 1): 23–27
[27]
Kleindorfer, P R Saad, G H (2005). Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 14( 1): 53–68
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Lam, J S L Bai, X (2016). A quality function deployment approach to improve maritime supply chain resilience. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 92: 16–27
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Liu, J G Jiang, X H Zhao, J L (2015). Resilience of the supply chain system based on interpretative structural modeling. Journal of Systems & Management, 24( 4): 617–623
[30]
March, J G Shapira, Z (1987). Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33( 11): 1404–1418
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Mitroff, I I Alpaslan, M C (2003). Preparing for evil. Harvard Business Review, 81( 4): 109–115
[32]
Nooraie, V Fathi, M Narenji, M Parast, M M Pardalos, P M Stanfield, P M (2020). A multi-objective model for risk mitigating in supply chain design. International Journal of Production Research, 58( 5): 1338–1361
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Nyoman Pujawan, I Geraldin, L H (2009). House of risk: A model for proactive supply chain risk management. Business Process Management Journal, 15( 6): 953–967
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Park, T Kim, K J (1998). Determination of an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality. Journal of Operations Management, 16( 5): 569–581
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Pettit, T J Croxton, K L Fiksel, J (2013). Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development and implementation of an assessment tool. Journal of Business Logistics, 34( 1): 46–76
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Pettit, T J Fiksel, J Croxton, K L (2010). Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 31( 1): 1–21
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Pires Ribeiro, J Barbosa-Povoa, A (2018). Supply Chain Resilience: Definitions and quantitative modelling approaches, a literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 115: 109–122
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Ponomarov, S Y Holcomb, M C (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. International Journal of Logistics Management, 20( 1): 124–143
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Qazi, A Dickson, A Quigley, J Gaudenzi, B (2018). Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks. International Journal of Production Economics, 196: 24–42
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Song, H (2020). The implication of the novel coronavirus outbreak to supply chain flexibility management. China Business and Market, 34( 3): 11–16
[41]
Svensson, G (2000). A conceptual framework for the analysis of vulnerability in supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 30( 9): 731–750
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Vugrin, E D Warren, D E Ehlen, M A (2011). A resilience assessment framework for infrastructure and economic systems: Quantitative and qualitative resilience analysis of petrochemical supply chains to a hurricane. Process Safety Progress, 30( 3): 280–290
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Wagner, S M Bode, C (2006). An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnerability. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 12( 6): 301–312
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Wang, Y Q Gao, Y Teng, C X (2017). Literature review and research prospects of supply chain resilience under disruption. Management Review, 29( 12): 204–216
[45]
Wasserman, G S (1993). On how to prioritize design requirements during the QFD planning process. IIE Transactions, 25( 3): 59–65
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
XieYHeLXiangWPengZMingXGohM (2022). Prioritizing risk factors in sustainable supply chain using fuzzy Kano and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy QFD. Kybernetes, in press, doi:10.1108/K-07-2021-0642
[47]
Yazdani, M Wang, Z X Chan, F T (2020). A decision support model based on the combined structure of DEMATEL, QFD and fuzzy values. Soft Computing, 24( 16): 12449–12468
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Zhang, Z Awasthi, A (2014). Modelling customer and technical requirements for sustainable supply chain planning. International Journal of Production Research, 52( 17): 5131–5154
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Zheng, X Pulli, P (2012). Improving mobile services design: A QFD approach. Computing and Informatics, 26( 4): 369–381

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1050 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/