How do digital technologies improve supply chain resilience in the COVID-19 pandemic? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms

Yu NING, Lixu LI, Su Xiu XU, Shuili YANG

PDF(1750 KB)
PDF(1750 KB)
Front. Eng ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 39-50. DOI: 10.1007/s42524-022-0230-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

How do digital technologies improve supply chain resilience in the COVID-19 pandemic? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Digital technologies (DTs) can assist businesses in coping with supply chain (SC) disruptions caused by unpredictability, such as pandemics. However, the current knowledge of the relationship between DTs and supply chain resilience (SCR) is insufficient. This study draws on information processing theory to develop a serial mediation model to address this deficiency. We analyze a sample set consisting of 264 Chinese manufacturers. The empirical results reveal that digital supply chain platforms (DSCPs), as well as supply chain traceability (SCT) and supply chain agility (SCA), fully mediate the favorable association between DTs and SCR. Specifically, the four significant indirect paths indicated that firms can improve SCR only if they use DTs to directly or indirectly improve SCT and SCA (through DSCPs). Our study contributes to the literature on resilience by examining the possible mechanism of mediation through which DTs influence SCR. The findings also offer essential insights for firms to modify their digital strategies and thrive in a turbulent environment.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

digital technologies / supply chain resilience / information processing theory / COVID-19 / China

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yu NING, Lixu LI, Su Xiu XU, Shuili YANG. How do digital technologies improve supply chain resilience in the COVID-19 pandemic? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Front. Eng, 2023, 10(1): 39‒50 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-022-0230-4

References

[1]
Accenture (2020). China Enterprise Digital Transformation Index 2020. Online Report
[2]
Angelidou, S Lisboa, A C C Saridakis, C (2022). Expanding into new product lines in response to COVID-19: The interplay between firm age and performance aspirations. Industrial Marketing Management, 104: 167–181
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Ardolino, M Rapaccini, M Saccani, N Gaiardelli, P Crespi, G Ruggeri, C (2018). The role of digital technologies for the service transformation of industrial companies. International Journal of Production Research, 56( 6): 2116–2132
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Armstrong, J S Overton, T S (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14( 3): 396–402
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Aslam, H Blome, C Roscoe, S Azhar, T M (2018). Dynamic supply chain capabilities. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38( 12): 2266–2285
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Aslam, H Khan, A Q Rashid, K Rehman, S (2020). Achieving supply chain resilience: The role of supply chain ambidexterity and supply chain agility. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31( 6): 1185–1204
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Balakrishnan, A S Ramanathan, U (2021). The role of digital technologies in supply chain resilience for emerging markets’ automotive sector. Supply Chain Management, 26( 6): 654–671
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Bechini, A Cimino, M G C A Marcelloni, F Tomasi, A (2008). Patterns and technologies for enabling supply chain traceability through collaborative e-business. Information and Software Technology, 50( 4): 342–359
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Blome, C Schoenherr, T Rexhausen, D (2013). Antecedents and enablers of supply chain agility and its effect on performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 51( 4): 1295–1318
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Brandon-Jones, E Squire, B Autry, C W Petersen, K J (2014). A contingent resource-based perspective of supply chain resilience and robustness. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50( 3): 55–73
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Bruque, Cámara S Moyano, Fuentes J Maqueira, Marín J M (2015). Cloud computing, Web 2.0, and operational performance: The mediating role of supply chain integration. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 26( 3): 426–458
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Büyüközkan, G Göçer, F (2018). Digital Supply Chain: Literature review and a proposed framework for future research. Computers in Industry, 97: 157–177
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Cegielski, C G Allison Jones Farmer, L Wu, Y Hazen, B T (2012). Adoption of cloud computing technologies in supply chains. International Journal of Logistics Management, 23( 2): 184–211
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Centobelli, P Cerchione, R Vecchio, P D Oropallo, E Secundo, G (2021). Blockchain technology for bridging trust, traceability and transparency in circular supply chain. Information & Management, 59( 7): 103508
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Chiarini, A (2021). Industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: Are we sure they are all relevant for environmental performance?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30( 7): 3194–3207
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Christopher, M (2000). The agile supply chain: Competing in volatile markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 29( 1): 37–44
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Cousins, P D Lawson, B Petersen, K J Fugate, B (2019). Investigating green supply chain management practices and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 39( 5): 767–786
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
DiNunzioJ (2020). Siemens & SAP deliver supply chain resiliency through digitalization
[19]
Dolgui, A Ivanov, D Rozhkov, M (2020). Does the ripple effect influence the bullwhip effect? An integrated analysis of structural and operational dynamics in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 58( 5): 1285–1301
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
El Baz, J Ruel, S (2021). Can supply chain risk management practices mitigate the disruption impacts on supply chains’ resilience and robustness? Evidence from an empirical survey in a COVID-19 outbreak era. International Journal of Production Economics, 233: 107972
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Fairbank, J F Labianca, G J Steensma, H K Metters, R (2006). Information processing design choices, strategy, and risk management performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23( 1): 293–319
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Faruquee, M Paulraj, A Irawan, C A (2021). Strategic supplier relationships and supply chain resilience: Is digital transformation that precludes trust beneficial?. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41( 7): 1192–1219
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
FayR (2020). What can we learn from a year of intense digital dependence? Online Paper
[24]
Fornell, C Larcker, D F (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18( 3): 382–388
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Fosso Wamba, S Akter, S Edwards, A Chopin, G Gnanzou, D (2015). How “big data” can make big impact: Findings from a systematic review and a longitudinal case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 165: 234–246
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Frank, A G Dalenogare, L S Ayala, N F (2019). Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 210: 15–26
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Galbraith, J R (1974). Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces, 4( 3): 28–36
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
GillisA S (2022). What is SAP ERP?
[29]
Gunasekaran, A Papadopoulos, T Dubey, R Fosso Wamba, S Childe, S J Hazen, B Akter, S (2017). Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 70: 308–317
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
HayesA F (2017). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press
[31]
Hosseini, S Ivanov, D Dolgui, A (2019). Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 125: 285–307
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Hu, Y McNamara, P Piaskowska, D (2017). Project suspensions and failures in new product development: Returns for entrepreneurial firms in co-development alliances. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34( 1): 35–59
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Inditex (2020). Inditex 2020 Annual Report. Online Report
[34]
Ivanov, D (2020). Predicting the impacts of epidemic outbreaks on global supply chains: A simulation-based analysis on the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) case. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 136: 101922
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Ivanov, D Dolgui, A (2021). A digital supply chain twin for managing the disruption risks and resilience in the era of Industry 4.0. Production Planning and Control, 32( 9): 775–788
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Joshi, A D Gupta, S M (2019). Evaluation of design alternatives of end-of-life products using Internet of Things. International Journal of Production Economics, 208: 281–293
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Kim, M Chai, S (2017). The impact of supplier innovativeness, information sharing and strategic sourcing on improving supply chain agility: Global supply chain perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 187: 42–52
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Lee, C K H (2017). A GA-based optimisation model for big data analytics supporting anticipatory shipping in Retail 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 55( 2): 593–605
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Lee, I Lee, K (2015). The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises. Business Horizons, 58( 4): 431–440
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Lee, S M Rha, J S (2016). Ambidextrous supply chain as a dynamic capability: Building a resilient supply chain. Management Decision, 54( 1): 2–23
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Li, L (2022). Digital transformation and sustainable performance: The moderating role of market turbulence. Industrial Marketing Management, 104: 28–37
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
LiLGongYWangZLiuS (2022a). Big data and big disaster: A mechanism of supply chain risk management in global logistics industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, in press, doi:10.1108/IJOPM-04-2022-0266
[43]
Li, L Tong, Y Wei, L Yang, S (2022b). Digital technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their impacts on firm performance: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Information & Management, 59( 8): 103689
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Li, L Wang, Z Ye, F Chen, L Zhan, Y (2022c). Digital technology deployment and firm resilience: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Industrial Marketing Management, 105: 190–199
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Li, L Ye, F Zhan, Y Kumar, A Schiavone, F Li, Y (2022d). Unraveling the performance puzzle of digitalization: Evidence from manufacturing firms. Journal of Business Research, 149: 54–64
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Li, Y Dai, J Cui, L (2020). The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of Industry 4.0: A moderated mediation model. International Journal of Production Economics, 229: 107777
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Lindell, M K Whitney, D J (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86( 1): 114–121
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Manuel Maqueira, J Moyano-Fuentes, J Bruque, S (2019). Drivers and consequences of an innovative technology assimilation in the supply chain: Cloud computing and supply chain integration. International Journal of Production Research, 57( 7): 2083–2103
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Melville, N Ramirez, R (2008). Information technology innovation diffusion: An information requirements paradigm. Information Systems Journal, 18( 3): 247–273
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Mimecast (2021). State of Email Security. Cyber Security Report
[51]
Najafi Tavani, S N Sharifi, H Ismail, H S (2014). A study of contingency relationships between supplier involvement, absorptive capacity and agile product innovation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34( 1): 65–92
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Nguyen, T Zhou, L Spiegler, V Ieromonachou, P Lin, Y (2018). Big data analytics in supply chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review. Computers & Operations Research, 98: 254–264
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Ning, Y Yan, M Xu, S X Li, Y Li, L (2021). Shared parking acceptance under perceived network externality and risks: Theory and evidence. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 150: 1–15
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Omar, I A Debe, M Jayaraman, R Salah, K Omar, M Arshad, J (2022). Blockchain-based supply chain traceability for COVID-19 personal protective equipment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 167: 107995
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Pan, S Trentesaux, D McFarlane, D Montreuil, B Ballot, E Huang, G Q (2021). Digital interoperability in logistics and supply chain management: State-of-the-art and research avenues towards Physical Internet. Computers in Industry, 128: 103435
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Pettit, T J Fiksel, J Croxton, K L (2010). Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 31( 1): 1–21
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Podsakoff, P M MacKenzie, S B Lee, J Podsakoff, N P (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88( 5): 879–903
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Premkumar, G Ramamurthy, K Saunders, C S (2005). Information processing view of organizations: An exploratory examination of fit in the context of interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22( 1): 257–294
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Sarkis, J (2020). Supply chain sustainability: Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41( 1): 63–73
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Sawik, T (2022). Stochastic optimization of supply chain resilience under ripple effect: A COVID-19 pandemic related study. Omega, 109: 102596
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Schniederjans, D G Hales, D N (2016). Cloud computing and its impact on economic and environmental performance: A transaction cost economics perspective. Decision Support Systems, 86: 73–82
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Scholten, K Stevenson, M van Donk, D P (2020). Dealing with the unpredictable: Supply chain resilience. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40( 1): 1–10
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Shekarian, M Reza Nooraie, S V Parast, M M (2020). An examination of the impact of flexibility and agility on mitigating supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Production Economics, 220: 107438
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
ShermanE (2020). 94% of the Fortune 1000 are seeing coronavirus supply chain disruptions. Online Report
[65]
Shou, Y Li, Y Park, Y W Kang, M (2017). The impact of product complexity and variety on supply chain integration. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 47( 4): 297–317
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Siemens (2013). Siemens Digital Logistics. Twitter
[67]
Skilton, P F Robinson, J L (2009). Traceability and normal accident theory: How does supply network complexity influence the traceability of adverse events?. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45( 3): 40–53
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Subramanian, N Abdulrahman, M D (2017). Logistics and cloud computing service providers’ cooperation: A resilience perspective. Production Planning and Control, 28( 11–12): 919–928
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
The State Council Information Office of PRC (2022). China accounts for 30% of global manufacturing output in 2021
[70]
TianF (2018). An Information System for Food Safety Monitoring in Supply Chains Based on HACCP, Blockchain and Internet of Things. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Vienna: Vienna University of Economics and Business (in Austria)
[71]
Tietze, F Vimalnath, P Aristodemou, L Molloy, J (2022). Crisis-critical intellectual property: Findings from the COVID-19 pandemic. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69( 5): 2039–2056
CrossRef Google scholar
[72]
Tushman, M L Nadler, D A (1978). Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Academy of Management Review, 3( 3): 613–624
CrossRef Google scholar
[73]
Wang, Y Hong, A Li, X Gao, J (2020). Marketing innovations during a global crisis: A study of China firms’ response to COVID-19. Journal of Business Research, 116: 214–220
CrossRef Google scholar
[74]
WangYPettitS (2016). E-Logistics: Managing Your Digital Supply Chains for Competitive Advantage. London: Kogan Page Ltd.
[75]
Wong, C W Y Lirn, T Yang, C Shang, K (2020). Supply chain and external conditions under which supply chain resilience pays: An organizational information processing theorization. International Journal of Production Economics, 226: 107610
CrossRef Google scholar
[76]
Wowak, K D Craighead, C W Ketchen Jr, D J (2016). Tracing bad products in supply chains: The roles of temporality, supply chain permeation, and product information ambiguity. Journal of Business Logistics, 37( 2): 132–151
CrossRef Google scholar
[77]
Xue, L (2014). Governance–knowledge fit and strategic risk taking in supply chain digitization. Decision Support Systems, 62: 54–65
CrossRef Google scholar
[78]
Yang, Y Pan, S Ballot, E (2017). Mitigating supply chain disruptions through interconnected logistics services in the Physical Internet. International Journal of Production Research, 55( 14): 3970–3983
CrossRef Google scholar
[79]
Ye, F Liu, K Li, L Lai, K Zhan, Y Kumar, A (2022). Digital supply chain management in the COVID-19 crisis: An asset orchestration perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 245: 108396
CrossRef Google scholar
[80]
Yu, J Subramanian, N Ning, K Edwards, D (2015). Product delivery service provider selection and customer satisfaction in the era of Internet of Things: A Chinese e-retailers’ perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 159: 104–116
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1750 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/