Evaluating R&D efficiency of China’s listed lithium battery enterprises

Abstract

Promoting the growth of the lithium battery sector has been a critical aspect of China’s energy policy in terms of achieving carbon neutrality. However, despite significant support on research and development (R&D) investments that have resulted in increasing size, the sector seems to be falling behind in technological areas. To guide future policies and understand proper ways of promoting R&D efficiency, we looked into the lithium battery industry of China. Specifically, data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used as the primary approach based on evidence from 22 listed lithium battery enterprises. The performance of the five leading players was compared with that of the industry as a whole. Results revealed little indication of a meaningful improvement in R&D efficiency throughout our sample from 2010 to 2019. However, during this period, a significant increase in R&D expenditure was witnessed. This finding was supported, as the results showed that the average technical efficiency of the 22 enterprises was 0.442, whereas the average pure technical efficiency was at 0.503, thus suggesting that they were suffering from decreasing returns to scale (DRS). In contrast, the performance of the five leading players seemed superior because their average efficiency scores were higher than the industry’s average. Moreover, they were experiencing increasing scale efficiency (IRS). We draw on these findings to suggest to policymakers that supporting technologically intensive sectors should be more than simply increasing investment scale; rather, it should also encompass assisting businesses in developing efficient managerial processes for R&D.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Data Envelopment Analysis / R&D investment efficiency / China’s listed lithium battery enterprises / technical efficiency / pure technical efficiency / scale efficiency

References

[1] Acs, Z J Anselin, L Varga, A ( 2002). Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy, 31( 7): 1069– 1085

[2] Avkiran, N K Rowlands, T ( 2008). How to better identify the true managerial performance: State of the art using DEA. Omega, 36( 2): 317– 324

[3] Bandyopadhyay, S Gupta, A Srivastava, R Nandan, B ( 2022). Bio-inspired design of electrospun poly(acrylonitrile) and novel ionene based nanofibrous mats as highly flexible solid state polymer electrolyte for lithium batteries. Chemical Engineering Journal, 440: 135926

[4] Banker, R D Charnes, A Cooper, W W ( 1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30( 9): 1078– 1092

[5] Berg S ( 2010). Water Utility Benchmarking. London: IWA Publishing

[6] Cao Y ( 2020). Research on R&D Efficiency of Listed Companies in New Energy Vehicle Industry — Based on Three-stage DEA and Malmquist Index Models. Dissertation for the Master’s Degree. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications

[7] Charnes, A Cooper, W W Rhodes, E ( 1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2( 6): 429– 444

[8] Chen, X Liu, Z Zhu, Q ( 2020). Performance evaluation of China’s high-tech innovation process: Analysis based on the innovation value chain. Technovation, 94−95: 102094

[9] Chiu, Y Huang, C Chen, Y ( 2012). The R&D value-chain efficiency measurement for high-tech industries in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29( 4): 989– 1006

[10] Chun, D Chung, Y Bang, S ( 2015). Impact of firm size and industry type on R&D efficiency throughout innovation and commercialisation stages: Evidence from South Korean manufacturing firms. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 27( 8): 895– 909

[11] Duan, X Zhu, W Ruan, Z Xie, M Chen, J Ren, X ( 2022). Recycling of lithium batteries: A review. Energies, 15( 5): 1611

[12] Fang, H Wu, J Zeng, C ( 2009). Comparative study on efficiency performance of listed coal mining companies in China and the US. Energy Policy, 37( 12): 5140– 5148

[13] Fang, S Xue, X Yin, G Fang, H Li, J Zhang, Y ( 2020). Evaluation and improvement of technological innovation efficiency of new energy vehicle enterprises in China based on DEA-Tobit model. Sustainability, 12( 18): 7509

[14] Griliches, Z ( 1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28( 4): 1661– 1707

[15] Guan, J Chen, K ( 2010). Measuring the innovation production process: A cross-region empirical study of China’s high-tech innovations. Technovation, 30( 5–6): 348– 358

[16] Han, C Thomas, S R Yang, M Ieromonachou, P Zhang, H ( 2017). Evaluating R&D investment efficiency in China’s high-tech industry. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 28( 1): 93– 109

[17] Hollanders H Celikel Esser F ( 2007). Measuring innovation efficiency: INNO-Metrics Thematic Paper. Brussels: European Commission-DG Enterprise

[18] Iglesias, G Castellanos, P Seijas, A ( 2010). Measurement of productive efficiency with frontier methods: A case study for wind farms. Energy Economics, 32( 5): 1199– 1208

[19] Jing, R Wang, J Shah, N Guo, M ( 2021). Emerging supply chain of utilising electrical vehicle retired batteries in distributed energy systems. Advances in Applied Energy, 1: 100002

[20] Kafouros, M I Wang, C ( 2008). The role of time in assessing the economic effects of R&D. Industry and Innovation, 15( 3): 233– 251

[21] Kozmetsky, G Yue, P ( 1998). Comparative performance of global semiconductor companies. Omega, 26( 2): 153– 175

[22] Lashari, N U R Zhao, M Wang, J He, X Ahmed, I Liang, M M Tangsee, S Song, X ( 2022). Improved cycling performance of polypyrrole coated potassium trivanadate as an anode for aqueous rechargeable lithium batteries. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 108: 366– 373

[23] Lee, H Choi, Y Seo, H ( 2020). Comparative analysis of the R&D investment performance of South Korean local governments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157: 120073

[24] Lin, B Xu, B ( 2018). How to promote the growth of new energy industry at different stages?. Energy Policy, 118: 390– 403

[25] Lin, S Sun, J Marinova, D Zhao, D ( 2018). Evaluation of the green technology innovation efficiency of China’s manufacturing industries: DEA window analysis with ideal window width. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 30( 10): 1166– 1181

[26] Liu, J Lu, K Cheng, S ( 2018). International R&D spillovers and innovation efficiency. Sustainability, 10( 11): 3974

[27] Liu, Z Qian, Q Hu, B Shang, W Li, L Zhao, Y Zhao, Z Han, C ( 2022). Government regulation to promote coordinated emission reduction among enterprises in the green supply chain based on evolutionary game analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 182: 106290

[28] Lv, L Wang, Y Huang, W Wang, Y Zhu, G Zheng, H ( 2022). Effect of lithium salt type on silicon anode for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochimica Acta, 413: 140159

[29] Ma, R Cai, H Ji, Q Zhai, P ( 2021). The impact of feed-in tariff degression on R&D investment in renewable energy: The case of the solar PV industry. Energy Policy, 151: 112209

[30] Mohsin, M Hanif, I Taghizadeh-Hesary, F Abbas, Q Iqbal, W ( 2021). Nexus between energy efficiency and electricity reforms: A DEA-based way forward for clean power development. Energy Policy, 149: 112052

[31] Niewerth, S Vogt, P Thewes, M ( 2022). Tender evaluation through efficiency analysis for public construction contracts. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 9( 1): 148– 158

[32] Pakes, A Griliches, Z ( 1980). Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first report. Economics Letters, 5( 4): 377– 381

[33] Qianzhan Industrial Research Institute ( 2021). Deep analysis! A detailed understanding of the current market situation, competition pattern and development prospect of China’s lithium battery industry in 2021 (in Chinese)

[34] Reinhard, S Knox Lovell, C A Thijssen, G J ( 2000). Environmental efficiency with multiple environmentally detrimental variables: Estimated with SFA and DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 121( 2): 287– 303

[35] Rousseau, S Rousseau, R ( 1997). Data envelopment analysis as a tool for constructing scientometric indicators. Scientometrics, 40( 1): 45– 56

[36] Shang, W L Chen, J Bi, H Sui, Y Chen, Y Yu, H ( 2021). Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on user behaviors and environmental benefits of bike sharing: A big-data analysis. Applied Energy, 285: 116429

[37] Shi, Z Zhang, X Guo, W Xu, Q Min, Y ( 2022). Interfacial electric field effect of Double-Network composite electrolyte for Ultra-Stable lithium batteries. Chemical Engineering Journal, 440: 135779

[38] Sun X X ( 2021). Sound of the material industry chain of the national “Two Sessions” in 2021. Advanced Materials Industry, 321( 2): 2– 19 (in Chinese)

[39] Tong, L Ding, R ( 2008). Efficiency assessment of coal mine safety input by data envelopment analysis. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, 18( 1): 88– 92

[40] Wang, E C Huang, W ( 2007). Relative efficiency of R&D activities: A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach. Research Policy, 36( 2): 260– 273

[41] Wang, J Han, D Wang, Y ( 2020). Empirical research on innovation efficiency in China based on SFA model. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 474( 7): 072055

[42] Wu, J Sun, J Liang, L ( 2021). Methods and applications of DEA cross-efficiency: Review and future perspectives. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 8( 2): 199– 211

[43] Yang, F Wang, M ( 2020). A review of systematic evaluation and improvement in the big data environment. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 7( 1): 27– 46

[44] Yang, Z Shang, W Zhang, H Garg, H Han, C ( 2022). Assessing the green distribution transformer manufacturing process using a cloud-based q-rung orthopair fuzzy multi-criteria framework. Applied Energy, 311: 118687

[45] Yeh, Q ( 1996). The application of data envelopment analysis in conjunction with financial ratios for bank performance evaluation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47( 8): 980– 988

[46] Yoo, J Lee, S Park, S ( 2019). The effect of firm life cycle on the relationship between R&D expenditures and future performance, earnings uncertainty, and sustainable growth. Sustainability, 11( 8): 2371

[47] Zhang, L Li, L Rui, H Shi, D Peng, X Ji, L Song, X ( 2020). Lithium recovery from effluent of spent lithium battery recycling process using solvent extraction. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 398: 122840

[48] Zhang, M ( 2020). The analysis of the influencing factors of high-tech industry collaborative innovation efficiency in China based on two-stage DEA-Tobit model. International Journal of Frontiers in Engineering Technology, 2( 1): 84– 94

[49] Zhong, W Yuan, W Li, S X Huang, Z ( 2011). The performance evaluation of regional R&D investments in China: An application of DEA based on the first official China economic census data. Omega, 39( 4): 447– 455

[50] Zhou, J Zhang, Y Zhang, Y Shang, W Yang, Z Feng, W ( 2022). Parameters identification of photovoltaic models using a differential evolution algorithm based on elite and obsolete dynamic learning. Applied Energy, 314: 118877

[51] Zhou, P Ang, B W Poh, K L ( 2008). A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. European Journal of Operational Research, 189( 1): 1– 18

[52] Zhu, L Chen, M ( 2020). Development of a two-stage pyrolysis process for the end-of-life nickel cobalt manganese lithium battery recycling from electric vehicles. Sustainability, 12( 21): 9164

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s). This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn