Levelized costs of the energy chains of new energy vehicles targeted at carbon neutrality in China

Abstract

The diffusion of new energy vehicles (NEVs), such as battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and fuel cell vehicles (FCVs), is critical to the transportation sector’s deep decarbonization. The cost of energy chains is an important factor in the diffusion of NEVs. Although researchers have addressed the technological learning effect of NEVs and the life cycle emissions associated with the diffusion of NEVs, little work has been conducted to analyze the life cycle costs of different energy chains associated with different NEVs in consideration of technological learning potential. Thus, relevant information on investment remains insufficient to promote the deployment of NEVs. This study proposes a systematic framework that includes various (competing or coordinated) energy chains of NEVs formed with different technologies of power generation and transmission, hydrogen production and transportation, power-to-liquid fuel, and fuel transportation. The levelized costs of three typical carbon-neutral energy chains are investigated using the life cycle cost model and considering the technological learning effect. Results show that the current well-to-pump levelized costs of the energy chains in China for BEVs, FCVs, and internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) are approximately 3.60, 4.31, and 2.21 yuan/GJ, respectively, and the well-to-wheel levelized costs are 4.50, 6.15, and 7.51 yuan/GJ, respectively. These costs primarily include raw material costs, and they vary greatly for BEVs and FCVs from resource and consumer costs. In consideration of the technological learning effect, the energy chains’ well-to-wheel levelized costs are expected to decrease by 24.82% for BEVs, 27.12% for FCVs, and 19.25% for ICEVs by 2060. This work also summarizes policy recommendations on developing energy chains to promote the diffusion of NEVs in China.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

energy chain / new energy vehicle / internal combustion engine vehicle / life cycle cost / technological learning

References

[1] Abdelkareem, M A Elsaid, K Wilberforce, T Kamil, M Sayed, E T Olabi, A ( 2021). Environmental aspects of fuel cells: A review. The Science of the Total Environment, 752: 141803

[2] Anandarajah, G McDowall, W Ekins, P ( 2013). Decarbonising road transport with hydrogen and electricity: Long term global technology learning scenarios. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38( 8): 3419– 3432

[3] Arrow, K J ( 1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29( 3): 155– 173

[4] Arthur, W B ( 1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal, 99( 394): 116

[5] Athanasopoulou, L Bikas, H Stavropoulos, P ( 2018). Comparative well-to-wheel emissions assessment of internal combustion engine and battery electric vehicles. Procedia CIRP, 78: 25– 30

[6] Atsbha, T A Yoon, T Seongho, P Lee, C J ( 2021). A review on the catalytic conversion of CO₂ using H₂ for synthesis of CO, methanol, and hydrocarbons. Journal of CO₂ Utilization , 44: 101413

[7] Borlaug, B Salisbury, S Gerdes, M Muratori, M ( 2020). Levelized cost of charging electric vehicles in the United States. Joule, 4( 7): 1470– 1485

[8] Comello, S Glenk, G Reichelstein, S ( 2021). Transitioning to clean energy transportation services: Life-cycle cost analysis for vehicle fleets. Applied Energy, 285: 116408

[9] Das, R Wang, Y Putrus, G Kotter, R Marzband, M Herteleer, B Warmerdam, J ( 2020). Multi-objective techno–economic–environmental optimisation of electric vehicle for energy services. Applied Energy, 257: 113965

[10] Detz, R J Reek, J N H van der Zwaan, B C C ( 2018). The future of solar fuels: When could they become competitive?. Energy & Environmental Science, 11( 7): 1653– 1669

[11] Fan, J L Wei, S Yang, L Wang, H Zhong, P Zhang, X ( 2019). Comparison of the LCOE between coal-fired power plants with CCS and main low-carbon generation technologies: Evidence from China. Energy, 176: 143– 155

[12] Fan, J L Yu, P Li, K Xu, M Zhang, X ( 2022). A levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) comparison of coal-to-hydrogen with CCS and water electrolysis powered by renewable energy in China. Energy, 242: 123003

[13] Gambhir, A Schulz, N Napp, T Tong, D Munuera, L Faist, M Riahi, K ( 2013). A hybrid modelling approach to develop scenarios for China’s carbon dioxide emissions to 2050. Energy Policy, 59: 614– 632

[14] Gan, L Li, G Lin, J Zhou, M ( 2017). A bi-level probabilistic transmission planning with intermittent generations based on life cycle cost. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 90: 306– 314

[15] Greene, D L Ogden, J M Lin, Z ( 2020). Challenges in the designing, planning and deployment of hydrogen refueling infrastructure for fuel cell electric vehicles. eTransportation, 6: 100086

[16] He, X Wang, F Wallington, T J Shen, W Melaina, M W Kim, H C de Kleine, R Lin, T Zhang, S Keoleian, G A Lu, X Wu, Y ( 2021). Well-to-wheels emissions, costs, and feedstock potentials for light-duty hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in China in 2017 and 2030. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 137: 110477

[17] Heralova, R S ( 2017). Life cycle costing as an important contribution to feasibility study in construction projects. Procedia Engineering, 196: 565– 570

[18] Hu, H Dong, W Zhou, Q ( 2021). A comparative study on the environmental and economic effects of a resource tax and carbon tax in China: Analysis based on the computable general equilibrium model. Energy Policy, 156: 112460

[19] Huang, X Lin, Y Zhou, F Lim, M K Chen, S ( 2021). Agent-based modelling for market acceptance of electric vehicles: Evidence from China. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28: 206– 217

[20] İnci, M Büyük, M Demir, M H İlbey, G ( 2021). A review and research on fuel cell electric vehicles: Topologies, power electronic converters, energy management methods, technical challenges, marketing and future aspects. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 137: 110648

[21] Jenn, A Highleyman, J ( 2022). Distribution grid impacts of electric vehicles: A California case study. iScience, 25( 1): 103686

[22] Kahouli-Brahmi, S ( 2008). Technological learning in energy–environment–economy modelling: A survey. Energy Policy, 36( 1): 138– 162

[23] Karayel, G K Javani, N Dincer, I ( 2022). Green hydrogen production potential for Turkey with solar energy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47( 45): 19354– 19364

[24] Kavlak, G McNerney, J Trancik, J E ( 2018). Evaluating the causes of cost reduction in photovoltaic modules. Energy Policy, 123: 700– 710

[25] Khan, M I Shahrestani, M Hayat, T Shakoor, A Vahdati, M ( 2019). Life cycle (well-to-wheel) energy and environmental assessment of natural gas as transportation fuel in Pakistan. Applied Energy, 242: 1738– 1752

[26] Koohi-Fayegh, S Rosen, M A ( 2020). A review of energy storage types, applications and recent developments. Journal of Energy Storage, 27: 101047

[27] Kosai, S Nakanishi, M Yamasue, E ( 2018). Vehicle energy efficiency evaluation from well-to-wheel lifecycle perspective. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 65: 355– 367

[28] Lagaros, N D Karlaftis, M G Paida, M K ( 2015). Stochastic life-cycle cost analysis of wind parks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 144: 117– 127

[29] Lane, B Reed, J Shaffer, B Samuelsen, S ( 2021). Forecasting renewable hydrogen production technology shares under cost uncertainty. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46( 54): 27293– 27306

[30] Lopez, N S Tria, L A Tayo, L A Cruzate, R J Oppus, C Cabacungan, P Isla Jr, I Ansay, A Garcia, T Cabarrubias-Dela Cruz, K Biona, J B M ( 2021). Societal cost-benefit analysis of electric vehicles in the Philippines with the inclusion of impacts to balance of payments. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 150: 111492

[31] McDonald, A Schrattenholzer, L ( 2001). Learning rates for energy technologies. Energy Policy, 29( 4): 255– 261

[32] Milovanoff, A Posen, I D MacLean, H L ( 2020). Electrification of light-duty vehicle fleet alone will not meet mitigation targets. Nature Climate Change, 10( 12): 1102– 1107

[33] Newell, R G Pizer, W A ( 2004). Uncertain discount rates in climate policy analysis. Energy Policy, 32( 4): 519– 529

[34] Qian, F Gao, W Yang, Y Yu, D ( 2020). Economic optimization and potential analysis of fuel cell vehicle-to-grid (FCV2G) system with large-scale buildings. Energy Conversion and Management, 205: 112463

[35] Rout, U K Blesl, M Fahl, U Remme, U Voß, A ( 2009). Uncertainty in the learning rates of energy technologies: An experiment in a global multi-regional energy system model. Energy Policy, 37( 11): 4927– 4942

[36] Rubin, E S Azevedo, I M L Jaramillo, P Yeh, S ( 2015). A review of learning rates for electricity supply technologies. Energy Policy, 86: 198– 218

[37] Sahoo A Mistry K Baker T ( 2019). The costs of revving up the grid for electric vehicles

[38] Schäppi, R Rutz, D Dähler, F Muroyama, A Haueter, P Lilliestam, J Patt, A Furler, P Steinfeld, A ( 2022). Drop-in fuels from sunlight and air. Nature, 601( 7891): 63– 68

[39] Schoots, K Ferioli, F Kramer, G Vanderzwaan, B ( 2008). Learning curves for hydrogen production technology: An assessment of observed cost reductions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33( 11): 2630– 2645

[40] Schwoon, M ( 2007). A tool to optimize the initial distribution of hydrogen filling stations. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 12( 2): 70– 82

[41] Shafiei, E Davidsdottir, B Stefansson, H Asgeirsson, E I Fazeli, R Gestsson, M H Leaver, J ( 2019). Simulation-based appraisal of tax-induced electro-mobility promotion in Iceland and prospects for energy-economic development. Energy Policy, 133: 110894

[42] Shirazi, A Rahbari, A Asselineau, C A Pye, J ( 2019). A solar fuel plant via supercritical water gasification integrated with Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: System-level dynamic simulation and optimisation. Energy Conversion and Management, 192: 71– 87

[43] Sinigaglia, T Lewiski, F Santos Martins, M E Mairesse Siluk, J C ( 2017). Production, storage, fuel stations of hydrogen and its utilization in automotive applications: A review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42( 39): 24597– 24611

[44] Taalbi, J Nielsen, H ( 2021). The role of energy infrastructure in shaping early adoption of electric and gasoline cars. Nature Energy, 6( 10): 970– 976

[45] Thomassen, G van Passel, S Dewulf, J ( 2020). A review on learning effects in prospective technology assessment. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 130: 109937

[46] Victor, N Nichols, C Balash, P ( 2014). The impacts of shale gas supply and climate policies on energy security: The US energy system analysis based on MARKAL model. Energy Strategy Reviews, 5: 26– 41

[47] Wang, H Liu, H Yao, J Ye, D Lang, Z Glowacz, A ( 2021). Mapping the knowledge domains of new energy vehicle safety: Informetrics analysis-based studies. Journal of Energy Storage, 35: 102275

[48] Watabe, A Leaver, J Shafiei, E Ishida, H ( 2020). Life cycle emissions assessment of transition to low-carbon vehicles in Japan: Combined effects of banning fossil-fueled vehicles and enhancing green hydrogen and electricity. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 22( 9): 1775– 1793

[49] Wei, J Ge, Q Yao, R Wen, Z Fang, C Guo, L Xu, H Sun, J ( 2017). Directly converting CO₂ into a gasoline fuel. Nature Communications, 8( 1): 15174

[50] Wulf, C Kaltschmitt, M ( 2012). Life cycle assessment of hydrogen supply chain with special attention on hydrogen refuelling stations. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37( 21): 16711– 16721

[51] Xiong, H Liu, H Zhang, R Yu, L Zong, Z Zhang, M Li, Z ( 2019). An energy matching method for battery electric vehicle and hydrogen fuel cell vehicle based on source energy consumption rate. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44( 56): 29733– 29742

[52] Yang, Z Wang, B Jiao, K ( 2020). Life cycle assessment of fuel cell, electric and internal combustion engine vehicles under different fuel scenarios and driving mileages in China. Energy, 198: 117365

[53] Yu, Y Li, S Sun, H Taghizadeh-Hesary, F ( 2021). Energy carbon emission reduction of China’s transportation sector: An input–output approach. Economic Analysis and Policy, 69: 378– 393

[54] Zhang, G Y Niu, D S Shi, Y M Xu, G L Li, G L Zhang, H Li, J Cao, L Guo, Z Q Wang, Z C Qiu, Y T ( 2017). Nuclear fuel cycle modelling using MESSAGE. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 311( 2): 1435– 1440

[55] Zhao, D Ji, S F Wang, H P Jiang, L W ( 2021a). How do government subsidies promote new energy vehicle diffusion in the complex network context? A three-stage evolutionary game model. Energy, 230: 120899

[56] Zhao, J Zhou, L Zhou, W Ren, H Yu, Y Wang, F Ma, T ( 2021b). Techno-economic analysis and comparison of coal-based chemical technologies with consideration of water resources scarcity. Energy Strategy Reviews, 38: 100754

[57] Zhou, L Duan, M Yu, Y Zhang, X ( 2018). Learning rates and cost reduction potential of indirect coal-to-liquid technology coupled with CO₂ capture. Energy, 165: 21– 32

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 The Author(s). This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn