Sustainability performance analysis of environment innovation systems using a two-stage network DEA model with shared resources

Abstract

The term environmental innovation system refers to an innovation network composed of enterprises, universities, and research institutions involved in the development and diffusion of environmental technology, with the participation of a government. An environmental innovation system not only exerts important impact on the achievement of carbon neutrality but also affects social and economic activities. Investigations on environmental innovation system performance constantly assume a single-stage independent system while ignoring its internal structure. However, such systems are composed of environmental innovation research and development (R&D) and environmental innovation conversion subsystems. A two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) model is developed in this study to analyze the efficiency of Chinese regional environmental innovation system by opening the “black box” and considering shared resources. Empirical results indicated that China presents high overall environmental innovation efficiency although some regions need to improve. Regions with low efficiencies in both environmental innovation R&D (EIR) and environmental innovation conversion (EIC) subsystems should expand their investment in and strengthen the management of environmental innovation resources. Regions with low EIR efficiency should improve the absorption and transformation of environmental innovation achievements. Regions with low EIC efficiency should increase investment in the commercialization of environmental innovation achievements and encourage green economy industries, such as new energy, art, tourism, and environmental protection.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

data envelopment analysis / environmental efficiency / environmental innovation system / shared resources / two-stage structure

References

[1] Amado, C A Santos, S P Marques, P M ( 2012). Integrating the data envelopment analysis and the balanced scorecard approaches for enhanced performance assessment. Omega, 40( 3): 390– 403

[2] Amirteimoori, A ( 2013). A DEA two-stage decision processes with shared resources. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 21( 1): 141– 151

[3] Bressers, H T A Rosenbaum, W A ( 2000). Innovation, learning, and environmental policy: Overcoming “a plague of uncertainties”. Policy Studies Journal: The Journal of the Policy Studies Organization, 28( 3): 523– 539

[4] Brunnermeier, S B Cohen, M A ( 2003). Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45( 2): 278– 293

[5] Chang, Y T Zhang, N Danao, D Zhang, N ( 2013). Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China: A non-radial DEA approach. Energy Policy, 58: 277– 283

[6] Charnes, A Cooper, W W ( 1962). Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9( 3–4): 181– 186

[7] Charnes, A Cooper, W W Rhodes, E ( 1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2( 6): 429– 444

[8] Chen, J Cui, H Xu, Y Ge, Q ( 2021). Long-term temperature and sea-level rise stabilization before and beyond 2100: Estimating the additional climate mitigation contribution from China’s recent 2060 carbon neutrality pledge. Environmental Research Letters, 16( 7): 074032

[9] Chen, L Jia, G ( 2017). Environmental efficiency analysis of China’s regional industry: A data envelopment analysis (DEA) based approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142: 846– 853

[10] Chen, X Liu, Z Zhu, Q ( 2018). Performance evaluation of China’s high-tech innovation process: Analysis based on the innovation value chain. Technovation, 74–75: 42– 53

[11] Chen, Y Cook, W D Li, N Zhu, J ( 2009). Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 196( 3): 1170– 1176

[12] Chen, Y Du, J Sherman, H D Zhu, J ( 2010). DEA model with shared resources and efficiency decomposition. European Journal of Operational Research, 207( 1): 339– 349

[13] Chen, Y S ( 2008). The driver of green innovation and green image–green core competence. Journal of Business Ethics, 81( 3): 531– 543

[14] Cho, J H Sohn, S Y ( 2018). A novel decomposition analysis of green patent applications for the evaluation of R&D efforts to reduce CO₂ emissions from fossil fuel energy consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 193: 290– 299

[15] Chung, Y H Färe, R Grosskopf, S ( 1997). Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 51( 3): 229– 240

[16] Costantini, V Mazzanti, M Montini, A ( 2013). Environmental performance, innovation and spillovers: Evidence from a regional NAMEA. Ecological Economics, 89: 101– 114

[17] Färe, R Grosskopf, S Tyteca, D ( 1996). An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms: Application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities. Ecological Economics, 18( 2): 161– 175

[18] Fraj, E Matute, J Melero, I ( 2015). Environmental strategies and organizational competitiveness in the hotel industry: The role of learning and innovation as determinants of environmental success. Tourism Management, 46: 30– 42

[19] Fujii, H Managi, S ( 2019). Decomposition analysis of sustainable green technology inventions in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139: 10– 16

[20] Ghisetti, C Quatraro, F ( 2017). Green technologies and environmental productivity: A cross-sectoral analysis of direct and indirect effects in Italian regions. Ecological Economics, 132: 1– 13

[21] Gopalakrishnan, S Damanpour, F ( 1997). A review of innovation research in economics, sociology and technology management. Omega, 25( 1): 15– 28

[22] Guan, J Chen, K ( 2010). Measuring the innovation production process: A cross-region empirical study of China’s high-tech innovations. Technovation, 30( 5–6): 348– 358

[23] Guan, J Chen, K ( 2012). Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems. Research Policy, 41( 1): 102– 115

[24] Hailu, A Veeman, T S ( 2001). Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: An application to the Canadian pulp and paper industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83( 3): 605– 616

[25] Halkos, G Petrou, K N ( 2019). Treating undesirable outputs in DEA: A critical review. Economic Analysis and Policy, 62: 97– 104

[26] He, F Zhang, Q Lei, J Fu, W Xu, X ( 2013). Energy efficiency and productivity change of China’s iron and steel industry: Accounting for undesirable outputs. Energy Policy, 54: 204– 213

[27] Hemmelskamp, J Rennings, K Leone, F ( 2000). Innovation-oriented Environmental Regulation: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Analysis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer– Verlag

[28] Kao, C Hwang, S N ( 2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185( 1): 418– 429

[29] Korhonen, P J Luptacik, M ( 2004). Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: An extension of data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 154( 2): 437– 446

[30] Kortelainen, M ( 2008). Dynamic environmental performance analysis: A Malmquist index approach. Ecological Economics, 64( 4): 701– 715

[31] Lei, X Li, Y Xie, Q Liang, L ( 2015). Measuring Olympics achievements based on a parallel DEA approach. Annals of Operations Research, 226( 1): 379– 396

[32] Li, H Chen, J Wan, Z Zhang, H Wang, M Bai, Y ( 2020). Spatial evaluation of knowledge spillover benefits in China’s free trade zone provinces and cities. Growth and Change, 51( 3): 1158– 1181

[33] Liang, L Cook, W D Zhu, J ( 2008). DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Research Logistics, 55( 7): 643– 653

[34] Lin, R J Tan, K H Geng, Y ( 2013). Market demand, green product innovation, and firm performance: Evidence from Vietnam motorcycle industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40: 101– 107

[35] Long, X Chen, Y Du, J Oh, K Han, I ( 2017). Environmental innovation and its impact on economic and environmental performance. Energy Policy, 107: 131– 137

[36] Mensah, C N Long, X Boamah, K B Bediako, I A Dauda, L Salman, M ( 2018). The effect of innovation on CO₂ emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 25( 29): 29678– 29698

[37] Meyer, S M ( 1995). The economic impact of environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Law and Practice, 3( 2): 4– 15

[38] Pathomsiri, S Haghani, A Dresner, M Windle, R J ( 2008). Impact of undesirable outputs on the productivity of US airports. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44( 2): 235– 259

[39] Pujari, D ( 2006). Eco-innovation and new product development: Understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, 26( 1): 76– 85

[40] Reinhard, S Knox Lovell, C A Thijssen, G J ( 2000). Environmental efficiency with multiple environmentally detrimental variables: Estimated with SFA and DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 121( 2): 287– 303

[41] Satterthwaite, D ( 2011). How urban societies can adapt to resource shortage and climate change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369( 1942): 1762– 1783

[42] Shephard R W ( 1971). Theory of Cost and Production Functions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

[43] Song, M An, Q Zhang, W Wang, Z Wu, J ( 2012). Environmental efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis: A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16( 7): 4465– 4469

[44] Song, M Wang, S Liu, W ( 2014). A two-stage DEA approach for environmental efficiency measurement. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186( 5): 3041– 3051

[45] Sterner, T Turnheim, B ( 2009). Innovation and diffusion of environmental technology: Industrial NO_x abatement in Sweden under refunded emission payments. Ecological Economics, 68( 12): 2996– 3006

[46] Tiba, S Omri, A ( 2017). Literature survey on the relationships between energy, environment and economic growth. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69: 1129– 1146

[47] Tomkovick, C Miller, C ( 2000). Riding the wind: Managing new product development in an age of change. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17( 6): 413– 423

[48] Wang, K Yu, S Zhang, W ( 2013). China’s regional energy and environmental efficiency: A DEA window analysis based dynamic evaluation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58( 5–6): 1117– 1127

[49] Wang, Q Hang, Y Sun, L Zhao, Z ( 2016). Two-stage innovation efficiency of new energy enterprises in China: A non-radial DEA approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112: 254– 261

[50] Wu, J Xiong, B An, Q Sun, J Wu, H ( 2017). Total-factor energy efficiency evaluation of Chinese industry by using two-stage DEA model with shared inputs. Annals of Operations Research, 255( 1–2): 257– 276

[51] Wu, J Yang, J Zhou, Z ( 2020). How does environmental regulation affect environmental performance? A case study of China’s regional energy efficiency. Expert Systems: International Journal of Knowledge Engineering and Neural Networks, 37( 3): e12326

[52] Wu, J Zhou, Z Liang, N A ( 2010). Measuring the performance of Chinese regional innovation systems with two-stage DEA-based model. International Journal of Sustainable Society, 2( 1): 85– 99

[53] Wu, J Zhu, Q Chu, J Liu, H Liang, L ( 2016a). Measuring energy and environmental efficiency of transportation systems in China based on a parallel DEA approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 48: 460– 472

[54] Wu, J Zhu, Q Liang, L ( 2016b). CO₂ emissions and energy intensity reduction allocation over provincial industrial sectors in China. Applied Energy, 166: 282– 291

[55] Yang, H Pollitt, M ( 2009). Incorporating both undesirable outputs and uncontrollable variables into DEA: The performance of Chinese coal-fired power plants. European Journal of Operational Research, 197( 3): 1095– 1105

[56] Yang, L Ouyang, H Fang, K Ye, L Zhang, J ( 2015). Evaluation of regional environmental efficiencies in China based on super-efficiency-DEA. Ecological Indicators, 51: 13– 19

[57] Yew, W L Zhu, Z ( 2019). Innovative autocrats? Environmental innovation in public participation in China and Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Management, 234: 28– 35

[58] Zhang, J Chang, Y Zhang, L Li, D ( 2018). Do technological innovations promote urban green development? A spatial econometric analysis of 105 cities in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182: 395– 403

[59] Zhang, Y J Peng, Y L Ma, C Q Shen, B ( 2017). Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 100: 18– 28

[60] Zhao, L Zha, Y Zhuang, Y Liang, L ( 2019). Data envelopment analysis for sustainability evaluation in China: Tackling the economic, environmental, and social dimensions. European Journal of Operational Research, 275( 3): 1083– 1095

[61] Zhou, P Ang, B W Han, J Y ( 2010). Total factor carbon emission performance: A Malmquist index analysis. Energy Economics, 32( 1): 194– 201

[62] Zhou, P Ang, B W Poh, K L ( 2008). Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies. Energy Economics, 30( 1): 1– 14

[63] Zhu, Q Aparicio, J Li, F Wu, J Kou, G ( 2022). Determining closest targets on the extended facet production possibility set in data envelopment analysis: Modeling and computational aspects. European Journal of Operational Research, 296( 3): 927– 939

[64] Zhu, Q Li, X Li, F Wu, J Zhou, D ( 2020). Energy and environmental efficiency of China’s transportation sectors under the constraints of energy consumption and environmental pollutions. Energy Economics, 89: 104817

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 Higher Education Press