Developing a TRL-oriented roadmap for the adoption of biocomposite materials in the construction industry

Abstract

The construction industry is a major contributor to environmental pollution. The effect of the construction industry on the environment may be mitigated using eco-friendly construction materials, such as biocomposites. Once developed, biocomposites may offer a viable alternative to the current materials in use. However, biocomposites are lagging in terms of adoption and eventual use in the construction industry. This article provides insights into the steps for biocomposites to become a product that is ready to use by the construction industry in a structural role. The development and the adoption of such a material is tackled with the use of two concepts, i.e., technology readiness level and roadmapping, and explored in a case study on the “liquid wood”. Furthermore, interviews in the construction industry are carried out to identify the industry’s take on biocomposites. A customized roadmap, which underlines a mostly nontechnical perspective concerning this material, has emerged. Additionally, the adoption and diffusion issues that the “liquid wood” may encounter are outlined and complemented with further recommendations.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

biocomposite / technology readiness level / roadmap / interview / “liquid wood”

References

[1] Arora S K, Foley R W, Youtie J, Shapira P, Wiek A (2014). Drivers of technology adoption—The case of nanomaterials in building construction. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 87: 232–244

[2] Carey H F (2004). Romania Since 1989: Politics, Economics, and Society. Lanham: Lexington Books

[3] Christensen M C, Remler D (2009). Information and communications technology in US health care: Why is adoption so slow and is slower better? Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 34(6): 1011–1034

[4] Clausing D, Holmes M (2010). Technology readiness. Research Technology Management, 53(4): 52–59

[5] Clausing D P, Fey V (2004). Effective Innovation: The Development of Winning Technologies. New York: ASME Press

[6] Cornford S L, Sarsfield L (2004). Quantitative methods for maturing and infusing advanced spacecraft technology. In: IEEE Aerospace Conference. Big Sky, MT

[7] Daim T U, Intarode N (2011). Technology roadmapping for mature industries: 2010–2050 global cement product roadmap. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 11(2): 173–186

[8] Dewick P, Miozzo M (2002). Sustainable technologies and the innovation-regulation paradox. Futures, 34(9–10): 823–840

[9] Eindhoven T U (2016). The world’s first biocomposite bridge on the TU/e campus. Available at: tue.nl/en/news/news-overview/24-10-2016

[10] Environmental Pollution Centers (2017). Construction sites pollution. Available at: environmentalpollutioncenters.org/construction/

[11] European Space Agency (ESA) (2008). Technology Readiness Levels Handbook for Space Applications. ESA Document TEC-SHS/5551/MG/ap

[12] Faruk O, Bledzki A, Fink H, Sain M (2012). Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Progress in Polymer Science, 37(11): 1552–1596

[13] Frâncu L G (2015). The impact of bureaucracy over the foreign direct investments in Romania. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 22(Special(I)): 33–38

[14] Gan X, Zuo J, Ye K, Skitmore M, Xiong B (2015). Why sustainable construction? Why not? An owner’s perspective. Habitat International, 47: 61–68

[15] Garcia M L, Bray O H (1997). Fundamentals of technology roadmapping. Sandia Report. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories

[16] Ghobakhloo M (2018). The future of manufacturing industry: A strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(6): 910–936

[17] Goodman L A (1961). Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1): 148–170

[18] Groenveld P (1997). Roadmapping integrates business and technology. Research Technology Management, 40(5): 48–55

[19] Hicks B, Larsson A, Culley S J, Larsson T (2009). A methodology for evaluating technology readiness during product development. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design. Stanford, CA, 3: 157–168

[20] Holmes M F, Campbell Jr R B (2004). Product development processes: Three vectors of improvement. Research Technology Management, 47(4): 47–55

[21] John M J, Thomas S (2008). Biofibres and biocomposites. Carbohydrate Polymers, 71(3): 343–364

[22] Kelly-Cirino C, Mazzola L T, Chua A, Oxenford C J, van Kerkhove M D (2019). An updated roadmap for MERS-CoV research and product development: Focus on diagnostics. BMJ Global Health, 4: e001105

[23] Lay T, Kanamori H, Ammon C J, Nettles M, Ward S N, Aster R C, Beck S L, Bilek S L, Brudzinski M R, Butler R, DeShon H R, Ekström G, Satake K, Sipkin S (2005). The great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of 26 December 2004. Science, 308(5725): 1127–1133

[24] Lee J H, Phaal R, Lee S H (2013). An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(2): 286–306

[25] Mankins J (2009). Technology readiness assessments: A retrospective. Acta Astronautica, 65(9–10): 1216–1223

[26] Martin G, Eggink E (2008). Creation of a thermal technology roadmap in a consumer electronics product environment. In: IEEE/CPMT 24th Semiconductor Thermal Measurement, Modeling & Management Symposium, 106–111

[27] Mihály H (2017). From NASA to EU: The evolution of the TRL scale in public sector innovation. The Innovation Journal, 22(2): 3

[28] Nägele H, Pfitzer J, Eyerer P, Eisenreich N, Elsner P, Eckl W (2004). Composite body with decorative layers. European Patent 1135441B1

[29] Nägele H, Pfitzer J, Ziegler L, Inone-Krauffmann E R, Eckl W, Eisenreich N (2014). Lignin matrix composites from natural resources-ARBOFORM®. In: Kabasci S, ed. Bio-Based Plastics: Materials and Applications. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 89–115

[30] National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (2014). Technology readiness levels (TRL). Available at: nasa.gov/directorates/heo/scan/engineering/technology

[31] Nedelcu D, Ciofu C, Lohan N (2013). Microindentation and differential scanning calorimetry of “liquid wood”. Composites Part B: Engineering, 55: 11–15

[32] Nedelcu D, Plavanescu S, Puiu E (2014). Impact resistance of “liquid wood”. Advanced Materials Research, 1036: 13–17

[33] Nedelcu D, Stefan A, Mindru T, Plavanescu S (2012). Flexural properties of samples obtained from “liquid wood”. Selected Engineering Problems, 3: 151–154

[34] Ortiz O, Castells F, Sonnemann G (2009). Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA. Construction & Building Materials, 23(1): 28–39

[35] Palaszewski B A, Goebel D, White H, Coote D (2010). DRAFT In-Space Propulsion Systems Roadmap. Technology Area 02. National Aeronautics and Space Administration

[36] Petrick I, Echols A (2004). Technology roadmapping in review: A tool for making sustainable new product development decisions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(1–2): 81–100

[37] Phaal R, Farrukh C, Mitchell R, Probert D (2003). Starting-up roadmapping fast. Research Technology Management, 46(2): 52–59

[38] Phaal R, Farrukh C, Probert D (2004a). Customizing roadmapping. Research Technology Management, 47(2): 26–37

[39] Phaal R, Farrukh C, Probert D (2004b). Technology roadmapping—A planning framework for evolution and revolution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(1–2): 5–26

[40] Phaal R, Muller G (2009). An architectural framework for roadmapping: Towards visual strategy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(1): 39–49

[41] Probert D, Radnor M (2016). Frontier experiences from industry-academia consortia. Research-Technology Management, 46(2): 27–30

[42] Puiu E, Văideanu D, Simona B E, Agop M (2017). Thermal and electrical behaviors of the Arbofill “liquid wood”. International Journal of Modern Manufacturing Technologies, 4(1): 79–83

[43] Purcaru G (1979). The Vrancea, Romania earthquake of March 4, 1977 — a quite successful prediction. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 18(4): 274–287

[44] Rödel J, Kounga A B N, Weissenberger-Eibl M, Koch D, Bierwisch A, Rossner W, Hoffmann M J, Danzer R, Schneider G (2009). Development of a roadmap for advanced ceramics: 2010–2025. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 29(9): 1549–1560

[45] Rogers E M (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press

[46] Ruehl K, Bull D (2012). Wave energy development roadmap: Design to commercialization. In: 2012 Oceans. Hampton Roads, VA, 1–10

[47] Rybicka J, Tiwari A, Leeke G A (2016). Technology readiness level assessment of composites recycling technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112: 1001–1012

[48] Sabharwall P, McCllar M, Siahpush A, Clark D, Patterson M, Collins J (2012). Technology development roadmap for the advanced high temperature reactor secondary heat exchanger. Technical Report. Idaho Falls, ID: Idaho National Laboratory

[49] Sadin S, Povinelli F, Rosen R (1989). The NASA technology push towards future space mission systems. Acta Astronautica, 20: 73–77

[50] Schinasi K V (1999). Best practices: Better management of technology development can improve weapon system outcomes. Chapter Report NSIAD-99-162. Washington: General Accounting Office

[51] Siebelink R (2013). The Road Ahead: Business Roadmapping and How to Compensate for Uncertainty—The Case of the Construction Company. Dissertation for the Master’s Degree. Enschede: University of Twente

[52] Silventoinen A, Papinniemi J, Lampela H (2009). A roadmap for product lifecycle management implementation in SMEs. In: The 10th ISPIM Conference, 21

[53] Sykes L R, Jaumé S C (1990). Seismic activity on neighbouring faults as a long-term precursor to large earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay area. Nature, 348(6302): 595–599

[54] Tam V W Y, Tam C M, Zeng S X, Ng W C Y (2007). Towards adoption of prefabrication in construction. Building and Environment, 42(10): 3642–3654

[55] Tecnaro GmbH (2020). TECNARO—The Biopolymer Company|Applications. Available at: tecnaro.de/en/anwendungen/

[56] Tomaschek K, Olechowski A, Eppinger S, Joglekar N (2016). A survey of technology readiness level users. In: INCOSE International Symposium, 26(1): 2101–2117

[57] Vos J (2018). Demonstrating biocomposites’ properties using Bio-Bridges. Available at: allthings.bio

[58] Willyard C, McClees C (1987). Motorola’s technology roadmap process. Research Management, 30(5): 13–19

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 Higher Education Press