Optimal risk allocation in alliance infrastructure projects: A social preference perspective

Abstract

The mechanism of risk allocation is designed to protect all stakeholders, and it is vital to project success. Qualitative and quantitative ways of optimizing risk allocation have been well documented in extant literature (e.g., allocation principles, models, and solutions), and the foci of existing research are usually the maximization of rational utility. Few research has focused on partners’ social preferences affecting the output of risk allocation. This study presents a quantitative approach based on modeling alliance member (AM)’s inequity aversion (IA) to analyze risk-sharing arrangements in an alliance project. Fehr and Schmidt’s inequity-aversion model is integrated into modeling partner’s utility. This paper derives results for an alliance leader (AL)’s optimal risk-sharing ratio and AM’s optimal risk-management effort simultaneously. The derivation is based on solving a restrained optimization problem using the conception and methods from Stackelberg game theory. Results show that an AM’s IA significantly affects risk allocation between AL and AM. Specifically, envious preference is positively related to AL’s optimal risk-sharing ratio, whereas guilty preference negatively affects AL’s optimal risk-sharing ratio. These findings will be of interest to academics and practitioners involved in designing alliance negotiations.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

public project / contract design / risk sharing / inequity aversion / governance

References

[1] Abednego M P, Ogunlana S O (2006). Good project governance for proper risk allocation in public–private partnerships in Indonesia. International Journal of Project Management, 24(7): 622–634

[2] Alderman N, Ivory C (2007). Partnering in major contracts: Paradox and metaphor. International Journal of Project Management, 25(4): 386–393

[3] Alireza V, Mohammadreza Y, Zin R M, Yahaya N, Noor N M (2014). An enhanced multi-objective optimization approach for risk allocation in public–private partnership projects: A case study of Malaysia. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 41(2): 164–177

[4] Ameyaw E E, Chan A P C (2016). A fuzzy approach for the allocation of risks in public–private partnership water-infrastructure projects in developing countries. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 22(3): 04016016

[5] Ballesteros-Pérez P (2017). Modelling the boundaries of project fast-tracking. Automation in Construction, 84: 231–241

[6] Bamberg G, Spremann K (1987). Agency Theory, Information, and Incentives. New York: Springer

[7] Bolton G E, Ockenfels A (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90(1): 166–193

[8] Carvalho M M, Rabechini Junior R (2015). Impact of risk management on project performance: The importance of soft skills. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2): 321–340

[9] Casey E, Bamford P (2014). Building and Construction Procurement Guide: Principles and Options. Sydney: Australian Procurement and Construction Council, Austroads Ltd.

[10] Chan A P C, Osei-Kyei R, Hu Y, Le Y (2018). A fuzzy model for assessing the risk exposure of procuring infrastructure mega-projects through public–private partnership: The case of Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macao bridge. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 5(1): 64–77

[11] Chang C Y (2014). Principal-agent model of risk allocation in construction contracts and its critique. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(1): 04013032

[12] Chapman C B, Ward S C (1994). The efficient allocation of risk in contracts. Omega, 22(6): 537–552

[13] Chen C, Hubbard M (2012). Power relations and risk allocation in the governance of public–private partnerships: A case study from China. Policy and Society, 31(1): 39–49

[14] Chiles T H, McMackin J F (1996). Integrating variable risk preferences, trust, and transaction cost economics. Academy of Management Review, 21(1): 73–99

[15] Chou J S, Pramudawardhani D (2015). Cross-country comparisons of key drivers, critical success factors and risk allocation for public–private partnership projects. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5): 1136–1150

[16] Chu Y F, You F Q (2014). Integrated scheduling and dynamic optimization by Stackelberg game: Bilevel model formulation and efficient solution algorithm. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 53(13): 5564–5581

[17] Clark A E, Masclet D, Villeval M C (2010). Effort and comparison income: Experimental and survey evidence. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 63(3): 407–426

[18] Clark Brown P (1986). Competitive procurement contracting when risk-preferences are uncertain. Mathematical Modelling, 7(2–3): 285–299

[19] Clark Brown P (1987). Optimal risk-sharing when risk preferences are uncertain. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 38(1): 17–29

[20] Croson R, Konow J (2009). Social preferences and moral biases. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 69(3): 201–212

[21] Das T K, Kumar R (2011). Interpartner negotiations in alliances: A strategic framework. Management Decision, 49(8): 1235–1256

[22] Du G, Jiao R J, Chen M (2014). Joint optimization of product family configuration and scaling design by Stackelberg game. European Journal of Operational Research, 232(2): 330–341

[23] Fehr E, Schmidt K M (1999). A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3): 817–868

[24] Forsythe R, Horowitz J L, Savin N E, Sefton M (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6(3): 347–369

[25] Frank R H, Jennings S, Bernanke B S (2006). Principles of Microeconomics. North Ryde, NSW: McGraw-Hill Education

[26] Hartman F, Snelgrove P, Ashrafi R (1997). Effective wording to improve risk allocation in lump sum contracts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123(4): 379–387

[27] Hauck A J, Walker D H T, Hampson K D, Peters R J (2004). Project alliancing at National Museum of Australia-Collaborative process. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(1): 143–152

[28] Ho T H, Zhang J (2008). Designing pricing contracts for boundedly rational customers: Does the framing of the fixed fee matter? Management Science, 54(4): 686–700

[29] Hosseinian S M, Carmichael D G (2013a). Optimal gainshare/painshare in alliance projects. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64(8): 1269–1278

[30] Hosseinian S M, Carmichael D G (2013b). Optimal incentive contract with risk-neutral contractor. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(8): 899–909

[31] Jin H Y, Liu S J, Liu C L, Udawatta N (2019). Optimizing the concession period of PPP projects for fair allocation of financial risk. Engineering, Construction, and Architectural Management, 26(10): 2347–2363

[32] Jin X H, Zhang G M (2011). Modelling optimal risk allocation in PPP projects using artificial neural networks. International Journal of Project Management, 29(5): 591–603

[33] Kahneman D, Knetsch J, Thaler R H (1986). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. American Economic Review, 76(4): 728–741

[34] Kakati M, Baruah P (2016). Optimal risk allocation in Public–Private Partnership (PPP) projects in India. In: The 2016 WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings. Boston, 144–166

[35] Karim N A A (2011). Risk allocation in Public–Private Partnership (PPP) project: A review on risk factors. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering & Technology, 2(2): 8–16

[36] Kate G S, Patil P S (2020). Risk analysis and allocation in public–private partnership power transmission line projects. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 16(1): 23–37

[37] Katok E, Pavlov V (2013). Fairness in supply chain contracts: A laboratory study. Journal of Operations Management, 31(3): 129–137

[38] Khazaeni G, Khanzadi M, Afshar A (2012). Optimum risk allocation model for construction contracts: Fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 39(7): 789–800

[39] Konow J (2001). Fair and square the four sides of distributive justice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 46(2): 137–164

[40] Kumaraswamy M, Ling F Y, Rahman M M, Phng S T (2005). Constructing relationally integrated teams. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(10): 1076–1086

[41] Laffont J J, Marimort D (2001). The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

[42] Lam K C, Wang D, Lee P T K, Tsang Y T (2007). Modelling risk allocation decision in construction contracts. International Journal of Project Management, 25(5): 485–493

[43] Laux C (2001). Limited-liability and incentive contracting with multiple projects. RAND Journal of Economics, 32(3): 514–526

[44] Ling F Y Y, Ning Y, Ke Y, Kumaraswamy M M (2013). Modeling relational transaction and relationship quality among team members in public projects in Hong Kong. Automation in Construction, 36: 16–24

[45] Lomoro A, Mossa G, Pellegrino R, Ranieri L (2020). Optimizing risk allocation in public–private partnership projects by project finance contracts—The case of put-or-pay contract for stranded Posidonia disposal in the municipality of Bari. Sustainability, 12(3): 806

[46] Love P E D, Mistry D, Davis P R (2010). Price competitive alliance projects: Identification of success factors for public clients. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(9): 947–956

[47] Love P E D, Sing C P, Wang X, Irani Z, Thwala D W (2014). Overruns in transportation infrastructure projects. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10(2): 141–159

[48] Luttmer E F P (2005). Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3): 963–1002

[49] McAfee R P, McMillan J (1986). Bidding for contracts: A principal-agent analysis. RAND Journal of Economics, 17(3): 326–338

[50] Meng Q, Li Z, Du J, Liu H, Ding X (2019). Negotiation for time optimization in construction projects with competitive and social welfare preferences. Complexity, 3269025

[51] Nasirzadeh F, Khanzadi M, Rezaie M (2014). Dynamic modeling of the quantitative risk allocation in construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 32(3): 442–451

[52] Ng S T, Rose T M, Mak M, Chen S E (2002). Problematic issues associated with project partnering—The contractor perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 20(6): 437–449

[53] Nicholas A (2012). Fairness as a constraint on reciprocity: Playing simultaneously as dictator and trustee. Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(2): 211–221

[54] Osei-Kyei R, Chan A P C (2015). Review of studies on the critical success factors for Public–Private Partnership (PPP) projects from 1990 to 2013. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6): 1335–1346

[55] Owen S, Yawson A (2013). Information asymmetry and international strategic alliances. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(10): 3890–3903

[56] Pishdad-Bozorgi P, de la Garza J M, Austin R B (2016). Readiness assessment for flash tracking. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(12): 06016005

[57] Rasul N, Malik M S A, Bakhtawar B, Thaheem M J (2019). Risk assessment of fast-track projects: A systems-based approach. International Journal of Construction Management, in press, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2019.1602587

[58] Rey-Biel P (2008). Inequity aversion and team incentives. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110(2): 297–320

[59] Rohde K I M (2010). A preference foundation for Fehr and Schmidt’s model of inequity aversion. Social Choice and Welfare, 34(4): 537–547

[60] Scherer F M (1964). The theory of contractual incentives for cost reduction. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 78(2): 257–280

[61] Shan M, Le Y, Yiu K T W, Chan A P C, Hu Y, Zhou Y (2018). Assessing collusion risks in managing construction projects using artificial neural network. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(5): 2003–2025

[62] Tang Y, Chen Y, Hua Y, Fu Y (2020). Impacts of risk allocation on conflict negotiation costs in construction projects: Does managerial control matter? International Journal of Project Management, 38(3): 188–199

[63] Tseng F S, Yeh Y (2014). Maintenance outsourcing coordination with risk-averse contractors. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(11): 1760–1769

[64] Winch G M (2010). Managing Construction Projects. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell

[65] Xu H L, Wang X Y (2014). Optimization and Control Methods in Industrial Engineering and Construction. Dordrecht: Springer

[66] Xue W L, Caliskan Demirag O, Niu B Z (2014). Supply chain performance and consumer surplus under alternative structures of channel dominance. European Journal of Operational Research, 239(1): 130–145

[67] Yescombe E R (2002). Principles of Project Finance. San Diego, CA: Academic Press

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press