Carbon performance evaluation model from the perspective of circular economy—The case of Chinese thermal power enterprise

Abstract

Carbon emission reduction is the only way to alleviate environmental problems, such as global warming. Effective evaluation of carbon performance can help enterprises to carry out energy saving and emission reduction activities to a certain extent and promote sustainable development. This paper constructs a carbon performance evaluation index system that includes the four dimensions of carbon resource (energy) input, cycle, output, and carbon management by incorporating the principles of circular economy and the theory of resource value circulation from the perspective of the flow trajectory of carbon-containing resources in the circulation of enterprises combined with the production characteristics of thermoelectric enterprises. Subsequently, combined with the case study, this paper discusses the scientific and practical nature of the system and provides another way of thinking for carbon performance evaluation of micro-enterprises in other industries. This paper expands the application boundary of matter–element model and supplements the literature of carbon performance, which has certain theoretical and practical significance.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

circular economy / carbon performance / comprehensive evaluation / thermal power enterprise

References

[1] Allan G, Mcgregor P, Swales K (2017). Greening regional development: Employment in low-carbon and renewable energy activities. Regional Studies, 51(8): 1270–1280

[2] Ang B W, Goh T (2016). Carbon intensity of electricity in ASEAN: Drivers, performance and outlook. Energy Policy, 98: 170–179

[3] Ashraf N, Meschi P, Spencer R (2014). Alliance network embeddedness and effects on the carbon performance of firms in emerging economies. Organization & Environment, 27(1): 65–84

[4] Büchs M, Bahaj A S, Blunden L, Bourikas L, Falkingham J, James P, Kamanda M, Wu Y (2018). Promoting low carbon behaviours through personalised information? Long-term evaluation of a carbon calculator interview. Energy Policy, 120: 284–293

[5] Cheng Y, Lv K J, Wang J, Xu H (2019). Energy efficiency, carbon dioxide emission efficiency, and related abatement costs in regional China: A synthesis of input-output analysis and DEA. Energy Efficiency, 12(4): 863–877

[6] Chiang T A, Che Z H, Liu C H (2020). A benchmark-based low carbon performance evaluation and improvement approach for beverage production. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139: 106137

[7] Córdova C, Zoriogrima A, Merello P (2018). Carbon emissions by South American companies: Driving factors for reporting decisions and emissions reduction. Sustainability, 10(7): 2411

[8] Dahlmann F, Branicki L, Brammer S (2017). Managing carbon aspirations: The influence of corporate climate change targets on environmental performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(1): 1–24

[9] Goldstein B D, Greenberg M R (2018). Global climate change and the “So What?” issue: Reversing the impact of Donald Trump. American Journal of Public Health, 108(S2): S78–S79

[10] Guler B, Çelebi E, Nathwani J (2018). A “Regional Energy Hub” for achieving a low-carbon energy transition. Energy Policy, 113: 376–385

[11] Hamilton T G A, Kelly S (2017). Low carbon energy scenarios for Sub-Saharan Africa: An input-output analysis on the effects of universal energy access and economic growth. Energy Policy, 105: 303–319

[12] Haque F (2017). The effects of board characteristics and sustainable compensation policy on carbon performance of UK firms. British Accounting Review, 49(3): 347–364

[13] Kim S, Kim S K (2016). Decomposition analysis of the greenhouse gas emissions in Korea’s electricity generation sector. Carbon Management, 7(5–6): 249–260

[14] Lewandowski S (2017). Corporate carbon and financial performance: The role of emission reductions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(8): 1196–1211

[15] Liesen A, Figge F, Hoepner A, Patten D M (2017). Climate change and asset prices: Are corporate carbon disclosure and performance priced appropriately? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 44(1–2): 35–62

[16] Liu N, Ma Z, Kang J (2017). A regional analysis of carbon intensities of electricity generation in China. Energy Economics, 67: 268–277

[17] Modak M, Pathak K, Ghosh K K (2017). Performance evaluation of outsourcing decision using a BSC and fuzzy AHP approach: A case of the Indian coal mining organization. Resources Policy, 52: 181–191

[18] Moussa T, Allam A, Elbanna S, Bani-Mustafa A (2020). Can board environmental orientation improve US firms’ carbon performance? The mediating role of carbon strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1): 72–86

[19] Newton P W (2014). Low-carbon precincts for low-carbon living. Carbon Management, 5(1): 5–8

[20] Padilla-Rivera A, Amor B, Blanchet P (2018). Evaluating the link between low carbon reductions strategies and its performance in the context of climate change: A carbon footprint of a wood-frame residential building in Quebec, Canada. Sustainability, 10(8): 2715

[21] Qian W, Schaltegger S (2017). Revisiting carbon disclosure and performance: Legitimacy and management views. British Accounting Review, 49(4): 365–379

[22] Rietbergen M G, Opstelten I J, Blok K (2017). Improving energy and carbon management in construction and civil engineering companies—Evaluating the impacts of the CO₂ performance ladder. Energy Efficiency, 10(1): 55–79

[23] Sejian V, Prasadh R S, Lees A M, Lees J C, Al-Hosni Y A S, Sullivan M L, Gaughan J B (2018). Assessment of the carbon footprint of four commercial dairy production systems in Australia using an integrated farm system model. Carbon Management, 9(1): 57–70

[24] Simoes S, Nijs W, Ruiz P, Sgobbi A, Thiel C (2017). Comparing policy routes for low-carbon power technology deployment in EU—an energy system analysis. Energy Policy, 101: 353–365

[25] Song X H, Jiang X, Zhang X B, Liu J P (2018). Analysis, evaluation and optimization strategy of China thermal power enterprises’ business performance considering environmental costs under the background of carbon trading. Sustainability, 10(6): 2006

[26] Sun H P, Attuquaye Clottey S, Geng Y, Fang K, Clifford Kofi Amissah J (2019a). Trade openness and carbon emissions: Evidence from belt and road countries. Sustainability, 11(9): 2682

[27] Sun H P, Edziah B K, Sun C W, Kporsu A K (2019b). Institutional quality, green innovation and energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 135: 111002

[28] Sun H P, Tariq G, Chen H, Zhu J, Liu Y, Wu C (2018). Allocation of carbon emission quotas to Chinese power enterprises. Energy Procedia, 152: 115–124

[29] Sun Y, Cadarso M A, Driml S M (2020). Tourism carbon footprint inventories: A review of the environmentally extended input-output approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 82: 102928

[30] Tarnoczi T J (2017). An assessment of carbon offset risk: A methodology to determine an offset risk adjustment factor, and considerations for offset procurement. Carbon Management, 8(2): 143–153

[31] Trumpp C, Guenther T (2017). Too little or too much? Exploring U-shaped relationships between corporate environmental performance and corporate financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1): 49–68

[32] van Zyl H, Lewis Y, Kinghorn J, Reeler J (2018). The cost of achieving South Africa’s “fair share” of global climate change mitigation. Climate Policy, 18(10): 1327–1339

[33] Velte P, Stawinoga M, Lueg R (2020). Carbon performance and disclosure: A systematic review of governance-related determinants and financial consequences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254: 120063

[34] Wang Y, Wang E D, Bi Y (2017). Effects of carbon emission peaking on China’s economy under different scenarios—Analysis based on CGE model. Resources Science, 39(10): 1896–1908 (in Chinese)

[35] Wu Y Y, Ma H W (2019). Challenges for integrating strategic environmental assessment to enhance environmental thinking: A case study of Taiwan energy policy. Sustainability, 11(3): 609

[36] Yan H, Ma Y, Wang D (2018). Construction of carbon budget system for cement enterprises. Statistics & Decisions, 34(11): 185–188 (in Chinese)

[37] Yue Y, Cheng L (2017). Operational efficiency evaluation and system design improvements for carbon emissions trading pilots in China. Carbon Management, 8(5–6): 399–415

[38] Zhang N, Choi Y (2013). Total-factor carbon emission performance of fossil fuel power plants in China: A metafrontier non-radial Malmquist index analysis. Energy Economics, 40: 549–559

[39] Zhang Y J, Sun Y F, Huang J L (2018a). Energy efficiency, carbon emission performance, and technology gaps: Evidence from CDM project investment. Energy Policy, 115: 119–130

[40] Zhang Y X, Wei Y M, Zhou G H (2018b). Promoting firms’ energy-saving behavior: The role of institutional pressures, top management support and financial slack. Energy Policy, 115: 230–238

[41] Zhou Z, Zhou H, Peng D, Chen X, Li S (2018). Carbon disclosure, financial transparency, and agency cost: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing listed companies. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 54(12): 2669–2686

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the teachers who participated in the questionnaire survey and the members who participated in the team discussion and writing. Any remaining errors are the authors’ own.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 Higher Education Press