Semantics for linking data from 4D BIM to digital collaborative support

Abstract

Synchronous collaboration sessions within the context of 4D BIM position construction professionals into a complex socio–technical system. This system includes hardware, software, people, and broader community aspects. This article strictly focuses on the ontology representation of synchronous collaboration sessions with collocated collective decision-making. The model is designed by considering various 4D BIM model uses while a digital multiuser touch table facilitates the collaboration between actors. The outlined ontological model aims to improve interoperability and to move toward a knowledge-driven, smart-built environment paradigm. A knowledge engineering methodology is outlined, by virtue of which the semantics of the presented model are defined and discussed. Concepts from nearby knowledge fields, especially from the Industry Foundation Classes, are reused. Several examples on querying the knowledge base according to the project meeting requirements are outlined to demonstrate the benefits of using the model. Although 4D BIM model data can be imported by using standard formats, capturing data about the social context remains a challenge in the future. This is expected to change the ontology model structure by considering user ergonomics, data modeling requirements, as well as technical implementation constraints.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

4D BIM / ontology / IFC / decision-making / linked data / collaboration / planning

References

[1] Abanda F H, Tah J H M, Keivani R (2013). Trends in built environment semantic web applications: Where are we today? Expert Systems with Applications, 40(14): 5563–5577

[2] Abels S, Ahlemann F, Hahn A, Hausmann K, Strickmann J (2006). PROMONT—A project management ontology as a reference for virtual project organizations. In: OTM Confederated International Conferences “On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems”. Springer, 4277: 813–823

[3] Beetz J, van Leeuwen J, de Vries B (2009). IfcOWL: A case of transforming EXPRESS schemas into ontologies. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 23(1): 89–101

[4] Boje C, Bolshakova V, Guerriero A, Kubickia S, Halin G (2019). Ontology assisted collaboration sessions on 4D BIM. In: Creative Construction Conference 2019, 591–596

[5] Bolshakova V, Guerriero A, Halin G (2018). Identification of relevant project documents to 4D BIM uses for a synchronous collaborative decision support. In: Creative Construction Conference 2018. Ljubljana, 1036–1043

[6] Bolshakova V, Halin G, Humbert P, Boton C (2017). Digital synchronous collaboration workspace and 3D interactions for an AEC project. Decision-making scenario evaluation. In: International Conference on Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering. Springer, 168–176

[7] Boton C, Kubicki S, Halin G (2011). Method to design coordinated multiple views adapted to user’s business requirements in 4D collaborative tools in AEC. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information Visualisation. London: IEEE, 96–101

[8] Boton C, Kubicki S, Halin G (2013). Designing adapted visualization for collaborative 4D applications. Automation in Construction, 36: 152–167

[9] Boton C, Kubicki S, Halin G (2015). 4D/BIM simulation for pre-construction and construction scheduling: Multiple levels of development within a single case study. In: Creative Construction Conference 2015. Diamond Congress Ltd., 500–505

[10] BuildingSMART International (2007). IFC2×3 Technical Corrigendum 1

[11] BuildingSMART International (2017). IFC4 Addendum 2 Technical Corrigendum 1

[12] Butkovic B, Heesom D, Oloke D (2019). The need for multi-LOD 4D simulations in construction projects. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 24: 256–272

[13] CIC (2011). BIM project execution planning guide. Version 2.1. Pennsylvania: The Computer Integrated Construction (CIC) Research Group, Department of Architecture Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University

[14] 4DCollab (2020). 4DCollab-project. Available at: 4dcollab-project.eu

[15] Ding L, Zhou Y, Akinci B (2014). Building Information Modeling (BIM) application framework: The process of expanding from 3D to computable nD. Automation in Construction, 46: 82–93

[16] dotNetRDF (2019). dotNetRDF—An open source. NET library for RDF

[17] Fidan G, Dikmen I, Tanyer A M, Birgonul M T (2011). Ontology for relating risk and vulnerability to cost overrun in international projects. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 25(4): 302–315

[18] GaoJ, Fischer M (2008). Framework & case studies comparing implementations & impacts of 3D/4D modeling across projects. Technical Report. Stanford

[19] Ghaffarianhoseini A, Tookey J, Ghaffarianhoseini A, Naismith N, Azhar S, Efimova O, Raahemifar K (2017). Building Information Modelling (BIM) uptake: Clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75: 1046–1053

[20] Guerriero A, Kubicki S, Berroir F, Lemaire C (2017). BIM-enhanced collaborative smart technologies for LEAN construction processes. In: 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC). Funchal: IEEE, 1023–1030

[21] Hamledari H, McCabe B, Davari S, Shahi A (2017). Automated schedule and progress updating of IFC-based 4D BIMs. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 31(4): 04017012

[22] Horrocks I, Parsia B, Patel-Schneider P, Hendler J (2005). Semantic web architecture: Stack or two towers? In: International Workshop on Principles and Practice of Semantic Web Reasoning. Springer, 37–41

[23] Howell S, Rezgui Y (2018). Beyond BIM: Knowledge Management for a Smarter Built Environment. BRE Electronic Publications

[24] Hu Z, Zhang J (2011). BIM- and 4D-based integrated solution of analysis and management for conflicts and structural safety problems during construction: 2. Development and site trials. Automation in Construction, 20(2): 167–180

[25] Immersion (2020). Meetiiim collaborative working platform, 2020. Available at: shariiing.com/en

[26] ISO (2019). ISO 9241-210:2019 Ergonomics of human–system interaction—part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems

[27] Kassem M, Dawood N, Chavada R (2015). Construction workspace management within an Industry Foundation Class-Compliant 4D tool. Automation in Construction, 52: 42–58

[28] Knoll S, Plumbaum T, Hoffmann J F, de Luca E W (2010). Collaboration ontology: Applying collaboration knowledge to a generic group support system. In: Proceedings of the Group Decision and Negotiation Meeting (GDN). Omaha, NE, 12–26

[29] Kreider R G, Messner J I (2013). The uses of BIM: Classifying and selecting BIM uses (Version 0.9). University Park, PA: Penn State Computer Integrated Construction

[30] Kubicki S, Guerriero A, Schwartz L, Daher E, Idris B (2019). Assessment of synchronous interactive devices for BIM project coordination: Prospective ergonomics approach. Automation in Construction, 101: 160–178

[31] Laakso M, Kiviniemi A O (2012). The IFC standard: A review of history, development, and standardization. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 17(9): 134–161

[32] Lee A, Wu S, Marshall-Ponting A, Aouad G, Tah J, Cooper R, Fu C (2005). nD modelling—A driver or enabler for construction improvement?  RICS Research Paper Series, 5: 6

[33] Lee Y C, Eastman C M, Lee J K (2015). Validations for ensuring the interoperability of data exchange of a building information model. Automation in Construction, 58: 176–195

[34] McKinney K, Kim J, Fischer M, Howard C (1996). Interactive 4D-CAD. Computing in Civil Engineering, 20: 383–389

[35] Mehrbod S, Staub-French S, Mahyar N, Tory M (2019). Characterizing interactions with BIM tools and artifacts in building design coordination meetings. Automation in Construction, 98: 195–213

[36] Microsoft (2019). Microsoft Office Project 2007 XML Data Interchange Schema

[37] Moon H, Dawood N, Kang L (2014). Development of workspace conflict visualization system using 4D object of work schedule. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 28(1): 50–65

[38] National Building Specification (2014). NBS national BIM report 2014. RIBA Enterprise Ltd.

[39] Niknam M, Karshenas S (2015). Integrating distributed sources of information for construction cost estimating using Semantic Web and Semantic Web Service technologies. Automation in Construction, 57: 222–238

[40] Niknam M, Karshenas S (2016). Integrating BIM and project schedule information using semantic web technology. In: Construction Research Congress 2016. San Juan, 689–697

[41] Noy N F, McGuinness D L (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Technical Report. Stanford, CA

[42] Oh M, Lee J, Hong S W, Jeong Y (2015). Integrated system for BIM-based collaborative design. Automation in Construction, 58: 196–206

[43] Pauwels P, Oraskari J, McGibbney L J (2016). IFCtoRDF.

[44] Pauwels P, Zhang S, Lee Y C (2017). Semantic web technologies in AEC industry: A literature overview. Automation in Construction, 73: 145–165

[45] Porkka J, Kähkönen K (2007). Software development approaches and challenges of 4D product models. In: 24th CIB W78 Conference—Bringing ITC Knowledge to Work, 85–90

[46] Rasmussen M H, Lefrançois M, Bonduel M, Hviid C A, Karlshø J (2018). OPM: An ontology for describing properties that evolve over time. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2159: 23–33

[47] Schneider G F (2017). Towards aligning domain ontologies with the building topology ontology. In: Proceedings of 5th Linked Data in Architecture and Construction (LDAC) Workshop

[48] Sezer O B, Dogdu E, Ozbayoglu M, Onal A (2016). An extended IOT framework with semantics, big data, and analytics. In: IEEE International Conference on Big Data. Washington, DC, 1849–1856

[49] Steinberg G (2012). Natural user interfaces. In: ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Austin, TX

[50] Tomašević N M, Batić M Č, Blanes L M, Keane M M, Vraneš S (2015). Ontology-based facility data model for energy management. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 29(4): 971–984

[51] Turkan Y, Bosche F, Haas C T, Haas R (2012). Automated progress tracking using 4D schedule and 3D sensing technologies. Automation in Construction, 22: 414–421

[52] Venugopal M, Eastman C M, Teizer J (2015). An ontology-based analysis of the industry foundation class schema for building information model exchanges. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 29(4): 940–957

[53] Wagner A, Bonduel M, Pauwels P, Uwe R (2019). Relating geometry descriptions to its derivatives on the web. In: Proceedings of the 2019 European Conference for Computing in Construction. Chania, Crete, 304–313

[54] W3C (2017). Time Ontology in OWL. Spatial Data on the Web Working Group. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)

[55] Wood H L, Piroozfar P, Farr E R P (2014). Understanding complexity in the AEC industry. In: Smith S D, Ahiaga-Dagbui D D, eds. Proceedings of 29th Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management Conference. Reading, 2: 859–869

[56] Zhang S, Boukamp F, Teizer J (2015). Ontology-based semantic modeling of construction safety knowledge: Towards automated safety planning for job hazard analysis (JHA). Automation in Construction, 52: 29–41

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press