The carbon dioxide removal potential of Liquid Air Energy Storage: A high-level technical and economic appraisal

Andrew LOCKLEY, Ted von HIPPEL

PDF(216 KB)
PDF(216 KB)
Front. Eng ›› 2021, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (3) : 456-464. DOI: 10.1007/s42524-020-0102-8
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The carbon dioxide removal potential of Liquid Air Energy Storage: A high-level technical and economic appraisal

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Liquid Air Energy Storage (LAES) is at pilot scale. Air cooling and liquefaction stores energy; reheating revaporises the air at pressure, powering a turbine or engine (Ameel et al., 2013). Liquefaction requires water & CO2 removal, preventing ice fouling. This paper proposes subsequent geological storage of this CO2– offering a novel Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) by-product, for the energy storage industry. It additionally assesses the scale constraint and economic opportunity offered by implementing this CDR approach. Similarly, established Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) uses air compression and subsequent expansion. CAES could also add CO2 scrubbing and subsequent storage, at extra cost. CAES stores fewer joules per kilogram of air than LAES – potentially scrubbing more CO2 per joule stored. Operational LAES/CAES technologies cannot offer full-scale CDR this century (Stocker et al., 2014), yet they could offer around 4% of projected CO2 disposals for LAES and<25% for current-technology CAES. LAES CDR could reach trillion-dollar scale this century (20 billion USD/year, to first order). A larger, less certain commercial CDR opportunity exists for modified conventional CAES, due to additional equipment requirements. CDR may be commercially critical for LAES/CAES usage growth, and the necessary infrastructure may influence plant scaling and placement. A suggested design for low-pressure CAES theoretically offers global-scale CDR potential within a century (ignoring siting constraints) – but this must be costed against competing CDR and energy storage technologies.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

carbon dioxide removal / Liquid Air Energy Storage / Compressed Air Energy Storage / geoengineering

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Andrew LOCKLEY, Ted von HIPPEL. The carbon dioxide removal potential of Liquid Air Energy Storage: A high-level technical and economic appraisal. Front. Eng, 2021, 8(3): 456‒464 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-020-0102-8

References

[1]
Ameel B, T’Joen C, de Kerpel K, de Jaeger P, Huisseune H, van Belleghem M, de Paepe M (2013). Thermodynamic analysis of energy storage with a liquid air Rankine cycle. Applied Thermal Engineering, 52(1): 130–140
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Carr G (2012). Sunny uplands: Alternative energy will no longer be alternative. The Economist, 21
[3]
Ding Y, Tong L, Zhang P, Li Y, Radcliffe J, Wang L (2016). Liquid air energy storage. In: Letcher T M, ed. Storing Energy: With Special Reference to Renewable Energy Sources. Holland: Elsevier, 167–181
[4]
Dorminey B (2014). Underwater compressed air energy storage: Fantasy or reality? Renewable Energy World
[5]
EIA (2013). EIA projects world energy consumption will increase 56% by 2040. US Energy Information Administration (EIA).
[6]
Energy Storage Association (2018). Mechanical energy storage.
[7]
Fajardy M, Mac Dowell N (2018). The energy return on investment of BECCS: Is BECCS a threat to energy security? Energy & Environmental Science, 11(6): 1581–1594
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Fuss S, Lamb W F, Callaghan M W, Hilaire J, Creutzig F, Amann T, Beringer T, de Oliveira Garcia W, Hartmann J, Khanna T, Luderer G, Nemet G F, Rogelj J, Smith P, Vicente J L V, Wilcox J, del Mar Zamora Dominguez M, Minx J C (2018). Negative emissions—part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects. Environmental Research Letters, 13(6): 063002
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Gerlach A, Breyer C, Fischer M, Werner C (2015). Forecast of long-term PV installations: A discussion of scenarios range from IEA to the solar economy. In: 31st European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition. Hamburg, 2973–2981
[10]
Gurwick N P, Moore L A, Kelly C, Elias P (2013). A systematic review of biochar research, with a focus on its stability in situ and its promise as a climate mitigation strategy. PLoS One, 8(9): e75932
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[11]
Hansen J, Sato M, Kharecha P, Beerling D, Berner R, Masson-Delmotte V, Pagani M, Raymo M, Royer D L, Zachos J C (2008). Target atmospheric CO2: Where should humanity aim? Open Atmospheric Science Journal, 2(1): 217–231
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
IEA (2017). World Energy Outlook 2017. International Energy Agency (IEA).
[13]
Jülch V (2016). Comparison of electricity storage options using levelized cost of storage (LCOS) method. Applied Energy, 183: 1594–1606
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Kaiser F (2015). Steady state analysis of existing compressed air energy storage plants. In: Power and Energy Student Summit, Dortmund
[15]
Kantharaj B, Garvey S, Pimm A (2015). Thermodynamic analysis of a hybrid energy storage system based on compressed air and liquid air. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 11: 159–164
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Köhler P, Hartmann J, Wolf-Gladrow D A, (2010). Geoengineering potential of artificially enhanced silicate weathering of olivine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(47): 20228–20233
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[17]
Koplow J P (2010). A fundamentally new approach to air-cooled heat exchangers. Sandia Report, SAND2010–0258. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories
[18]
Kriegler E, Edenhofer O, Reuster L, Luderer G, Klein D (2013). Is atmospheric carbon dioxide removal a game changer for climate change mitigation? Climatic Change, 118(1): 45–57
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Luo X, Wang J, Dooner M, Clarke J (2015). Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation. Applied Energy, 137: 511–536
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Mathiesen B V, Lund H, Karlsson K (2011). 100% Renewable energy systems, climate mitigation and economic growth. Applied Energy, 88(2): 488–501
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Morgan R, Nelmes S, Gibson E, Brett G (2015). An analysis of a large-scale liquid air energy storage system. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Energy, 168(2): 135–144
[22]
Muratori M, Calvin K, Wise M, Kyle P, Edmonds J (2016). Global economic consequences of deploying bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). Environmental Research Letters, 11(9): 095004
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
She X H, Peng X D, Nie B J, Leng X S, Zhang X S, Weng L K, Tong L G, Zheng L F, Wang L, Ding Y L (2017). Enhancement of round trip efficiency of liquid air energy storage through effective utilization of heat of compression. Applied Energy, 206: 1632–1642
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Spector J (2017). LightSail energy enters ‘hibernation’ as quest for game-changing energy storage runs out of cash. Greentech Media.
[25]
Stocker T F, Qin D, Plattner G K, Tignor M M B, Allen S K, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley P M (2014). Climate change 2013—The physical science basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
[26]
Stolaroff J K, Keith D W, Lowry G V (2008). Carbon dioxide capture from atmospheric air using sodium hydroxide spray. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(8): 2728–2735
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[27]
Strahan D (2013). Liquid Air in the energy and transport systems: Opportunities for industry and innovation in the UK. The Centre for Low Carbon Futures
[28]
Sun Y, Gao B, Yao Y, Fang J, Zhang M, Zhou Y M, Chen H, Yang L Y (2014). Effects of feedstock type, production method, and pyrolysis temperature on biochar and hydrochar properties. Chemical Engineering Journal, 240: 574–578
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
von Hippel T (2018). Thermal removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere: Energy requirements and scaling issues. Climatic Change, 148: 491–501
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
You S, Ok Y S, Chen S S, Tsang D C W, Kwon E E, Lee J, Wang C H (2017). A critical review on sustainable biochar system through gasification: Energy and environmental applications. Bioresource Technology, 246: 242–253
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 The Author(s) 2020. This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(216 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/