Identifying subassemblies and understanding their functions during a design review in immersive and non-immersive virtual environments

Abstract

Design review (DR) is a product development (PD) activity used to inspect the technical characteristics of a design solution. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) technology enables the presentation of spatial information and interaction with 3D CAD models inside an immersive virtual environment (IVE). Such capabilities have shown the potential to mitigate the cognitive load needed for the visual perception of spatial information and, consequently, enhance design understanding and DR performance. Thus, an increasing number of studies have explored the effect of IVR technology on DR activities in different domains. However, determining when the implementation of IVR technology rather than a conventional user interface for DRs in mechanical engineering PD projects will be beneficial remains unclear. Hence, a conceptual DR experimental study was conducted to investigate the differences in the ability of engineering students to identify mechanisms and understand their functions when a design solution for a technical system is presented in an IVE by IVR technology and in a non-immersive virtual environment (nIVE) by a conventional user interface (monitor display, keyboard, and mouse). Data were collected by performing DR tasks and having participants complete a prior experience questionnaire, presence questionnaire, and mental rotations test. Findings of the study indicate that IVR does not support an enhanced ability of engineering students to identify mechanisms and understand their functions compared with a conventional user interface.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

design review / virtual environment / virtual reality / mechanism / function

References

[1] Aust M, de Clerk M, Blach R, Dangelmaier M (2011). Towards a holistic workflow pattern for using VR for design decisions: Learning from other disciplines. In: ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, 1463–1470

[2] Banerjee P, Bochenek G M, Ragusa J M (2002). Analyzing the relationship of presence and immersive tendencies on the conceptual design review process. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 2(1): 59–64

[3] Bassanino M, Wu K C, Yao J, Khosrowshahi F, Fernando T, Skjærbæk J (2010). The impact of immersive virtual reality on visualisation for a design review in construction. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Visualisation. IEEE, 585–589

[4] Berg L P, Vance J M (2017). An industry case study: Investigating early design decision making in virtual reality. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 17(1): 011001

[5] Chandrasegaran S K, Ramani K, Sriram R D, Horváth I, Bernard A, Harik R F, Gao W (2013). The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems. Computer-Aided Design, 45(2): 204–228

[6] Chen Q, Weidner R, Vossel S, Weiss P H, Fink G R (2012). Neural mechanisms of attentional reorienting in three-dimensional space. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(39): 13352–13362

[7] Chu C C P, Dani T H, Gadh R (1998). Evaluation of virtual reality interface for product shape designs. IIE Transactions, 30(7): 629–643

[8] Coburn J Q, Freeman I, Salmon J L (2017). A review of the capabilities of current low-cost virtual reality technology and its potential to enhance the design process. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 17(3): 031013

[9] Cruz-Neira C, Sandin D J, DeFanti T A (1993). Surround-screen projection-based virtual reality: The design and implementation of the CAVE. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, 135–142

[10] de Casenave L, Lugo J E (2017). Design review using virtual reality enabled CAD. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2017 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Cleveland: American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, 1–11

[11] Dieter G E, Schmidt L C (2012). Engineering Design. 5th ed. New York: The McGraw-Hill Higher Education

[12] Dunston P S, Arns L L, McGlothlin J D (2010). Virtual reality mock-ups for healthcare facility design and a model for technology hub collaboration. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 3(3): 185–195

[13] Eckert C, Ruckpaul A, Alink T, Albers A (2012). Variations in functional decomposition for an existing product: Experimental results. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 26(2): 107–128

[14] Faas D, Bao Q, Frey D D, Yang M C (2014). The influence of immersion and presence in early stage engineering designing and building. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 28(2): 139–151

[15] Freeman I J, Salmon J L, Coburn J Q (2016). CAD integration in virtual reality design reviews for improved engineering model interaction. In: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection

[16] George P, Kemeny A, Colombet F, Merienne F, Chardonnet J R, Thouvenin I M (2014). Evaluation of smartphone-based interaction techniques in a CAVE in the context of immersive digital project review. In: The Engineering Reality of Virtual Reality. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 9012: 901203

[17] Germani M, Mengoni M, Peruzzini M (2009). Metric-based approach for VR technology evaluation in styling product design. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, 1325–1339

[18] Hannah R, Joshi S, Summers J D (2012). A user study of interpretability of engineering design representations. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(6): 443–468

[19] Hartmann T, Wirth W, Schramm H, Klimmt C, Vorderer P A, Gysbers A, Böcking S, Ravaja N, Laari J, Saari T, Gouveia F R, Sacau A (2015). The Spatial Presence Experience Scale (SPES): A short self-report measure for diverse media settings. Journal of Media Psychology, 28(1): 1–15

[20] Hendrix C, Barfield W (1996). Presence within virtual environments as a function of visual display parameters. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 5(3): 274–289

[21] Heydarian A, Carneiro J P, Gerber D, Becerik-Gerber B, Hayes T, Wood W (2015). Immersive virtual environments versus physical built environments: A benchmarking study for building design and user-built environment explorations. Automation in Construction, 54: 116–126

[22] Hubka V, Eder W E (1988). Theory of Technical Systems: A Total Concept Theory for Engineering Design. Berlin: Springer-Verlag

[23] Hubona G S, Shirah G W, Fout D G (1997). The effects of motion and stereopsis on three-dimensional visualization. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47(5): 609–627

[24] Igroup (2019). Igroup Presence Questionnaire (IPQ)

[25] Kalisperis L N, Muramoto K, Balakrishnan B, Nikolic D, Zikic N (2002). Evaluating relative impact of virtual reality system variables on architectural design comprehension and presence: A variable-centered approach using fractional factorial experiment. In: Proceedings of the 24th Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe). Volos, Greece, 66–73

[26] Lessiter J, Freeman J, Keogh E, Davidoff J (2001). A cross-media presence questionnaire: The ITC-sense of presence inventory. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 10(3): 282–297

[27] Liu Y F, Lather J, Messner J (2014). Virtual reality to support the integrated design process: A retrofit case study. In: International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, 801–808

[28] Lombard M, Ditton T (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2): JCMC321

[29] Lombard M, Ditton T B, Weinstein L (2009). Measuring presence: The temple presence inventory. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Workshop on Presence. Los Angeles, 1–15

[30] Maftei L, Harty C (2016). Challenging design perceptions in immersive virtual reality environments? In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ARCOM Conference, 113–122

[31] Mckenna A F, Chen W, Simpson T W (2008). Exploring the impact of virtual and physical dissection activities on students’ understanding of engineering design principles. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, 359–368

[32] Mengoni M, Peruzzini M, Germani M (2009). The impact of virtual environments on human collaboration in product design. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design—vol. 9, Human Behavior in Design. Palo Alto, CA, 57–68

[33] Newcombe N S, Shipley T F (2015). Thinking about spatial thinking: New typology, new assessments. In: Gero J S, ed. Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity. Dordrecht: Springer, 179–192

[34] Ostergaard K J, Wetmore W, Summers J D (2003). A methodology for the study of the effects of communication method on design review effectiveness. In: Proceedings of ASME 2003 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, 383–390

[35] Paes D, Arantes E, Irizarry J (2017). Immersive environment for improving the understanding of architectural 3D models: Comparing user spatial perception between immersive and traditional virtual reality systems. Automation in Construction, 84: 292–303

[36] Pahl G, Beitz W, Feldhusen J, Grote K H (2007). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach (3rd ed). London: Springer-Verlag

[37] Peters M, Laeng B, Latham K, Jackson M, Zaiyouna R, Richardson C (1995). A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test: Different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain and Cognition, 28(1): 39–58

[38] Rigutti S, Stragà M, Jez M, Baldassi G, Carnaghi A, Miceu P, Fantoni C (2018). Don’t worry, be active: How to facilitate the detection of errors in immersive virtual environments. PeerJ, 6: e5844

[39] Robinson M A (2016). Quantitative research principles and methods for human-focused research in engineering design. In: Cash P, Stanković T, Štorga M, eds. Experimental Design Research: Exploring Complex Design Activity. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 41–64

[40] Satter K, Butler A (2015). Competitive usability analysis of immersive virtual environments in engineering design review. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 15(3): 031001

[41] Satter K M, Butler A C (2012). Finding the value of immersive, virtual environments using competitive usability analysis. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 12(2): 024504

[42] Schnabel M A, Kvan T (2003). Spatial understanding in immersive virtual environments. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 1(4): 435–448

[43] Schubert T, Friedmann F, Regenbrecht H (2001). The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 10(3): 266–281

[44] Slater M, Linakis V, Usoh M, Kooper R (1995). Immersion, presence, and performance in virtual environments: An experiment with tri-dimensional chess. In: Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST). New York: ACM Press, 163–172

[45] Spence M L, Dux P E, Arnold D H (2016). Computations underlying confidence in visual perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(5): 671–682

[46] Stankov L, Kleitman S, Jackson S A (2014). Measures of the trait of confidence. In: Boyle G J, Saklofske D H, Matthews G, eds. Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs. Academic Press, 158–189

[47] Stanney K M, Mourant R R, Kennedy R S (1998). Human factors issues in virtual environments: A review of the literature. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 7(4): 327–351

[48] Steuer J (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4): 73–93

[49] Sutherland I E (1968). A head-mounted three dimensional display. In: Proceedings of the Fall Joint Computer Conference, part I, 757–764

[50] Thimmaiah S, Phelan K, Summers J D (2017). An experimental study on the influence that failure number, specialization, and controls have on confidence in predicting system failures. Journal of Mechanical Design, 139(1): 011102

[51] Vora J, Nair S, Gramopadhye A K, Melloy B J, Medlin E, Duchowski A T, Kanki B G (2001). Using virtual reality technology to improve aircraft inspection performance: Presence and performance measurement studies. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, 45(27): 1867–1871

[52] Wann J, Mon-Williams M (1996). What does virtual reality NEED? Human factors issues in the design of three-dimensional computer environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44(6): 829–847

[53] Watanuki K (2010). Development of virtual reality-based universal design review system. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 24(1): 257–262

[54] Whyte J, Bouchlaghem D, Thorpe T (2002). IT implementation in the construction organization. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 9(5–6): 371–377

[55] Witmer B G, Singer M J (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 7(3): 225–240

[56] Wolfartsberger J (2019). Analyzing the potential of virtual reality for engineering design review. Automation in Construction, 104: 27–37

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press