System dynamics analytical modeling approach for construction project management research: A critical review and future directions

Xiaoxiao XU, Patrick X. W. ZOU

PDF(587 KB)
PDF(587 KB)
Front. Eng ›› 2021, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 17-31. DOI: 10.1007/s42524-019-0091-7
REVIEW ARTICLE
REVIEW ARTICLE

System dynamics analytical modeling approach for construction project management research: A critical review and future directions

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Building and infrastructure construction projects can be viewed as a complex system consisting of many subsystems. Over the last two decades, considerable researches that use system dynamics (SD) as an analytical and modeling approach exist to address construction project management issues. However, only few critical reviews have been conducted to provide an in-depth understanding of SD application in construction project management. Moreover, many studies have failed to apply SD accurately. Therefore, the present study aims to gain an understanding of the current state of play and future directions in applying SD method in construction project management research, by undertaking a comprehensive review of 105 relevant articles published from 1994 to 2018. These articles are analyzed in terms of annual publication rate, key papers and their contribution, critical issues in SD application, and research topics. A significant increase in the number of publications in the last five years has been observed. When applying SD method to model construction system, the following aspects must be carefully considered: Model boundary, model development, model test, and model simulation. In addition, SD has been applied in a wide range of research topics, including (1) sustainable construction; (2) design error, rework, and change management; (3) risk management; (4) resource management; (5) decision making; (6) hybrid modeling; (7) safety management; (8) PPP project; and (9) organization performance. Based on the review findings, this study discusses three future research directions, namely, integration of SD with other methods, uncertainty analysis, and human factor analysis. This study can help researchers gain an in-depth understanding of the critical issues in the application of SD in construction management and the state-of-the-art of SD research.

Keywords

system dynamics / construction management / problem and recommendation / research directions / literature review / human factor

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiaoxiao XU, Patrick X. W. ZOU. System dynamics analytical modeling approach for construction project management research: A critical review and future directions. Front. Eng, 2021, 8(1): 17‒31 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0091-7

References

[1]
Ahmad S, Mat Tahar R, Muhammad-Sukki F, Munir A B, Abdul Rahim R (2016). Application of system dynamics approach in electricity sector modelling: A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56: 29–37
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Akhwanzada S A, Tahar R M (2012). Strategic forecasting of electricity demand using system dynamics approach. International Journal of Environmental Sciences and Development, 3(4): 328–333
[3]
Balci O (1994). Validation, verification, and testing techniques throughout the life cycle of a simulation study. Annals of Operations Research, 53(1): 121–173
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Barlas Y (1996). Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 12(3): 183–210
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Barratt M, Choi T Y, Li M (2011). Qualitative case studies in operations management: Trends, research outcomes, and future research implications. Journal of Operations Management, 29(4): 329–342
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Chen L, Fong P S (2013). Visualizing evolution of knowledge management capability in construction firms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(7): 839–851
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Choudhry R M, Aslam M A, Hinze J W, Arain F M (2014). Cost and schedule risk analysis of bridge construction in Pakistan: Establishing risk guidelines. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(7): 04014020
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Coyle R G (1996). System Dynamics Modelling: A Practical Approach. Boca Raton: CRC Press
[9]
Cui Q, Hastak M, Halpin D (2010). Systems analysis of project cash flow management strategies. Construction Management and Economics, 28(4): 361–376
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Ding Z, Gong W, Li S, Wu Z (2018). System dynamics versus agent-based modeling: A review of complexity simulation in construction waste management. Sustainability, 10(7): 2484–2497
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Fang C, Marle F (2012). A simulation-based risk network model for decision support in project risk management. Decision Support Systems, 52(3): 635–644
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Feng C M, Hsieh C H (2009). Effect of resource allocation policies on urban transport diversity. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 24(7): 525–533
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Guo B H W, Yiu T W, González V A (2015). Identifying behaviour patterns of construction safety using system archetypes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 80: 125–141
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[14]
Han S, Lee S, Peña-Mora F (2012). Identification and quantification of non-value-adding effort from errors and changes in design and construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(1): 98–109
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Han S, Love P, Peña-Mora F (2013). A system dynamics model for assessing the impacts of design errors in construction projects. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 57(9–10): 2044–2053
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Han S, Saba F, Lee S, Mohamed Y, Peña-Mora F (2014). Toward an understanding of the impact of production pressure on safety performance in construction operations. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 68: 106–116
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[17]
Ibrahim Shire M, Jun G T, Robinson S (2018). The application of system dynamics modelling to system safety improvement: Present use and future potential. Safety Science, 106: 104–120
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Jin X, Xu X, Xiang X, Bai Q, Zhou Y (2016). System-dynamic analysis on socio-economic impacts of land consolidation in china. Habitat International, 56: 166–175
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Khan K I A, Flanagan R, Lu S L (2016). Managing information complexity using system dynamics on construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 34(3): 192–204
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Khanzadi M, Nasirzadeh F, Alipour M (2012). Integrating system dynamics and fuzzy logic modeling to determine concession period in BOT projects. Automation in Construction, 22: 368–376
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Lee S (2017). Applying system dynamics to strategic decision making in construction. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 4(1): 35–40
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Lee S, Han S, Peña-Mora F (2009). Integrating construction operation and context in large-scale construction using hybrid computer simulation. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 23(2): 75–83
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Lee S, Peña-Mora F, Park M (2005). Quality and change management model for large scale concurrent design and construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(8): 890–902
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Lee S, Peña-Mora F, Park M (2006a). Web-enabled system dynamics model for error and change management on concurrent design and construction projects. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 20(4): 290–300
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Lee S H, Peña-Mora F, Park M (2006b). Dynamic planning and control methodology for strategic and operational construction project management. Automation in Construction, 15(1): 84–97
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Leveson N, Dulac N, Marais K, Carroll J (2009). Moving beyond normal accidents and high reliability organizations: A systems approach to safety in complex systems. Organization Studies, 30(2–3): 227–249
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Li Y, Taylor T R (2014). Modeling the impact of design rework on transportation infrastructure construction project performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(9): 04014044
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Li Z, Shen G Q, Alshawi M (2014a). Measuring the impact of prefabrication on construction waste reduction: An empirical study in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 91: 27–39
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Li Z, Shen G Q, Xue X (2014b). Critical review of the research on the management of prefabricated construction. Habitat International, 43: 240–249
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Liang X, Shen G Q, Bu S (2016). Multiagent systems in construction: A ten-year review. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 30(6): 04016016
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Lo W, Lin C, Yan M (2007). Contractor’s opportunistic bidding behavior and equilibrium price level in the construction market. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(6): 409–416
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Love P, Holt G D, Shen L Y, Li H, Irani Z (2002). Using systems dynamics to better understand change and rework in construction project management systems. International Journal of Project Management, 20(6): 425–436
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Love P E, Edwards D J, Irani Z (2008). Forensic project management: An exploratory examination of the causal behavior of design-induced rework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(2): 234–247
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Love P E, Mandal P, Li H (1999). Determining the causal structure of rework influences in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 17(4): 505–517
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Mbiti T K, Blismas N, Wakefield R, Lombardo R (2011). System archetypes underlying the problematic behaviour of construction activity in Kenya. Construction Management and Economics, 29(1): 3–13
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Motawa I, Anumba C, Lee S, Peña-Mora F (2007). An integrated system for change management in construction. Automation in Construction, 16(3): 368–377
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Nasirzadeh F, Afshar A, Khanzadi M (2008). Dynamic risk analysis in construction projects. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 35(8): 820–831
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Nasirzadeh F, Mazandaranizadeh H, Rouhparvar M (2016). Quantitative risk allocation in construction projects using cooperative-bargaining game theory. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 14(3): 161–170
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Nasirzadeh F, Nojedehi P (2013). Dynamic modeling of labor productivity in construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 31(6): 903–911
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Ogunlana S O, Li H, Sukhera F A (2003). System dynamics approach to exploring performance enhancement in a construction organization. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(5): 528–536
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Onat N C, Egilmez G, Tatari O (2014). Towards greening the US residential building stock: A system dynamics approach. Building and Environment, 78: 68–80
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Ozcan-Deniz G, Zhu Y (2016). A system dynamics model for construction method selection with sustainability considerations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121: 33–44
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Park M (2005). Model-based dynamic resource management for construction projects. Automation in Construction, 14(5): 585–598
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Park M, Ji S H, Lee H S, Kim W (2009). Strategies for design-build in Korea using system dynamics modeling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11): 1125–1137
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Parvan K, Rahmandad H, Haghani A (2015). Inter-phase feedbacks in construction projects. Journal of Operations Management, 39–40: 48–62
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Peña-Mora F, Li M (2001). Dynamic planning and control methodology for design/build fast-track construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(1): 1–17
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Peña-Mora F, Park M (2001). Dynamic planning for fast-tracking building construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(6): 445–456
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Perrenoud A J, Smithwick J B, Hurtado K C, Sullivan K T (2016). Project risk distribution during the construction phase of small building projects. Journal of Management Engineering, 32(3): 04015050
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Prasertrungruang T, Hadikusumo B (2008). System dynamics modelling of machine downtime for small to medium highway contractors. Engineering, Construction, and Architectural Management, 15(6): 540–561
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Rodrigues A, Bowers J (1996). The role of system dynamics in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 14(4): 213–220
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Senge P M, Forrester J W (1980). Tests for building confidence in system dynamics models. System Dynamics, TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, 14: 209–228
[52]
Shadpour A, Unger A J, Knight M A, Haas C T (2015). Numerical DAE approach for solving a system dynamics problem. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 29(3): 04014054
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Shin M, Lee H S, Park M, Moon M, Han S (2014). A system dynamics approach for modeling construction workers’ safety attitudes and behaviors. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 68: 95–105
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[54]
Sterman J D (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. New York: McGraw-Hill Education
[55]
Tang Y H, Ogunlana S O (2003). Modelling the dynamic performance of a construction organization. Construction Management and Economics, 21(2): 127–136
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Wan S K, Kumaraswamy M, Liu D T (2013). Dynamic modelling of building services projects: A simulation model for real-life projects in the Hong Kong construction industry. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 57(9–10): 2054–2066
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Wang F, Ding L, Love P E, Edwards D J (2016). Modeling tunnel construction risk dynamics: Addressing the production versus protection problem. Safety Science, 87: 101–115
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Wang J, Li Z, Tam V W (2015). Identifying best design strategies for construction waste minimization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 92: 237–247
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Wang J, Yuan H (2016). System dynamics approach for investigating the risk effects on schedule delay in infrastructure projects. Journal of Management Engineering, 33(1): 04016029
[60]
Williams T M (2000). Safety regulation changes during projects: The use of system dynamics to quantify the effects of change. International Journal of Project Management, 18(1): 23–31
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Wing C K (1997). The ranking of construction management journals. Construction Management and Economics, 15(4): 387–398
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Xiong B, Skitmore M, Xia B (2015a). A critical review of structural equation modeling applications in construction research. Automation in Construction, 49: 59–70
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Xiong W, Yuan J F, Li Q, Skibniewski M J (2015b). Performance objective-based dynamic adjustment model to balance the stakeholders’ satisfaction in PPP projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 21(5): 539–547
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Xu X, Wang J, Li C Z, Huang W, Xia N (2018). Schedule risk analysis of infrastructure projects: A hybrid dynamic approach. Automation in Construction, 95: 20–34
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Xu Y, Sun C, Skibniewski M J, Chan A P, Yeung J F, Cheng H (2012). System dynamics (SD)-based concession pricing model for PPP highway projects. International Journal of Project Management, 30(2): 240–251
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Ye G, Yuan H, Shen L, Wang H (2012). Simulating effects of management measures on the improvement of the environmental performance of construction waste management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 62: 56–63
CrossRef Google scholar
[67]
Yuan H (2012). A model for evaluating the social performance of construction waste management. Waste Management, 32(6): 1218–1228
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[68]
Yuan H, Chini A R, Lu Y, Shen L (2012). A dynamic model for assessing the effects of management strategies on the reduction of construction and demolition waste. Waste Management, 32(3): 521–531
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[69]
Yuan H, Shen L (2011). Trend of the research on construction and demolition waste management. Waste Management, 31(4): 670–679
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[70]
Yuan H, Shen L, Hao J J, Lu W (2011). A model for cost-benefit analysis of construction and demolition waste management throughout the waste chain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(6): 604–612
CrossRef Google scholar
[71]
Yuan H, Wang J (2014). A system dynamics model for determining the waste disposal charging fee in construction. European Journal of Operational Research, 237(3): 988–996
CrossRef Google scholar
[72]
Zhang X, Wu Y, Shen L, Skitmore M (2014). A prototype system dynamic model for assessing the sustainability of construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1): 66–76
CrossRef Google scholar
[73]
Zheng X, Le Y, Chan A P, Hu Y, Li Y (2016). Review of the application of social network analysis (SNA) in construction project management research. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7): 1214–1225
CrossRef Google scholar
[74]
Zou P X W, Zhang G, Wang J (2007). Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China. International Journal of Project Management, 25(6): 601–614
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(587 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/