Understanding barriers to BIM implementation: Their impact across organizational levels in relation to BIM maturity

Sander SIEBELINK, Hans VOORDIJK, Maaike ENDEDIJK, Arjen ADRIAANSE

PDF(1553 KB)
PDF(1553 KB)
Front. Eng ›› 2021, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2) : 236-257. DOI: 10.1007/s42524-019-0088-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Understanding barriers to BIM implementation: Their impact across organizational levels in relation to BIM maturity

Author information +
History +

Abstract

This multiple case study of a contracting firm contributes to understanding the barriers that organizations face during the implementation of building information modeling (BIM) by providing insights into the impact of these barriers across different organizational levels (i.e., from top management to project teams) and by relating these barriers to different degrees of BIM maturity. First, we observe the dominance of barriers related to the motivation, competence, and time capacity of people across all levels of an organization. Second, the cluster of barriers at the middle-management level highlights the important role of this level in reducing these barriers. Third, only those cases with a low level of BIM maturity have struggled with lack of top management support, thereby highlighting the importance of such support in achieving BIM maturity growth. High BIM maturity situations are more prone to externally oriented barriers in attempting to further leverage the benefits of BIM. Our study provides insights on where to focus BIM implementation measures and how to enhance organizational BIM maturity.

Keywords

building information modeling / implementation barriers / maturity / organizational levels

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Sander SIEBELINK, Hans VOORDIJK, Maaike ENDEDIJK, Arjen ADRIAANSE. Understanding barriers to BIM implementation: Their impact across organizational levels in relation to BIM maturity. Front. Eng, 2021, 8(2): 236‒257 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0088-2

References

[1]
Adriaanse A, Voordijk H, Dewulf G (2010a). Adoption and use of interorganizational ICT in a construction project. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(9): 1003–1014
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Adriaanse A, Voordijk H, Dewulf G (2010b). The use of interorganisational ICT in United States construction projects. Automation in Construction, 19(1): 73–83
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Arayici Y, Coates P, Koskela L, Kagioglou M, Usher C, O’Reilly K (2011). Technology adoption in the BIM implementation for lean architectural practice. Automation in Construction, 20(2): 189–195
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Arena M, Cross R, Sims J, Uhl-Bien M (2017). How to catalyze innovation in your organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(4): 38–48
[5]
Barbosa F, Woetzel J, Mischke J, Ribeirinho M J, Sridhar M, Parsons M, Bertram N, Brown S (2017). Reinventing construction: A route to higher productivity. New York: McKinsey Global Institute
[6]
Bew M, Underwood J, Wix J, Storer G (2008). Going BIM in a commercial world. In: Zarli A, Scherer R, eds. eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Product and Process Modelling. Sophia Antipolis: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, 139–150
[7]
Cheung S O, Wong P S, Wu A W (2011). Towards an organizational culture framework in construction. International Journal of Project Management, 29(1): 33–44
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Chien K F, Wu Z H, Huang S C (2014). Identifying and assessing critical risk factors for BIM projects: Empirical study. Automation in Construction, 45: 1–15
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Cho J, Trent A (2006). Validity in qualitative research revisited. Qualitative Research, 6(3): 319–340
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
CMMI Product Team (2010). CMMI for development, version 1.3. Technical Report. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
[11]
Cross R, Rebele R, Grant A (2016). Collaborative overload. Harvard Business Review, 94(1): 16
[12]
Duncan R B (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3): 313–327
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Eastman C, Teicholz P, Sacks R, Liston K (2011). BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modelling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers, and Contractors. 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons
[14]
Eisenhardt K M (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532–550
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Gal U, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2008). The dynamics of IT boundary objects, information infrastructures, and organisational identities: The introduction of 3D modelling technologies into the architecture, engineering, and construction industry. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3): 290–304
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Gerbert P, Castagnino S, Rothballer C, Renz A, Filitz R (2016). Digital in Engineering and Construction: The Transformative Power of Building Information Modeling. Boston: The Boston Consulting Group Inc.
[17]
Gioia D A, Corley K G, Hamilton A L (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1): 15–31
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Grilo A, Jardim-Goncalves R (2010). Value proposition on interoperability of BIM and collaborative working environments. Automation in Construction, 19(5): 522–530
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Gu N, London K (2010). Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry. Automation in Construction, 19(8): 988–999
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Guth W D, MacMillan I C (1986). Strategy implementation versus middle management self-interest. Strategic Management Journal, 7(4): 313–327
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Hall P A (2006). Systematic process analysis: When and how to use it. European Management Review, 3(1): 24–31
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Holt D T, Armenakis A A, Feild H S, Harris S G (2007). Readiness for organizational change: The systematic development of a scale. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(2): 232–255
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
International Organization for Standardisation (2015). ISO/IEC 33001: 2015 Information technology—Process assessment—Concepts and terminology. Geneva: ISO/IEC
[24]
Jones R A, Jimmieson N L, Griffiths A (2005). The impact of organizational culture and reshaping capabilities on change implementation success: The mediating role of readiness for change. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2): 361–386
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Kamara J M, Augenbroe G, Anumba C J, Carrillo P M (2002). Knowledge management in the architecture, engineering and construction industry. Construction Innovation, 2(1): 53–67
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Li H, Lu W, Huang T (2009). Rethinking project management and exploring virtual design and construction as a potential solution. Construction Management and Economics, 27(4): 363–371
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Liu S, Xie B, Tivendal L, Liu C (2015). Critical barriers to BIM implementation in the AEC industry. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 7(6): 162–171
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Lockamy III A, McCormack K (2004). The development of a supply chain management process maturity model using the concepts of business process orientation. Supply Chain Management, 9(4): 272–278
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Lu W, Fung A, Peng Y, Liang C, Rowlinson S (2014). Cost-benefit analysis of Building Information Modeling implementation in building projects through demystification of time-effort distribution curves. Building and Environment, 82: 317–327
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
McGraw Hill Construction (2014). The business value of BIM for construction in major global markets: How contractors around the world are driving innovation with Building Information Modeling. SmartMarket Report. New York: McGraw Hill Construction
[31]
Messner J, Kreider R (2013). BIM planning guide for facility owners (version 2.0). Computer Integrated Construction Research Program, Pennsylvania State University
[32]
Miettinen R, Paavola S (2014). Beyond the BIM utopia: Approaches to the development and implementation of building information modeling. Automation in Construction, 43: 84–91
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Myers M D, Newman M (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17(1): 2–26
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
National Institute of Building Sciences (2015). National BIM Standard—United States Version 3. In: Construction Operation Building Information Exchange (COBie). Washington DC: National Institute of Building Sciences, 1–252
[35]
Scandura T A, Williams E A (2000). Research methodology in management: Current practices, trends, and implications for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6): 1248–1264
[36]
Siebelink S, Voordijk J T, Adriaanse A M (2018). Developing and testing a tool to evaluate BIM maturity: Sectoral analysis in the Dutch construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(8): 05018007
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Succar B (2009). Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Automation in Construction, 18(3): 357–375
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Tarakci M, Ateş N Y, Floyd S W, Ahn Y, Wooldridge B (2018). Performance feedback and middle managers’ divergent strategic behavior: The roles of social comparisons and organizational identification. Strategic Management Journal, 39(4): 1139–1162
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Taylor J E, Levitt R (2007). Innovation alignment and project network dynamics: An integrative model for change. Project Management Journal, 38(3): 22–35
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Underwood J, Isikdag U (2009). Handbook of Research on Building Information Modeling and Construction Informatics: Concepts and Technologies. Hershey: IGI Global
[41]
Volk R, Stengel J, Schultmann F (2014). Building Information Modeling (BIM) for existing buildings—Literature review and future needs. Automation in Construction, 38: 109–127
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Whelan-Berry K S, Gordon J R, Hinings C (2003). Strengthening organizational change processes: Recommendations and implications from a multilevel analysis. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(2): 186–207
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Won J, Lee G, Dossick C, Messner J (2013). Where to focus for successful adoption of building information modeling within organization. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(11): 04013014
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Wooldridge B, Schmid T, Floyd S W (2008). The middle management perspective on strategy process: Contributions, synthesis, and future research. Journal of Management, 34(6): 1190–1221
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Yin R K (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.ƒThe images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 The Author(s) 2020. This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1553 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/