Understanding innovation diffusion and adoption strategies in megaproject networks through a fuzzy system dynamic model

Yan ZHANG , His-Hsien WEI , Dong ZHAO , Yilong HAN , Jiayu CHEN

Front. Eng ›› 2021, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 32 -47.

PDF (1279KB)
Front. Eng ›› 2021, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 32 -47. DOI: 10.1007/s42524-019-0082-8
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Understanding innovation diffusion and adoption strategies in megaproject networks through a fuzzy system dynamic model

Author information +
History +
PDF (1279KB)

Abstract

Innovation and knowledge diffusion in megaprojects is one of the most complicated issues in project management. Compared with conventional projects, megaprojects typically entail large-scale investments, long construction periods, and conflicting stakeholder interests, which result in a distinctive pattern of innovation diffusion. However, traditional investigation of innovation diffusion relies on subjective feedback from experts and frequently neglects inter-organizational knowledge creation, which frequently emerges in megaprojects. Therefore, this study adopted project network theory and modeled innovation diffusion in megaprojects as intra- and inter-organizational learning processes. In addition, system dynamics and fuzzy systems were combined to interpret experts’ subject options as quantitative coefficients of the project network model. This integrated model will assist in developing an insightful understanding of the mechanisms of innovation diffusion in megaprojects. Three typical network structures, namely, a traditional megaproject procurement organization (TMO), the environ megaproject organization (EMO), and an integrated megaproject organization (IMO), were examined under six management scenarios to verify the proposed analytic paradigm. Assessment of project network productivity suggested that the projectivity of the TMO was insensitive to technical and administrative innovations, the EMO could achieve substantial improvement from technical innovations, and the IMO trended incompatibly with administrative innovations. Thus, industry practitioners and project managers can design and reform agile project coordination by using the proposed quantitative model to encourage innovation adoption and reduce productivity loss at the start of newly established collaborations.

Keywords

megaproject / innovation adoption / project network / system dynamic / fuzzy logic

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yan ZHANG, His-Hsien WEI, Dong ZHAO, Yilong HAN, Jiayu CHEN. Understanding innovation diffusion and adoption strategies in megaproject networks through a fuzzy system dynamic model. Front. Eng, 2021, 8(1): 32-47 DOI:10.1007/s42524-019-0082-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ackermann F, Eden C, Williams T, Howick S (2007). Systemic risk assessment: A case study. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(1): 39–51

[2]

Alegre J, Chiva R (2008). Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test. Technovation, 28(6): 315–326

[3]

Alin P, Taylor J E, Smeds R (2011). Knowledge transformation in project networks: A speech act level cross-boundary analysis. Project Management Journal, 42(4): 58–75

[4]

Alvanchi A, Lee S, AbouRizk S (2012). Dynamics of working hours in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(1): 66–77

[5]

Ansar A, Flyvbjerg B, Budzier A, Lunn D (2014). Should we build more large dams? The actual costs of hydropower megaproject development. Energy Policy, 69: 43–56

[6]

Carrillo P, Robinson H, Al-Ghassani A, Anumba C (2004). Knowledge management in UK construction: Strategies, resources and barriers. Project Management Journal, 35(1): 46–56

[7]

Chan I Y S, Liu A M M, Fellows R (2014). Role of leadership in fostering an innovation climate in construction firms. Journal of Management Engineering, 30(6): 06014003

[8]

Chang C Y (2013). Understanding the hold-up problem in the management of megaprojects: The case of the Channel Tunnel Rail Link project. International Journal of Project Management, 31(4): 628–637

[9]

Chen H, Su Q, Zeng S, Sun D, Shi J J (2018). Avoiding the innovation island in infrastructure mega-project. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 5(1): 109–124

[10]

Chen J, Taylor J E (2014). Modeling retention loss in project networks: Untangling the combined effect of skill decay and turnover on learning. Journal of Management Engineering, 30(5): 04014017

[11]

Chow L (2005). Incorporating Fuzzy Membership Functions and Gap Analysis Concept into Performance Evaluation of Engineering Consultants. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Hong Kong, China: University of Hong Kong

[12]

Chung J K H, Kumaraswamy M M, Palaneeswaran E (2009). Improving megaproject briefing through enhanced collaboration with ICT. Automation in Construction, 18(7): 966–974

[13]

Damanpour F, Schneider M (2006). Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: Effects of environment, organization and top managers. British Journal of Management, 17(3): 215–236

[14]

Davies A, Gann D, Douglas T (2009). Innovation in megaprojects: Systems integration at London Heathrow Terminal 5. California Management Review, 51(2): 101–125

[15]

Davies A, MacAulay S, DeBarro T, Thurston M (2014). Making innovation happen in a megaproject: London’s crossrail suburban railway system. Project Management Journal, 45(6): 25–37

[16]

de Orue D A O, Taylor J E, Chanmeka A, Weerasooriya R (2009). Robust project network design. Project Management Journal, 40(2): 81–93

[17]

Dietrich P, Eskerod P, Dalcher D, Sandhawalia B (2010). The dynamics of collaboration in multipartner projects. Project Management Journal, 41(4): 59–78

[18]

Dikmen I, Birgonul M T, Artuk S U (2005). Integrated framework to investigate value innovations. Journal of Management in Engineering, 21(2): 81–90

[19]

Dubois A, Gadde L E (2002). The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: Implications for productivity and innovation. Construction Management and Economics, 20(7): 621–631

[20]

Egbu C O (2004). Managing knowledge and intellectual capital for improved organizational innovations in the construction industry: An examination of critical success factors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 11(5): 301–315

[21]

Evans M, Forgues B, van Marrewijk A (2005). Strategies of cooperation: Control and commitment in mega-projects. Management, 8(4): 89

[22]

Fayek A R, Dissanayake M, Campero O (2004). Developing a standard methodology for measuring and classifying construction field rework. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 31(6): 1077–1089

[23]

Fayek A R, Oduba A (2005). Predicting industrial construction labor productivity using fuzzy expert systems. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(8): 938–941

[24]

Ford D N, Voyer J J, Wilkinson J M G (2000). Building learning organizations in engineering cultures: Case study. Journal of Management Engineering, 16(4): 72–83

[25]

Frick K T (2008). The cost of the technological sublime: Daring ingenuity and the new San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge. In: Priemus H, Flyvbjerg B, van Wee B, eds. Decision-Making on Mega-Projects: Cost-Benefit Analysis, Planning and Innovation. Cheltenham, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 239–262

[26]

Gambatese J A, Hallowell M (2011). Factors that influence the development and diffusion of technical innovations in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 29(5): 507–517

[27]

Guikema S D (2009). Infrastructure design issues in disaster-prone regions. Science, 323(5919): 1302–1303

[28]

Harty C (2008). Implementing innovation in construction: Contexts, relative boundedness and actor-network theory. Construction Management and Economics, 26(10): 1029–1041

[29]

Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4): 1008–1015

[30]

Hijazi A M, AbouRizk S M, Halpin D W (1992). Modeling and simulating learning development in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(4): 685–700

[31]

Hosseini M R, Banihashemi S, Martek I, Golizadeh H, Ghodoosi F (2018). Sustainable delivery of megaprojects in Iran: Integrated model of contextual factors. Journal of Management Engineering, 34(2): 05017011

[32]

Hu Y, Chan A P C, Le Y, Jin R (2015). From construction megaproject management to complex project management: Bibliographic analysis. Journal of Management Engineering, 31(4): 04014052

[33]

Hu Y, Chan A P C, Le Y, Xu Y, Shan M (2016). Developing a program organization performance index for delivering construction megaprojects in China: Fuzzy synthetic evaluation analysis. Journal of Management Engineering, 32(4): 05016007

[34]

Javernick-Will A (2012). Motivating knowledge sharing in engineering and construction organizations: Power of social motivations. Journal of Management in Engineering, 28(2): 193–202

[35]

Kardes I, Ozturk A, Cavusgil S T, Cavusgil E (2013). Managing global megaprojects: Complexity and risk management. International Business Review, 22(6): 905–917

[36]

Knight K, Fayek A R (2002). Use of fuzzy logic for predicting design cost overruns on building projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(6): 503–512

[37]

Koskela L J, Vrijhoef R (2001). Is the current theory of construction a hindrance to innovation? Building Research and Information, 29(3): 197–207

[38]

Kramer D, Bigelow P, Vi P, Garritano E, Carlan N, Wells R (2009). Spreading good ideas: A case study of the adoption of an innovation in the construction sector. Applied Ergonomics, 40(5): 826–832

[39]

M A T, Law K H (2009). System dynamic approach for simulation of experience transfer in the AEC industry. Journal of Management Engineering, 25(4): 195–203

[40]

Liu A M M, Chan I Y S (2017a). Critical role of the learning transfer climate in fostering innovation in construction. Journal of Management Engineering, 33(3): 04016050

[41]

Liu A M M, Chan I Y S (2017b). Understanding the interplay of organizational climate and leadership in construction innovation. Journal of Management Engineering, 33(5): 04017021

[42]

Liu H, Wang M, Skibniewski M J, He J, Zhang Z (2014). Identification of critical success factors for construction innovation: From the perspective of strategic cooperation. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 1(2): 202–209

[43]

Lutz J D, Halpin D W, Wilson J R (1994). Simulation of learning development in repetitive construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 120(4): 753–773

[44]

Lyneis J M, Ford D N (2007). System dynamics applied to project management: A survey, assessment, and directions for future research. System Dynamics Review, 23(2–3): 157–189

[45]

McKee D (1992). An organizational learning approach to product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9(3): 232–245

[46]

Mihm J, Loch C, Huchzermeier A (2003). Problem-solving oscillations in complex engineering projects. Management Science, 49(6): 733–750

[47]

Mirchi A, Madani K, Watkins D, Ahmad S (2012). Synthesis of system dynamics tools for holistic conceptualization of water resources problems. Water Resources Management, 26(9): 2421–2442

[48]

Molenaar K R (2005). Programmatic cost risk analysis for highway megaprojects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(3): 343–353

[49]

Newcombe R (2003). From client to project stakeholders: A stakeholder mapping approach. Construction Management and Economics, 21(8): 841–848

[50]

Nikas A, Poulymenakou A, Kriaris P (2007). Investigating antecedents and drivers affecting the adoption of collaboration technologies in the construction industry. Automation in Construction, 16(5): 632–641

[51]

Oliveros A V O, Fayek A R (2005). Fuzzy logic approach for activity delay analysis and schedule updating. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(1): 42–51

[52]

Ozorhon B, Oral K, Demirkesen S (2016). Investigating the components of innovation in construction projects. Journal of Management Engineering, 32(3): 04015052

[53]

Park M, Peña-Mora F (2003). Dynamic change management for construction: Introducing the change cycle into model-based project management. System Dynamics Review, 19(3): 213–242

[54]

Pauget B, Wald A (2013). Relational competence in complex temporary organizations: The case of a French hospital construction project network. International Journal of Project Management, 31(2): 200–211

[55]

Pohlner H (2016). Institutional change and the political economy of water megaprojects: China’s south–north water transfer. Global Environmental Change, 38: 205–216

[56]

Powell W (2003). Neither market nor hierarchy. In: Handel M J, ed. The Sociology of Organizations: Classic, Contemporary, and Critical Readings. London: SAGE Publications, 315: 104–117

[57]

Qi X W, Zhang J L, Liang C Y (2018). Multiple attributes group decision-making approaches based on interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy unbalanced linguistic set and their applications. Complexity, 1–22

[58]

Ross T J (2016). Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons

[59]

Sepasgozar S M E, Davis S R, Loosemore M (2018). Dissemination practices of construction sites’ technology vendors in technology exhibitions. Journal of Management Engineering, 34(6): 04018038

[60]

Shaheen A A, Fayek A R, AbouRizk S M (2007). Fuzzy numbers in cost range estimating. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(4): 325–334

[61]

Shenhar A J (2001). One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science, 47(3): 394–414

[62]

Smyth H (2010). Construction industry performance improvement programmes: The UK case of demonstration projects in the “Continuous Improvement” programme. Construction Management and Economics, 28(3): 255–270

[63]

Sommer S C, Loch C H (2004). Selectionism and learning in projects with complexity and unforeseeable uncertainty. Management Science, 50(10): 1334–1347

[64]

Sterman J D (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. New York: McGraw-Hill Education

[65]

Sterman J D (2001). System dynamics modeling: Tools for learning in a complex world. California Management Review, 43(4): 8–25

[66]

Subramanian A, Nilakanta S (1996). Organizational innovativeness: Exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. Omega, 24(6): 631–647

[67]

Tah J H M, Carr V (2000). A proposal for construction project risk assessment using fuzzy logic. Construction Management and Economics, 18(4): 491–500

[68]

Taylor J E, Levitt R (2007). Innovation alignment and project network dynamics: An integrative model for change. Project Management Journal, 38(3): 22–35

[69]

Taylor J E, Levitt R, Villarroel J A (2009). Simulating learning dynamics in project networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(10): 1009–1015

[70]

Unsal H I, Taylor J E (2011). Absorptive capacity of project networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(11): 994–1002

[71]

Van de Ven A H (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5): 590–607

[72]

van Marrewijk A, Clegg S R, Pitsis T S, Veenswijk M (2008). Managing public-private megaprojects: Paradoxes, complexity, and project design. International Journal of Project Management, 26(6): 591–600

[73]

Wuyts S, Geyskens I (2005). The formation of buyer-supplier relationships: Detailed contract drafting and close partner selection. Journal of Marketing, 69(4): 103–117

[74]

Xu Y, Chan A P C, Yeung J F Y (2010). Developing a fuzzy risk allocation model for PPP projects in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(8): 894–903

[75]

Yeung J F Y, Chan A P C, Chan D W M, Li L K (2007). Development of a partnering performance index (PPI) for construction projects in Hong Kong: A Delphi study. Construction Management and Economics, 25(12): 1219–1237

[76]

Zadeh L A (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3): 338–353

[77]

Zhang L, Wang D, Wang M, Hui N (2016). Influences of technical innovation mode on innovation strategy of energy enterprises. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 3(3): 283–289

[78]

Zhang R, Wang J, Zhu X, Xia M, Yu M (2017). Some generalized Pythagorean fuzzy Bonferroni mean aggregation operators with their application to multiattribute group decision-making. Complexity, 1–16

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1279KB)

7342

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/