Environmental and human health impact assessment of major interior wall decorative materials

Bingqing ZHANG, Ruochen ZENG, Xiaodong LI

PDF(719 KB)
PDF(719 KB)
Front. Eng ›› 2019, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3) : 406-415. DOI: 10.1007/s42524-019-0025-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Environmental and human health impact assessment of major interior wall decorative materials

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Despite the growing interest in green products in the interior wall decorative material market, knowledge gaps exist because determining which product is more environmental and user friendly than the others is difficult. This work assesses the environmental and human health profiles of interior latex and wallpaper. Two interior latex products of different raw material ratios and one non-woven wallpaper product are considered. The environmental impact assessment follows life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology and applies Building Environmental Performance Analysis System (BEPAS). The human health impact is based on impact-pathway chain and is performed using Building Health Impact Analysis System (BHIAS). The assessment scope, associated emissions, and territorial scope of various emissions are defined to facilitate comparison study of interior wall decorative products. The impacts are classified into 15 categories belonging to three safeguard areas: ecological environment, natural resources, and human health. The impacts of categories are calculated and monetized using willingness to pay (WTP) and disability-adjusted life year (DALY) and summarized as an integrated external cost of environmental and human health impacts. Assessment results reveal that the integrated impact of interior latex is lower than that of non-woven wallpaper, and the interior latex of low quality causes low life cycle integrated impact. The most impacted categories are global warming, respiratory effects, and water consumption. Hotspots of product manufacturing are recognized to promote green product design.

Keywords

life cycle assessment / human health impact / integrated assessment / interior wall decorative material / green product

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Bingqing ZHANG, Ruochen ZENG, Xiaodong LI. Environmental and human health impact assessment of major interior wall decorative materials. Front. Eng, 2019, 6(3): 406‒415 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0025-4

References

[1]
Acharya B K, Cao C, Xu M, Khanal L, Naeem S, Pandit S (2018). Present and future of dengue fever in Nepal: mapping climatic suitability by ecological niche model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(2): 187–201
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[2]
Azuma K, Uchiyama I, Uchiyama S, Kunugita N (2016). Assessment of inhalation exposure to indoor air pollutants: screening for health risks of multiple pollutants in Japanese dwellings. Environmental Research, 145: 39–49
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[3]
Barberio G, Scalbi S, Buttol P, Masoni P, Righi S (2014). Combining life cycle assessment and qualitative risk assessment: the case study of alumina nanofluid production. The Science of the Total Environment, 496: 122–131
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[4]
Brandt J, Silver J D, Christensen J H, Andersen M S, Bonlokke J H, Sigsgaard T, Geels C, Gross A, Hansen A B, Hansen K M, Hedegaard G B, Kaas E, Frohn L M (2013a). Assessment of past, present and future health-cost externalities of air pollution in Europe and the contribution from international ship traffic using the EVA model system. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 13(15): 7747–7764
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Brandt J, Silver J D, Christensen J H, Andersen M S, Bonlokke J H, Sigsgaard T, Geels C, Gross A, Hansen A B, Hansen K M, Hedegaard G B, Kaas E, Frohn L M (2013b). Contribution from the ten major emission sectors in Europe and Denmark to the health-cost externalities of air pollution using the EVA model system - An integrated modelling approach. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 13(15): 7725–7746
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Brasche S, Bischof W (2005). Daily time spent indoors in German homes - Baseline data for the assessment of indoor exposure of German occupants. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 208(4): 247–253
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[7]
Bueno C, Hauschild M Z, Rossignolo J A, Ometto A R, Mendes N C (2016). Sensitivity analysis of the use of life cycle impact assessment methods: a case study on building materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112: 2208–2220
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Burnett R T, Pope C A, Ezzati M, Olives C, Lim S S, Mehta S, Shin H H, Singh G, Hubbell B, Brauer M, Anderson H R, Smith K R, Balmes J R, Bruce N G, Kan H, Laden F, Prüss-Ustün A, Turner M C, Gapstur S M, Diver W R, Cohen A (2014). An integrated risk function for estimating the global burden of disease attributable to ambient fine particulate matter exposure. Environmental Health Perspectives, 122(4): 397–403
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[9]
EPLCA (2010). European platform on life cycle assessment, list of tools
[10]
Ferrao J L, Niquisse S, Mendes J M, Painho M (2018). Mapping and modelling malaria risk areas using climate, socio-demographic and clinical variables in Chimoio, Mozambique. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(4): 795–809
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[11]
Furberg A, Arvidsson R, Molander S (2018). Live and let die? Life cycle human health impacts from the use of tire studs. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(8): 1774–1786
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[12]
Im U, Brandt J, Geels C, Hansen K M, Christensen J H, Andersen M S, Solazzo E, Kioutsioukis I, Alyuz U, Balzarini A, Baro R, Bellasio R, Bianconi R, Bieser J, Colette A, Curci G, Farrow A, Flemming J, Fraser A, Jimenez-Guerrero P, Kitwiroon N, Liang C K, Nopmongcol U, Pirovano G, Pozzoli L, Prank M, Rose R, Sokhi R, Tuccella P, Unal A, Vivanco M G, West J, Yarwood G, Hogrefe C, Galmarini S (2018). Assessment and economic valuation of air pollution impacts on human health over Europe and the United States as calculated by a multi-model ensemble in the framework of AQMEII3. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18(8): 5967–5989
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13]
ISO (2006a). Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment- Principles and Framework. London: British Standards Institution
[14]
ISO (2006b). Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment- Requirements and Guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization
[15]
Kong X Q (2010). Research on the health damage assessment model of building during the life cycle. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Beijing: Tsinghua University
[16]
Li X D, Su S, Zhang Z H, Kong X Q (2017). An integrated environmental and health performance quantification model for pre-occupancy phase of buildings in China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 63: 1–11
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Li X D, Zhu Y M, Zhang Z H (2010). An LCA-based environmental impact assessment model for construction processes. Building and Environment, 45(3): 766–775
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Liu R J, Zhang Z H, Zhou L (2011). A comparative study of waterproof material’s life cycle environmental impact. Environmental Pollution & Control, 33(12):103–106
[19]
Ma Y, Cao L, Zhou C H (2011). Environmental impact assessment of typical chemical product using life cycle assessment-based on water-based paint. Environmental Science & Technology, 34: 189–193
[20]
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2016). China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statitics Press (in Chinese)
[21]
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2017). China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statitics Press (in Chinese)
[22]
Sexton K, Adgate J L, Ramachandran G, Pratt G C, Mongin S J, Stock T H, Morandi M T (2004). Comparison of personal, indoor, and outdoor exposures to hazardous air pollutants in three urban communities. Environmental Science & Technology, 38(2): 423–430
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[23]
Shanghai Bureau of Statistics (2017). Shanghai Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statitics Press
[24]
Skaar C, Jorgensen R B (2013). Integrating human health impact from indoor emissions into an LCA: a case study evaluating the significance of the use stage. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18(3): 636–646
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Steen B (2000). A systematic approach to environmental priority strategies in product development (EPS): Version 2000-General System Characteristics. Centre for Environmental Assessment of Products and Material Systems, Gothenburg
[26]
The Danish Environmental Protection Agency (2004). The product, functional unit and reference flows in LCA. Environmental News No. 70
[27]
Tian L W, Zhang G Q, Lin Y L, Yu J H, Zhou J, Zhang Q (2009). Mathematical model of particle penetration through smooth/rough building envelop leakages. Building and Environment, 44(6): 1144–1149
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
US EPA (2008). Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Office of Health and Environmental Assessment
[29]
Weldu Y W, Assefa G, Jolliet O (2017). Life cycle human health and ecotoxicological impacts assessment of electricity production from wood biomass compared to coal fuel. Applied Energy, 187: 564–574
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
WHO (2010). WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Selected Pollutants. Bonn: World Health Organization
[31]
Yang J X, Wang R S, Liu J R (2001). Methodology of life cycle impact assessment for Chinese products. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 21(2): 234–237
[32]
Zhang Y Z, Luo X F, Buis J J, Sutherland J W (2015). LCA-oriented semantic representation for the product life cycle. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86: 146–162
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Zhang Z H, Wu X, Yang X M, Zhu Y M (2006). BEPAS - A life cycle building environmental performance assessment model. Building and Environment, 41(5): 669–675
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(719 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/