Environmental and human health impact assessment of major interior wall decorative materials
Bingqing ZHANG , Ruochen ZENG , Xiaodong LI
Front. Eng ›› 2019, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3) : 406 -415.
Environmental and human health impact assessment of major interior wall decorative materials
Despite the growing interest in green products in the interior wall decorative material market, knowledge gaps exist because determining which product is more environmental and user friendly than the others is difficult. This work assesses the environmental and human health profiles of interior latex and wallpaper. Two interior latex products of different raw material ratios and one non-woven wallpaper product are considered. The environmental impact assessment follows life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology and applies Building Environmental Performance Analysis System (BEPAS). The human health impact is based on impact-pathway chain and is performed using Building Health Impact Analysis System (BHIAS). The assessment scope, associated emissions, and territorial scope of various emissions are defined to facilitate comparison study of interior wall decorative products. The impacts are classified into 15 categories belonging to three safeguard areas: ecological environment, natural resources, and human health. The impacts of categories are calculated and monetized using willingness to pay (WTP) and disability-adjusted life year (DALY) and summarized as an integrated external cost of environmental and human health impacts. Assessment results reveal that the integrated impact of interior latex is lower than that of non-woven wallpaper, and the interior latex of low quality causes low life cycle integrated impact. The most impacted categories are global warming, respiratory effects, and water consumption. Hotspots of product manufacturing are recognized to promote green product design.
life cycle assessment / human health impact / integrated assessment / interior wall decorative material / green product
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
EPLCA (2010). European platform on life cycle assessment, list of tools |
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
ISO (2006a). Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment- Principles and Framework. London: British Standards Institution |
| [14] |
ISO (2006b). Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment- Requirements and Guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization |
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2016). China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statitics Press (in Chinese) |
| [21] |
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2017). China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statitics Press (in Chinese) |
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
Shanghai Bureau of Statistics (2017). Shanghai Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statitics Press |
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
The Danish Environmental Protection Agency (2004). The product, functional unit and reference flows in LCA. Environmental News No. 70 |
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
US EPA (2008). Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Office of Health and Environmental Assessment |
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
WHO (2010). WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Selected Pollutants. Bonn: World Health Organization |
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
Higher Education Press
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |