Effects of design parameters on rooftop photovoltaic economics in the urban environment: A case study in Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

Many researchers found high potential of adopting building photovoltaic (PV) systems in urban areas, especially on building rooftop, to improve the sustainability of urban environment. However, the optimal energy output performance and economic benefit of the PV system are affected by the usable roof area, PV array layout, and shading effect considering high city density. This study aims to understand the effects of these design parameters in the urban environment of rooftop PV’s economic performance. This study carries out a case study in the urban area of Melbourne with 90 PV designs under three shading conditions to generate 270 scenarios. Through a lifecycle cost-benefit analysis, including net present value (NPV), NPV per kW, internal return rate (IRR), and payback year, the results can help in developing a comprehensive understanding of the economic performance of rooftop PV designs that cover most of the urban areas of Melbourne. The optimal PV design scenarios for the urban environment are identified, thereby providing investors and industry professionals with useful information on value-for-money PV design. Meanwhile, the maximum shading loss that makes the PV systems financially unfeasible is investigated, and design scenarios with greatest ability to sustain the shading effect are identified. This research can also support the policy makers’ decision on the development and deployment of the roof PV systems in urban planning.

Keywords

building photovoltaics / tilt and azimuth / orientation / shading analysis / economic analysis

References

[1] Australian Energy Market Commission (2018). 2018 residential electricity price trends review. 2018-8-15

[2] Australian Energy Regulator (2017). State of the Energy Market-May 2017. Performance Report

[3] Bakirci K (2012). General models for optimum tilt angles of solar panels: Turkey case study. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(8): 6149–6159

[4] Bana S, Saini R P (2017). Experimental investigation on power output of different photovoltaic array configurations under uniform and partial shading scenarios. Energy, 127: 438–453

[5] Bhattacharya P, Dey S, Mustaphi B (2014). Some analytical studies on the performance of grid connected solar photovoltaic system with different parameters. Procedia Materials Science, 6: 1942–1950

[6] Chang Y P (2010). Optimal the tilt angles for photovoltaic modules in Taiwan. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 32(9): 956–964

[7] City of Melbourne (2012). Thematic history: a history of the city of Melbourne’s urban environment.

[8] Clean Energy Council (2009). Grid-Connected PV Systems System Design Guidelines for Accredited Designers

[9] Compagnon R (2004). Solar and daylight availability in the urban fabric. Energy and Building, 36(4): 321–328

[10] Deline C, Meydbray J, Donovan M, Forrest J (2012). Photovoltaic Shading Testbed for Module-Level Power Electronics. NREL Technical Report 5200-54876. Golden: National Renewable Energy Laboratory

[11] Freitas S, Reinhart C, Brito M C (2018). Minimizing storage needs for large scale photovoltaics in the urban environment. Solar Energy, 159: 375–389

[12] Frontini F, Bouziri S M, Corbellini G, Medici V (2016). S.M.O solution: an innovative design approach to optimize the output of BIPV systems located in dense urban environments. Energy Procedia, 91: 945–953

[13] Horn B (2011). Maximizing Performance: Determining the Relative Influence of Key Design Elements on the Performance Grid Connected Solar Photovoltaic Systems in Geraldton, Western Australia. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Perth: Murdoch University

[14] Jafarkazemi F, Saadabadi S A (2013). Optimum tilt angle and orientation of solar surfaces in Abu Dhabi, UAE. Renewable Energy, 56: 44–49

[15] Jantsch M, Stoll M, Roth W, Kaiser R, Schmidt H, Schmid J (1991). The effect of tilt angle and voltage conditions on PV system performance an experimental investigation. In: Luque A, Sala G, Palz W, Dos Santos G, Helm P, eds. Tenth E.C. Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference. Dordrecht: Springer, 431–434

[16] Kaddoura T O, Ramli M A M, Al-Turki Y A (2016). On the estimation of the optimum tilt angle of PV panel in Saudi Arabia. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65: 626–634

[17] Khahro S F, Tabbassum K, Talpur S, Alvi M B, Liao X, Dong L (2015). Evaluation of solar energy resources by establishing empirical models for diffuse solar radiation on tilted surface and analysis for optimum tilt angle for a prospective location in southern region of Sindh, Pakistan. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 64: 1073–1080

[18] Loulas N M, Karteris M M, Pilavachi P A, Papadopoulos A M (2012). Photovoltaics in urban environment: a case study for typical apartment buildings in Greece. Renewable Energy, 48: 453–463

[19] Melius J, Margolis R, Ong S (2013). Estimating Rooftop Suitability for PV: A Review of Methods, Patents, and Validation Techniques. NREL Technical Report 6A20-60593. Golden: National Renewable Energy Laboratory

[20] Mohajeri N, Upadhyay G, Gudmundsson A, Assouline D, Kämpf J, Scartezzini J L (2016). Effects of urban compactness on solar energy potential. Renewable Energy, 93: 469–482

[21] Mondol J D, Yohanis Y G, Norton B (2007). The impact of array inclination and orientation on the performance of a grid-connected photovoltaic system. Renewable Energy, 32(1): 118–140

[22] National Centers for Environmental Information (2018). Magnetic declination. 2018-6-2

[23] Nguyen H T, Pearce J M (2012). Incorporating shading losses in solar photovoltaic potential assessment at the municipal scale. Solar Energy, 86(5): 1245–1260

[24] NREL (2018). PVWatts calculator. 2018-5-20

[25] Office of Best Practice Regulation (2016). Cost-benefit analysis guidance note. 2018-6-2

[26] Redweik P, Catita C, Brito M (2013). Solar energy potential on roofs and facades in an urban landscape. Solar Energy, 97: 332–341

[27] Rowlands I H, Kemery B P, Beausoleil-Morrison I (2011). Optimal solar-PV tilt angle and azimuth: an Ontario (Canada) case-study. Energy Policy, 39(3): 1397–1409

[28] Sarralde J J, Quinn D J, Wiesmann D, Steemers K (2015). Solar energy and urban morphology: scenarios for increasing the renewable energy potential of neighbourhoods in London. Renewable Energy, 73: 10–17

[29] Singh R, Banerjee R (2016). Impact of solar panel orientation on large scale rooftop solar photovoltaic scenario for Mumbai. Energy Procedia, 90: 401–411

[30] State Government of Victoria (2018). Victorian feed-in tariff. 2018-6-2

[31] Talebizadeh P, Mehrabian M A, Abdolzadeh M (2011). Prediction of the optimum slope and surface azimuth angles using the genetic algorithm. Energy and Building, 43(11): 2998–3005

[32] University of Melbourne (2008). Grid plan. 2018-6-1

[33] Wijeratne W M P U, Yang R J, Too E, Wakefield R (2018). Design and development of distributed solar PV systems: do the current tools work? Sustainable Cities and Society, 45: 553–578

[34] Wong M S, Zhu R, Liu Z, Lu L, Peng J, Tang Z, Lo C H, Chan W K (2016). Estimation of Hong Kong’s solar energy potential using GIS and remote sensing technologies. Renewable Energy, 99: 325–335

[35] Woyte A, Nijs J, Belmans R (2003). Partial shadowing of photovoltaic arrays with different system configurations: literature review and field test results. Solar Energy, 74(3): 217–233

[36] Yang R J, Carre A (2018). A feasibility study and assessment: distributed solar system in high-density areas. In: Rajagopalan P, Andamon M M, Moore T, eds. Energy Performance in the Australian Built Environment. Singapore: Springer, 167–181

[37] Zomer C, Nobre A, Reindl T, Rüther R (2016). Shading analysis for rooftop BIPV embedded in a high-density environment: a case study in Singapore. Energy and Building, 121: 159–164

[38] Zomer C, Nobre A, Yang D, Reindl T, Rüther R (2014). Performance analysis for BIPV in high-rise, high-density cities: a case study in Singapore. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, Kyoto, Japan, 1151–1152

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press