A global carbon market?

Michael G. POLLITT

PDF(337 KB)
PDF(337 KB)
Front. Eng ›› 2019, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 5-18. DOI: 10.1007/s42524-019-0011-x
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A global carbon market?

Author information +
History +

Abstract

This paper explores the prospects for a global carbon market as the centerpiece of any serious attempt to reach the ambitious goal for greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions set by climate scientists. My aim is to clarify the extent to which we know what policy might best support global decarbonisation. We begin by discussing what we might mean by a global carbon market and its theoretical properties. We then go on to discuss the EU Emissions Trading System experience and the recent experience with the Australian carbon tax. Next, we assess recent carbon market initiatives in the US and in China. My argument is that while establishing the amount of emissions required and dividing it up acceptably between countries requires an enormous scientific and international negotiations effort, the economic instruments to deliver the agreed targets are readily at hand.

Keywords

carbon market / carbon tax / EU ETS

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Michael G. POLLITT. A global carbon market?. Front. Eng, 2019, 6(1): 5‒18 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0011-x

References

[1]
Allen M, Frame D, Huntingford C, Jones C D, Lowe J A, Meinshausen M, Meinshausen N (2009). Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature, 458: 1163–1166
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Boasson E L, Wettestad J (2013). EU Climate Policy: Industry, Policy Interaction and External Environment. Farnham: Ashgate
[3]
Boyd R, Turner J C, Ward B (2015). Intended nationally determined contributions: What are the implications for greenhouse gas emissions in 2030? Policy Paper, ESRC Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment
[4]
BP (2017). BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2017. London: BP
[5]
Carson E, Kreilis J (2015). Legal Challenges to Clean Power Plan Create Uncertainties for Utilities. Policy Brief. Enerknol Research. https://enerknol.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/EKR-EM-Clean-Power-Plan-Legal-Challenges-11-2-2015.pdf
[6]
Cramton P, Ockenfels A, Stoft S (2015). An international carbon-price commitment promotes co-operation. Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy, 4(2): 51–64
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Elgie S, McClay J (2013). BC’s carbon tax shift is working well after four years (Attention Ottawa). Canadian Public Policy, 39(Supplement 2): S1–S10
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Ellerman D, Convery F J, De Perthuis C (2010). Pricing Carbon: The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
[9]
Environmental Protection Agency (2014). Regulatory impact analysis for the proposed carbon pollution guidelines for existing power plants and emission standards for modified and reconstructed power plants. Washington D.C.: EPA
[10]
Environmental Protection Agency (2015). Carbon pollution emission guidelines for existing stationary sources: Electric utility generating units; Final rule. Federal Register, 80(205): 64661–65120
[11]
European Commission (1992). Proposal for a council directive introducing a tax on carbon dioxide emissions and energy. COM(92) 226 final, Brussels: European Commission
[12]
Frankfurt School-UNEP Centre/BNEF (2018). Global trends in renewable energy investment 2018, UNEP and BNEF
[13]
Gollier C, Tirole J (2015). Negotiating effective institutions against climate change. Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy, 4(2): 5–27
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Goulder L H, Schein A R (2013). Carbon taxes versus cap and trade: a critical review. Climate Change Economics (Singapore), 4(3): 1–28
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Grubb M, Newbery D (2008). Pricing carbon for electricity generation: national and international dimensions. In Grubb M, Jamasb T, Pollitt M (eds.), Delivering a Low Carbon Electricity System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 278–332
[16]
Hope C, Newbery D (2008). Calculating the social cost of carbon. In Grubb M, Jamasb T, Pollitt M (eds.), Delivering a Low Carbon Electricity System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 31–63
[17]
IEA (2015), World Energy Outlook 2015. Paris: OECD
[18]
IEA (2017a), Key World Energy Statistics. Paris: OECD
[19]
IEA (2017b), World Energy Outlook 2017. Paris: OECD
[20]
IPCC (2014), Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. Summary for Policy Makers, Geneva: IPCC King D, Browne J, Layard R, O’Donnell G, Rees M, Stern N, Turner A (undated). A global Apollo Programme to combat climate change. London: LSE Centre for Economic Performance
[21]
Meadows D, Slingenberg Y, Zapfel P (2015). EU ETS: Pricing carbon to drive cost-effective reductions across Europe. In Delbeke, J. and Vis, P. (eds.), EU Climate Policy Explained. London: Routledge, 29–60
[22]
National Development and Reform Commission (2013). Market Readiness Proposal (MRP): Establishing a national emission trading scheme in China. Beijing: NDRC
[23]
Neuhoff K, Ismer R (2007). Border Tax Adjustment: A feasible way to support stringent emission trading. European Journal of Law and Economics, 24(2): 137–164
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Olivier J G J, Schure K M, Peters J A H W (2017). Trends in global CO2 and total greenhouse gas emissions: 2017 Report. PBL Netherlands Environmental
[25]
Palmer K (2014). Climate regulation in the United States. IAEE New York
[26]
Robson A (2014). Australia’s carbon tax: An economic evaluation. Journal of Economic Affairs, 34(1): 35–45
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Schmalensee R, Stavins R N (2017). Lessons learned from three decades of experience with cap-and-trade. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(1): 59–79
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Sinn H W (2008). Public policies against global warming. International Tax and Public Finance, 15(4): 360–394
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Smith S (1998). Environmental and public finance aspects of the taxation of energy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14(4): 64–83
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Stern N (2008). The economics of climate change. American Economic Review, 98(2): 1–37
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Stiglitz J (2015). Overcoming the Copenhagen failure with more flexible commitments. Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy, 4(2): 29–36
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate (2014). Better growth, better climate: The new climate economy report. The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate
[33]
Tuerk A, Mehling M, Flachsland C, Sterk W (2011). Linking carbon markets: concepts, case studies and pathways. Climate Policy, 9(4): 341–357
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Weitzman M (1974). Prices vs. quantities. Review of Economic Studies, 41(4): 477–491
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Weitzman M (2015). Internalising the climate externality: Can a uniform price commitment help? Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy, 4(2): 37–50
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
World Bank (2014). State and trends of carbon pricing. Washington DC: Ecofys, World Bank
[37]
World Bank World Bank (2015). State and trends of carbon pricing. Washington DC: Ecofys, World Bank
[38]
World Bank (2016). State and trends of carbon pricing. Washington DC: Ecofys, Vivid Economics, World Bank
[39]
World Bank (2017). State and trends of carbon pricing. Washington DC: Ecofys, Vivid Economics, World Bank
[40]
World Economic Forum and Bain Consulting (2015). The Future of Electricity: Attracting investment to build tomorrow’s electricity sector. Geneva: World Economic Forum
[41]
World Resources Institute (2018). CAIT-Historical Emissions Data (Countries, U.S. States, UNFCCC). http://www.wri.org/resources/data-sets/cait-historical-emissions-data-countries-us-states-unfccc
[42]
Xiong L, Shen B, Shaozhou Q, Price L (2015). Assessment of Allowance Mechanism in China’s Carbon Trading Pilots. Energy Procedia, 75: 2510–2015
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Zhang Z (2015). Carbon emissions trading in China: Features and compliance of pilots and their transition to a nationwide scheme. Review of Environment, Energy and Economics (Re3), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2634916

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Michael Mehling, three anonymous referees, the editors of this special issue and various seminar audiences for their comments and encouragement. He acknowledges the financial support of MIT CEEPR. The usual disclaimer applies.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 The Author(s) 2019, July/2019
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(337 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/