Internal incentives and operations strategies for the water-saving supply chain with cap-and-trade regulation

Zhisong CHEN , Li FANG , Huimin WANG

Front. Eng ›› 2019, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 87 -101.

PDF (914KB)
Front. Eng ›› 2019, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 87 -101. DOI: 10.1007/s42524-019-0006-7
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Internal incentives and operations strategies for the water-saving supply chain with cap-and-trade regulation

Author information +
History +
PDF (914KB)

Abstract

Faced with the rapid development of modern industries of agriculture, manufacturing, and services, water resources are becoming increasingly scarce. Industries with high water consumption are generally regulated by the government’s water cap-and-trade (CAT) regulation to solve the contradiction between the limited water supply and the rapid growing water demand. Supply chain equilibrium and coordination models under the benchmark scenario without water saving and CAT regulation, water-saving supply chain equilibrium and coordination models under the scenario without/with CAT regulation are developed, analyzed and compared. The corresponding numerical and sensitivity analyses for all models are conducted and compared, and the managerial insights and policy recommendations are summarized in this article. The results indicate that (1) Conducting water saving could improve effectively the operational performance of the water-saving supply chain under the scenario without/with CAT regulation. (2) The coordination strategy based on the revenue sharing contract could efficiently coordinate the water-saving supply chain, enhance water consumption reduction rate, and improve the operational performance of the water-saving supply chain. (3) The implementation of CAT regulation enhances effectively water-consumption-reduction in the water-saving supply chain and improves the operational performance of water-saving supply chain. (4) Simultaneous implementation of CAT regulation by the government and adopting coordination strategy by the water-saving supply chain would be superior to any other scenarios/strategies. (5) A suitable water cap based on the industrial average water consumption and historical water consumption data are beneficial for constructing reasonable and effective incentive mechanism. (6) A higher marginal trade price could induce more reduction in water consumption and create better operational performance for the manufacturer and water-saving supply chain, both under the equilibrium and coordination strategies.

Keywords

water-saving supply chain / equilibrium / coordination / internal incentive / cap and trade regulation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhisong CHEN, Li FANG, Huimin WANG. Internal incentives and operations strategies for the water-saving supply chain with cap-and-trade regulation. Front. Eng, 2019, 6(1): 87-101 DOI:10.1007/s42524-019-0006-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Campisano A, D’Amico G, Modica C (2017). Water saving and cost analysis of large-scale implementation of domestic rain water harvesting in minor Mediterranean Islands. Water (Basel), 9(12): 1–14

[2]

Gao H, Wei T, Lou I, Yang Z, Shen Z, Li Y (2014). Water saving effect on integrated water resource management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 93: 50–58

[3]

Gilg A, Barr S (2006). Behavioural attitudes towards water saving? Evidence from a study of environmental actions. Ecological Economics, 57(3): 400–414

[4]

Hu Y, Moiwo J P, Yang Y, Han S, Yang Y (2010). Agricultural water-saving and sustainable groundwater management in Shijiazhuang Irrigation District, North China Plain. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 393(3–4): 219–232

[5]

Ji J, Zhang Z, Yang L (2017). Comparisons of initial carbon allowance allocation rules in an O2O retail supply chain with the cap-and-trade regulation. International Journal of Production Economics, 187: 68–84

[6]

Khatib J M (2015). Energy, Environmental & Sustainable Ecosystem Development: International Conference on Energy, Environmental & Sustainable Ecosystem Development (EESED 2015). Singapore: World Scientific

[7]

Liu H, Guo J, He W (2014). The research on subject behavioral risk of whole life-cycle water conservation projects. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 1(4): 348–352

[8]

Lu Y, Shang C (2014). The environmental impact of the three gorges project and the countermeasures. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 1(2): 120–128

[9]

Luckmann J, Grethe H, McDonald S (2016). When water saving limits recycling: Modelling economy-wide linkages of wastewater use. Water Research, 88: 972–980

[10]

Monaco F, Sali G, Hassen M B, Facchi A, Romani M, Valè G (2016). Water management options for rice cultivation in a temperate area: A multi-objective model to explore economic and water saving results. Water (Basel), 8(8): 1–21

[11]

Nikouei A, Zibaei M, Ward F A (2012). Incentives to adopt irrigation water saving measures for wetlands preservation: An integrated basin scale analysis. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 464–465: 216–232

[12]

Novak J, Melenhorst M, Micheel I, Pasini C, Fraternali P, Rizzoli A E (2018). Integrating behavioural change and gamified incentive modelling for stimulating water saving. Environmental Modelling & Software, 102: 120–137

[13]

Ørum J E, Boesen M V, Jovanovic Z, Pedersen S M (2010). Farmers’ incentives to save water with new irrigation systems and water taxation–A case study of Serbian potato production. Agricultural Water Management, 98(3): 465–471

[14]

Peterson J M, Ding Y (2005). Economic adjustments to groundwater depletion in the high plains: Do water-saving irrigation systems save water? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(1): 147–159

[15]

Shang H, Zhou S, Zhang L (2008). Circular Economy Development Evaluation and Policy Design. Beijing: China Financial & Economic Publishing House

[16]

Varouchakis E A, Apostolakis A, Siaka M, Vasilopoulos K, Tasiopoulos A (2018). Alternatives for domestic water tariff policy in the municipality of Chania, Greece, toward water saving using game theory. Water Policy, 20(1): 175–188

[17]

WWAP (United Nations World Water Assessment Programme) (2015). The United Nations World Water Development Report 2015: Water for a Sustainable World. Paris: UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization)

[18]

Xie G (2015). Modelling decision processes of a green supply chain with regulation on energy saving level. Computers & Operations Research, 54: 266–273

[19]

Xin B, Sun M (2018). A differential oligopoly game for optimal production planning and water savings. European Journal of Operational Research, 269(1): 206–217

[20]

Xu X, He P, Hao X, Zhang Q (2017). Supply chain coordination with green technology under cap-and-trade regulation. International Journal of Production Economics, 183: 433–442

[21]

Xu X, Zhang W, He P, Xu X (2017). Production and pricing problems in make-to-order supply chain with cap-and-trade regulation. Omega, 66: 248–257

[22]

Yi Y, Li J (2018). Cost-Sharing contracts for energy saving and emissions reduction of a supply chain under the conditions of government subsidies and a carbon tax. Sustainability, 10(3): 895

[23]

Zhang D, Guo P (2016). Integrated agriculture water management optimization model for water saving potential analysis. Agricultural Water Management, 170: 5–19

[24]

Zhou L, Xu K, Cheng X, Xu Y, Jia Q (2017). Study on optimizing production scheduling for water-saving in textile dyeing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141: 721–727

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (914KB)

3420

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/