Multi-objective allocation of measuring system based on binary particle swarm optimization

Khalil Gorgani FIROUZJAH, Abdolreza SHEIKHOLESLAMI, Taghi BARFOROUSHI

Front. Electr. Electron. Eng. ›› 2012, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4) : 399-415.

PDF(787 KB)
PDF(787 KB)
Front. Electr. Electron. Eng. ›› 2012, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4) : 399-415. DOI: 10.1007/s11460-012-0213-z
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Multi-objective allocation of measuring system based on binary particle swarm optimization

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Due to the size and complexity of power network and the cost of monitoring and telecommunication equipment, it is unfeasible to monitor the whole system variables. All system analyzers use voltages and currents of the network. Thus, monitoring scheme plays a main role in system analysis, control, and protection. To monitor the whole system using distributed measurements, strategic placement of them is needed. This paper improves a topological circuit observation method to minimize essential monitors. Besides the observability under normal condition of power networks, the observability of abnormal network is considered. Consequently, a high level of system reliability is carried out. In terms of reliability constraint, identification of bad measurement data in a given measurement system by making theme sure to be detectable is well done. Furthermore, it is maintained by a certain level of reliability against the single-line outages. Thus, observability is satisfied if all possible single line outages are plausible. Consideration of these limitations clears the role of utilizing an optimization algorithm. Hence, particle swarm optimization (PSO) is used to minimize monitoring cost and removing unobservable states under abnormal condition, simultaneously. The algorithm is tested in IEEE 14 and 30-bus test systems and Iranian (Mazandaran) Regional Electric Company.

Keywords

optimal allocation / phasor measurement units / observability / binary particle swarm optimization

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Khalil Gorgani FIROUZJAH, Abdolreza SHEIKHOLESLAMI, Taghi BARFOROUSHI. Multi-objective allocation of measuring system based on binary particle swarm optimization. Front Elect Electr Eng, 2012, 7(4): 399‒415 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11460-012-0213-z

References

[1]
Bollen M H J. Understanding Power Quality previous Problems: Voltage Sags and Interruptions. Wiley-IEEE Press, 2000
[2]
Ahmadi Y, Alinejad-Beromi Y, Moradi M. Optimal PMU placement for power system observability using binary particle swarm optimization and considering measurement redundancy. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(6): 7263-7269
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Sodhi R, Srivastava S C, Singh S N. Optimal PMU placement method for complete topological and numerical observability of power system. Electric Power Systems Research, 2010, 80(9): 1154-1159
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Chakrabarti S, Kyriakides E. Optimal placement of phasor measurement units for power system observability. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2008, 23(3): 1433-1440
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Won D J, Moon S I. Optimal number and locations of power quality monitors considering system topology. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2008, 23(1): 288-295
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Abur A, Gómez A E. Power System State Estimation: Theory and Implementation. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2004
[7]
Rakpenthai C, Premrudeepreechacharn S, Uatrongjitb S, Watson N R. Measurement placement for power system state estimation using decomposition technique. Electric Power Systems Research, 2005, 75(1): 41-49
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Phadke A G, Thorp J S. Synchronized Phasor Measurements and Their Application. New York: Springer, 2008
[9]
Korres G N, Manousakis N M. State estimation and bad data processing for systems including PMU and SCADA measurements. Electric Power Systems Research, 2011, 81(7): 1514-1524
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Jabr R A. Power system state estimation using an iteratively reweighted least squares method for sequential L1-regression. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2006, 28(2): 86-92
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Eldery M A, El-Saadany E F, Salama M M A, Vannelli A. A novel power quality monitoring allocation algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2006, 21(2): 768-777
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Chen J, Abur A. Placement of PMUs to enable bad data detection in state estimation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2006, 21(4): 1608-1615
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Xu B, Abur A. Observability analysis and measurement placement for systems with PMUs. In: Proceedings of IEEE Power System Conference and Exposition. 2004, 2: 943-946
[14]
Yang X, Zhang X P, Zhou S Y. Coordinated algorithms for distributed state estimation with synchronized phasor measurements. Applied Energy, 2012, 96: 253-260
[15]
Milosevic B, Begovic M. Non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for optimal phasor measurement placement. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2003, 18(1): 69-75
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Kennedy J, Eberhart R C. A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 1997, 5: 4104-4109
[17]
Gomez M, Lopez A, Jurado F. Optimal placement and sizing from standpoint of the investor of photovoltaics grid-connected systems using binary particle swarm optimization. Applied Energy, 2010, 87(6): 1911-1918
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Engelbrecht A P. Computational Intelligence: An Introduction. John Wiley and Sons, 2007, ch. 16: 289-358

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
PDF(787 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/