Maximal terminal region approach for MPC using subsets sequence

Yafeng WANG, Fuchun SUN, Huaping LIU, Dongfang YANG

Front. Electr. Electron. Eng. ›› 2012, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2) : 270-278.

PDF(327 KB)
PDF(327 KB)
Front. Electr. Electron. Eng. ›› 2012, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2) : 270-278. DOI: 10.1007/s11460-012-0178-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Maximal terminal region approach for MPC using subsets sequence

Author information +
History +

Abstract

For the sake of enlarging the domain of attraction of model predictive control (MPC), a novel approach of gradually approximating the maximal terminal state region is proposed in this paper. Given the terminal cost, both surrounding set sequence and subsets sequence of the maximal terminal region were constructed by employing one-step set expansion iteratively. It was theoretically proved that when the iteration time goes to infinity, both the surrounding set sequence and the subsets sequence will converge to the maximal terminal region. All surrounding and subsets sets in these sequences are extracted from the state space by exploiting support vector machine (SVM) classifier. Finally, simulations are implemented to validate the effectiveness of this approach.

Keywords

model predictive control (MPC) / terminal region / domain of attraction / support vector machine (SVM)

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yafeng WANG, Fuchun SUN, Huaping LIU, Dongfang YANG. Maximal terminal region approach for MPC using subsets sequence. Front Elect Electr Eng, 2012, 7(2): 270‒278 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11460-012-0178-y

References

[1]
Mayne D Q, Rawlings J B, Rao C V, Scokaert P O M. Constrained model predictive control: Stability and optimality. Automatica, 2000, 36(6): 789-814
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
González A H, Odloak D. Enlarging the domain of attraction of stable MPC controllers, maintaining the output performance. Automatica, 2009, 45(4): 1080-1085
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Magni L, De Nicolao G, Magnani L, Scattolini R. A stabilizing model based predictive control algorithm for nonlinear systems. Automatica, 2001, 37(9): 1351-1362
[4]
Chen H, Allgower F. A quasi-infinite horizon nonlinear model predictive control scheme with guaranteed stability. Automatica, 1998, 34(10): 1205-1217
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Cannon M, Deshmukh V, Kouvaritakis B. Nonlinear model predictive control with polytopic invariant sets. Automatica, 2003, 39(8): 1487-1494
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
De Doná J A, Seron M M, Mayne D Q, Goodwin G C. Enlarged terminal sets guaranteeing stability of receding horizon control. Systems & Control Letters, 2002, 47(1): 57-63
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Ong C J, Sui D, Gilbert E G. Enlarging the terminal region of nonlinear model predictive control using the support vector machine method. Automatica, 2006, 42(6): 1011-1016
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Limon D, Alamo T, Salas F, Camacho E F. On the stability of constrained MPC without terminal constraint. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2006, 51(5): 832-836
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Limon D, Alamo T, Camacho E F. Enlarging the domain of attraction of MPC controllers. Automatica, 2005, 41(4): 629-635
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Burges C C. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1998, 2(2): 121-167
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Vapnik V. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. New York: Springer, 1995
[12]
Wang Y F, Sun F C, Zhang Y A, Liu H P, Min H B. Getting a suitable terminal cost and maximizing the terminal region for MPC. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2010, 2010: 1-16

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
PDF(327 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/