Stochastic systems simulation optimization

Chun-Hung CHEN, Leyuan SHI, Loo Hay LEE

PDF(359 KB)
PDF(359 KB)
Front. Electr. Electron. Eng. ›› 2011, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3) : 468-480. DOI: 10.1007/s11460-011-0168-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Stochastic systems simulation optimization

Author information +
History +

Abstract

With the advance of new computational technology, stochastic systems simulation and optimization has become increasingly a popular subject in both academic research and industrial applications. This paper presents some of recent developments about the problem of optimizing a performance function from a simulation model.We begin by classifying different types of problems and then provide an overview of the major approaches, followed by a more in-depth presentation of two specific areas: optimal computing budget allocation and the nested partitions method.

Keywords

simulation optimization / discrete-event systems / simulation-based decision making / computing budget allocation / ranking and selection

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chun-Hung CHEN, Leyuan SHI, Loo Hay LEE. Stochastic systems simulation optimization. Front Elect Electr Eng Chin, 2011, 6(3): 468‒480 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11460-011-0168-5

References

[1]
Fu M C. Are we there yet? The marriage between simulation & optimization. OR/MS Today, 2007, 16-17
[2]
Rubinstein R Y, Shapiro A. Discrete Event Systems: Sensitivity Analysis and Stochastic Optimization by the Score Function Method. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1993
[3]
Homem-de-Mello T, Shapiro A, Spearman M L. Finding optimal material release times using simulation-based optimization. Management Science, 1999, 45(1): 86-102
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Kleywegt A, Shapiro A, Homem-de-Mello T. The sample average approximation method for stochastic discrete optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 2002, 12(2): 479-502
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Barton R R, Meckesheimer M. Metamodel-based simulation optimization. In: Henderson S G, Nelson B L, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation. Chapter 18. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006, 535-574
[6]
Kleijnen J. Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments. New York, NY: Springer, 2008
[7]
Kushner H J, Yin G G. Stochastic Approximation Algorithms and Applications. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 2003
[8]
Ólafsson S. Metaheuristics. In: Henderson S G, Nelson B L, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation. Chapter 21. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006, 633-654
[9]
Fu M C. Optimization via simulation: A review. Annals of Operations Research, 1994, 53(1): 199-247
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Fu M C. Optimization for simulation: Theory vs. practice (Feature Article). INFORMS Journal on Computing, 2002, 14(3): 192-215
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Andradóttir S. Simulation optimization. In: Banks J, ed. Handbook of Simulation: Principles, Methodology, Advances, Applications, and Practice. Chapter 9. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1998
[12]
Andradóttir S. An overview of simulation optimization with random search. In: Henderson S G, Nelson B L, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation. Chapter 20. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006, 617-632
[13]
Fu M C. Gradient estimation. In: Henderson S G, Nelson B L, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation. Chapter 19. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006, 575-616
[14]
Fu M C. What you should know about simulation and derivatives. Naval Research Logistics, 2008, 55(8): 723-736
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Fu MC. Sample path derivatives for (s, S) inventory systems. Operations Research, 1994, 42(2): 351-364
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Fu M C, Hu J Q. (s, S) inventory systems with random lead times: Harris recurrence and its implications in sensitivity analysis. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, 1994, 8(3): 355-376
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Bashyam S, Fu M C. Application of perturbation analysis to a class of periodic review (s, S) inventory systems. Naval Research Logistics, 1994, 41(1): 47-80
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Bashyam S, Fu M C. Optimization of (s, S) inventory systems with random lead times and a service level constraint. Management Science, 1998, 44(12): S243-S256
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Pflug G C, Rubinstein R Y. Inventory processes: Quasiregenerative property, performance evaluation and sensitivity estimation via simulation. Stochastic Models, 2002, 18(3): 469-496
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Zhang H, Fu M C. Sample path derivatives for (s, S) inventory systems with price determination. In: Golden B L, Raghavan S, Wasil E A, eds. The Next Wave in Computing, Optimization, and Decision Technologies. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 2005, 229-246
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Whitt W. What you should know about queuing models to set staffing requirements in service systems. Naval Research Logistics, 2007, 54(5): 476-484
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Bechhofer R E, Santner T J, Goldsman D M. Design and Analysis of Experiments for Statistical Selection, Screening, and Multiple Comparisons. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1995
[23]
Kim S H, Nelson B L. Selecting the best system. In: Henderson S G, Nelson B L, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation. Chapter 17. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006, 501-534
[24]
Chen H C, Chen C H, Dai L, Yücesan E. New development of optimal computing budget allocation for discrete event simulation. In: Proceedings of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference. 1997, 334-341
[25]
Chen C H, Lin J, Yücesan E, Chick S E. Simulation budget allocation for further enhancing the efficiency of ordinal optimization. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems: Theory and Applications, 2000, 10(3): 251-270
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Chen C H, Yücesan E, Dai L, Chen H C. Optimal budget allocation for discrete-event simulation experiments. IIE Transactions, 2010, 42(1): 60-70
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Fu M C, Hu J Q, Chen C H, Xiong X. Simulation allocation for determining the best design in the presence of correlated sampling. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 2007, 19(1): 101-111
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Glynn P, Juneja S. A large deviations perspective on ordinal optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference. 2004, 577-585
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Fu M C, Hu J Q, Chen C H, Xiong X. Optimal computing budget allocation under correlated sampling. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference. 2004, 595-603
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Brantley M W, Lee L H, Chen C H, Chen A. Optimal sampling in design of experiment for simulation-based stochastic optimization. In: Proceedings of 2008 IEEE Conference on Automation Science and Engineering. 2008, 388-393
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Lee L H, Chew E P, Teng S Y, Goldsman D. Optimal computing budget allocation for multi-objective simulation models. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference. 2004, 586-594
[32]
Chew E P, Lee L H, Teng S Y, Koh C H. Differentiated service inventory optimization using nested partitions and MOCBA. Computers & Operations Research, 2009, 36(5): 1703-1710
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Lee L H, Chew E P, Teng S Y, Goldsman D. Finding the nondominated Pareto set for multi-objective simulation models. IIE Transactions, 2010, 42(9): 656-674
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Chick S E, Wu Y Z. Selection procedures with frequentist expected opportunity cost. Operations Research, 2005, 53(5): 867-878
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
He D, Chick S E, Chen C H. The opportunity cost and OCBA selection procedures in ordinal optimization. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, 2007, 37(5): 951-961
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Trailovic L, Pao L Y. Computing budget allocation for efficient ranking and selection of variances with application to target tracking algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2004, 49(1): 58-67
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Morrice D J, Brantley M W, Chen C H. An efficient ranking and selection procedure for a linear transient mean performance measure. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference. 2008, 290-296
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Morrice D J, Brantley M W, Chen C H. A transient means ranking and selection procedure with sequential sampling constraints. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference. 2009, 590-600
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Chen C H, He D, Fu M C, Lee L H. Efficient simulation budget allocation for selecting an optimal subset. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 2008, 20(4): 579-595
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Pujowidianto N A, Lee L H, Chen C H, Yep C M. Optimal computing budget allocation for constrained optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference. 2009, 584-589
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Yan S, Zhou E, Chen C H. Efficient simulation budget allocation for selecting the best set of simplest good enough designs. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference. 2010, 1152-1159
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Chick S E, Inoue K. New two-stage and sequential procedures for selecting the best simulated system. Operations Research, 2001, 49(5): 732-743
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Chick S E, Inoue K. New procedures to select the best simulated system using common random numbers. Management Science, 2001, 47(8): 1133-1149
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Branke J, Chick S E, Schmidt C. Selecting a selection procedure. Management Science, 2007, 53(12): 1916-1932
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Chen C H. A lower bound for the correct subset-selection probability and its application to discrete event system simulations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1996, 41(8): 1227-1231
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Chen C H, Lee L H. Stochastic Simulation Optimization: An Optimal Computing Budget Allocation. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company, 2011
[47]
Rinott Y. On two-stage selection procedures and related probability inequalities. Communications in Statistics, 1978, 7(8): 799-811
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Shi L, Ólafsson S. Nested partitions method for global optimization. Operations Research, 2000, 48(3): 390-407
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Shi L, Ólafsson S. Nested partitions method for stochastic optimization. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 2000, 2(3): 271-291
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Shi L, Ólafsson S. Nested Partitions Optimization: Methodology and Applications. New York, NY: Springer, 2008
[51]
Shi L, Ólafsson S. Nested partitions optimization. In: Tutorials in Operations Research. Chapter 1. Hanover, MD: INFORMS, 2007, 1-22
[52]
Shi L, Ólafsson S, Sun N. New parallel randomized algorithms for the traveling salesman problem. Computers & Operations Research, 1999, 26(4): 371-394
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Ho Y C, Sreenivas R S, Vakili P. Ordinal optimization of DEDS. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems: Theory and Applications, 1992, 2(4): 61-88
[54]
Ho Y C, Cassandras C G, Chen C H, Dai L. Ordinal optimization and simulation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2000, 51(4): 490-500
[55]
Shi L, Chen C H. A new algorithm for stochastic discrete resource allocation optimization. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems: Theory and Applications, 2000, 10(3): 271-294
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Chen C H, Fu M C, Shi L. Simulation and optimization. In: Tutorials in Operations Research. Chapter 11. Hanover, MD: INFORMS, 2008, 247-260
[57]
Fu M C, Chen C H, Shi L. Some topics for simulation optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference. 2008, 27-38
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
PDF(359 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/