Remanufacturing planning based on constrained ordinal optimization

Chen SONG, Xiaohong GUAN, Qianchuan ZHAO, Qing-Shan JIA

PDF(330 KB)
PDF(330 KB)
Front. Electr. Electron. Eng. ›› 2011, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3) : 443-452. DOI: 10.1007/s11460-011-0162-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Remanufacturing planning based on constrained ordinal optimization

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Resource planning for a remanufacturing system is in general extremely difficult in terms of problem size, uncertainties, complicated constraints, etc. In this paper, we present a new method based on constrained ordinal optimization (COO) for remanufacturing planning. The key idea of our method is to estimate the feasibility of plans by machine learning and to select a subset with the estimated feasibility based on the procedure of horse racing with feasibility model (HRFM). Numerical testing shows that our method is efficient and effective for selecting good plans with high probability. It is thus a scalable optimization method for large scale remanufacturing planning problems with complicated stochastic constraints.

Keywords

remanufacturing systems / constrained ordinal optimization (COO) / simulation-based optimization / machine learning

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chen SONG, Xiaohong GUAN, Qianchuan ZHAO, Qing-Shan JIA. Remanufacturing planning based on constrained ordinal optimization. Front Elect Electr Eng Chin, 2011, 6(3): 443‒452 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11460-011-0162-y

References

[1]
Haynsworth H C, Lyons R T. Remanufacturing by design, the missing link. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 1987, 28(2): 24-29
[2]
Perry J H. The impact of lot size and production scheduling on inventory investment in a remanufacturing environment. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 1991, 32(3): 41-45
[3]
Fourcaud R. Is repair/remanufacturing really different? In: Proceedings of APICS Remanufacturing Seminar. 1993, 4-9
[4]
Song C, Guan X H, Zhao Q C, Ho Y C. Machine learning approach for determining feasible plans of a remanufacturing system. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2005, 2(3): 262-275
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Birge J R, Louveaux F. Introduction to Stochastic Programming. Chapter 7. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1997
[6]
Olhager J, Rapp B. Operations research techniques in manufacturing planning and control systems. Operational Research, 1995, 2(1): 29-43
[7]
Kusiak A. Rough set theory: A data mining tool for semiconductor manufacturing. Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, 2001, 24(1): 44-50
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Maturana F, Gu P, Naumann A, Norrie D H. Object-oriented job-shop scheduling using genetic algorithms. Computer in Industry, 1997, 32(3): 281-294
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Cohen G. Neural networks implementations to control realtime manufacturing systems. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 1998, 11(4): 243-251
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Tang Y, Zhou M C, Caudill R. An Integrated approach to disassembly planning and demanufacturing operation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 2001, 17(6): 773-784
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Lambert A J D. Determining optimum disassembly sequences in electronic equipment. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2002, 43(3): 553-575
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Kiesmuller G P. Optimal control of a one product recovery system with leadtimes. International Journal of Production Economics, 2003, 81-82(11): 333-340
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Gosavi A. Simulation-Based Optimization: Parametric Optimization Techniques and Reinforcement Learning. Berlin: Springer, 2003
[14]
Ho Y C, Zhao Q C, Jia Q S. Ordinal Optimization: Soft Optimization for Hard Problems. New York: Springer, 2007
[15]
Ho Y C, Sreenivas R S, Vakili P. Ordinal optimization of discrete event dynamic systems. Journal of DEDS, 1992, 2(2): 61-88
[16]
Dai L. Convergence properties of ordinal comparison in the simulation of discrete event dynamic systems. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 1996, 91(2): 363-388
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Xie X L. Dynamics and convergence rate of ordinal comparison of stochastic discrete event systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1997, 42(4): 586-590
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Ho Y C, Lee L H, Lau E T K. Explanation of goal softening in ordinal optimization. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1999, 44(1): 94-99
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Cassandras C G. Discrete Event Systems: Modeling and Performance Analysis. Boston: Aksen Associates Inc, 1993
[20]
Spall J C. Introduction to Stochastic Search and Optimization: Estimation, Simulation and Control. 1st ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2003
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Fu M. Optimization for simulation: Theory vs. practice (feature article). INFORMS Journal on Computing, 2002, 14(3): 192-215
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Li D, Lee L H, Ho Y C. Constrainted ordinal optimization. Information Sciences, 2002, 148(1-4): 201-220
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Zhao Q C, Ho Y C, Jia Q S. Vector ordinal optimization. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2005, 125(2): 259-274
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Lee L H, Li W G, Ho Y C. Vector ordinal optimization — A new heuristic approach and its application to computer network routing design problems. International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management, 1999, 5(3): 211-230
[25]
Guan X H, Song C, Ho Y C, Zhao Q C. Constrained ordinal optimization — A feasibility model based approach. Discrete Dynamic Event Systems: Theory and Applications, 2006, 16(2): 279-299
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Lau T W E, Ho Y C. Universal alignment probabilities and subset selection for ordinal optimization. Journal of Optimization and Theory, 1997, 39(3): 455-490
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Pawlak Z. Rough Sets — Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data. Chapter 1. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
PDF(330 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/