MRI image segmentation based on fast kernel clustering analysis

Liang LIAO, Yanning ZHANG

PDF(377 KB)
PDF(377 KB)
Front. Electr. Electron. Eng. ›› 2011, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (2) : 363-373. DOI: 10.1007/s11460-011-0154-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

MRI image segmentation based on fast kernel clustering analysis

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Kernel-based clustering is supposed to provide a better analysis tool for pattern classification, which implicitly maps input samples to a high-dimensional space for improving pattern separability. For this implicit space map, the kernel trick is believed to elegantly tackle the problem of “curse of dimensionality”, which has actually been more challenging for kernel-based clustering in terms of computational complexity and classification accuracy, which traditional kernelized algorithms cannot effectively deal with. In this paper, we propose a novel kernel clustering algorithm, called KFCM-III, for this problem by replacing the traditional isotropic Gaussian kernel with the anisotropic kernel formulated by Mahalanobis distance. Moreover, a reduced-set represented kernelized center has been employed for reducing the computational complexity of KFCM-I algorithm and circumventing the model deficiency of KFCM-II algorithm. The proposed KFCMIII has been evaluated for segmenting magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. For this task, an image intensity inhomogeneity correction is employed during image segmentation process. With a scheme called preclassification, the proposed intensity correction scheme could further speed up image segmentation. The experimental results on public image data show the superiorities of KFCM-III.

Keywords

kernel-based clustering / dimensionality reduction / speeding-up scheme / magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image segmentation / intensity inhomogeneity correction

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Liang LIAO, Yanning ZHANG. MRI image segmentation based on fast kernel clustering analysis. Front Elect Electr Eng Chin, 2011, 6(2): 363‒373 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11460-011-0154-y

References

[1]
Zhang D Q. Kernel-based associative memories, clustering algorithms and their applications. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2004 (in Chinese)
[2]
Girolami M. Mercer kernel-based clustering in feature space. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2002, 13(3): 780-784
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Müller K R, Mika S, Rätsch G, Tsuda K. An introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2001, 12(2): 181-202
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Zhang D Q, Chen S C. A novel kernelized fuzzy C-means algorithm with application in medical image segmentation. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 2004, 32(1): 37-40
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Chen S C, Zhang D Q. Robust image segmentation using FCM with spatial constraints based on new kernel-induced distance measure. IEEE Transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics, Part B, 2004, 34(4): 1907-1916
[6]
Schölkopf B, Mika S, Burges C J C, Knirsch P, Müller K, Rätsch G, Smola A J. Input space versus feature space in kernel-based methods. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 1999, 10(5): 1000-1017
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Bi L P, Huang H, Zheng Z Y, Song H T. New heuristic for determination Gaussian kernel’s parameter. In: Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics. 2005, 7: 4299-4304
[8]
Wang W J, Xu Z B, Lu W Z. Determination of the spread parameter in the Gaussian kernel for classification and regression. Neurocomputing, 2003, 3(4): 643-663
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Zhang D Q, Chen S C, Zhou Z H. Learning the kernel parameters in kernel minimum distance classifier. Pattern Recognition, 2006, 39(1): 133-135
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Ahmed M, Yamany S, Mohamed N, Farag A A, Moriarty T. A modified fuzzy c-means algorithm for bias field estimation and segmentation of MRI data. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2002, 21(3): 193-199
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Candes E J, Romberg J, Tao T. Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2006, 52(2): 489-509
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Candes E J, Tao T. Near-optimal signal recovery from random projections: universal encoding strategies? IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2006, 52(12): 5406-5425
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Donoho D L. Compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2006, 52(4): 1289-1306
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Szilagyi L, Benyo Z, Szilagyi S M, Adam H S. MR brain image segmentation using an enhanced fuzzy C-means algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2003, 1: 724-726
[15]
Cai W L, Chen S C, Zhang D Q. Fast and robust fuzzy cmeans clustering algorithms incorporating local information for image segmentation. Pattern Recognition, 2007, 40(3): 825-838
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Aubert-Broche B, Evans A C, Collins L. A new improved version of the realistic digital brain phantom. Neuroimage, 2006, 32(1): 138-145
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Collins D L, Zijdenbos A P, Kollokian V, Sled J G, Kabani N J, Holmes C J, Evans A C. Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 1998, 17(3): 463-468
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Cocosco C A, Kollokian V, Kwan R K S, Evans A C. BrainWeb: online interface to a 3-D MRI simulated brain database. NeuroImage, 1997, 5(4): S425

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
PDF(377 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/