Addiction as a dynamical rationality disorder

Abstract

Addiction is frequently modeled as a behavioral disorder resulting from the internal battle between two subsystems: one model describes slow planning versus fast habitual action; another, hot versus cold modes. In another model, one subsystem pushes the individual toward substance abuse, while the other tries to pull him away. These models all describe one side winning over the other at each point of confrontation, represented as a simple binary switch: on or off, win or lose. We propose however, an alternative model, in which opposing systems work in parallel, tipping toward one subsystem or the other, in greater or lesser degree, based on a continuous rationality factor. Our approach results in a dynamical system that qualitatively emulates seeking behavior, cessation, and relapse—enabling the accurate description of a process that can lead to recovery. As an adjunct to the model, we are in the process of creating an associated, interactive website that will enable addicts to journal their thoughts, emotions and actions on a daily basis. The site is not only a potentially rich source of data for our model, but will in its primary function aid addicts to individually identify parameters affecting their decisions and behavior.

Keywords

addiction / emotional-cognitive rationality / dynamical systems / dynamical disease / dynamical rehabilitation / relapse / higher power

References

[1] Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings. NSDUH Series H-34, DHHS Publication No. SMA 08–4343, 2008

[2] Kreek M J, Nielsen D A, Butelman E R, LaForge K S. Genetic influences on impulsivity, risk taking, stress responsivity and vulnerability to drug abuse and addiction. Nature Neuroscience, 2005, 8(11): 1450-1457

[3] Volkow N D, Fowler J S, Wang G J. The addicted human brain viewed in the light of imaging studies: brain circuits and treatment strategies. Neuropharmacology, 2004, 47(Suppl 1): 3-13

[4] Jones A M. Health, addiction, social interaction and the decision to quit smoking. Journal of Health Economics, 1994, 13(1): 93-110

[5] Kleber H D, Weissman M M, Rounsaville B J, Wilber C H, Prusoff B A, Riordan C E. Imipramine as treatment for depression in addicts. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1983, 40(6): 649-653

[6] Redish A D. Addiction as a computational process gone awry. Science, 2004, 306(5703): 1944-1947

[7] Heyman G M. Addiction: a Disorder of Choice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009

[8] Soria G, Barbano M F, Maldonado R, Valverde O. A reliable method to study cue-, priming-, and stress-induced reinstatement of cocaine self-administration in mice. Psychopharmacology, 2008, 199(4): 593-603

[9] Johnson P M, Kenny P J. Dopamine D2 receptors in addiction-like reward dysfunction and compulsive eating in obese rats. Nature Neuroscience, 2010, 13(5): 635-641

[10] Alexander B K. “The Myth of Drug-Induced Addiction”, a paper delivered to the Canadian Senate, 2001

[11] Dockner E J, Feichtinger G. Cyclical consumption patterns and rational addiction. American Economic Review, 1993, 83(1): 256-263

[12] Epstein D H, Willner-Reid J, Vahabzadeh M, Mezghanni M, Lin J L, Preston K L. Real-time electronic diary reports of cue exposure and mood in the hours before cocaine and heroin craving and use. Archives of General Psychiatry, 2009, 66(1): 88-94

[13] Goldstein R Z, Volkow N D. Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. American Journal of Psychiatry, 2002, 159(10): 1642-1652

[14] McClure S M, Daw N D, Montague P R. A computational substrate for incentive salience. Trends in Neurosciences, 2003, 26(8): 423-428

[15] Ahmed S H, Koob G F. Transition to drug addiction: a negative reinforcement model based on an allostatic decrease in reward function. Psychopharmacology, 2005, 180(3): 473-490

[16] Berridge K C, Robinson T E. Parsing reward. Trends in Neurosciences, 2003, 26(9): 507-513

[17] Redish A D, Jensen S, Johnson A, Kurth-Nelson Z. Reconciling reinforcement learning models with behavioral extinction and renewal: implications for addiction, relapse, and problem gambling. Psychological Review, 2007, 114(3): 784-805

[18] Dezfouli A, Piray P, Keramati M M, Ekhtiari H, Lucas C, Mokri A. A neurocomputational model for cocaine addiction. Neural Computation, 2009, 21(10): 2869-2893

[19] Redish A D, Jensen S, Johnson A. A unified framework for addiction: vulnerabilities in the decision process. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2008, 31(4): 415-487

[20] Daw N D, Niv Y, Dayan P. Uncertainty-based competition between prefrontal and dorsolateral striatal systems for behavioral control. Nature Neuroscience, 2005, 8(12): 1704-1711

[21] Redish A D, Johnson A. A computational model of craving and obsession. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2007, 1104(1): 324-339

[22] Bickel W K, Yi R. Addiction science as a hedgehog and as a fox. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2008, 31(4): 441-442

[23] Ahmed S H, Graupner M, Gutkin B. Computational approaches to the neurobiology of drug addiction. Pharmacopsychiatry, 2009, 42(Suppl 1): S144-S152

[24] Gutkin B S, Dehaene S, Changeux J P. A neurocompu tational hypothesis for nicotine addiction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006, 103(4): 1106-1111

[25] Becker G S, Murphy K M. A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy, 1988, 96(4): 675-699

[26] Bernheim B D, Rangel A. Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes. American Economic Review, 2004, 94(5): 1558-1590

[27] Winick C. Maturing out of narcotic addiction. Bulletin on Narcotics, 1962, 14(1): 1-7

[28] Maddux J F, Desmond D P. New light on the maturing out hypothesis in opioid dependence. Bulletin on Narcotics, 1980, 32(1): 15-25

[29] Waldorf D. Natural recovery from opiate addiction: some socio-psychological processes of untreated recovery. Journal of Drug Issues, 1983, 13(2): 237-280

[30] Tucker J A. Different pathways to knowledge about different pathways to recovery: a comment on the people awakening study. Addiction, 2008, 103(2): 216-217

[31] Alligood K T, Sauer T, Yorke J A. Chaos, An Introduction to Dynamical Systems. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1997

[32] Leise T, Siegelmann H. Dynamics of a multistage circadian system. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 2006, 21(4): 314-323

[33] Rapatski B L, Suppe F, Yorke J A. HIV epidemics driven by late disease stage transmission. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2005, 38(3): 241-253

[34] Olsen M M, Siegelmann-Danieli N, Siegelmann H T. Dynamic computational model suggests that cellular citizenship is fundamental for selective tumor apoptosis. PloS ONE, 2010, 5(5): e10637

[35] Glass L, Mackey MC. From Clocks to Chaos: The Rhythms of Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988

[36] Belair J, Glass L, An Der Heiden U, Milton J. Dynamical disease: identification, temporal aspects and treatment strategies of human illness. Chaos, 1995, 5(1): 1-7

[37] Siegelmann H T. Complex systems science and brain dynamics. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2010, 4(7): 1-2

[38] Anthony J C, Warner L A, Kessler R C. Comparative epidemiology of dependence on tobacco, alcohol, controlled substances, and inhalants: basic findings from the national comorbidity survey. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 1994, 2(3): 244-268

[39] Koenigs M, Young L, Adolphs R, Tranel D, Cushman F, Hauser M, Damasio A. Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature, 2007, 446(7138): 908-911

[40] Monterosso J, Ainslie G. The behavioral economics of will in recovery from addiction. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 2007, 90(Suppl 1): S100-S111

[41] Niv Y, Joel D, Dayan P. A normative perspective on motivation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2006, 10(8): 375-381

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg