When semi-supervised learning meets ensemble learning

Abstract

Semi-supervised learning and ensemble learning are two important machine learning paradigms. The former attempts to achieve strong generalization by exploiting unlabeled data; the latter attempts to achieve strong generalization by using multiple learners. Although both paradigms have achieved great success during the past decade, they were almost developed separately. In this paper, we advocate that semi-supervised learning and ensemble learning are indeed beneficial to each other, and stronger learning machines can be generated by leveraging unlabeled data and classifier combination.

Keywords

machine learning / semi-supervised learning / ensemble learning

References

[1] Chapelle O, Schölkopf B, Zien A. Semi-Supervised Learning. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006

[2] Zhou Z H, Li M. Semi-supervised learning by disagreement. Knowledge and Information Systems, 2010, 24(3): 415-439

[3] Zhu X. Semi-supervised learning literature survey. Technical Report 1530. Madison: University of Wisconsin at Madison, Department of Computer Sciences, 2006. http://www.cs.wisc.edu/∼jerryzhu/pub/ssl survey.pdf

[4] Zhou Z H. Ensemble Learning. In: Li S Z, ed. Encyclopedia of Biometrics. Berlin: Springer, 2009, 270-273

[5] Bennett K, Demiriz A, Maclin R. Exploiting unlabeled data in ensemble methods. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2002, 289-296

[6] d’Alché-Buc F, Grandvalet Y, Ambroise C. Semi-Supervised MarginBoost. In: Dietterich T G, Becker S, Ghahramani Z, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14. 2002, 553-560

[7] Li M, Zhou Z H. Improve computer-aided diagnosis with machine learning techniques using undiagnosed samples. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 2007, 37(6): 1088-1098

[8] Mallapragada P K, Jin R, Jain A K, Liu Y. SemiBoost: boosting for semi-supervised learning. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2009, 31(11): 2000-2014

[9] Valizadegan H, Jin R, Jain A K. Semi-supervised boosting for multi-class classification. In: Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Machine Learning. 2008, 522-537

[10] Zhou Z H, Li M. Tri-training: Exploiting unlabeled data using three classifiers. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2005, 17(11): 1529-1541

[11] Zhou Z H. When semi-supervised learning meets ensemble learning. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems. 2010, 529-538

[12] Krogh A, Vedelsby J. Neural network ensembles, cross validation, and active learning. In: Tesauro G, Touretzky D S, Leen T K, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 7. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995, 231-238

[13] Brown G. An information theoretic perspective on multiple classifier systems. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems. 2009, 344-353

[14] Zhou Z H, Li N. Multi-information ensemble diversity. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems. 2010, 134-144

[15] Breiman L. Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 1996, 24(2): 123-140

[16] Freund Y, Schapire R E. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 1997, 55(1): 119-139

[17] Ho T K. The random subspace method for constructing decision forests. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1998, 20(8): 832-844

[18] Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5-32

[19] Zhou Z H. Learning with unlabeled data and its application to image retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 9th Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2006, 5-10

[20] Vapnik V N. Statistical Learning Theory. New York: Wiley, 1998

[21] Settles B. Active learning literature survey. Technical Report 1648. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin at Madison, Department of Computer Sciences, 2009. http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/∼bsettles/pub/settles.activelearning.pdf

[22] Miller D J, Uyar H S. A mixture of experts classifier with learning based on both labelled and unlabelled data. In: Mozer M, Jordan M I, Petsche T, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 9. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997, 571-577

[23] Nigam K, McCallum A K, Thrun S, Mitchell T. Text classification from labeled and unlabeled documents using EM. Machine Learning, 2000, 39(2-3): 103-134

[24] Shahshahani B, Landgrebe D. The effect of unlabeled samples in reducing the small sample size problem and mitigating the hughes phenomenon. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1994, 32(5): 1087-1095

[25] Xu L. Bayesian Ying Yang System and Theory as a Unified Statistical Learning Approach: (I) Unsupervised and Semi-Unsupervised Learning. In: Amari S, Kassabov N, eds. Brain-like Computing and Intelligent Information Systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1997, 241-274

[26] Chapelle O, Zien A. Semi-supervised learning by low density separation. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 2005, 57-64

[27] Grandvalet Y, Bengio Y. Semi-supervised Learning by Entropy Minimization. In: Saul L K, Weiss Y, Bottou L, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 17. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005, 529-536

[28] Joachims T. Transductive inference for text classification using support vector machines. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Machine Learning. 1999, 200-209

[29] Lawrence N D, Jordan M I. Semi-supervised learning via Gaussian processes. In: Saul L K, Weiss Y, Bottou L, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 17. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005, 753-760

[30] Belkin M, Niyogi P. Semi-supervised learning on Riemannian manifolds. Machine Learning, 2004, 56(1-3): 209-239

[31] Belkin M, Niyogi P, Sindhwani V. On manifold regularization. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 2005, 17-24

[32] Belkin M, Niyogi P, Sindhwani V. Manifold regularization: a geometric framework for learning from labeled and unlabeled examples. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2006, 7: 2399-2434

[33] Zhou D, Bousquet O, Lal T N, J. Weston, Schölkopf B. Learning with local and global consistency. In: Thrun S, Saul L, Schölkopf B, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 16. 2004, 321-328

[34] Zhu X, Ghahramani Z, Lafferty J. Semi-supervised learning using Gaussian fields and harmonic functions. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Machine Learning. 2003, 912-919

[35] Blum A, Mitchell T. Combining labeled and unlabeleddata with co-training. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory. 1998, 92-100

[36] Dasgupta S, Littman M, McAllester D. PAC Generalization Bunds for Co-training. In: Dietterich T G, Becker S, Ghahramani Z, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002, 375-382

[37] Balcan M F, Blum A, Yang K. Co-Training and Expansion: Towards Bridging Theory and Practice. In: Saul L K, Weiss Y, Bottou L, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 17. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005, 89-96

[38] Abney S. Bootstrapping. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2002, 360-367

[39] Nigam K, Ghani R. Analyzing the effectiveness and applicability of co-training. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 2000, 86-93

[40] Goldman S, Zhou Y. Enhancing supervised learning with unlabeled data. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning. 2000, 327-334

[41] Zhou Z H, Li M. Semi-supervised regression with cotraining. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2005, 908-913

[42] Zhou Z H, Li M. Semi-supervised regression with cotraining style algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2007, 19(11): 1479-1493

[43] Mohamed T A, Gayar N El, Atiya A F. A cotraining approach for time series prediction with missing data. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems. 2007, 93-102

[44] Wang W, Zhou Z H. Analyzing co-training style algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Machine Learning, 2007, 454-465

[45] Hwa R, Osborne M, Sarkar A, Steedman M. Corrected cotraining for statistical parsers. In: Working Notes of the ICML’03Workshop on the Continuum from Labeled to Unlabeled Data in Machine Learning and Data Mining. 2003

[46] Pierce D, Cardie C. Limitations of co-training for natural language learning from large data sets. In: Proceedings of the 2001 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2001, 1-9

[47] Sarkar A. Applying co-training methods to statistical parsing. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2001, 95-102

[48] Steedman M, Osborne M, Sarkar A, Clark S, Hwa R, Hockenmaier J, Ruhlen P, Baker S, Crim J. Bootstrapping statistical parsers from small data sets. In: Proceedings of the 11th Conference on the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2003, 331-338

[49] Li M, Li H, Zhou Z H. Semi-supervised document retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 2009, 45(3): 341-355

[50] Mavroeidis D, Chaidos K, Pirillos S, Christopoulos D, Vazirgiannis M. Using tri-training and support vector machines for addressing the ECML-PKDD 2006 Discovery Challenge. In: Proceedings of ECMLPKDD 2006 Discovery Challenge Workshop. 2006, 39-47

[51] Kockelkorn M, Lneburg A, Scheffer T. Using transduction and multi-view learning to answer emails. In: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases. 2003, 266-277

[52] Zhou Z H, Chen K J, Dai H B. Enhancing relevance feedback in image retrieval using unlabeled data. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2006, 24(2): 219-244

[53] Zhou Z H, Chen K J, Jiang Y. Exploiting unlabeled data in content-based image retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Machine Learning. 2004, 525-536

[54] Wang W, Zhou Z H. On multi-view active learning and the combination with semi-supervised learning. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning. 2008, 1152-1159

[55] Muslea I, Minton S, Knoblock C A. Active learning with multiple views. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2006, 27(1): 203-233

[56] Zhou Z H, Zhan D C, Yang Q. Semi-supervised learning with very few labeled training examples. In: Proceedings of the 22nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2007, 675-680

[57] Hotelling H. Relations between two sets of variates. Biometrika, 1936, 28(4): 321-377

[58] Hardoon D R, Szedmak S, Shawe-Taylor J. Canonical correlation analysis: an overview with application to learning methods. Neural Computation, 2004, 16(12): 2639-2664

[59] Zhang M L, Zhou Z H. Classifier ensemble with unlabeled data. CORR abs10909.3593, 2009

[60] Zhang M L, Zhou Z H. Exploiting unlabeled data to enhance ensemble diversity. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. 2010

[61] Xu L, Amari S. Combining classifiers and learning mixtureof-experts. In: Dopico J R R, Dorado J, Pazos A, eds. Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence. 2009, 318-326

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg