Research progress on mid-IR nonlinear optical crystals with high laser damage threshold in China

Tianxiang ZHU , Xingguo CHEN , Jingui QIN

Front. Chem. China ›› 2011, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 1 -8.

PDF (551KB)
Front. Chem. China ›› 2011, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 1 -8. DOI: 10.1007/s11458-011-0224-y
FEATURE ARTICLE
FEATURE ARTICLE

Research progress on mid-IR nonlinear optical crystals with high laser damage threshold in China

Author information +
History +
PDF (551KB)

Abstract

Nonlinear optical (NLO) crystals have been playing an increasingly important role in laser science and technology. The NLO crystals used in the middle infrared (mid-IR) region, compared with the NLO crystals in the other wavelength regions, are still not good enough for the application of high-energy laser. The main defect is that their laser damage thresholds (LDT) are low. Chinese scientists have made a lot of important contributions to the UV and visible NLO crystals. In the last decade, they also did a lot of work on the mid-IR NLO materials. The main purpose of these researches is to increase the LDT and simultaneously balance the other properties. This paper presents a brief summary of their research progress in this topic on three types of materials: chalcogenides, oxides, and halides. The emphasis is put on the design strategy and quality control of the crystals.

Keywords

nonlinear optical (NLO) crystals / laser damage threshold (LDT) / mid-IR region / design / crystal growth

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tianxiang ZHU, Xingguo CHEN, Jingui QIN. Research progress on mid-IR nonlinear optical crystals with high laser damage threshold in China. Front. Chem. China, 2011, 6(1): 1-8 DOI:10.1007/s11458-011-0224-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Introduction

Since the second harmonic generation (SHG) was observed when a ruby laser was directed into a quartz crystal in 1961 [1], nonlinear optical (NLO) crystals have played a key role in the laser frequency conversion, optical parameter oscillation (OPO), and signal communication [2,3]. Some good crystals have been discovered and commercialized for the applications in different wavelength ranges from vacuum UV to far infrared (far-IR) region. In visible and near-IR region, KH2PO4 (KDP), KTiOPO4 (KTP), and LiNbO3 (LN) [4-6] are some excellent materials. β-BaB2O4 (β-BBO), LiB3O5 (LBO), and KBe2BO3F2 (KBBF) as three “Chinese brand” crystals [7-9] are excellent NLO materials in UV and deep-UV region. Yet the application of the commercially available NLO crystals in the middle IR (mid-IR) region, such as AgGaS2 and AgGaSe2, was limited mainly due to their comparatively much lower laser damage threshold (LDT). As a result, these crystals are damaged quickly upon irradiation of the lasers.

Although the mechanism for laser damage has not been completely clarified, two types of effects have been accepted for it. These two types are thermal effect and electronic effect; both are due to electron absorption. It has been gradually recognized that the intrinsic reason (narrow band gap) and extrinsic reason (defects of crystals) have caused the low LDT. Therefore, two approaches may be taken to improve the LDT of the mid-IR NLO crystals. One is to improve the crystal quality through improving the crystal growth method of the current materials, and the other is to explore new materials with wide band gaps. Due to the important applications of the mid-IR NLO crystals in optical communications, IR spectroscopy, and high-energy laser system, the research to find new NLO materials with high damage resistance to the incident laser beam together with relatively large NLO coefficient, wide transparent range in the mid-IR region, and good stability to the environment has become an urgent and challenging task in the field and thus has attracted great attention worldwide. Some good progress has been achieved in the last decade or so, for which the Chinese scientists have made a considerable contribution in both aspects: improving the crystal growth technique and exploring new strategy to search for new mid-IR NLO crystals [10-19]. This paper summarizes the recent research progress in China for mid-IR NLO crystals with high LDT. The work will be described and discussed in three types of materials: chalcopyrites, oxides, and halides. The emphasis is put on the design strategy and quality control of the crystals.

Progress in ternary chalcopyrites

Chalcogenide NLO crystals normally show large SHG response (e.g., AgGaS2d36 = 24 pm/V, AgGaSe2d36 = 40 pm/V) and wide transparency (AgGaS2: 0.48-11.4 µm, AgGaSe2: 0.76-17 µm), but their narrow band gaps cause the low LDT (0.015 GW/cm2 for AgGaS2 and 0.012 GW/cm2 for AgGaSe2) [20].

AgGaS2 and AgGaSe2 crystallize in the chalcopyrite structure, which belong to I-42d space group. To this type of semiconductors, the higher crystal quality will be helpful to improve their LDT. With this aim, some groups have tried to improve the crystal growth equipments and methods to obtain high-quality crystals.

Zhu Shifu at Sichuan University made lots of effects on the crystal growth of these two materials. They used the modified Bridgman technique in two-zone vertical furnace. Crack-free AgGaS2 crystal ingot with 12 mm in diameter and 20 mm in length and AgGaSe2 crystal ingot with 22 mm in diameter and 88 mm in length have been grown using the polycrystalline materials. The transmission in the range of 2 to 10.6 µm is 49% for AgGaS2 and 62.4% for AgGaSe2. Recently, they used the quartz ampoule descending method to grow the AgGaS2 crystal. The cracking phenomenon from the anomalous expansion phenomenon of AgGaS2 crystal has been overcome, and the large-sized and integrally AsGaS2 crystal was obtained [21].

ZnGeP2 also belongs to the chalcopyrite system. It has drawn much attention due to its excellent properties in OPO and IR NLO device application [22-24]. Liu Yanting at Shandong University obtained the ZnGeP2 crystal with the dimension of 7 and 25 mm in length by Bridgman method with the synthesized polycrystalline material [25]. Recently, the ZnGeP2 crystals of larger size and higher quality were grown by Zhu Shifu at Sichuan University [26] and Tao Xutang at Shandong University, respectively [27].

In the past few years, some ternary chalcogenides containing lithium element, such as LiGaS2 (LGS) and LiInS2 (LIS) [28,29], have been discovered. The replacement of silver cation with main-group cationic elements, such as Li+ ion, increases their band gap and leads to a much higher LDT. LIS crystallizes in the spiauterite structure belonging to Pna21 space group. It has a wide transparency in 0.35 to 13 µm region, large NLO coefficient (d33 = 15.8 pm/V), and high LDT (>0.1 GW/cm2 at 1064 nm, 10 ns). As a unique IR NLO crystal, LIS possesses a nearly isotropic thermal expansion behavior and its thermal conductivity is about five times larger than that of AgGaS2 [30]. It was first synthesized by G.D. Boyd in early 1973 [31], but it was very difficult to get good quality crystals. Some research groups in China have paid a lot of efforts on the crystal growth of LIS.

Tao Xutang at Shandong University has grown LIS crystals by the modified Bridgman method with accelerated crucible rotation technique (ACRT) using high-purity single-phase polycrystalline materials synthesized by autoclave method. After 2 weeks, high-quality and integrated LIS crystal with diameter of 12 mm and length of 40 mm was obtained [10].

The discovery of LIS and the theoretical study indicated that the replacement of main-group elements can effectively enlarge the band gap of the chalcogenide crystal. With the inspiration of this, some groups tried to increase the LDT by this strategy. Ye Ning at Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter selected BaGa4S7 as another potential IR NLO material for research. BaGa4S7 was first synthesized by Eisenmann et al. in 1983 and its single crystal structure belongs to Pmn21 space group (Fig. 1) [32]. Ye used the Bridgman-Stockbarger technique to grow BaGa4S7 from the polycrystalline materials that were synthesized from BaS, Ga, and S as the initial materials by solid-state reactions. Its UV and IR optical absorption edges were found to be at 350 nm and 13.7 μm, respectively. They calculated the NLO coefficient d33 to be about 12.6 pm/V from the powder SHG intensity. From the measurements, the band-gap energy of BaGa4S7 crystal is about 3.54 eV. In comparison to AgGaS2 (2.64 eV) and ZnGeP2 (1.75 eV), BaGa4S7 crystal has a relatively large band-gap energy, and the LDT of the BaGa4S7 single crystal reached about 1.2 J/cm2 (0.12 GW/cm2) at 1.064 μm (Table 1) [11].

In addition to the discovery of new chalcogenides mid-IR NLO materials, quantum chemical calculations on the linear and nonlinear optical properties of known mid-IR NLO materials are also important for the rational design of the new materials. Lin Zheshuai and Chen Chuangtian at Beijing Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, CAS, have performed theoretical calculations on the band structures, birefractive indexes and nonlinear optical coefficients of chalcogenides, AgGaX2 and LiGaX2 (X= S, Se and Te) [33–35]. It was found that the reason for Li-containing crystals to exhibit the higher LDT value than that of Ag-containing crystals is that the d-orbitals of silver ion enter into the very top of the valence band of the Ag-containing crystals while no Li orbital lies at the band gap edge in the Li-containing crystals [34].

Progress in oxides

With the effective research on new chalcogenides, the LDT values have been improved but still not high enough for some applications. Compared to the semiconductive chalcogenides, many oxides are normally insulators, and the band gaps are normally much larger than that of chalcogenides. Meanwhile, oxides show some other advantages, such as diversity of structure, large distortions in crystal structure, good stability in air, and easy for crystal growth. However, oxides also have a disadvantage in the transparency in IR region since the atomic mass of oxygen is small. This can be improved by using heavy metal elements as the central cations. Therefore, oxides as potential mid-IR NLO materials have re-entered people’s vision.

Chen Xue’an at Beijing University of Technology systematically studied new iodate NLO materials. LiMoO3(IO3) was synthesized under mild hydrothermal conditions. It shows SHG effect of about 4 × KDP and its band edge is roughly 2.8 eV. Its transparent range is from 2.5 to 10.8 µm, and it is thermally stable up to at least 430°C [36].

Mao Jianggao at Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter synthesized many noncentrosymmetric oxides, and some of them showed good potential as mid-IR NLO materials. BaNbO(IO3)5 was synthesized by using hydrothermal reaction at 230°C for 4 days. It crystallizes in the acentric space group Cc (Fig. 2). This compound has a large SHG response about 14 times that of KDP and has a relatively wide band gap of 3.64 eV (AgGaS2 = 2.64 eV and ZnGeP2 = 1.75 eV) (Fig. 3). With the larger band gap, the LDT should be increased. Meanwhile, BaNbO(IO3)5 has a wide transparency wavelength range from 2.5 to 10 µm [37].

The above iodates are potential NLO materials for mid-IR. However, their single crystals of large size are difficult to obtain since the iodate compounds will be decomposed at high temperatures. Many iodate crystals can only be grown from solution, and the sizes of the crystals are always relatively small. How to find a suitable technique to grow large single crystal is another challenge for iodates to be used as mid-IR NLO materials.

BaTeM2O9 (M= Mo or W) was first synthesized by Halasyamani at Houston University using the solid-state reaction [38]. The group has synthesized a lot of noncentrosymmetric oxides with d0 transition-metal cations with lone pair of electrons under the guidance of second-order Jahn-Teller (SOJT) distortion effect. BaTeM2O9 showed SHG response as strong as about 15 × KH2PO4 (KDP). For the first time, Tao Xutang has successfully grown large-sized (30 × 23 × 18 mm3) single crystal of BaTeMo2O9 from the TeO2-MoO3 flux system (Fig. 4) [36]. The transmission spectra suggest that it transmits well from 0.5 to 5.0 μm. They found that thermal expansion of BaTeMo2O9 exhibits weak anisotropy although it belongs to low symmetry system, and the thermal conductivity of BaTeMo2O9 ascends as the temperature is increased as well [37]. These properties enable BaTeMo2O9 to be another promising NLO material for the wavelength 3 to 5 µm in the IR region.

Progress in halides

Halides normally have large band gaps with versatile structures and relatively high stability. They are normally water-soluble and the big-sized single crystals may be grown in solution. Furthermore, the atomic mass of some halogens can be quite heavy, with which the halide compounds may exhibit wide transparent range in the mid-IR region. Therefore, halides may be another type of NLO materials with high LDT in mid-IR region.

Our group has been one of the pioneer groups in the study of halide mid-IR NLO crystals. The first halide we studied was CsGeCl3, the crystal structure of which was known before with a space group R3 m. Its NLO property was first and independently investigated by us [41] and Rosker [42]. In the crystal, the anionic groups (GeCl3-) are arranged totally parallel, and Ge2+ ion has a lone pair of electron in its frontier orbital (Fig. 5). These facts are favorable to the second-order NLO property. It showed the powder SHG efficiency five times that of KDP with the wide transparency range within 0.4 to 20 μm. However, it is very difficult to grow large single crystals. Soon after we had published the above preliminary results, Fang et al. in Shandong University obtained 5 mm × 5 mm × 5 mm crystals of CsGeCl3 from a HCl-EtOH-CsCl mixture solution and measured its LDT to be 200 MW/cm2 [43].

Then Lin in National Chiao Tung University had paid attention to the mixed halides CsGeBrxCl3-x [44] and found that CsGeBrxCl3-x (x= 0) showed phase-matchable powder SHG of 14 times that of KDP.

Since the Ge2+ cation may not be stable toward oxidation to Ge4+, we started to study the terhalides with Cd2+ or Hg2+ as central ions, which are more stable. CsCdBr3 was a known compound reported as a centrosymmetric crystal structure in 1977 [45]. We used CsBr and CdI2 as starting agents in water and wished to obtain CsCdBrI2. However, the single crystal we got is CsCdBr3, which crystallizes with a non-centrosymmetric space group P63 mc [46]. It showed a powder SHG response three times that of KDP, with a transparent region in 0.3 to 20 μm. For Hg2+ as central cation, we focused on Cs2Hg3I8 and HgBr2. Single crystal Cs2Hg3I8 with the size 25mm × 14mm × 5 mm has been grown in acetone by a slow evaporation technique. It showed a powder SHG as strong as KTP with a transparent region within 0.5—25 μm [21]. For HgBr2, both Hg and Br are heavy elements and the difference of electro-negativity between these two elements may be favorable to the good stability and high LDT. The results indicated that HgBr2 showed a phase-matchable powder SHG intensity as strong as 11 times that of KDP, and it is transparent in the region of 0.4—20 μm. The crystal has been grown from EtOH solution and the LDT was determined to be 300 MW/cm2 [17].

Among the halides, the fluorides show widest band gap owing to the strongest electro-negativity of fluorine. To further enhance the LDT, fluorine atom can be used to replace the other halogen atom. On the other hand, however, fluorides normally show the weakest NLO effect, since fluorine atom has a strong ability to constrain the outer electrons. We first chose Sb3+ as a cation since it contains a lone electron pair, which is favorable for NLO, and studied the possibility of SbF3 for NLO application. This compound showed phase-matchable SHG 5.8 times that of KDP with the transparency within 0.29—12 µm range [19]. The band gap of SbF3 was about 4.3 eV, which is quite large. Relatively large-sized single crystals can be grown from aqueous hydrogen fluoride solution, but it is hygroscopic.

To avoid the hygroscopic behavior shown in SbF3, a sodium salt of antimony fluoride anion, NaSb3F10, was investigated. It was synthesized via the reaction of NaF with Sb2O3 in concentrated hydrogen fluoride solution and crystallized in the space group P63 (Fig. 6). It showed phase-matchable powder SHG 3.2 times that of KDP with a decomposition temperature over 200°C. The transparent region is 0.25 to 7.8 µm, and the band gap is about 5.0 eV (Fig. 7). Single crystal of the size 12mm × 10mm × 8 mm has been grown in aqueous solution by means of a slow evaporation technique (Fig. 8). The LDT value was determined to be 1.3 GW/cm2 by a laser radiation at a wavelength 1.064 µm and the pulse of 8 ns [16]. This value is one order of magnitude higher than that of LiInS2 (LiInS2 = 0.1 GW/cm2).

Conclusions and perspective

For the past decades, Chinese research groups have made a valuable contribution toward the UV and visible NLO crystals. Right now, they also commit themselves to the mid-IR NLO crystals and have made lots of effects. Chinese scientific researchers have excellent experiences on crystal growth and improved the crystal growth technologies of some known IR NLO crystals to enhance the crystal quality with the aim of achieving higher LDT. On the other hand, Chinese scientists also have strong ability to design new NLO crystals and explored the new mid-IR NLO crystals in three types of the compounds: chalcogenides, oxides, and halides. The progress has been encouraging and some new materials have shown great potential for future applications. However, there are still lots of work to be done for the practical applications in mid-IR NLO field. The new materials must show simultaneously excellent comprehensive properties, such as large NLO efficiency, wide transparency region, large LDT, high stability, and easy to grow relatively large-sized crystals with high quality. This interdisciplinary area needs a joint effort from chemists, physicists, and material scientists. We believe that their collaboration in molecular engineering and crystal engineering will produce excellent new mid-IR NLO crystals in the near future.

References

[1]

Franken, P. A.; Hill, A. E.; Peters, C. W.; Weinreich, G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 1961, 7, 118-119

[2]

Cyranoski, D., Nature2009, 457, 953-955

[3]

Chen, C.; Lin, Z.; Wang, Z., Appl. Phys. B2005, 80, 1-25

[4]

Smith, W. L.; Hickey, J.; Howell, H. B.; Jacobowitz, H.; Hilleary, D. T.; Drummond, A. J., Appl. Opt.1977, 16, 306-318

[5]

Kato, K., IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1991, 27, 1137-1140

[6]

Boyd, G. D.; Miller, R. C.; Nassau, K.; Bond, W. L.; Savage, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 1964, 5, 234

[7]

Chen, C. T.; Wu, B. C.; Jiang, A.; You, G., Sci. Sin. [B] 1985, 28, 235

[8]

Chen, C. T.; Wu, Y. C.; Jiang, A.; Wu, B. C.; You, G.; Li, R. K.; Lin, S. J., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1989, 6, 616

[9]

Chen, C.; Xu, Z.; Deng, D.; Zhang, J.; Wong, G. K. L.; Wu, B.; Ye, N.; Tang, D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 1996, 68, 2930

[10]

Wang, S.; Tao, X.; Dong, C.; Jiao, Z.; Jiang, M.ChineseJ. Struct. Chem.2007, 26, 1184

[11]

Lin, X.; Zhang, G.; Ye, N., Cryst. Growth Des. 2009, 9, 1186-1189

[12]

Phanon, D.; Gautier-Luneau, I., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8488-8491

[13]

Wang, S.; Tao, X.; Dong, C.; Jiao, Z.; Jiang, M., J of Synthetic Cryst 2007, 36, 8

[14]

Zhao, B.; Zhu, S.; Li, Z.; Fu, S.; Yu, F.; Li, Q., J of Synthetic Cryst 1999, 28, 4

[15]

Wang, M.; Yang, C.; Lei, Z.; Xia, S.; Zhu, C.; Sun, L.; Zhou, Y., Cryst. Res. Technol. 2010, 45, 25-30

[16]

Zhang, G.; Qin, J.; Liu, T.; Li, Y.; Wu, Y.; Chen, C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 261104/1

[17]

Liu, T.; Qin, J.; Zhang, G.; Zhu, T.; Niu, F.; Wu, Y.; Chen, C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 091102/1

[18]

Zhang, G.; Liu, T.; Qin, J.; Fu, P.; Wu, Y.; Chen, C., Cryst. Growth Des. 2008, 8, 2946-2949

[19]

Zhang, G.; Liu, T.; Zhu, T.; Qin, J.; Wu, Y.; Chen, C., Opt. Mater. 2008, 31, 110-113

[20]

Dmitriev, V. G.; Gurzadyan, G. G.; Nikogosyan, D. N., Handbook of Nonlinear Optical Crystals, Second edition, Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1995

[21]

Yuan, Z.; Zhu, S.; Zhao, B.; Chen, B.; He, Z.; Yang, S., J of Synthetic Cryst 2009, 38, 1

[22]

Jiang, Y.; Ding, Y. J., Opt. Express2007, 15, 12699-12707

[23]

Henriksson, M.; Tiihonen, M.; Pasiskevicius, V.; Laurell, F., Appl. Phys. B 2007, 88, 37–41

[24]

Zawilski, K. T.; Schunemann, P. G.; Setzler, S. D.; Pollak, T. M., J. Cryst. Growth 2008, 310, 1891-1896

[25]

Lin, Y.; Gu, Q.; Liu, H.; Zhang, H.; Ge, W.; Fang, C.; Hu, X.; Wang, J., Function Mater 2006, 37, 864

[26]

Zhao, X.; Zhu, S. F.; Zhao, B. J.; Chen, B. J.; He, Z. Y.; Wang, R. L.; Yang, H. G.; Sun, Y. Q.; Cheng, J., J. Cryst. Growth2008, 311, 190-193

[27]

Zhang, G. D.; Tao, X. T.; Wang, S. P.; Liu, G. D.; Shi, Q.; Jiang, M. H., In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on crystal growth/14th international conference on vapor growth and epitaxy (ICCG-16/ICVGE-14), August 8th, 2010, Beijing, PB131

[28]

Isaenko, L.; Yelisseyev, A.; Lobanov, S.; Krinitsin, P.; Petrov, V.; Zondy, J. J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2006, 352, 2439-2443

[29]

Isaenko, L.; Vasilyeva, I.; Merkulov, A.; Yelisseyev, A.; Lobanov, S., J. Cryst. Growth 2005, 275, 217-223

[30]

Isaenkoa, L.; Yelisseyevb, A.; Lobanova. S,Petrovc, V.; Rotermunde, V. F.; Zondyd, J. J.; Knippelse, G. H., M., Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2001, 4, 664

[31]

Boyd, G. D.; Kasper, H. M.; McFee, J. H., J. Appl. Phys. 1973, 44, 2809

[32]

Eisenmann, B.; Jakowski, M.; Schaefer, H., Rev. Chim. Miner 1983, 20, 329

[33]

Chen, X. A.; Zhang, L.; Chang, X. A.; Xue, H. P.; Zang, H. G.; Xiao, W. Q.; Song, X. M.; Yan, H., J. Alloy. Comp. 2007, 428, 54-58

[34]

Sun, C. F.; Hu, C. L.; Xu, X.; Ling, J. B.; Hu, T.; Kong, F.; Long, X. F.; Mao, J. G., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 9486-9487

[35]

Ra, H. S.; Ok, K. M.; Halasyamani, P. S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7764-7765

[36]

Zhang, W. G.; Tao, X. T.; Zhang, C. Q.; Gao, Z. L.; Zhang, Y. Z.; Yu, W. T.; Cheng, X. F.; Liu, X. S.; Jiang, M. H., Cryst. Growth Des. 2008, 8, 304-307

[37]

Zhang, W. G.; Tao, X. T.; Zhang, C. Q.; Zhang, H. J.; Jiang, M. H., Cryst. Growth Des. 2009, 9, 2633-2636

[38]

Zhang, J.; Qin, J., SPIE 1998, 3556, 1

[39]

Rosker, M. J.; Cunningham, P. H.; Ewbank, M. D.; Gunter, P., U.S. 1998, 6 pp

[40]

Gu, Q.; Pan, Q.; Wu, X.; Shi, W.; Fang, C., J. Cryst. Growth 2000, 212, 605-607

[41]

Lin, Z. G.; Tang, L. C.; Chou, C. P., Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 2362-2367

[42]

Moller, C. K.; Saarinen, H.; Näsäkkälä, E.; Pouchard, M.; Hagenmuller, P.; Andresen, A. F., Acta Chem. Scand. A 1977, 31, 669-672

[43]

Ren, P.; Qin, J.; Chen, C., Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 8-10

[44]

Lin, Z. G.; Tang, L. C.; Chou, C. P., Inorg. Chem.2008, 47, 2362–2367

[45]

Moller, C. K.; Saarinen, H.; Näsäkkälä, E.; Pouchard, M.; Hagenmuller, P.; Andresen, A. F., Acta Chem. Scand. A 1977, 31, 669–672

[46]

Ren, P.; Qin, J.; Chen, C., Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 8–10

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (551KB)

1256

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/