Implications of the EU’s Inclusion of Maritime Transport in the Emissions Trading System for Shipping Companies

Shuaian Wang, Lu Zhen, Harilaos N. Psaraftis, Ran Yan

PDF(448 KB)
PDF(448 KB)
Engineering ›› 2021, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (5) : 554-557. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2021.01.007

Implications of the EU’s Inclusion of Maritime Transport in the Emissions Trading System for Shipping Companies

Author information +
History +

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Shuaian Wang, Lu Zhen, Harilaos N. Psaraftis, Ran Yan. Implications of the EU’s Inclusion of Maritime Transport in the Emissions Trading System for Shipping Companies. Engineering, 2021, 7(5): 554‒557 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2021.01.007

References

[[1]]
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Review of maritime transport 2020 [Internet]. Geneva: United Nations; 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 7]. Available from: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2020_ en.pdf.
[[2]]
Faber J, Hanayama S, Zhang S, Pereda P, Comer B, Hauerhof E, et al. Reduction of GHG emissions from ships. Fourth IMO GHG Study 2020. Final report. London: International Maritime Organization; 2020 Jul. Report No.: IMO doc MEPC 75/7/15.
[[3]]
International Maritime Organization. Initial IMO strategy on reduction of GHG emissions from ships. Report. London: International Maritime Organization; 2018. Report No.: IMO doc MEPC 72/17/Add.1, Annex 11.
[[4]]
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Regulations on the monitoring, reporting and verification of carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport. Regulation. Strasbourg: The European Parliament; 2015 Apr. Regulation No.: EU2015/757.
[[5]]
European Parliament. Parliament says shipping industry must contribute to climate neutrality [Internet]. London: European Parliament; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 18]. Available from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/ press-room/20200910IPR86825/parliament-says-shipping-industry-mustcontribute-to-climate-neutrality.
[[6]]
Lagouvardou S, Psaraftis HN, Zis T. A literature survey on market-based measures for the decarbonization of shipping. Sustainability 2020;12(10):3953.
[[7]]
Bouman EA, Lindstad E, Rialland AI, Strømman AH. State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping—a review. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2017;52:408–21.
[[8]]
Metzger D, Schinas O. Fuzzy real options and shared savings: investment appraisal for green shipping technologies. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2019;77:1–10.
[[9]]
Zis T, Psaraftis HN, Panagakos G, Kronbak J. Policy measures to avert possible modal shifts caused by sulphur regulation in the European Ro–Ro sector. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2019;70:1–17.
[[10]]
Zis T, Psaraftis HN. Operational measures to mitigate and reverse the potential modal shifts due to environmental legislation. Marit Policy Manage 2019;46 (1):117–32.
[[11]]
Gu Y, Wallace SW, Wang X. Can an Emission Trading Scheme really reduce CO2 emissions in the short term? Evidence from a maritime fleet composition and deployment model. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2019;74:318–38.
[[12]]
Zhen L,Wu Y, Wang S, Laporte G. Green technology adoption for fleet deployment in a shipping network. Transp Res Pt B Methodol 2020;139:388–410.
[[13]]
Marine Insight. New Suez Canal transit tolls during 2020 [Internet]. Bangalore: Marine Insight; 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 2]. Available from: https:// www.marineinsight.com/shipping-news/new-suez-canal-transit-tolls-during2020/.
[[14]]
Theloadstar. Lines using cheaper Cape of Good Hope route will cost Suez Canal $10m; 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 2]. Available from: https://theloadstar. com/lines-using-cheaper-cape-of-good-hope-route-will-cost-suez-canal10m/.
[[15]]
Meng Q, Wang S, Andersson H, Thun K. Containership routing and scheduling in liner shipping: overview and future research directions. Transport Sci 2014;48(2):265–80.
PDF(448 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/