A comprehensive study on in situ stress field characteristics and changes in rock mechanical properties in deep mines in northeastern Yunnan, China

Hui Wang , Bangtao Sun , Cong Cao , Shibo Yu , He Wang , Ye Yuan , Hua Zhong

Deep Underground Science and Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) : 241 -254.

PDF
Deep Underground Science and Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) :241 -254. DOI: 10.1002/dug2.12124
RESEARCH ARTICLE
A comprehensive study on in situ stress field characteristics and changes in rock mechanical properties in deep mines in northeastern Yunnan, China
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The Maoping lead–zinc mining area is a significant metal mine site in northeastern Yunnan. In this study, both hydraulic fracturing in situ stress testing and ultrasonic imaging logging were first carried out in the mining area. Second, 930 focal mechanism solutions and 231 sets of stress data near the mining area were collected. Then, the variations in the type of in situ stress field, the magnitude of in situ stress, the direction of horizontal principal stress, and the ratio of lateral pressure were analyzed to characterize the distribution of the in situ stress field. On this basis, a new method using borehole breakouts and drilling-induced fractures was proposed to determine the stress direction. Finally, the evolution of the mechanical properties of dolomite with burial depth was analyzed and the influence of rock mechanical properties on the distributions of the in situ stress field was explored. The results show that the in situ stress in the mining area is σH > σV > σh, indicating a strike–slip stress state. The in situ stress is high in magnitude, and its value increases with burial depth. The maximum and minimum horizontal lateral stress coefficients are stabilized at approximately 1.22 and 0.73, respectively. The direction of the maximum horizontal principal stress is NW, mainly ranging from N58.44° W to N59.70° W. The stress field inferred from the focal mechanism solution is in good agreement with the test results. The proportion of structural planes with dip angles between 30° and 75° exceeds 80%, and the dip direction of the structural planes is mainly NW to NWW. The line density of structural planes shows high density in shallow areas and low density in deep areas. More energy tends to be accumulated in rocks with higher elastic modulus and strength, leading to higher in situ stress levels. These findings are of significant reference for mine tunnel layout, support design optimization, and disaster prevention.

Keywords

current stress field / in situ stress measurement / northeastern Yunnan / rock mechanical properties / structural plane characteristics

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hui Wang, Bangtao Sun, Cong Cao, Shibo Yu, He Wang, Ye Yuan, Hua Zhong. A comprehensive study on in situ stress field characteristics and changes in rock mechanical properties in deep mines in northeastern Yunnan, China. Deep Underground Science and Engineering, 2025, 4(2): 241-254 DOI:10.1002/dug2.12124

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Anderson EM. The dynamics of faulting and dyke formation with application to Britain. Oliver Boyd; 1951.

[2]

Brown ET, Hoek E. Trends in relationships between measured in-situ stresses and depth. Int J Rock Mech Min Geomech Abstr. 1978; 15(4): 211-215.

[3]

Chen G, Liu X, Song D. Research on in situ stress inversion of deep-buried tunnel based on pressure/tension axis mechanism and geological structure. Deep Undergr Sci Eng. 2023; 2(1): 61-73.

[4]

Cornet FH, Wileveau Y, Bert B, Darcy J. Complete stress determination with the HTPF tool in a mountainous region. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 1997; 34(3/4): 57.e1-57.e15.

[5]

Haimson BC. The effect of lithology, inhomogeneity, topography, and faults, on in situ stress measurements by hydraulic fracturing, and the importance of correct data interpretation and independent evidence in support of results. In: Xie , ed. Rock Stress and Earthquakes. Taylor and Francis Group; 2010.

[6]

Han XY. Research on calibrating method for measuring accuracy of in-situ stress by overcoring method. Chin J Undergr Space Eng. 2019; 15(1): 256-261.

[7]

He MC, Xie HP, Peng SP, Jiang YD. Study on rock mechanics in deep mining engineering. Chin J Rock Mech Eng. 2005; 24(16): 2803.

[8]

He SF, Zhao ZX, Zhang FH, Cao YB. Earthquake risk assessment in Zhaotong, Yunnan Province based on the 1 km grid cell. North China Earth Sci. 2023; 41(4): 16-26.

[9]

Heidbach O, Rajabi M, Cui X, et al. The world stress map database release 2016: crustal stress pattern across scales. Tectonophysics. 2018; 744: 484-498.

[10]

Hoek E, Brown ET. Underground Excavations in Rock. Institution of Mining and Metallurgy; 1980.

[11]

Kang H, Gao FQ. Evolution of mining-induced stress and strata control in underground coal mines. Chinese J Rock Mech Eng. 2024; 43(1): 1-40.

[12]

Lehtonen A, Särkkä P. Evaluation of rock stress estimation by the Kaiser effect. In: Lu M, Li CC, Kjorholt H, eds. In-situ Rock Stress. Taylor and Francis Group; 2006: 135-142.

[13]

Li P, Cai M. Insights into seismicity from the perspective of the crustal stress field: a comment. Nat Hazards. 2022; 111: 1153-1178.

[14]

Li P, Miao SJ. Analysis and application of in-situ stress in metal mining area of Chinese mainland. Chin J Eng. 2017; 39(3): 323-334.

[15]

Li P, Ren F, Cai M, Guo Q, Miao S. Present-day stress state and fault stability analysis in the capital area of China constrained by in situ stress measurements and focal mechanism solutions. J Asian Earth Sci. 2019; 185:104007.

[16]

Lu J, Jiang C, Jin Z, Wang W, Zhuang W, Yu H. Three-dimensional physical model experiment of mining-induced deformation and failure characteristics of roof and floor in deep underground coal seams. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2021; 150: 400-415.

[17]

Miao SJ, Cai MF, Guo QF, Huang ZJ. Rock burst prediction based on in-situ stress and energy accumulation theory. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2016; 83: 86-94.

[18]

Ning S, Zhu W, Xie J, et al. Influence of stress distribution in coal seams of non-uniform extremely thick key stratum and disaster-causing mechanisms. Sci Rep. 2022; 12:14465.

[19]

Rajabi M, Tingay M, Heidbach O. The present-day stress field of New South Wales, Australia. Aust J Earth Sci. 2016; 63: 1-21.

[20]

Vavryčuk V. Iterative joint inversion for stress and fault orientations from focal mechanisms. Geophys J Int. 2014; 199(1): 69-77.

[21]

Wang CH, Xing BR, Chen YQ. Prediction of stress field of super-long deep-buried tunnel area and case analysis. Chin J Geotech Eng. 2014; 36(5): 955-960.

[22]

Worotniki GD, Denham DB. The state stress in the upper part of the earth's crust in Australia according to measurements in mines and tunnels and from seismic observation. Int J Rock Mech Min Geomech Abstr. 1976; 13(10): 123.

[23]

Xie HP, Gao F, Ju Y. Research and development of rock mechanics in deep ground engineering. Chin J Rock Mech Eng. 2015; 34(11): 2161.

[24]

Xie HP, Gao F, Ju Y, Gao MZ, Xie LZ. Quantitative definition and investigation of deep mining. J China Coal Soc. 2015; 40(1): 1-10.

[25]

Zhu Z, Wu Y, Liang Z. Mining-induced stress and ground pressure behavior characteristics in mining a thick coal seam with hard roofs. Front Earth Sci. 2022; 10:843191.

[26]

Zoback ML. Stress field constraints on intraplate seismicity in eastern North America. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 1992; 97(B8): 11761-11782.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Deep Underground Science and Engineering published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of China University of Mining and Technology.

PDF

199

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/