Anensemble method for data stream classification in the presence of concept drift
Omid ABBASZADEH, Ali AMIRI, Ali Reza KHANTEYMOORI
Anensemble method for data stream classification in the presence of concept drift
One recent area of interest in computer science is data stream management and processing. By ‘data stream’, we refer to continuous and rapidly generated packages of data. Specific features of data streams are immense volume, high production rate, limited data processing time, and data concept drift; these features differentiate the data stream from standard types of data. An issue for the data stream is classification of input data. A novel ensemble classifier is proposed in this paper. The classifier uses base classifiers of two weighting functions under different data input conditions. In addition, a new method is used to determine drift, which emphasizes the precision of the algorithm. Another characteristic of the proposed method is removal of different numbers of the base classifiers based on their quality. Implementation of a weighting mechanism to the base classifiers at the decision-making stage is another advantage of the algorithm. This facilitates adaptability when drifts take place, which leads to classifiers with higher efficiency. Furthermore, the proposed method is tested on a set of standard data and the results confirm higher accuracy compared to available ensemble classifiers and single classifiers. In addition, in some cases the proposed classifier is faster and needs less storage space.
Data stream / Classificaion / Ensemble classifiers / Concept drift
[1] |
Baena-García, M., del Campo-Ávila, J., Fidalgo, R., et al., 2006. Early drift detection method. ECML PKDD.
|
[2] |
Bifet, A., 2009. Adaptive learning and mining for data streams and frequent patterns. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 11(1):55–56.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Bifet, A., Holmes, G., Kirkby, R., et al., 2010. MOA: massive online analysis. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 11:1601–1604.
|
[4] |
Brzezinski, D., Stefanowski, J., 2014. Reacting to different types of concept drift: the accuracy updated ensemble algorithm. IEEE Trans. Neur. Netw. Learn. Syst., 25(1):81–94.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Gama, J., 2010. Knowledge Discovery from Data Streams. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London.
|
[6] |
Gama, J., Medas, P., Castillo, G., et al., 2004. Learning with drift detection. Brazilian Symp. on Artificial Intelligence, p.286–295.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Hulten, G., Spencer, L., Domingos, P., 2001. Mining timechanging data streams. Proc. 7th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery Data Mining, p.97106. <DOI OutputMedium="All"/>[doi:10.1145/502512.502529]
|
[8] |
Jiang, T., Feng, Y.C., Zhang, B., et al., 2009. Monitoring correlative financial data streams by local pattern similarity. J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. A, 10(7):937–951.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Kolter, J.Z., Maloof, M.A., 2007. Dynamic weighted majority: an ensemble method for drifting concepts. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 8:2755–2790.
|
[10] |
Kuncheva, L.I., 2004. Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
|
[11] |
Minku, L.L., Yao, X., 2012. DDD: a new ensemble approach for dealing with concept drift. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 24(4):619–633.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Oza, N.C., 2005. Online bagging and boosting. IEEE Int. Conf. on System and Man Cybernetics, p.2340–2345.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Ruping, S., 2001. Incremental learning with support vector machines. IEEE 13th Int. Conf. on Data Mining, p.641–642.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Sim, J., Wright, C.C., 2005. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys. Ther., 85(3):257–268.
|
[15] |
Street, W.N., Kim, Y.S., 2001. A streaming ensemble algorithm (SEA) for large-scale classification. Proc. 7th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, p.377–382.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Tsymbal, A., Pechenizkiy, M., Cunningham, P., et al., 2008. Dynamic integration of classifiers for handling concept drift. Inform. Fus., 9(1):56–68.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Wang, H., Fan, W., Yu, P.S., et al., 2003. Mining concept-drifting data streams using ensemble classifiers. Proc. 9th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, p.226–235.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Xu, W.H., Qin, Z., Chang, Y., 2011. Clustering feature decision trees for semi-supervised classification from high-speed data streams. J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. C (Comput. & Electron.), 12(8):615–628.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Zhang, P., Zhu, X., Shi, Y., 2008. Categorizing and mining concept drifting data streams. Proc. 14th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, p.812–820.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Zhang, P., Zhou, C., Wang, P., et al., 2015. E-tree: an efficient indexing structure for ensemble models on data streams. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 27(2):461–474.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Zhu, X., Zhang, P., Lin, X., et al., 2010. Active learning from stream data using optimal weight classifier ensemble. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B, 40(6):1607–1621.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Žliobaite, I., 2009. Learning under Concept Drift: an Overview. Technical Report. Vilnius University, Lithuania.
|
/
〈 | 〉 |