Overlap maximum matching ratio (OMMR): a new measure to evaluate overlaps of essential modules

Xiao-xia ZHANG, Qiang-hua XIAO, Bin LI, Sai HU, Hui-jun XIONG, Bi-hai ZHAO

PDF(549 KB)
PDF(549 KB)
Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng ›› 2015, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4) : 293-300. DOI: 10.1631/FITEE.1400282

Overlap maximum matching ratio (OMMR): a new measure to evaluate overlaps of essential modules

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Protein complexes are the basic units of macro-molecular organizations and help us to understand the cell’s mechanism. The development of the yeast two-hybrid, tandem affinity purification, and mass spectrometry high-throughput proteomic techniques supplies a large amount of protein-protein interaction data, which make it possible to predict overlapping complexes through computational methods. Research shows that overlapping complexes can contribute to identifying essential proteins, which are necessary for the organism to survive and reproduce, and for life’s activities. Scholars pay more attention to the evaluation of protein complexes. However, few of them focus on predicted overlaps. In this paper, an evaluation criterion called overlap maximum matching ratio (OMMR) is proposed to analyze the similarity between the identified overlaps and the benchmark overlap modules. Comparison of essential proteins and gene ontology (GO) analysis are also used to assess the quality of overlaps. We perform a comprehensive comparison of serveral overlapping complexes prediction approaches, using three yeast protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks. We focus on the analysis of overlaps identified by these algorithms. Experimental results indicate the important of overlaps and reveal the relationship between overlaps and identification of essential proteins.

Keywords

Protein-protein interaction network / Essential protein modules / Overlap / Overlap maximum matching ratio

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiao-xia ZHANG, Qiang-hua XIAO, Bin LI, Sai HU, Hui-jun XIONG, Bi-hai ZHAO. Overlap maximum matching ratio (OMMR): a new measure to evaluate overlaps of essential modules. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng, 2015, 16(4): 293‒300 https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1400282

References

[1]
Adamcsek, B., Palla, G., Farkas, I.J., , 2006. CFinder: locating cliques and overlapping modules in biological networks. Bioinformatics, 22(8): 1021-1023. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Bader, G.D., Hogue, C.W.V., 2003. An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinform., 4: 2.1-2.27. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Boyle, E.I., Weng, S., Gollub, J., , 2004. GO::Term-Finder—open source software for accessing gene ontology information and finding significantly enriched Gene Ontology terms associated with a list of genes. Bioinformatics, 20(18): 3710-3715. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Chen, B., Shi, J., Zhang, S., , 2013. Identifying protein complexes in protein-protein interaction networks by using clique seeds and graph entropy. Proteomics, 13(2): 269-277. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Cherry, J.M., Adler, C., Ball, C., , 1998. SGD: Saccharomyces Genome Database. Nucl. Acids Res., 26(1): 73-79. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Dezső, Z., Oltvai, Z.N., Barabási, A.L., 2003. Bioinformatics analysis of experimentally determined protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Res., 13: 2450-2454. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Enright, A.J., van Dongen, S., Ouzounis, C.A., 2002. An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucl. Acids Res., 30(7): 1575-1584. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Gavin, A.C., Aloy, P., Grandi, P., , 2006. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature, 440: 631-636. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Han, J.D., Bertin, N., Hao, T., , 2004. Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature, 430: 88-93. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Hart, G.T., Lee, I., Marcotte, E.M., 2007. A high-accuracy consensus map of yeast protein complexes reveals modular nature of gene essentiality. BMC Bioinform., 8: 236.1-236.11. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Hu, H., Yan, X., Huang, Y., , 2005. Mining coherent dense subgraphs across massive biological networks for functional discovery. Bioinformatics, 21(suppl 1): i213-i221. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Jiang, P., Singh, M., 2010. SPICi: a fast clustering algorithm for large biological networks. Bioinformatics, 26(8): 1105-1111. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Krogan, N., Cagney, G., Yu, H., , 2006. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 440: 637-643. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Lei, X., Wu, S., Ge, L., , 2013. Clustering and overlapping modules detection in PPI network based on IBFO. Proteomics, 13(2): 278-290. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Leung, H.C.M., Xiang, Q., Yiu, S.M., , 2009. Predicting protein complexes from PPI data: a core-attachment approach. J. Comput. Biol., 16(2): 133-144. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Liu, G., Wong, L., Chua, H.N., 2009. Complex discovery from weighted PPI networks. Bioinformatics, 25(15): 1891-1897. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Macropol, K., Can, T., Singh, A.K., 2009. RRW: repeated random walks on genome-scale protein networks for local cluster discovery. BMC Bioinform., 10: 283.1-283.10.[
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Maraziotis, I.A., Dimitrakopoulou, K., Bezerianos, A., 2007. Growing functional modules from a seed protein via integration of protein interaction and gene expression data. BMC Bioinform., 8: 408.1-408.15. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Mewes, H.W., Frishman, D., Mayer, K.F.X., , 2006. MIPS: analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes in 2005. Nucl. Acids Res., 34(suppl 1): D169-D172. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Nepusz, T., Yu, H., Paccanaro, A., 2012. Detecting overlapping protein complexes in protein-protein interaction networks. Nat. Methods, 9(5): 471-472. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Ni, W.Y., Xiong, H.J., Zhao, B.H., , 2013. Predicting overlapping protein complexes in weighted interactome networks. J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. C (Comput. & Electron.), 14(10): 756-765. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Palla, G., Derényi, I., Farkas, I., , 2005. Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature, 435: 814-818. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Pu, S., Wong, J., Turner, B., , 2009. Up-to-date catalogues of yeast protein complexes. Nucl. Acids Res., 37(3): 825-831. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Shih, Y.K., Parthasarathy, S., 2012. Identifying functional modules in interaction networks through overlapping Markov clustering. Bioinformatics, 28(18): i473-i479. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Stark, C., Breitkreutz, B.J., Reguly, T., , 2006. BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucl. Acids Res., 34(suppl 1): D535-D539. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Wu, M., Li, X., Kwoh, C.K., , 2009. A core-attachment based method to detect protein complexes in PPI networks. BMC Bioinform., 10: 169.1-169.16. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Zhang, R., Lin, Y., 2009. DEG 5.0, a database of essential genes in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Nucl. Acids Res., 37(suppl 1): D455-D458. [
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Zhao, B., Wang, J., Li, M., , 2014. Prediction of essential proteins based on overlapping essential modules. IEEE Trans. NanoBiosci., 13(4): 415-424. [
CrossRef Google scholar
PDF(549 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/