Credible transition plans for coal power sector: current disclosure framework and considerations for transition finance

Abstract

The zero-carbon transition of the coal power industry comes with substantial economic costs, both in terms of the cost of stranded assets and the innovation and application of carbon reduction, zero-carbon, and decarbonization technologies. Mobilizing social capital through transition finance is crucial to support companies in their efforts to reduce carbon emissions. The lack of high-quality data and consistent, comparable disclosure frameworks hinders proper due diligence and strategic planning, presenting a major obstacle to financing the transition. To identify the mismatches between existing disclosure frameworks for transition plans and the needs of transition finance, we conducted a systematic review of various transition disclosure frameworks, such as TCFD (Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures), CA100+ (Climate Action 100+) and TPT (Transition Plan Taskforce), and compared them with the information requirements of financial institutions for assessing coal phase-out plans of production entities. The results indicate that the ex-ante assessment of transition finance requires disclosure frameworks to be further expanded and aligned in areas such as technological distinctions and data quality to meet the demands of pricing, risk management, new product innovation, and disclosure of financial institutions’ carbon footprints in their asset portfolios. Moreover, the implementation of the current disclosure standards by coal power enterprises may encounter dual constraints from soft regulatory practices and the external business environment, resulting in the emergence of the “green silence” phenomenon. The inconsistency between disclosure frameworks may also give rise to regulatory arbitrage, leading to a distorted evaluation of the transition process of coal power enterprises by the capital market, resulting in potential price distortions and credit risks.

Keywords

Coal power sector / zero-carbon transition / transition finance / information disclosure

References

[1] bp statistical review of world energy. 2022. Available from: https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2022-full-report.pdf [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[2] Iea. Tracking electricity. Available from: https://www.iea.org/fuels-and-technologies/electricity [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[3] Liu Q,Zhao X,Lugovoy O.Carbon emission scenarios of China's power sector: impact of controlling measures and carbon pricing mechanism.Adv Clim Chang Res2018;9:27-33

[4] Victor N,Zelek C.The U.S. power sector decarbonization: investigating technology options with MARKAL nine-region model.Energy Econ2018;73:410-25

[5] Gadre R.Assessing the evolution of India's power sector to 2050 under different CO₂ emissions rights allocation schemes.Energy Sustain Dev2019;50:126-38

[6] Climate Action Tracker. Global update: Paris agreement turning point. 2020. Available from: https://climateactiontracker.org/press/global-update-paris-agreement-turning-point/ [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[7] Bloomberg NEF. Getting on track for net-zero by 2050 will require rapid scaling of investment in the energy transition over the next ten years. 2021. Available from: https://about.newenergyfinance.com/blog/getting-on-track-for-net-zero-by-2050-will-require-rapid-scaling-of-investment-in-the-energy-transition-over-the-next-ten-years/ [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[8] Hauenstein C.Stranded assets and early closures in global coal mining under 1.5 °C.Environ Res Lett2023;18:024021

[9] Iea. Net zero by 2050: a roadmap for the global energy sector. 2021. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050 [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[10] Gao L; People’s Bank of China Harbin Central Sub-branch Subject G20roup. Analysis and suggestions on the connotation, meaning and criteria of transition finance abroad. Heilongjiang Finance 2022;10:10-2.(in Chinese). Available from: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=A67obWUfw0n_jLDjltXPEpUJ6Zjt3As_zv_LII3DPyUKsJpjsHMmMDQwF9iYAJOl7t1N4JjXtvxGe0aM8RlQ7y7eNqAl96p6gSh-FeR74zHTCP6gsT4gGnOmd_K4NGQO8izDNaLELwIukKcSHQLOLQ==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS [Last accessed on 26 Oct 2023].

[11] Yuan JH,Zhang J.Low carbon development outlook of China’s thermal power industry in the context of carbon neutrality.Chn Natl Cond Strength2022;12:9-13. (in Chinese)

[12] G20 sustainable finance working group. G20 sustainable finance report. 2022. Available from: https://g20sfwg.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/2022-G20-Sustainable-Finance-Report-2.pdf [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[13] Ameli N,Bisaro A,Chenet H.Climate finance and disclosure for institutional investors: why transparency is not enough.Clim Change2020;160:565-89

[14] Tandon, A. Transition finance: investigating the state of play - a stocktake of emerging approaches and financial instruments. Available from: https://one.oecd.org/document/ENV/WKP(2021)11/En/pdf [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[15] Tachev V. Investing in coal projects bears major financial and reputational risks. 2021. Available from: https://energytracker.asia/investing-in-coal-projects-bears-major-financial-and-reputational-risks/ [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[16] Li L. International progress and insights in transition finance. Financial Expo 2023;2:16-7.(in Chinese). Available from: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=A67obWUfw0moNSqvJE8QOt1bRGw32aigPzwgmYJ9axjOQ-I7g4Ga2r4PgoxhXjSK1Ep9WrBQAvOpBfOl5_w_I9-i2G8ReJvut48H9UHmIWSUqA1TmkOI2T4PJthW8lzf5IY6ksiaReTrlw8Uh18_eg==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS [Last accessed on 26 Oct 2023].

[17] United Nations. Glasgow climate pact. 2021. Available from: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/cma3_auv_2_cover%2520decision.pdf [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[18] Harvard law school forum on corporate governance. Vanguard’s expectations for companies with significant coal exposure. 2022. Available from: https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2022/01/07 [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[19] U.S. securities and exchange commission. SEC proposes rules to enhance and standardize climate-related disclosures for investors. 2022. Available from: https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2022-46 [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[20] TCFD. Task force on climate-related financial disclosures. 2022. Available from: https://assets.bbhub.io/company/sites/60/2022/12/tcfd-2022-overview-booklet.pdf [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[21] Wang JX.Recent trends in international zero-carbon disclosure regulatory policies and implications for China.Tsinghua Financ Rev2023;2:20-3. (in Chinese)

[22] Climate action 100+ net zero company benchmark 2.0. 2023. (in Chinese) Available from: https://www.climateaction100.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Climate-Action-100-Net-Zero-Company-Benchmark-Framework-2.0._SC.pdf [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[23] Progress update 2022. Five years of climate action 100+. Available from: https://www.climateaction100.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/CA-100-Progress-Update-2022-FINAL-2.pdf [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[24] Reclaim Finance. The CA100+ benchmark: still some way to go. 2022. Available from: https://reclaimfinance.org/site/en/2022/01/07/ca100-benchmark/ [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[25] Accounting for sustainability. Q&A with Jacques Morris, UK transition plan taskforce. 2022. Available from: https://www.accountingforsustainability.org/en/knowledge-hub/blogs/disclosure-framework-jacques-morris-uk-transition-plan-taskforce.html [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[26] Zhou XY. Assessing the credibility of climate transition plans in the power sector. 2023. Available from: https://sustainablefinance.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/SSEE-Discussion-Paper-Power_finalXZ.pdf [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[27] TPT. The transition plan taskforce disclosure framework. 2022. Available from: https://transitiontaskforce.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/TPT-Disclosure-Framework.pdf [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[28] Verrecchia RE.Essays on disclosure.J Account Econ2001;32:97-180

[29] Wu HJ,Wu SN.Corporate environmental disclosure and financing constraints. World Econ 2017;40:124-47. (in Chinese)

[30] Zhou YY,Lei FY,Zhang JX.Effect of environmental information disclosure on the financing efficiency of enterprises - evidence from China’s listed energy companies. Sustainability 2022;14:16699. Available from: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=A67obWUfw0khNF0eS79XKDWgO_K_B3TqAsNkE9tvnOugnFHENNdsb12jR0i5nvAJ3xIHKRsat8Ur-cEILvIGqWuIvml-WJ5ZMh-2XTu6qRvrCjZKVFmhqpmD9hio8YG345jgoacDUvk9gzVwPXnoPGbVb5Z3fcuFl00W3TjDSSk=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS [Last accessed on 26 Oct 2023].

[31] Ho K,Lu C.Does information disclosure and transparency ranking system prevent the default risk of a firm?.Econ Anal Policy2023;78:1089-105

[32] Li Q,Shi HM,Zhang FD.Corporate environmental information disclosure and bank financing: moderating effect of formal and informal institutions.Bus Strategy Environ2022;31:2931-46

[33] Wang G,Shen J.Corporate carbon information disclosure and financing costs: the moderating effect of sustainable development.Sustainability2022;14:9159

[34] Raimo N,Zito M,Mariani M.Extending the benefits of ESG disclosure: the effect on the cost of debt financing.Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag2021;28:1412-21

[35] LMA. Sustainability linked loan principles. Supporting environmentally and socially sustainable economic activity. 2019. Available from: https://www.lma.eu.com/application/files/5115/8866/8901/Sustainability_Linked_Loan_Principles_V032.pdf [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[36] ICMA. Sustainability-linked bond principles. 2020. Available from: https://www.icmagroup.org/sustainable-finance/the-principles-guidelines-and-handbooks/sustainability-linked-bond-principles-slbp/ [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[37] ICMA. Sustainability linked loan principles. 2019. Available from: https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Regulatory/Green-Bonds/LMASustainabilityLinkedLoanPrinciples-270919.pdf [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[38] Technical report. Taxonomy: final report of the technical expert group on sustainable finance. 2020. Available from: https://finance.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2020-03/200309-sustainable-finance-teg-final-report-taxonomy_en.pdf [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[39] Wei TL.Theoretical basis, practical experience and countermeasure suggestions of transition finance.Bus Econ2023; 42:141-9. (in Chinese)

[40] Liu BL.International practices and lessons learned in transition finance from the perspective of climate change risk.Fin Dev Rev2022;03:54-69. (in Chinese)

[41] Zhong GY.Definition, principle framework and characteristics of transition finance - a perspective based on literature review.West Finance2021;9:73-6+87. (in Chinese)

[42] China dialogue. What’s holding back transition finance in China? 2023. Available from: https://chinadialogue.net/en/energy/whats-holding-back-transition-finance-in-china/ [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[43] Forbes. Measuring up: financial institutions and emissions. Available from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/deloitte/2021/12/15/measuring-up-financial-institutions-and-emissions/ [Last accessed on23 Oct 2023].

[44] Hong Kong green finance association. Navigating climate transition finance. 2020. Available from: https://www.hkgreenfinance.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Navigating-Climate-Transition-Finance.pdf [Last accessed on 26 Oct 2023].

[45] CBI. Transition finance in China: latest development and future outlook. 2022. Available from: https://www.climatebonds.net/resources/reports/transition-finance-china-latest-development-and-future-outlook [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[46] CBI. Financing credible transitions. 2020. Available from: https://www.climatebonds.net/resources/reports/financing-credible-transitions-white-paper [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[47] ICMA. Climate transition finance handbook. 2020. Available from: https://www.icmagroup.org/sustainable-finance/the-principles-guidelines-and-handbooks/climate-transition-finance-handbook/ [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[48] DBS. Sustainable transition finance framework taxonomy. 2020. Available from: https://www.dbs.com/iwov-resources/images/sustainability/responsible-banking/IBG%20Sustainable%20%26%20Transition%20Finance%20Framework_Jun2020.pdf?pid=DBSBank-IBG-SustainableTransition-Finance-Framework-Taxonomy [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[49] Yin H; Transition Finance Disclosure Research Group. Research on disclosure in transition finance - based on the perspective of financial institutions.Financial Forum2023;28:3-9. (in Chinese)

[50] Platform on sustainable finance. Transition finance report. 2021. Available from: https://finance.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-03/210319-eu-platform-transition-finance-report_en.pdf [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[51] Bank of China Limited. Transition bonds management statement. 2021. Available from: https://pic.bankofchina.com/bocappd/report/202101/P020210106328842685396.pdf [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[52] China Construction Bank. Transition bond framework. 2021. Available from: http://www2.ccb.com/cn/investor/upload/bond/20210413_1618282946/20210413110254366415.pdf [Last accessed on 26 Oct 2023].

[53] Authority of Singapore. MAS launches consultation on coal phase-out criteria under the Singapore-Asia taxonomy. Available from: https://www.mas.gov.sg/news/media-releases/2023/mas-launches-consultation-on--coal-phase-out-criteria-under-the-singapore-asia-taxonomy [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[54] Glasgow financial alliance for net zero. Financing the managed phaseout of coal-fired power plants in Asia pacific. Available from: https://assets.bbhub.io/company/sites/63/2023/05/gfanz_consultation_managed-phaseout-of-coal-in-Asia-Pacific.pdf [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[55] GlobalData. Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of major power and utility companies in 2021. Available from: https://www.globaldata.com/data-insights/power-and-utilities/scope-3-greenhouse-gas-ghg-emissions-of-major-power-and-utility-companies-2091188/ [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[56] PetroChina. Environmental, social and governance report. 2022. Available from: http://www.petrochina.com.cn/petrochina/xhtml/images/shyhj/2022esgen.pdf [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[57] Sinopec. Sustainability report. 2022. Available from: http://www.sinopec.com/listco/en/Resource/Pdf/2023032506.pdf [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[58] Walmart. Environmental, social and governance summary report. 2022. Available from: https://mco-image.walmartmobile.cn/image/Compliance/walmart-fy2022-esg-summary.pdf [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[59] Volkswagen. Sustainability report. 2022. Available from: https://www.volkswagengroupchina.com.cn/zh-cn/csr/sustainabilityreport [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[60] Carbon tracker initiative. Still Flying blind: the absence of climate risk in financial reporting. Available from: https://carbontracker.org/reports/still-flying-blind-the-absence-of-climate-risk-in-financial-reporting/ [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[61] South Pole. Net zero and beyond - south pole’s 2022 net zero report. Available from: https://www.southpole.com/publications/net-zero-and-beyond [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].

[62] IRENA. Global renewables outlook: energy transformation 2050. 2020. Available from: https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Apr/Global-Renewables-Outlook-2020 [Last accessed on 23 Oct 2023].