A systematic review of urban road traffic CO2 emission models
Chenxiao Yu , Xiaoguang Yang , Jiantao Mu , Sijin Liu
Carbon Footprints ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3) : 17
With rapid urbanization and increasing mobility demand, urban traffic systems face intensifying congestion, resulting in elevated CO2 emissions. This paper provides a systematic review of the current status of models estimating CO2 emissions from urban road traffic, considering their applicability across various traffic management scenarios. Urban road traffic CO2 emission models can generally be categorized into two main types. Traditional models typically estimate emissions based on average speed, traffic conditions, or vehicle operation modes, whereas data-driven models leverage techniques such as machine learning and deep learning to capture complex emission patterns. The review proposes a set of model selection criteria, namely data availability, computational complexity, interpretability, and transferability. Based on a comparative evaluation of these criteria, the study finds that there is no one-size-fits-all model so far. Instead, model suitability depends heavily on local data infrastructure and specific application needs. Therefore, future work needs to enhance model localization and personalization to improve estimation accuracy, while the integration of spatiotemporal data-driven modeling approaches is likely to become a research hotspot in upcoming studies.
Urban road traffic / CO2 emission models / data-driven modeling / time-series analysis / spatiotemporal modeling / carbon emissions
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
California Air Resources Board. EMFAC2021 Volume III Technical Document, Version 1.0.1 April 2021. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2021-08/emfac2021_technical_documentation_april2021.pdf (accessed 2025-03-13). |
| [35] |
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Mobile source emission factors research. https://www.epa.gov/moves/mobile-source-emission-factors-research (accessed 2025-03-13). |
| [36] |
HBEFA-handbook emission factors for road transport. https://www.hbefa.net/ (accessed 2025-03-13). |
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
United States Environmental Protection Agency. MOVES and mobile source emissions research. https://www.epa.gov/moves (accessed 2025-03-13). |
| [41] |
International Sustainable Systems Research Center. International vehicle emissions Model (IVE). http://www.issrc.org/ive/ (accessed 2025-03-14). |
| [42] |
Center for Environmental Research and Technology. Comprehensive modal emission model (CMEM). https://www.cert.ucr.edu/cmem (accessed 2025-03-14). |
| [43] |
German Aerospace Center (DLR). PHEMlight-SUMO documentation. https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Models/Emissions/PHEMlight.html (accessed 2025-03-14). |
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
|
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
|
| [102] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |