Aim: Cisplatin resistance remains a major obstacle to the effective treatment of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC). This study is dedicated to elucidating the role and mechanism of circular RNA (circRNA) hsa-circ-0001030 in modulating cisplatin sensitivity and metabolic reprogramming in TSCC.
Methods: CircRNA sequencing, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization were used to test hsa-circ-0001030 expression in TSCC tissues and cell lines. Gain-of-function assays (colony formation, cell counting kit-8, Transwell assay, and xenograft models) were conducted to evaluate proliferation, invasion, and cisplatin response. Mechanistic studies, including RNA pull-down, RNA-binding protein immunoprecipitation, and western blotting, were performed to identify pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) as a binding partner of hsa-circ-0001030 and to assess glycolytic activity, glucose uptake, and lactate production.
Results: Hsa-circ-0001030 was markedly downregulated in TSCC and cisplatin-resistant cells. Overexpression of hsa-circ-0001030 suppressed tumor growth, migration, and glycolytic flux, while enhancing cisplatin sensitivity both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, hsa-circ-0001030 directly bound to PKM2 at nucleotides 138-169, inhibited PKM2 enzymatic activity, restraining tetramer formation and increased tyrosine 105 (Tyr105) phosphorylation and thereby blocking PKM2-driven glycolysis. Clinically, low hsa-circ-0001030 expression correlated with advanced tumor-node-metastasis stage, poor differentiation, and unsatisfying prognosis in TSCC patients.
Conclusion: Hsa-circ-0001030 acted as a tumor-suppressive circRNA that might depress PKM2-dependent metabolic reprogramming and cisplatin resistance in TSCC, highlighting its potential as a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for overcoming chemoresistance.
Aim: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) feature an antibody recognizing a specific protein joined to a potent toxic payload. Numerous ADCs have received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval; however, clinical resistance arises. Resistance mechanisms include decreased expression or mutation of the antibody target, impaired payload release, or increased expression of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding cassette (ABC) efflux transporters associated with multidrug resistance. We therefore sought to characterize the interactions of ABC multidrug transporters with ADC payloads.
Methods: We performed a high-throughput screen with 27 common ADC payloads using cell lines expressing ABC transporters P-glycoprotein [P-gp, encoded by ABC subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1)] or ABC subfamily B member G2 (ABCG2, encoded by ABCG2). Confirmatory assays were also performed using cells transfected to express P-gp, ABCG2, or multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1, encoded by ABCC1).
Results: Several commonly used ADC payloads were substrates of P-gp, including calicheamicin γ1, monomethyl auristatin E, mertansine (DM1), and ravtansine (DM4). All the pyrrolobenzodiazepines tested - SJG136, SGD-1882, SG2057, and SG3199 - were substrates of P-gp, ABCG2, and MRP1. The modified anthracyclines nemorubicin and its metabolite PNU-159682 were poorly transported by both ABCB1 and ABCG2 and displayed nanomolar to picomolar toxicity. Further, we found that the efficacy of the FDA-approved ADC mirvetuximab soravtansine, with DM4 as the toxic payload, was decreased in cell lines expressing P-gp. In contrast, Duocarmycin DM and PNU-159682 were exquisitely toxic to a panel of 99 cancer cell lines of varying origins.
Conclusion: Several commonly used ADC payloads can be transported by ABC transporters, potentially leading to transporter-mediated drug resistance in patients. Future ADCs should be developed using payloads that are not ABC transporter substrates.
The reciprocal feedback between cancer stem cells (CSCs) and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) is increasingly recognized as a driver of therapeutic resistance and tumor evolution. According to the “soil and seed” hypothesis, CAFs create a biochemical and biomechanical “soil” for CSCs to seed, grow, and thrive. In turn, CSCs manipulate and transform fibroblasts to promote CSC traits, thus completing the loop of CAF-CSC crosstalk through bidirectional molecular communication within the tumor microenvironment. This review encompasses recent advances in CAF heterogeneity, including conserved and malignancy-specific subtypes, as well as the molecular dialogue driving resistance. We also briefly discuss emerging therapeutic approaches, particularly the potential of natural compounds to target both CSCs and CAFs. By bridging mechanistic insights with translational innovations, this review provides a roadmap for breaking the CSC-CAF alliance, offering hope for overcoming therapeutic resistance and improving cancer outcomes.