Multi-omics analysis of human tendon adhesion reveals that ACKR1-regulated macrophage migration is involved in regeneration

Xinshu Zhang1, Yao Xiao1, Bo Hu2, Yanhao Li1, Shaoyang Zhang3, Jian Tian4, Shuo Wang1, Zaijin Tao1, Xinqi Zeng4, Ning-Ning Liu5, Baojie Li3, Shen Liu1

Bone Research ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (0) : 27. DOI: 10.1038/s41413-024-00324-w
ARTICLE

Multi-omics analysis of human tendon adhesion reveals that ACKR1-regulated macrophage migration is involved in regeneration

  • Xinshu Zhang1, Yao Xiao1, Bo Hu2, Yanhao Li1, Shaoyang Zhang3, Jian Tian4, Shuo Wang1, Zaijin Tao1, Xinqi Zeng4, Ning-Ning Liu5, Baojie Li3, Shen Liu1
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Tendon adhesion is a common complication after tendon injury with the development of accumulated fibrotic tissues without effective anti-fibrotic therapies, resulting in severe disability. Macrophages are widely recognized as a fibrotic trigger during peritendinous adhesion formation. However, different clusters of macrophages have various functions and receive multiple regulation, which are both still unknown. In our current study, multi-omics analysis including single-cell RNA sequencing and proteomics was performed on both human and mouse tendon adhesion tissue at different stages after tendon injury. The transcriptomes of over 74 000 human single cells were profiled. As results, we found that SPP1+ macrophages, RGCC+ endothelial cells, ACKR1+ endothelial cells and ADAM12+ fibroblasts participated in tendon adhesion formation. Interestingly, despite specific fibrotic clusters in tendon adhesion, FOLR2+ macrophages were identified as an antifibrotic cluster by in vitro experiments using human cells. Furthermore, ACKR1 was verified to regulate FOLR2+ macrophages migration at the injured peritendinous site by transplantation of bone marrow from Lysm-Cre;R26RtdTomato mice to lethally irradiated Ackr1-/- mice (Ackr1-/- chimeras; deficient in ACKR1) and control mice (WT chimeras). Compared with WT chimeras, the decline of FOLR2+ macrophages was also observed, indicating that ACKR1 was specifically involved in FOLR2+ macrophages migration. Taken together, our study not only characterized the fibrosis microenvironment landscape of tendon adhesion by multi-omics analysis, but also uncovered a novel antifibrotic cluster of macrophages and their origin. These results provide potential therapeutic targets against human tendon adhesion.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xinshu Zhang, Yao Xiao, Bo Hu, Yanhao Li, Shaoyang Zhang, Jian Tian, Shuo Wang, Zaijin Tao, Xinqi Zeng, Ning-Ning Liu, Baojie Li, Shen Liu. Multi-omics analysis of human tendon adhesion reveals that ACKR1-regulated macrophage migration is involved in regeneration. Bone Research, 2024, 12(0): 27 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-024-00324-w

References

1. de Putter, C. E.et al. Economic impact of hand and wrist injuries: health-care costs and productivity costs in a population-based study. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 94, e56(2012).
2. de Jong, J. P.et al. The incidence of acute traumatic tendon injuries in the hand and wrist: a 10-year population-based study. Clin. Orthop. Surg. 6, 196-202 (2014).
3. Manning, C. N.et al.The early inflammatory response after flexor tendon healing: a gene expression and histological analysis. J. Orthop. Res. 32, 645-652 (2014).
4. Li, Y.et al.Novel enzyme-sensitive poly-tioxolone membranes for peritendinous anti-adhesion. Compos Part B: Eng. 238, 1-10 (2022).
5. Voleti, P. B., Buckley, M. R.& Soslowsky, L. J. Tendon healing: repair and regeneration. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 14, 47-71 (2012).
6. Titan A. L., Foster D. S., Chang J.& Longaker, M. T. Flexor tendon: development, healing, adhesion formation, and contributing growth factors. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 144, 639e-647e (2019).
7. Oak, N. R.et al.Inhibition of 5-LOX, COX-1, and COX-2 increases tendon healing and reduces muscle fibrosis and lipid accumulation after rotator cuff repair. Am. J. Sports Med. 42, 2860-2868 (2014).
8. Ramachandran, P.et al. Resolving the fibrotic niche of human liver cirrhosis at single-cell level. Nature 575, 512-518 (2019).
9. Girbl, T.et al. Distinct compartmentalization of the chemokines CXCL1 and CXCL2 and the atypical receptor ACKR1 determine discrete stages of neutrophil diapedesis. Immunity 49, 1062-1076.e6 (2018).
10. Li, Y.et al.Neutralization of excessive levels of active TGF-β1 reduces MSC recruitment and differentiation to mitigate peritendinous adhesion. Bone Res. 11, 24(2023).
11. Cheng, S.et al. A pan-cancer single-cell transcriptional atlas of tumor infiltrating myeloid cells. Cell 184, 792-809.e23 (2021).
12. Wu Z., Zhang Z., Lei Z.& Lei, P. CD14: biology and role in the pathogenesis of disease. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 48, 24-31 (2019).
13. Muller, A. M.et al.Expression of the endothelial markers PECAM-1, vWf, and CD34 in vivo and in vitro. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 72, 221-229 (2002).
14. Kalucka, J.et al. Single-cell transcriptome atlas of murine endothelial cells. Cell 180, 764-779 e20 (2020).
15. Liu, H.et al.Prrx1 marks stem cells for bone, white adipose tissue and dermis in adult mice. Nat. Genet. 54, 1946-1958 (2022).
16. L. Ramos,T. et al. MSC surface markers (CD44, CD73, and CD90) can identify human MSC-derived extracellular vesicles by conventional flow cytometry. Cell Commun. Signal. 14, 2(2016).
17. Xie, X.et al.Single-cell transcriptome profiling reveals neutrophil heterogeneity in homeostasis and infection. Nat. Immunol. 21, 1119-1133 (2020).
18. King, H. W.et al.Single-cell analysis of human B cell maturation predicts how antibody class switching shapes selection dynamics. Sci. Immunol. 6, eabe6291 (2021).
19. Szabo, P. A.et al.Single-cell transcriptomics of human T cells reveals tissue and activation signatures in health and disease. Nat. Commun. 10, 4706(2019).
20. Derakhshan, T., Boyce, J. A.& Dwyer, D. F. Defining mast cell differentiation and heterogeneity through single-cell transcriptomics analysis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 150, 739-747 (2022).
21. Tasdemir-Yilmaz, O. E.et al. Diversity of developing peripheral glia revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Dev. Cell 56, 2516-2535.e8 (2021).
22. Cho H., Kozasa T., Bondjers C., Betsholtz C.& Kehrl, J. H. Pericyte-specific expression of Rgs5: implications for PDGF and EDG receptor signaling during vascular maturation. FASEB J. 17, 440-442 (2003).
23. Gogiraju, R.et al.Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B deficiency in vascular smooth muscle cells promotes perivascular fibrosis following arterial injury. Thromb. Haemost. 122, 1814-1826 (2022).
24. Dulauroy S.,Di Carlo, S. E., Langa, F., Eberl, G. & Peduto, L. Lineage tracing and genetic ablation of ADAM12+ perivascular cells identify a major source of profibrotic cells during acute tissue injury. Nat. Med. 18, 1262-1270 (2012).
25. Deng, C. C.et al.Single-cell RNA-seq reveals fibroblast heterogeneity and increased mesenchymal fibroblasts in human fibrotic skin diseases. Nat. Commun. 12, 3709(2021).
26. Zhan, T.et al.Cangrelor alleviates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis by inhibiting platelet activation in mice. Mol. Immunol. 120, 83-92 (2020).
27. Jia, L. X.et al.Inhibition of platelet activation by clopidogrel prevents hypertension-induced cardiac inflammation and fibrosis. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 27, 521-530 (2013).
28. Liu, G.et al.P?selectin increases angiotensin II?induced cardiac inflammation and fibrosis via platelet activation. Mol. Med Rep. 13, 5021-5028 (2016).
29. Moczydlowska, J.et al.HIF-1 alpha as a key factor in bile duct ligation-induced liver fibrosis in rats. J. Invest Surg. 30, 41-46 (2017).
30. Kutschera, S.et al.Differential endothelial transcriptomics identifies semaphorin 3G as a vascular class 3 semaphorin. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 31, 151-159 (2011).
31. Voigt, A. P.et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of the human retinal pigment epithelium and choroid in health and macular degeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 24100-24107 (2019).
32. Thiriot, A.et al.Differential DARC/ACKR1 expression distinguishes venular from non-venular endothelial cells in murine tissues. BMC Biol. 15, 45(2017).
33. Vlaicu, S. I.et al.RGC-32' dual role in smooth muscle cells and atherogenesis. Clin. Immunol. 238, 109020(2022).
34. Loiselle, A. E.et al.Bone marrow-derived matrix metalloproteinase-9 is associated with fibrous adhesion formation after murine flexor tendon injury. PLoS One 7, e40602 (2012).
35. Hu B.& Phan, S. H. Notch in fibrosis and as a target of anti-fibrotic therapy. Pharm. Res. 108, 57-64 (2016).
36. Griffin, M. F.et al.JUN promotes hypertrophic skin scarring via CD36 in preclinical in vitro and in vivo models. Sci. Transl. Med. 13, eabb3312 (2021).
37. Palomer, X.et al.SIRT3-mediated inhibition of FOS through histone H3 deacetylation prevents cardiac fibrosis and inflammation. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 5, 14(2020).
38. Villani, A. C.et al.Single-cell RNA-seq reveals new types of human blood dendritic cells, monocytes, and progenitors. Science 356, eaah4573 (2017).
39. Moller, A.et al.The roles of toll-like receptor 4, CD33, CD68, CD69, or CD147/ EMMPRIN for monocyte activation by the DAMP S100A8/S100A9. Front. Immunol. 14, 1110185(2023).
40. Nazari, A.et al.S100A12 in renal and cardiovascular diseases. Life Sci. 191, 253-258 (2017).
41. Papalexi E.& Satija, R. Single-cell RNA sequencing to explore immune cell heterogeneity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 18, 35-45 (2018).
42. Yi Y. S.Folate receptor-targeted diagnostics and therapeutics for inflammatory diseases. Immune Netw. 16, 337-343 (2016).
43. Nalio Ramos, R.et al. Tissue-resident FOLR2+ macrophages associate with CD8+ T cell infiltration in human breast cancer. Cell 185, 1189-1207.e25 (2022).
44. Mimpen, J. Y., Snelling, S. J.B., Carr, A. J. & Dakin, S. G. Interleukin-17 cytokines and receptors: potential amplifiers of tendon inflammation. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9, 795830(2021).
45. Morse, C.et al.Proliferating SPP1/MERTK-expressing macrophages in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J. 54, 1-25 (2019).
46. Wculek, S. K.et al. Oxidative phosphorylation selectively orchestrates tissue macrophage homeostasis. Immunity 56, 516-530.e9 (2023).
47. Nakerakanti S. S., Kapanadze B., Yamasaki M., Markiewicz M.& Trojanowska, M. Fli1 and Ets1 have distinct roles in connective tissue growth factor/CCN2 gene regulation and induction of the profibrotic gene program. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 25259-25269 (2006).
48. Zafar A., Ng H. P., Kim G. D., Chan E. R.& Mahabeleshwar, G. H. BHLHE40 promotes macrophage pro-inflammatory gene expression and functions. FASEB J. 35, e21940(2021).
49. Dai, W.et al.SOX4 promotes proliferative signals by regulating glycolysis through AKT activation in melanoma cells. J. Investig. Dermatol. 137, 2407-2416 (2017).
50. Ding, X.et al.Sperm-specific glycolysis enzyme glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase regulated by transcription factor SOX10 to promote uveal melanoma tumorigenesis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 610683(2021).
51. Fourman, L. T.et al.Effects of tesamorelin on hepatic transcriptomic signatures in HIV-associated NAFLD. JCI Insight 5, e140134 (2020).
52. Lee, K. M.et al. MYC and MCL1 cooperatively promote chemotherapy-resistant breast cancer stem cells via regulation of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. Cell Metab. 26, 633-647.e7 (2017).
53. Wang, X.et al.Association of A561C and G98T polymorphisms in E-selectin gene with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 8, e79301 (2013).
54. Tonkin, J.et al.Monocyte/macrophage-derived IGF-1 orchestrates murine skeletal muscle regeneration and modulates autocrine polarization. Mol. Ther. 23, 1189-1200 (2015).
55. Prabhath, A.et al. Pegylated insulin‐like growth factor‐1 biotherapeutic delivery promotes rotator cuff regeneration in a rat model. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 110, 1356-1371 (2022).
56. Miescher I., Rieber J., Calcagni M.& Buschmann, J. In vitro and in vivo effects of IGF-1 delivery strategies on tendon healing: a review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 2370(2023).
57. Minutti, C. M.et al. A macrophage-pericyte axis directs tissue restoration via amphiregulin-induced transforming growth factor beta activation. Immunity 50, 645-654.e6 (2019).
58. Wu, C. F.et al.Transforming growth factor beta-1 stimulates profibrotic epithelial signaling to activate pericyte-myofibroblast transition in obstructive kidney fibrosis. Am. J. Pathol. 182, 118-131 (2013).
59. Lin, S. L.et al.Targeting endothelium-pericyte cross talk by inhibiting VEGF receptor signaling attenuates kidney microvascular rarefaction and fibrosis. Am. J. Pathol. 178, 911-923 (2011).
60. Intratumor microbes promote murine breast cancer cell invasion. Cancer Discov. 12, 1407(2022).
61. Huang, W. Y.et al.RGC-32 mediates transforming growth factor-beta-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human renal proximal tubular cells. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 9426-9432 (2009).
62. Raslan, A. A.et al. Single cell transcriptomics of fibrotic lungs unveils agingassociated alterations in endothelial and epithelial cell regeneration. bioRxiv (2023).
63. Kerna, I.et al. The ADAM12 is upregulated in synovitis and postinflammatory fibrosis of the synovial membrane in patients with early radiographic osteoarthritis. Jt. Bone Spine 81, 51-56 (2014).
Funding
Baojie Li (libj@sjtu.edu.cn) or Shen Liu (liushensjtu@sjtu.edu.cn)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/