Optimized synthesis and characterization of laterite biochar composite for arsenic removal: examining colloidal stability and As(III) oxidation

Abstract

Arsenic contamination of water and soil affects many regions worldwide, and an eco-friendly and sustainable decontamination solution is needed. A promising approach involves preparing a composite adsorbent using biochar and laterite-based adsorbent. The biochar composite (LBC) uses biochar as a stable carbon matrix that distributes treated laterite minerals efficiently and reduces agglomeration. In contrast, treated laterite, rich in mixed metal oxides like iron and aluminum hydroxides, enhances the adsorption capacity, selectivity, and stability of biochar. Process optimization determines the optimal pyrolysis temperature, organic–inorganic content, treatment methodology, biochar incorporation at a particular pH, and colloidal instability. The Langmuir isotherm model estimates maximum arsenic adsorption capacities of 21 g kg^–1 for As(V) and 14 g kg^–1 for As(III), respectively, with high adsorption rates at both low and high arsenic concentrations. FTIR and XPS analysis suggest hydroxyl and metal oxide aid adsorption, while the quenching experiments with EPR analysis confirm the active role of hydroxyl-free radicles in the oxidation and subsequent adsorption of arsenic species. The used adsorbent can be regenerated using 0.2 M NaOH and shows a safe landfilling option for spent adsorbent based on the TCLP tests. The synergistic combination of laterite with biochar makes LBC an efficient and sustainable solution for the removal of arsenic from water with high adsorption capacity and easy regeneration.

Graphical Abstract

References

[1] AbbasZ, AliS, RizwanM, et al. . A critical review of mechanisms involved in the adsorption of organic and inorganic contaminants through biochar. Arab J Geosci, 2018

[2] AhmadM, RajapakshaAU, LimJE, et al. . Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere, 2014, 99: 19-33

[3] ArifM, LiuG, YousafB, et al. . Synthesis, characteristics and mechanistic insight into the clays and clay minerals-biochar surface interactions for contaminants removal—a review. J Clean Prod, 2021, 310: 127548

[4] ChaudharyM, RawatS, JainN, et al. . Chitosan-Fe-Al-Mn metal oxyhydroxides composite as highly efficient fluoride scavenger for aqueous medium. Carbohydr Polym, 2019, 216: 140-148

[5] ChenL, ChenXL, ZhouCH, et al. . Environmental-friendly montmorillonite-biochar composites: facile production and tunable adsorption-release of ammonium and phosphate. J Clean Prod, 2017, 156: 648

[6] GaiX, WangH, LiuJ, et al. . Effects of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature on biochar adsorption of ammonium and nitrate. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9 e0113888

[7] GuilhenSN, MašekO, OrtizN, et al. . Pyrolytic temperature evaluation of macauba biochar for uranium adsorption from aqueous solutions. Biomass Bioenergy, 2019, 122: 381

[8] HuP, ZhangY, LiuL, et al. . Biochar/struvite composite as a novel potential material for slow release of N and P. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2019, 26: 17152

[9] JainN, MaitiA. Arsenic adsorbent derived from the ferromanganese slag. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2021, 28: 3230

[10] JainN, MaitiA. Arsenite oxidation and arsenic adsorption strategy using developed material from laterite and ferromanganese slag: electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy analysis. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2023, 62: 15600

[11] JainN, SinghP, BhatnagarA, MaitiA. Arsenite oxidation and adsorptive arsenic removal from contaminated water: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2024

[12] MaitiA, BasuJK, DeS. Desorption kinetics and leaching study of arsenic from arsenite/arsenate-loaded natural laterite. Int J Environ Technol Manag, 2010, 12: 294

[13] Malabadi RB, Kolkar KP, Chalannavar RK et al (2023) Industrial Cannabis sativa-Hemp: biochar applications and disadvantages. World J Adv Res Rev 20

[14] OuředníčekP, HudcováB, TrakalL, et al. . Synthesis of modified amorphous manganese oxide using low-cost sugars and biochars: material characterization and metal(loid) sorption properties. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 670: 1159

[15] RawatS, MaitiA. A hybrid ultrafiltration membrane process using a low-cost laterite based adsorbent for efficient arsenic removal. Chemosphere, 2023, 316 137685

[16] RoyA, BharadvajaN. Efficient removal of heavy metals from artificial wastewater using biochar. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manage, 2021, 16 100602

[17] SableH, KumarV, MishraR, et al. . Bamboo stem derived biochar for biosorption of Cadmium (II) ions from contaminated wastewater. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manage, 2024, 21 100936

[18] SchneiderJT, FirakDS, RibeiroRR, Peralta-ZamoraP. Use of scavenger agents in heterogeneous photocatalysis: truths, half-truths, and misinterpretations. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2020, 22: 15723

[19] ShajiE, SantoshM, SarathKV, et al. . Arsenic contamination of groundwater: a global synopsis with focus on the Indian Peninsula. Geosci Front, 2021, 12 101079

[20] SinghP, RawatS, JainN, et al. . A review on biochar composites for soil remediation applications: comprehensive solution to contemporary challenges. J Environ Chem Eng, 2023, 11 110635

[21] SongP, XuH, SunS, et al. . Remediation of arsenic-spiked soil by biochar-loaded nanoscale zero-valent iron: performance, mechanism, and microbial response. J Clean Prod, 2022, 380 134985

[22] SumanS, SharmaPK, SiddiqueAB, et al. . Wheat is an emerging exposure route for arsenic in Bihar, India. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 703: 134774

[23] ThommesM, KanekoK, NeimarkAV, et al. . Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem, 2015, 87: 1051

[24] UsevičiūtėL, BaltrėnaitėE. Methods for determining lignocellulosic biochar wettability. Waste Biomass Valoriz, 2020, 11: 4457

[25] WangC, LinX, ZhangX, ShowPL. Research advances on production and application of algal biochar in environmental remediation. Environ Pollut, 2024, 348 123860

[26] WuJ, HuangD, LiuX, et al. . Remediation of As(III) and Cd(II) co-contamination and its mechanism in aqueous systems by a novel calcium-based magnetic biochar. J Hazard Mater, 2018, 348: 10

[27] XiaoR, WangJJ, GastonLA, et al. . Biochar produced from mineral salt-impregnated chicken manure: fertility properties and potential for carbon sequestration. Waste Manag, 2018, 78: 802

[28] YangQ, WangX, LuoW, et al. . Effectiveness and mechanisms of phosphate adsorption on iron-modified biochars derived from waste activated sludge. Bioresour Technol, 2018, 247: 537

[29] YangX, ZhangX, WangZ, et al. . Mechanistic insights into removal of norfloxacin from water using different natural iron ore–biochar composites: more rich free radicals derived from natural pyrite-biochar composites than hematite-biochar composites. Appl Catal B Environ, 2019, 255: 117752

[30] YaoY, GaoB, FangJ, et al. . Characterization and environmental applications of clay–biochar composites. Chem Eng J, 2014, 242: 136

[31] YrjäläK, RamakrishnanM, SaloE. Agricultural waste streams as resource in circular economy for biochar production towards carbon neutrality. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health, 2022, 26: 100339

[32] ZhangP, O’ConnorD, WangY, et al. . A green biochar/iron oxide composite for methylene blue removal. J Hazard Mater, 2020, 384 121286

[33] Zhang W, Cho Y, Vithanage M et al (2022) Arsenic removal from water and soils using pristine and modified biochars. Biochar 4

[34] ZhaoN, TanX, XiongJ, et al. . Quantitative analysis on the redox conversion mechanism of Cr(VI) and As(III) by iron carbide based biochar composites. Chem Eng J, 2022, 446: 13717

[35] ZhuS, QuT, IrshadMK, ShangJ. Simultaneous removal of Cd(II) and As(III) from co-contaminated aqueous solution by α-FeOOH modified biochar. Biochar, 2020, 2: 81-92

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)