Compost quality, earthworm activities and microbial communities in biochar-augmented vermicomposting of dewatered activated sludge: the role of biochar particle size

Wei Peng, Yue Wang, Guangyu Cui, Qiyong Xu, Hua Zhang, Pinjing He, Fan Lü

Biochar ›› 2024, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 73. DOI: 10.1007/s42773-024-00365-8

Compost quality, earthworm activities and microbial communities in biochar-augmented vermicomposting of dewatered activated sludge: the role of biochar particle size

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Vermicomposting utilizes the synergistic effect of earthworms with microorganisms to accelerate the stabilization of organic matter in biowastes. Nevertheless, the exact mechanism behind the maturity of vermicompost and the growth of earthworms exposed to biochar of varying particle sizes remains unclear. This study presents an investigation of the effect of biochar particle size on earthworm (Eisenia fetida) survival, microbial diversity, and the quality of vermicompost products. To address these issues, pelletized dewatered sludge samples from a municipal sewage treatment plant were amended with pine-based biochar with particle sizes of 1–2 mm, 25–75 μm, 200 nm, and 60 nm as the substrate for vermicomposting. This study revealed that the addition of millimeter-scale biochar and micron-scale biochar significantly promoted the degradation of organic matter since the organic matter in the treatment with 1–2 mm biochar at the end of the vermicomposting experiment decreased by 12.6%, which was equivalent to a 1.9-fold increase compared with that of the control. Excessive nanopowdering of nanobiochar significantly affected the survival of earthworms and led to 24.4–33.3% cumulative mortality, while millimeter-scale (mm) biochar and micron-scale (μm) biochar achieved zero mortality. The findings of this study could be used for evaluating the potential impact of nanoscale biochar to earthworms and guiding biochar-augmented vermicomposting.

Highlights

1.

The addition of 1–2 mm biochar resulted in a 1.9-fold greater reduction in organic matter compared to the control group.

2.

The introduction of 25–75 μm biochar led to a significant 94% increase in earthworm cocoons.

3.

The cumulative mortality rates of 200 nm and 60 nm biochar amendment reached peaks of 33.3% and 24.4% at first week, respectively.

4.

Earthworms excrete mucus that effectively removes attached nanobiochar.

Keywords

Sewage sludge / Vermicomposting / Biochar / Particle sizes / Eisenia fetida / Gut microbes

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wei Peng, Yue Wang, Guangyu Cui, Qiyong Xu, Hua Zhang, Pinjing He, Fan Lü. Compost quality, earthworm activities and microbial communities in biochar-augmented vermicomposting of dewatered activated sludge: the role of biochar particle size. Biochar, 2024, 6(1): 73 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-024-00365-8

References

[1]
Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Ok YS. Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere, 2013, 99(3): 19-33
[2]
APHA. . Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 2005 Washington American Public Health Association (APHA)
[3]
Awasthi MK, Duan Y, Awasthi SK, Liu T, Zhang Z. Influence of bamboo biochar on mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and nitrogen loss during poultry manure composting. Bioresour Technol, 2020, 303: 122952,
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Beck-Friis B, Smårs S, Jönsson H, Kirchmann H. SE—structures and environment: gaseous emissions of carbon dioxide, ammonia and nitrous oxide from organic household waste in a compost reactor under different temperature regimes. J Agric Eng Res, 2001, 78(4): 423-430,
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Benitez E, Nogales R, Elvira C, Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B. Enzyme activities as indicators of the stabilization of sewage sludges composting with Eisenia foetida. Biores Technol, 1999, 67(3): 297-303,
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Boakye P, Tran HN, Lee DS, Woo SH. Effect of water washing pretreatment on property and adsorption capacity of macroalgae-derived biochar. J Environ Manage, 2019, 233: 165-174,
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Boruszko D. Impact of effective microorganisms on the vermicomposting of sewage sludge. Desalin Water Treat, 2023, 288: 273-282,
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods, 2016, 13(7): 581-583,
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Cao YN, Tian YQ, Wu Q, Li JS, Zhu HY. Vermicomposting of livestock manure as affected by carbon-rich additives (straw, biochar and nanocarbon): a comprehensive evaluation of earthworm performance, microbial activities, metabolic functions and vermicompost quality. Bioresour Technol, 2021, 320: 124404,
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Cui G, Li F, Li S, Bhat SA, Ishiguro Y, Wei Y, Yamada T, Fu X, Huang K. Changes of quinolone resistance genes and their relations with microbial profiles during vermicomposting of municipal excess sludge. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 644: 494-502,
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Cui GY, Fu XY, Bhat SA, Tian WP, Lei XY, Wei YF, Li FS. Temperature impacts fate of antibiotic resistance genes during vermicomposting of domestic excess activated sludge. Environ Res, 2022, 207: 112654,
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Cui GY, Lue F, Hu T, Zhang H, Shao LM, He PJ. Vermicomposting leads to more abundant microplastics in the municipal excess sludge. Chemosphere, 2022, 307: 136042,
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Cui J, Jiang J, Chang E, Zhang F, Guo L, Fang D, Xu R, Wang Y. Underlying reasons and factors associated with changes in earthworm activities in response to biochar amendment: a review. Biochar, 2023, 5(1): 79-79,
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Domínguez J, Aira M, Gómez-Brandón M. . Microbes at work: from wastes to resources, 2010 Berlin Heidelberg Springer 93-114,
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Domínguez J, Aira M, Kolbe AR, Gómez-Brandón M, Pérez-Losada M. Changes in the composition and function of bacterial communities during vermicomposting may explain beneficial properties of vermicompost. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1): 9657,
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Dume B, Hanc A, Svehla P, Michal P, Chane AD, Nigussie A. Composting and vermicomposting of sewage sludge at various C/N ratios: technological feasibility and end-product quality. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2023, 263: 115255,
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Frank R, Klauck C, Stonefield KI. Metal transfer in vermicomposting of sewage-sludge and plant wastes. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol, 1983, 31(6): 673-679,
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Fu XY, Huang K, Cui GY, Chen XM, Li FS, Zhang XY, Li F. Dynamics of bacterial and eukaryotic community associated with stability during vermicomposting of pelletized dewatered sludge. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad, 2015, 104: 452-459,
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Garg P, Gupta A, Satya S. Vermicomposting of different types of waste using Eisenia foetida: a comparative study. Biores Technol, 2006, 97(3): 391-395,
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Gómez RB, Lima FV, Ferrer AS. The use of respiration indices in the composting process: a review. Waste Manage Res, 2006, 24(1): 37-47,
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Gong XQ, Cai LL, Li SY, Chang SX, An ZF. Bamboo biochar amendment improves the growth and reproduction of Eisenia fetida and the quality of green waste vermicompost. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2018, 156: 197-204,
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Gong X, Zhang Z, Wang H. Effects of Gleditsia sinensis pod powder, coconut shell biochar and rice husk biochar as additives on bacterial communities and compost quality during vermicomposting of pig manure and wheat straw. J Environ Manage, 2021, 295: 113136,
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Gong XQ, Zou L, Wang L, Zhang B, Jiang JX. Biochar improves compost humification, maturity and mitigates nitrogen loss during the vermicomposting of cattle manure-maize straw. J Environ Manag, 2023, 325: 116432,
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Gray TRG, Baxby P. Chitin decomposition in soil: II. The ecology of chitinoclastic micro-organisms in forest soil. Trans Br Mycol Soc, 1968, 51(2): 293-309,
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Gupta R, Garg VJ. Stabilization of primary sewage sludge during vermicomposting. J Hazard Mater, 2008, 153(3): 1023-1030,
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Hait S, Tare V. Optimizing vermistabilization of waste activated sludge using vermicompost as bulking material. Waste Manage, 2011, 31(3): 502-511,
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Hait S, Tare V. Vermistabilization of primary sewage sludge. Biores Technol, 2011, 102(3): 2812-2820,
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Hogg D, Barth J, Favoino E, Centemero M, Caimi V, Amlinger F, Devliegher W, Brinton W, Antler S (2002) Comparison of compost standards within the EU, North America and Australasia: main report, WRAP. Programme
[29]
Huang K, Li F, Wei Y, Chen X, Fu X. Changes of bacterial and fungal community compositions during vermicomposting of vegetable wastes by Eisenia foetida. Biores Technol, 2013, 150: 235-241,
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Khan MB, Cui XQ, Lazzat U, Zehra DA, Hamid Y, Hussain B, Tang L, Yang XE, He ZL. Eisenia fetida and biochar synergistically alleviate the heavy metals content during valorization of biosolids via enhancing vermicompost quality. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 684: 597-609,
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Khan MB, Cui XQ, Jilani G, Tang L, Lu M, Cao XR, Sahito ZA, Hamid Y, Hussain B, Yang XE, He ZL. New insight into the impact of biochar during vermi-stabilization of divergent biowastes: literature synthesis and research pursuits. Chemosphere, 2020, 238: 124679,
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Kızılkaya R, Türkay FŞH. Vermicomposting of anaerobically digested sewage sludge with hazelnut husk and cow manure by earthworm Eisenia foetida. Compost Sci Util, 2014, 22(2): 68-82,
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Knapp BA, Podmirseg SM, Seeber J, Meyer E, Insam H. Diet-related composition of the gut microbiota of Lumbricus rubellus as revealed by a molecular fingerprinting technique and cloning. Soil Biol Biochem, 2009, 41(11): 2299-2307,
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Lazcano C, Gómez-Brandón M, Domínguez J. Comparison of the effectiveness of composting and vermicomposting for the biological stabilization of cattle manure. Chemosphere, 2008, 72(7): 1013-1019,
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Lee LH, Wu TY, Shak KPY, Lim SL, Ng KY, Nguyen MN, Teoh WH, Biotechnology, . Sustainable approach to biotransform industrial sludge into organic fertilizer via vermicomposting: a mini-review. J Chem Technol Biotechnol, 2018, 93(4): 925-935,
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Li R, Liu Y, Sheng Y, Xiang Q, Zhou Y, Cizdziel JV. Effect of prothioconazole on the degradation of microplastics derived from mulching plastic film: apparent change and interaction with heavy metals in soil. Environ Pollut, 2020, 260: 113988-113988,
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Liesch AM, Weyers SL, Gaskin J, Das KC. Impact of two different biochars on earthworm growth and survival. Ann Environ Sci, 2010, 4(1–9): 1-9
[38]
Malińska K, Zabochnicka-Świątek M, Cáceres R, Marfà O. The effect of precomposted sewage sludge mixture amended with biochar on the growth and reproduction of Eisenia fetida during laboratory vermicomposting. Ecol Eng, 2016, 90: 35-41,
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Malińska K, Golańska M, Caceres R, Rorat A, Weisser P, Ślęzak E. Biochar amendment for integrated composting and vermicomposting of sewage sludge—the effect of biochar on the activity of Eisenia fetida and the obtained vermicompost. Biores Technol, 2017, 225: 206-214,
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
McLachlan KL, Chong C, Voroney RP, Liu H-W, Holbein BE. Variability of soluble salts using different extraction methods on composts and other substrates. Compost Sci Util, 2004, 12(2): 180-184,
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Mohanty SK, Boehm AB. Escherichia coli removal in biochar-augmented biofilter: effect of infiltration rate, initial bacterial concentration, biochar particle size, and presence of compost. Environ Sci Technol, 2014, 48(19): 11535-11542,
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Najm IN, Snoeyink VL, Suidan MT, Lee CH, Richard Y. Effect of particle size and background natural organics on the adsorption efficiency of PAC. J Am Water Works Ass, 1990, 82(1): 65-72,
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Ndegwa PM, Thompson SA. Integrating composting and vermicomposting in the treatment and bioconversion of biosolids. Biores Technol, 2001, 76(2): 107-112,
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Rashid MI, Shah GA, Iqbal Z, Shahzad K, Ali N, Rehan M, Alhakamy NAA, Klemes JJ. Nanobiochar reduces ammonia emission, increases nutrient mineralization from vermicompost, and improves maize productivity. J Clean Prod, 2023, 414: 137694,
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Rollett AJ, Bhogal A, Scullion J, Nicholson FA, Taylor MJ, Williams JR. The effect of field application of food-based anaerobic digestate on earthworm populations. Soil Use Manag, 2021, 37(3): 648-657,
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Sanchez-Hernandez JC, Ro KS, Díaz FJ. Biochar and earthworms working in tandem: research opportunities for soil bioremediation. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 688: 574-583,
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Sanchez-Monedero MA, Cayuela ML, Roig A, Jindo K, Mondini C, Bolan N. Role of biochar as an additive in organic waste composting. Biores Technol, 2018, 247: 1155-1164,
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Shafiq F, Anwar S, Firdaus-e-Bareen, Zhang LX, Ashraf M. Nano-biochar: Properties and prospects for sustainable agriculture. Land Degrad Dev, 2023, 34(9): 2445-2463,
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Siedt M, Schäffer A, Smith KEC, Nabel M, Ross-Nickoll M, van Dongen JT. Comparing straw, compost, and biochar regarding their suitability as agricultural soil amendments to affect soil structure, nutrient leaching, microbial communities, and the fate of pesticides. Sci Total Environ, 2021, 751: 141607,
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Sizmur T, Fresno T, Akgül G, Frost H, Moreno-Jiménez E. Biochar modification to enhance sorption of inorganics from water. Biores Technol, 2017, 246: 34-47,
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Suthar S. Vermicomposting potential of (Perrier) in different waste materials. Biores Technol, 2007, 98(6): 1231-1237,
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Swaren L, Safari S, Konhauser KO, Alessi DS. Pyrolyzed biomass-derived nanoparticles: a review of surface chemistry, contaminant mobility, and future research avenues to fill the gaps. Biochar, 2022, 4(1): 33,
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Tiquia SM. Microbiological parameters as indicators of compost maturity. J Appl Microbiol, 2005, 99(4): 816-828,
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Vavouraki AI, Kornaros M. Vermi-conversion of anaerobic sludges by earthworms. Ferment Basel, 2023, 9(6): 512,
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Villar I, Alves D, Pérez-Díaz D, Mato S. Changes in microbial dynamics during vermicomposting of fresh and composted sewage sludge. Waste Manage, 2016, 48: 409-417,
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Wang Y, Xu YA, Li D, Tang BC, Man SL, Jia YF, Xu H. Vermicompost and biochar as bio-conditioners to immobilize heavy metal and improve soil fertility on cadmium contaminated soil under acid rain stress. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 621: 1057-1065,
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Wu D, Feng YF, Xue LH, Liu MQ, Yang B, Hu F, Yang LZ. Biochar combined with vermicompost increases crop production while reducing ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions from a paddy soil. Pedosphere, 2019, 29(1): 82-94,
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Wu QQ, Zhang J, Liu XN, Chang TT, Wang Q, Shaghaleh H, Hamoud YA. Effects of biochar and vermicompost on microorganisms and enzymatic activities in greenhouse soil. Front Env Sci-Switz, 2023, 10: 1060277,
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Wu YP, Li QF, Zheng Y, Xiong XJ, Chen YF, Shaaban M, Hu RG. Optimizing biochar addition for vermicomposting: a comprehensive evaluation of earthworms' activity, N2O emissions and compost quality. Biochar, 2023, 5(1): 4,
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Xie JC, Xia H, Guan MX, Huang K, Chen J. Accelerating the humification mechanism of dissolved organic matter using biochar during vermicomposting of dewatered sludge. Waste Manage, 2023, 159: 102-113,
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Yadav A, Garg V. Industrial wastes and sludges management by vermicomposting. Rev Environ Sci Bio/Technol, 2011, 10(3): 243-276,
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Zhang B, He P-J, F, Shao L-M, Wang P. Extracellular enzyme activities during regulated hydrolysis of high-solid organic wastes. Water Res, 2007, 41(19): 4468-4478,
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Zhang JN, F, Shao LM, He PJ. The use of biochar-amended composting to improve the humification and degradation of sewage sludge. Biores Technol, 2014, 168: 252-258,
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Zhang J, F, Zhang H, Shao L, Chen D, He P. Multiscale visualization of the structural and characteristic changes of sewage sludge biochar oriented towards potential agronomic and environmental implication. Sci Rep, 2015, 5(1): 9406-9406,
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Zhang QM, Li SZ, Saleem M, Ali MY, Xiang JH. Biochar and earthworms synergistically improve soil structure, microbial abundance, activities and pyraclostrobin degradation. Appl Soil Ecol, 2021, 168: 104154,
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Zhou YW, Xiao R, Klammsteiner T, Kong XL, Yan BH, Mihai FC, Liu T, Zhang ZQ, Awasthi MK. Recent trends and advances in composting and vermicomposting technologies: a review. Bioresour Technol, 2022, 360: 127591,
CrossRef Google scholar
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China(52000144); Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of the Central South University(22120220553); Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2023-3-YB-11)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/