Comparative responses of two maize genotypes with contrasting drought tolerance to biochar application

Renjie Ruan, Hans Lambers, Yaosheng Wang

Biochar ›› 2024, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 66. DOI: 10.1007/s42773-024-00359-6

Comparative responses of two maize genotypes with contrasting drought tolerance to biochar application

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The impact of biochar application on plant performance under drought stress necessitates a comprehensive understanding of biochar–soil interaction, root growth, and plant physiological processes. Therefore, pot experiments were conducted to assess the effects of biochar on plant responses to drought stress at the seedling stage. Two contrasting maize genotypes (drought-sensitive KN5585 vs. -tolerant Mo17) were subjected to biochar application under drought stress conditions. The results indicated that biochar application decreased soil exchangeable Na+ and Ca2+ contents while increased soil exchangeable K+ content (2.7-fold) and electrical conductivity (4.0-fold), resulting in an elevated leaf sap K+ concentration in both maize genotypes. The elevated K+ concentration with biochar application increased root apoplastic pH in the drought-sensitive KN5585, but not in the drought-tolerant Mo17, which stimulated the activation of H+-ATPase and H+ efflux in KN5585 roots. Apoplast alkalinization of the drought-sensitive KN5585 resulting from biochar application further inhibited root growth by 30.7%, contributing to an improvement in water potential, a reduction in levels of O2 , H2O2, T-AOC, SOD, and POD, as well as the down-regulation of genes associated with drought resistance in KN5585 roots. In contrast, biochar application increased leaf sap osmolality and provided osmotic protection for the drought-tolerant Mo17, which was associated with trehalose accumulation in Mo17 roots. Biochar application improved sucrose utilization and circadian rhythm of Mo17 roots, and increased fresh weight under drought stress. This study suggests that biochar application has the potential to enhance plant drought tolerance, which is achieved through the inhibition of root growth in sensitive plants and the enhancement of osmotic protection in tolerant plants, respectively.

Abstract Highlights

Biochar application decreased soil exchangeable Na+ and Ca2+, but increased soil exchangeable K+ and electrical conductivity.

Biochar increased apoplastic pH, but reduced root growth, stress damage and stress response during drought for the drought-sensitive KN5585.

Biochar improved osmotic protection, trehalose accumulation, and fresh weight during drought for the drought-tolerant Mo17.

Keywords

Biochar application / Drought stress / Apoplastic pH / Root growth / Physiological traits

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Renjie Ruan, Hans Lambers, Yaosheng Wang. Comparative responses of two maize genotypes with contrasting drought tolerance to biochar application. Biochar, 2024, 6(1): 66 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-024-00359-6

References

[1]
Akhtar SS, Andersen MN, Liu F. Biochar mitigates salinity stress in potato. J Agron Crop Sci, 2015, 201(5): 368-378,
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Ali S, Rizwan M, Qayyum MF, Ok YS, Ibrahim M, Riaz M, Arif MS, Hafeez F, Al-Wabel MI, Shahzad AN. Biochar soil amendment on alleviation of drought and salt stress in plants: a critical review. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2017, 24(14): 12700-12712,
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Baronti S, Vaccari FP, Miglietta F, Calzolari C, Lugato E, Orlandini S, Pini R, Zulian C, Genesio L. Impact of biochar application on plant water relations in Vitis vinifera (L.). Eur J Agron, 2014, 53: 38-44,
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Bechtold U, Field B. Molecular mechanisms controlling plant growth during abiotic stress. J Exp Bot, 2018, 69(11): 2753-2758,
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Chakraborty K, Bhaduri D, Meena HN, Kalariya K. External potassium (K+) application improves salinity tolerance by promoting Na+-exclusion, K+-accumulation and osmotic adjustment in contrasting peanut cultivars. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2016, 103: 143-153,
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Chen J, Wang W-H, Wu F-H, He E-M, Liu X, Shangguan Z-P, Zheng H-L. Hydrogen sulfide enhances salt tolerance through nitric oxide-mediated maintenance of ion homeostasis in barley seedling roots. Sci Rep, 2015, 5(1): 12516,
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Cong MF, Hu Y, Sun X, Yan H, Yu GL, Tang GM, Chen SH, Xu WL, Jia HT. Long-term effects of biochar application on the growth and physiological characteristics of maize. Front Plant Sci, 2023,
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Felle HH, Herrmann A, Hückelhoven R, Kogel KH. Root-to-shoot signalling: apoplastic alkalinization, a general stress response and defence factor in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Protoplasma, 2005, 227(1): 17-24,
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Fernandez O, Béthencourt L, Quero A, Sangwan R, Clément C. Trehalose and plant stress responses: friend or foe?. Trends Plant Sci, 2010, 15: 409-417,
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Feugier FG, Satake A. Dynamical feedback between circadian clock and sucrose availability explains adaptive response of starch metabolism to various photoperiods. Front Plant Sci, 2012, 3: 305,
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Gascó G, Cely P, Paz-Ferreiro J, Plaza C, Méndez A. Relation between biochar properties and effects on seed germination and plant development. Biol Agricult Horticult, 2016, 32(4): 237-247,
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Geilfus C-M. The pH of the apoplast: dynamic factor with functional impact under stress. Mol Plant, 2017, 10(11): 1371-1386,
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Grundy J, Stoker C, Carré IA. Circadian regulation of abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Front Plant Sci, 2015,
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Han S, Fang L, Ren X, Wang W, Jiang J. MPK6 controls H2 O2-induced root elongation by mediating Ca2+ influx across the plasma membrane of root cells in Arabidopsis seedlings. New Phytol, 2015, 205(2): 695-706,
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Heidari P, Faraji S, Ahmadizadeh M, Ahmar S, Mora-Poblete F. New insights into structure and function of TIFY genes in Zea mays and Solanum lycopersicum: a genome-wide comprehensive analysis. Front Genet, 2021,
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Henry C, Bledsoe SW, Siekman A, Kollman A, Waters BM, Feil R, Stitt M, Lagrimini LM. The trehalose pathway in maize: conservation and gene regulation in response to the diurnal cycle and extended darkness. J Exp Bot, 2014, 65(20): 5959-5973,
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Joseph S, Cowie AL, Van Zwieten L, Bolan N, Budai A, Buss W, Cayuela ML, Graber ER, Ippolito JA, Kuzyakov Y, Luo Y, Ok YS, Palansooriya KN, Shepherd J, Stephens S, Weng Z, Lehmann J. How biochar works, and when it doesn’t: a review of mechanisms controlling soil and plant responses to biochar. GCB Bioenerg, 2021, 13(11): 1731-1764,
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Kim H, Lee K, Hwang H, Bhatnagar N, Kim D-Y, Yoon IS, Byun M-O, Kim ST, Jung K-H, Kim B-G. Overexpression of PYL5 in rice enhances drought tolerance, inhibits growth, and modulates gene expression. J Exp Bot, 2014, 65(2): 453-464,
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Li JS, Jia HL, Wang J. cGMP and ethylene are involved in maintaining ion homeostasis under salt stress in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell Rep, 2014, 33(3): 447-459,
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Li Y, Cai H, Liu P, Wang C, Gao H, Wu C, Yan K, Zhang S, Huang J, Zheng C. Arabidopsis MAPKKK18 positively regulates drought stress resistance via downstream MAPKK3. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2017, 484(2): 292-297,
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Li L, Verstraeten I, Roosjen M, Takahashi K, Rodriguez L, Merrin J, Chen J, Shabala L, Smet W, Ren H, Vanneste S, Shabala S, De Rybel B, Weijers D, Kinoshita T, Gray WM, Friml J. Cell surface and intracellular auxin signalling for H+ fluxes in root growth. Nature, 2021, 599(7884): 273-277,
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Limwikran T, Kheoruenromne I, Suddhiprakarn A, Prakongkep N, Gilkes RJ. Dissolution of K, Ca, and P from biochar grains in tropical soils. Geoderma, 2018, 312: 139-150,
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Liu YX, Wang YY, Lu HH, Lonappan L, Brar SK, He LL, Chen JY, Yang SM. Biochar application as a soil amendment for decreasing cadmium availability in soil and accumulation in Brassica chinensis. J Soils Sediments, 2018, 18(7): 2511-2519,
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Liu M, Ke X, Liu X, Fan X, Xu Y, Li L, Solaiman ZM, Pan G. The effects of biochar soil amendment on rice growth may vary greatly with rice genotypes. Sci Total Environ, 2022, 810,
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Liu Y, Xiao L, Chi J, Li R, Han Y, Cui F, Peng Z, Wan S, Li G. Genome-wide identification and expression of SAUR gene family in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and functional identification of AhSAUR3 in drought tolerance. BMC Plant Biol, 2022, 22(1): 178,
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Lunn JE, Delorge I, Figueroa CM, Van Dijck P, Stitt M. Trehalose metabolism in plants. Plant J, 2014, 79(4): 544-567,
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Ma Q, Zhou H, Sui X, Su C, Yu Y, Yang H, Dong C-H. Generation of new salt-tolerant wheat lines and transcriptomic exploration of the responsive genes to ethylene and salt stress. Plant Growth Regulation, 2021, 94(1): 33-48,
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Mehdizadeh L, Moghaddam M, Lakzian A. Alleviating negative effects of salinity stress in summer savory (Satureja hortensis L.) by biochar application. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2019, 41(6): 98,
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Nuccio ML, Wu J, Mowers R, Zhou H-P, Meghji M, Primavesi LF, Paul MJ, Chen X, Gao Y, Haque E, Basu SS, Lagrimini LM. Expression of trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase in maize ears improves yield in well-watered and drought conditions. Nat Biotechnol, 2015, 33(8): 862-869,
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Paul MJ, Jhurreea D, Zhang Y, Primavesi LF, Delatte T, Schluepmann H, Wingler A. Up-regulation of biosynthetic processes associated with growth by trehalose 6-phosphate. Plant Signal Behav, 2010, 5(4): 386-392,
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Peng X, Ye LL, Wang CH, Zhou H, Sun B. Temperature- and duration-dependent rice straw-derived biochar: characteristics and its effects on soil properties of an Ultisol in southern China. Soil Tillage Res, 2011, 112(2): 159-166,
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Rowe JH, Topping JF, Liu J, Lindsey K. Abscisic acid regulates root growth under osmotic stress conditions via an interacting hormonal network with cytokinin, ethylene and auxin. New Phytol, 2016, 211(1): 225-239,
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Saifullah DS, Naeem A, Rengel Z, Naidu R. Biochar application for the remediation of salt-affected soils: challenges and opportunities. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 625: 320-335,
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Schluepmann H, Pellny T, van Dijken A, Smeekens S, Paul M. Trehalose 6-phosphate is indispensable for carbohydrate utilization and growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2003, 100(11): 6849-6854,
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Silber A, Levkovitch I, Graber ER. pH-dependent mineral release and surface properties of cornstraw biochar: agronomic implications. Environ Sci Technol, 2010, 44(24): 9318-9323,
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Soil Survey Staff. . Illustrated guide to soil taxonomy. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2015 Lincoln, Nebraska National Soil Survey Center
[37]
Sun CX, Chen X, Cao MM, Li MQ, Zhang YL. Growth and metabolic responses of maize roots to straw biochar application at different rates. Plant and Soil, 2017, 416(1): 487-502,
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Tong T, Fang Y-x, Zhang Z, Zheng J, Zhang X, Li J, Niu C, Xue D, Zhang X. Genome-wide identification and expression pattern analysis of the KCS gene family in barley. Plant Growth Regulation, 2021, 93(1): 89-103,
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Viger M, Hancock RD, Miglietta F, Taylor G. More plant growth but less plant defence? First global gene expression data for plants grown in soil amended with biochar. GCB Bioenergy, 2015, 7(4): 658-672,
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Wakeel A, Sümer A, Hanstein S, Yan F, Schubert S. In vitro effect of different Na+/K+ ratios on plasma membrane H+-ATPase activity in maize and sugar beet shoot. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2011, 49(3): 341-345,
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Wu J-F, Tsai H-L, Joanito I, Wu Y-C, Chang C-W, Li Y-H, Wang Y, Hong JC, Chu J-W, Hsu C-P, Wu S-H. LWD–TCP complex activates the morning gene CCA1 in Arabidopsis. Nature Commun, 2016, 7(1): 13181,
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Xiang Y, Deng Q, Duan H, Guo Y. Effects of biochar application on root traits: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy, 2017, 9(10): 1563-1572,
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Yang Z-B, Rao IM, Horst WJ. Interaction of aluminium and drought stress on root growth and crop yield on acid soils. Plant and Soil, 2013, 372(1): 3-25,
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Zeng F, Konnerup D, Shabala L, Zhou M, Colmer TD, Zhang G, Shabala S. Linking oxygen availability with membrane potential maintenance and K+ retention of barley roots: implications for waterlogging stress tolerance. Plant, Cell Environ, 2014, 37(10): 2325-2338,
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Zhang J, Bai Z, Huang J, Hussain S, Zhao F, Zhu C, Zhu L, Cao X, Jin Q. Biochar alleviated the salt stress of induced saline paddy soil and improved the biochemical characteristics of rice seedlings differing in salt tolerance. Soil Tillage Res, 2019,
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Zhang H, Liu D, Yang B, Liu WZ, Mu B, Song H, Chen B, Li Y, Ren D, Deng H, Jiang YQ. Arabidopsis CPK6 positively regulates ABA signaling and drought tolerance through phosphorylating ABA-responsive element-binding factors. J Exp Bot, 2020, 71(1): 188-203,
CrossRef Google scholar
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China(2023YFD1500900)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/