Plant performance and soil–plant carbon relationship response to different biochar types

Jia Xin Liao, Pui San So, Sanandam Bordoloi, De Nian Li, Hao Ran Yuan, Yong Chen, Li Qing Xin

Biochar ›› 2024, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 75. DOI: 10.1007/s42773-024-00355-w

Plant performance and soil–plant carbon relationship response to different biochar types

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Biochar (BC) applications in soil has positive effects on plant performance, particularly for loose soil in agricultural context. However, how biochar types affect plant performance of non-crop species and soil–plant carbon relationships is not clear. We selected five different BC types and three plant species to investigate the responses of plant performance and the soil–plant carbon relationship to BC effects. The result demonstrated that peanut shell BC led to the death of both R. tomentosa and C. edithiae, due to a reduction in nutrient uptake caused by higher soil electricity conductivity (2001.7 and 976.3 µS cm−1). However, the carbon content of S. arboricola increased by 57% in peanut shell BC-amended soil, suggesting that S. arboricola has a higher tolerance for soil salinity. Wood BC-amended soil led to better stomatal conductance (gs) and leaf area index (LAI) of both R. tomentosa and C. edithiae due to the higher water retention in the soil (22.68% and 20.79%). This illustrated that a higher amount of water retention brought by wood BC with a great amount of pore volume might be the limited factor for plant growth. The relationship between gs and LAI suggested that gs would not increase when LAI reached beyond 3. Moreover, wood and peanut shell BC caused a negative relationship between soil organic carbon and plant carbon content, suggesting that plants consume more carbon from the soil to store it in the plant. Overall, wood BC is recommended for plant growth of R. tomentosa and C. edithiae, and peanut shell BC is suggested for S. arboricola carbon storage.

Highlights

Peanut shell biochar enhanced soil salinity which causes the death of R. tomentosa and C. edithiae, while wood biochar is suitable for these plant species.

Wood and peanut shell biochar caused a negative relationship between soil organic carbon and plant carbon content.

The stomatal conductance will not increase when the leaf area reaches the limiting value 3.

An empirical function is developed to correlate plant carbon content and leaf area index under different biochar applications.

Keywords

Biochar / Carbon content / Feedstocks / Stomatal conductance / Leaf area index

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jia Xin Liao, Pui San So, Sanandam Bordoloi, De Nian Li, Hao Ran Yuan, Yong Chen, Li Qing Xin. Plant performance and soil–plant carbon relationship response to different biochar types. Biochar, 2024, 6(1): 75 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-024-00355-w

References

[1]
Ahmad M, Lee SS, Dou X, Mohan D, Sung JK, Yang JE, Ok YS. Effects of pyrolysis temperature on soybean stover-and peanut shell-derived biochar properties and TCE adsorption in water. Bioresource Technol, 2012, 118: 536-544,
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Ahmed F, Arthur E, Plauborg F, Razzaghi F, Kørup K, Andersen MN. Biochar amendment of fluvio-glacial temperate sandy subsoil: effects on maize water uptake, growth and physiology. J Agron Crop Sci, 2018, 204(2): 123-136,
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
ASTM (2013) ASTM D4972-13: Standard Test Method for pH of soils. American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM: West Conshohocken. https://webstore.ansi.org/standards/astm/astmd497213
[4]
ASTM (2015) ASTM D698-12: Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort (12 400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3). American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM: West Conshohocken. https://www.astm.org/d0698-12r21.html
[5]
ASTM (2020) ASTM D2974-20: Standard test methods for determining the water (Moisture) content, ash content, and organic material of peat and other organic soils. ASTM: West Conshohocken. https://www.astm.org/d2974-20e01.html
[6]
Baharudin S, Abdullah TL, Bakar RA. Insert formulation and characterization of empty fruit bunch compost formulation as soilless growing media for ornamentals. Chem Eng Trans, 2023, 106: 673-678,
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Bordoloi S, Ng CWW. The effects of vegetation traits and their stability functions in bio-engineered slopes: a perspective review. Eng Geol, 2020, 275,
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Bordoloi S, Liao JX, Ng CWW. Tree morphology dependent transpiration reduction function of Schefflera arboricola for landfill cover restoration. J Hydrol Hydromech, 2024, 72(1): 1-14,
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Borges BM, Strauss M, Camelo PA, Sohi SP, Franco HC. Re-use of sugarcane residue as a novel biochar fertiliser-Increased phosphorus use efficiency and plant yield. J Cleaner Prod, 2020, 262,
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Brodribb TJ, Sussmilch F, McAdam SA. From reproduction to production, stomata are the master regulators. Plant J, 2020, 101(4): 756-767,
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Cai T, Liu X, Zhang J, Tie B, Lei M, Wei X, Peng O, Du H. Silicate-modified oiltea camellia shell-derived biochar: a novel and cost-effective sorbent for cadmium removal. J Cleaner Prod, 2021, 281,
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Cameron AC, Windmeijer FA. An R-squared measure of goodness of fit for some common nonlinear regression models. J Econometrics, 1997, 77(2): 329-342,
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Chen W, He ZL, Yang XE, Mishra S, Stoffella PJ. Chlorine nutrition of higher plants: progress and perspectives. J Plant Nutr, 2010, 33(7): 943-952,
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Chen XW, Wong JTF, Chen ZT, Tang TWL, Guo HW, Leung AOW, Charles WWN, Wong MH. Effects of biochar on the ecological performance of a subtropical landfill. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 644: 963-975,
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Chintala R, Mollinedo J, Schumacher TE, Malo DD, Julson JL. Effect of biochar on chemical properties of acidic soil. Arch Agron Soil Sci, 2014, 60(3): 393-404,
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Comita LS, Engelbrecht BM. Seasonal and spatial variation in water availability drive habitat associations in a tropical forest. Ecology, 2009, 90(10): 2755-2765,
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Corlett RT. Environmental forestry in Hong Kong: 1871–1997. Forest Ecol Manag, 1999, 116(1–3): 93-105,
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Feng W, Yang F, Cen R, Liu J, Qu Z, Miao Q, Chen H. Effects of straw biochar application on soil temperature, available nitrogen and growth of corn. J Environ Manage, 2021, 277,
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Gabhi R, Basile L, Kirk DW, Giorcelli M, Tagliaferro A, Jia CQ. Electrical conductivity of wood biochar monoliths and its dependence on pyrolysis temperature. Biochar, 2020, 2: 369-378,
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Gan R, Zhang Y, Shi H, et al.. Use of satellite leaf area index estimating evapotranspiration and gross assimilation for Australian ecosystems. Ecohydrology, 2018, 11(5),
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Gao Y, Shao G, Yang Z, Zhang K, Lu J, Wang Z, Wu S, Xu D. Influences of soil and biochar properties and amount of biochar and fertilizer on the performance of biochar in improving plant photosynthetic rate: a meta-analysis. Eur J Agron, 2021, 130,
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Garg A, Leung AK, Ng CWW. Transpiration reduction and root distribution functions for a non-crop species Schefflera heptaphylla. CATENA, 2015, 135: 78-82,
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Gholizadeh M, Hu X, Liu Q. A mini review of the specialties of the bio-oils produced from pyrolysis of 20 different biomasses. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 2019, 114,
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Granier A, Loustau D, Bréda N. A generic model of forest canopy conductance dependent on climate, soil water availability and leaf area index. Ann for Sci, 2000, 57(8): 755-765,
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Grubb PJ. The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biol Rev, 1977, 52(1): 107-145,
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Guo HW, Zhang Q, Chen YB, Lu H. Effects of biochar on plant growth and hydro-chemical properties of recycled concrete aggregate. Sci Total Environ, 2023, 882,
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Hall J, Maschmedt D, Billing B (2009) The Soils of Southern South Australia. (Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation, Government of South Australia: Adelaide, S. Aust.) https://www.environment.sa.gov.au/topics/soil-and-land-management/soils-of-sa
[28]
Hasanuzzaman M, Raihan MRH, Masud AAC, et al.. Regulation of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under salinity. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(17): 9326,
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Heaton L, Fullen MA, Bhattacharyya R. Critical analysis of the van Bemmelen conversion factor used to convert soil organic matter data to soil organic carbon data: comparative analyses in a UK loamy sand soil. Espaço Aberto, 2016, 6(1): 35-44,
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Hossain MK, Strezov V, Chan KY, Ziolkowski A, Nelson PF. Influence of pyrolysis temperature on production and nutrient properties of wastewater sludge biochar. J Environ Manag, 2011, 92(1): 223-228,
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Hossain MZ, Bahar MM, Sarkar B, Donne SW, Ok YS, Palansooriya KN, Bolan N. Biochar and its importance on nutrient dynamics in soil and plant. Biochar, 2020, 2: 379-420,
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Ippolito JA, Cui L, Kammann C, Wrage-Mönnig N, Estavillo JM, Fuertes-Mendizabal T, Cayuela ML, Sigua G, Novak J, Spokas K, Borchard N. Feedstock choice, pyrolysis temperature and type influence biochar characteristics: a comprehensive meta-data analysis review. Biochar, 2020, 2: 421-438,
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Islam MS, Magid ASIA, Chen Y, et al.. Arsenic and cadmium load in rice tissues cultivated in calcium enriched biochar amended paddy soil. Chemosphere, 2021, 283,
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Jansson C, Wullschleger SD, Kalluri UC, Tuskan GA. Phytosequestration: carbon biosequestration by plants and the prospects of genetic engineering. Bioscience, 2010, 60(9): 685-696,
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Jasechko S, Sharp ZD, Gibson JJ, Birks SJ, Yi Y, Fawcett PJ. Terrestrial water fluxes dominated by transpiration. Nature, 2013, 496(7445): 347-350,
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Jezek M, Silva-Alvim FA, Hills A, Donald N, Ishka MR, Shadbolt J, Blatt MR. Guard cell endomembrane Ca2+-ATPases underpin a ‘carbon memory’ of photosynthetic assimilation that impacts on water-use efficiency. Nat Plants, 2021, 7(9): 1301-1313,
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
José M, Sánchez-Martín ÁM, Campos P, Miller AZ. Effect of pyrolysis conditions on the total contents of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Biochars produced from organic residues: assessment of their hazard potential. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 667: 578-585,
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Joseph S, Cowie AL, Van Zwieten L, Bolan N, Budai A, Buss W, Lehmann J. How biochar works, and when it doesn't: A review of mechanisms controlling soil and plant responses to biochar. GCB Bioenergy, 2021, 13(11): 1731-1764,
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Keenan TF, Hollinger DY, Bohrer G, Dragoni D, Munger JW, Schmid HP, Richardson AD. Increase in forest water-use efficiency as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise. Nature, 2013, 499(7458): 324-327,
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Kloss S, Zehetner F, Dellantonio A, Hamid R, Ottner F, Liedtke V, Schwanninger MH, Soja G. Characterization of slow pyrolysis biochars: effects of feedstocks and pyrolysis temperature on biochar properties. J Environ Qual, 2012, 41(4): 990-1000,
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Kuzyakov Y, Bogomolova I, Glaser B. Biochar stability in soil: decomposition during eight years and transformation as assessed by compound-specific 14C analysis. Soil Biol Biochem, 2014, 70: 229-236,
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Lamlom SH, Savidge RA. A reassessment of carbon content in wood: variation within and between 41 North American species. Biomass Bioenergy, 2003, 25(4): 381-388,
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Lawlor DW. Carbon and nitrogen assimilation in relation to yield: mechanisms are the key to understanding production systems. J Exp Bot, 2002, 53(370): 773-787,
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Lee DK. Data transformation: a focus on the interpretation. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2020, 73(6): 503,
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Li LY, Li RS. The role of clay minerals and the effect of H+ ions on removal of heavy metal (Pb2+) from contaminated soils. Can Geotech J, 2000, 37(2): 296-307,
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Li T, Zhang Y, Bei S, Li X, Reinsch S, Zhang H, Zhang J. Contrasting impacts of manure and inorganic fertilizer applications for nine years on soil organic carbon and its labile fractions in bulk soil and soil aggregates. CATENA, 2020, 194,
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Li S, Wang N, Chen S, Sun Y, Li P, Tan J, Jiang X. Enhanced soil P immobilization and microbial biomass P by application of biochar modified with eggshell. J Environ Manag, 2023, 345,
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Liu Q, Gu L, Dickinson RE, Tian Y, Zhou L, Post WM. Assimilation of satellite reflectance data into a dynamical leaf model to infer seasonally varying leaf areas for climate and carbon models. J Geophys Res Atmos, 2008,
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Liu Z, Wu X, Li S, et al.. Quantitative assessment of the effects of biochar amendment on photosynthetic carbon assimilation and dynamics in a rice–soil system. New Phytol, 2021, 232(3): 1250-1258,
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Mao J, Zhang K, Chen B. Linking hydrophobicity of biochar to the water repellency and water holding capacity of biochar amended soil. Environ Pollut, 2019, 253: 779-789,
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Markesteijn L, Poorter L, Bongers F, Paz H, Sack L. Hydraulics and life history of tropical dry forest tree species: coordination of species’ drought and shade tolerance. New Phytol, 2011, 191(2): 480-495,
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Mašek O, Buss W, Brownsort P, Rovere M, Tagliaferro A, Zhao L, Xu G. Potassium doping increases biochar carbon sequestration potential by 45%, facilitating decoupling of carbon sequestration from soil improvement. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1): 1-8,
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Medina E, Klinge H (1983) Productivity of tropical forests and tropical woodlands. In: Physiological Plant Ecology IV: Ecosystem Processes: Mineral Cycling, Productivity and Man’s Influence. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 281–303
[54]
Nelson DW, Sommers LE. A simple digestion procedure for estimation of total nitrogen in soils and sediments. J Env Quality., 1972, 1(4): 423-425,
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Ng CWW, Leung AK, Woon KX. Effects of soil density on grass-induced suction distributions in compacted soil subjected to rainfall. Can Geotech J, 2014, 51(3): 311-321,
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Ng CWW, Ni JJ, Leung AK, Zhou C, Wang ZJ. Effects of planting density on tree growth and induced soil suction. Géotechnique, 2016, 66(9): 711-724,
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Ng CWW, Leung A, Ni JJ. (2019a) Plant-soil slope interaction. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351052382/plant-soil-slope-interaction-charles-ng-anthony-leung-junjun-ni
[58]
Ng CWW, Tasnim R, Wong JTF. Coupled effects of atmospheric CO2 concentration and nutrients on plant-induced soil suction. Plant Soil, 2019, 439: 393-404,
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Ng CWW, Wang ZJ, Ni JJ. Effects of plant morphology on root–soil hydraulic interactions of Schefflera heptaphylla. Can Geotech J, 2021, 58(5): 666-681,
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Ng CWW, Liao JX, Bordoloi S. Relationship between matric suction and leaf indices of Schefflera arboricola in biochar amended soil. Can Geotech J, 2022, 59(2): 191-202,
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Ng CWW, Wang YC, Ni JJ, Tsim KWK. Coupled effects of CO2 and biochar amendment on the yield and quality of Pseudostellaria heterophylla. Ind Crop Prod, 2022, 188,
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Ng CWW, Liao JX, Lau SY, So PS, Hau BCH, Peprah-Manu D. Coupled effects of elevated CO2 and biochar on microbial communities of vegetated soil. J Environ Manage, 2023, 342,
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Ochiai S, Iwabuchi K, Itoh T, Watanabe T, Osaki M, Taniguro K. Effects of different feedstock type and carbonization temperature of biochar on oat growth and nitrogen uptake in coapplication with compost. J Soil Sci Plant Nut, 2021, 21: 276-285,
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Offord CA, Meagher PF, Zimmer HC. Growing up or growing out? How soil pH and light affect seedling growth of a relictual rainforest tree. AoB Plants., 2014, 6: plu011,
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Oladele SO. Changes in physicochemical properties and quality index of an Alfisol after three years of rice husk biochar amendment in rainfed rice–Maize cropping sequence. Geoderma, 2019, 353: 359-371,
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Pardo GS, Sarmah AK, Orense RP. Mechanism of improvement of biochar on shear strength and liquefaction resistance of sand. Géotechnique, 2019, 69(6): 471-480,
CrossRef Google scholar
[67]
Parker GG. Tamm review: Leaf Area Index (LAI) is both a determinant and a consequence of important processes in vegetation canopies. Forest Ecol Manag, 2020, 477,
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Patanè C. Leaf area index, leaf transpiration and stomatal conductance as affected by soil water deficit and VPD in processing tomato in semi arid Mediterranean climate. J Agron Crop Sci, 2011, 197(3): 165-176,
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
Phillips CL, Light SE, Gollany HT, Chiu S, Wanzek T, Meyer K, Trippe KM. Can biochar conserve water in Oregon agricultural soils?. Soil till Res, 2020, 198,
CrossRef Google scholar
[70]
Poorter H, Knopf O, Wright IJ, et al.. A meta-analysis of responses of C3 plants to atmospheric CO2: dose-response curves for 85 traits ranging from the molecular to the whole-plant level. New Phytol, 2022, 233(4): 1560-1596,
CrossRef Google scholar
[71]
Pratt PF (1965) Potassium. Methods of soil analysis: part 2 chemical and microbiological properties, 9, 1022–1030. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.c20
[72]
Razzaghi F, Obour PB, Arthur E. Does biochar improve soil water retention? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Geoderma, 2020, 361,
CrossRef Google scholar
[73]
Reda GK, Kebede TG, Kahsay ST, Gebrehiwot BH. Carbon sequestration and vegetation properties across the age of community managed exclosures in Northern Ethiopia. J Nat Conserv, 2020, 56,
CrossRef Google scholar
[74]
Rees RM, Bingham IJ, Baddeley JA, Watson CA. The role of plants and land management in sequestering soil carbon in temperate arable and grassland ecosystems. Geoderma, 2005, 128(1–2): 130-154,
CrossRef Google scholar
[75]
Renforth P, Edmondson J, Leake JR, Gaston KJ, Manning DA. Designing a carbon capture function into urban soils. Proc Inst Civ Eng-u, 2011, 164: 121-128,
CrossRef Google scholar
[76]
Ross DS, Ketterings Q. Recommended methods for determining soil cation exchange capacity. Recommend Soil Test Proced Northeastern United States, 1995, 493(101): 62
[77]
Running SW, Nemani RR. Relating seasonal patterns of the AVHRR vegetation index to simulated photosynthesis and transpiration of forests in different climates. Remote Sens Environ, 1988, 24(2): 347-367,
CrossRef Google scholar
[78]
Sage RF, Khoshravesh R. Passive CO2 concentration in higher plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2016, 31: 58-65,
CrossRef Google scholar
[79]
Saugier B. The evapotranspiration of grasslands and crops. C r Acad Fr, 1996, 82: 133-153
[80]
Schieving F, Poorter H. Carbon gain in a multispecies canopy: the role of specific leaf area and photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency in the tragedy of the commons. New Phytol, 1999, 143(1): 201-211,
CrossRef Google scholar
[81]
Schmidt HP, Kammann C, Hagemann N, Leifeld J, Bucheli TD, Sánchez Monedero MA, Cayuela ML. Biochar in agriculture–a systematic review of 26 global meta-analyses. GCB Bioenergy, 2021, 13(11): 1708-1730,
CrossRef Google scholar
[82]
Shuttleworth WJ. Micrometeorology of temperate and tropical forest. Philos T R Soc B, 1989, 324(1223): 299-334,
CrossRef Google scholar
[83]
Singh B, Singh BP, Cowie AL. Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment. Soil Res, 2010, 48(7): 516-525,
CrossRef Google scholar
[84]
Smith (2022) Soil pH, Soil Acidity and Alkalinity. https://knowledgebase.centreforelites.com/soil-ph-soil-acidity-and-alkalinity/ Accessed 11 Dec 2023.
[85]
Song SH, Wen YJ, Zhang JY, Wang H. Rapid spectrophotometric measurement with a microplate reader for determining phosphorus in NaHCO3 soil extracts. Microchem J, 2019, 146: 210-213,
CrossRef Google scholar
[86]
Sun Y, Gao B, Yao Y, Fang J, Zhang M, Zhou Y, Chen H, Yang L. Effects of feedstock type, production method, and pyrolysis temperature on biochar and hydrochar properties. Chem Eng J, 2014, 240: 574-578,
CrossRef Google scholar
[87]
Tanure MMC, da Costa LM, Huiz HA, Fernandes RBA, Cecon PR, Junior JDP, da Luz JMR. Soil water retention, physiological characteristics, and growth of maize plants in response to biochar application to soil. Soil till Res, 2019, 192: 164-173,
CrossRef Google scholar
[89]
Wang J, Xiong Z, Kuzyakov Y. Biochar stability in soil: meta-analysis of decomposition and priming effects. GCB Bioenergy, 2016, 8(3): 512-523,
CrossRef Google scholar
[90]
Wang S, Ju W, Peñuelas J, Cescatti A, Zhou Y, Fu Y, Zhang Y. Urban−rural gradients reveal joint control of elevated CO2 and temperature on extended photosynthetic seasons. Nat Ecol Evol, 2019, 3(7): 1076-1085,
CrossRef Google scholar
[91]
Wang Y, Villamil MB, Davidson PC, Akdeniz N. A quantitative understanding of the role of co-composted biochar in plant growth using meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 685: 741-752,
CrossRef Google scholar
[92]
Wang H, Yue C, Mao Q, Zhao J, Ciais P, Li W, Mu X. Vegetation and species impacts on soil organic carbon sequestration following ecological restoration over the Loess Plateau. China Geoderma, 2020, 371,
CrossRef Google scholar
[93]
Weng Z, Van Zwieten L, Singh BP, Tavakkoli E, Joseph S, Macdonald LM, Rose TJ, Cowie A. Biochar built soil carbon over a decade by stabilizing rhizodeposits. Nat Clim Change, 2017, 7(5): 371-376,
CrossRef Google scholar
[94]
Xiang L, Harindintwali JD, Wang F, et al.. Integrating biochar, bacteria, and plants for sustainable remediation of soils contaminated with organic pollutants. Environ Sci Technol, 2022, 56(23): 16546-16566,
CrossRef Google scholar
[95]
Xue F, Liu W, Cao H, Song L, Ji S, Tong L, Ding R. Stomatal conductance of tomato leaves is regulated by both abscisic acid and leaf water potential under combined water and salt stress. Physiol Plant, 2021, 172(4): 2070-2078,
CrossRef Google scholar
[96]
Zeng B, Xu W, Khan SB, Wang Y, Zhang J, Yang J, Su X, Lin Z. Preparation of sludge biochar rich in carboxyl/hydroxyl groups by quenching process and its excellent adsorption performance for Cr (VI). Chemosphere, 2021, 285,
CrossRef Google scholar
[97]
Zimmerman AR, Ouyang L. Priming of pyrogenic C (biochar) mineralization by dissolved organic matter and vice versa. Soil Biol Biochem, 2019, 130: 105-112,
CrossRef Google scholar
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China(2023YFC3905804-05); Oversea Postdoctoral Talent Support Project(354649); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2023M743308)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/