Phytotoxicity and hormesis in common mobile organic compounds in leachates of wood-derived biochars

Sean C. Thomas, Ryan Ruan, Nigel V. Gale, Sossina Gezahegn

Biochar ›› 2024, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 51. DOI: 10.1007/s42773-024-00339-w

Phytotoxicity and hormesis in common mobile organic compounds in leachates of wood-derived biochars

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Although addition of pyrolyzed organic materials (biochars) to soil generally results in increased growth and physiological performance of plants, neutral and negative responses have also commonly been detected. Toxicity of organic compounds generated during pyrolysis, sorbed by biochars, and then released into the soil solution, has been implicated as a possible mechanism for such negative effects. Conversely, water-soluble biochar constituents have also been suggested to have “hormetic” effects (positive effects on plants at low concentrations); however, no specific compounds responsible have been identified. We investigated the relative phytotoxicity—and possible hormetic effects—of 14 organic compounds common in aqueous extracts of freshly produced lignocellulosic biochars, using seed germination bioassays. Of the compounds examined, volatile fatty acids (VFAs: acetic, propionic, butyric, valeric, caproic, and 2-ethylbutyric acids) and phenol, showed acute phytotoxicity, with germination-based ED50 values of 1–30 mmol L−1, and 2-ethylbutyric acid showed ED50 values of 0.1–1.0 mmol L−1. Other compounds (benzene, benzoic acid, butanone, methyl salicylate, toluene, and 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol) showed toxic effects only at high concentrations close to solubility limits. Although phytotoxic at high concentrations, valeric and caproic acid also showed detectable hormetic effects on seedlings, increasing radicle extension by 5–15% at concentrations of ~ 0.01–0.1 mmol L−1. These data support the hypothesis that VFAs are the main agents responsible for phytotoxic effects of lignocellulosic biochar leachates, but that certain VFAs also have hormetic effects at low concentrations and may contribute to positive effects of biochar leachates on early plant development in some cases.

Highlights

151 compounds were identified in leachates from 13 biochars.

Among common compounds, volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and phenol showed the most pronounced phytotoxic effects.

Some VFAs also had hormetic effects, enhancing radicle extension growth at low concentrations.

Effects were consistent among test plant species but the smallest-seeded species showed the highest sensitivity.

Keywords

Acetic acid / Caproic acid / Charcoal / Carboxylic acids / Germination / Pyrogenic carbon / Pyroligneous acid / Valeric acid / Volatile fatty acids / Wood vinegar

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Sean C. Thomas, Ryan Ruan, Nigel V. Gale, Sossina Gezahegn. Phytotoxicity and hormesis in common mobile organic compounds in leachates of wood-derived biochars. Biochar, 2024, 6(1): 51 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-024-00339-w

References

[1]
Agoncillo ES. Vegetable seed germination enhancement using different levels of pyroligneous acid (PA). J Biol Agric Healthcare, 2018, 8: 14-18
[2]
Andersson JT, Achten C. Time to say goodbye to the 16 EPA PAHs? Toward an up-to-date use of PACs for environmental purposes. Polycyclic Aromat Compd, 2015, 35: 330-354,
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Bargmann I, Rillig MC, Buss W, Kruse A, Kuecke M. Hydrochar and biochar effects on germination of spring barley. J Agron Crop Sci, 2013, 199: 360-373,
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Biederman LA, Harpole WS. Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy, 2013, 5: 202-214,
CrossRef Google scholar
[150]
Bieser JM, Thomas SC. Biochar and high-carbon wood ash effects on soil and vegetation in a boreal clearcut. Can J For Res, 2019, 49(9): 1124-1134,
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods, 2010, 1: 97-111,
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Buss W, Mašek O. Mobile compounds in biochar – a potential source of contamination – phytotoxic effects on cress seed (Lepidium sativum) germination. J Environ Manage, 2014, 137: 111-119,
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Buss W, Mašek O, Graham M, Wüst D. Inherent compounds in biochar – their content, composition and potential toxic effects. J Environ Manage, 2015, 156: 150-157,
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Cedergreen N, Ritz C, Streibig JC. Improved empirical models describing hormesis. Environ Toxic Chem, 2005, 24: 3166-3172,
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Chia CH, Downie A, Munroe P (2015) Characteristics of biochar: physical and structural properties. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation, pp 89–109
[13]
Clough TJ, Condron LM, Kammann C, Müller C. A review of biochar and soil nitrogen dynamics. Agronomy, 2013, 3: 275-293,
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Dai Y, Zheng H, Jiang Z, Xing B. Combined effects of biochar properties and soil conditions on plant growth: a meta-analysis. Sci Tot Environ, 2020, 713,
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Daosukho S, Kongkeaw A, Oengeaw U. The development of durian shell biochar as a nutrition enrichment medium for agricultural purpose: Part 1, chemical and physical characterization. Bull Appl Sci (thailand), 2012, 1: 133-141,
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
das Graças Souza K, de Oliveira MA, Alcantara GU, Paulino GM, de Lima RP, Ferreira OE, Machado AR. Effect of pyrolysis temperature on the properties of the coffee grounds biochar and composition of its leachates. Chem Papers, 2023, 77: 3947-3956,
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Fernández-Aparicio M, Cimmino A, Evidente A, Rubiales D. Inhibition of Orobanche crenata seed germination and radicle growth by allelochemicals identified in cereals. J Agric Food Chem, 2013, 61: 9797-9803,
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Flesch F, Berger P, Robles-Vargas D, Santos-Medrano GE, Rico-Martínez R. Characterization and determination of the toxicological risk of biochar using invertebrate toxicity tests in the state of Aguascalientes. México Appl Sci, 2019, 9: 1706,
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Gale NV, Thomas SC. Dose-dependence of growth and ecophysiological responses of plants to biochar. Sci Tot Environ, 2019, 658: 1344-1354,
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Gale NV, Sackett TE, Thomas SC. Thermal treatment and leaching biochar alleviates plant growth inhibition from mobile organic compounds. PeerJ, 2016, 4,
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Gale NV, Halim MA, Horsburgh M, Thomas SC. Comparative responses of early-successional plants to charcoal soil amendments. Ecosphere, 2017, 8,
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Gezahegn S, Sain M, Thomas SC. Variation in feedstock wood chemistry strongly influences biochar liming potential. Soil Syst, 2019, 3: 26,
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Gezahegn S, Sain M, Thomas SC. Phytotoxic condensed organic compounds are common in fast but not slow pyrolysis biochars. Biores Technol Rep, 2021, 13,
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Godlewska P, Ok YS, Oleszczuk P. The dark side of black gold: ecotoxicological aspects of biochar and biochar-amended soils. J Hazard Mater, 2021, 403,
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Hale SE, Lehmann J, Rutherford D, Zimmerman AR, Bachmann RT, Shitumbanuma V, O’Toole A, Sundqvist KL, Arp HPH, Cornelissen G. Quantifying the total and bioavailable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and dioxins in biochars. Environ Sci Technol, 2012, 46: 2830-2838,
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Himanen M, Prochazka P, Hänninen K, Oikari A. Phytotoxicity of low-weight carboxylic acids. Chemosphere, 2012, 88: 426-431,
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
International Biochar Initiative (IBI) (2015) Standardized product definition and product testing guidelines for biochar that is used in soil (IBI Biochar Standards) version 2.1. https://biochar-international.org/characterizationstandard/. Accessed 11 Nov 2023
[36]
Jaki T, Hothorn LA. Statistical evaluation of toxicological assays: Dunnett or Williams test—take both. Arch Toxicol, 2013, 87: 1901-1910,
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Jeffery S, Abalos D, Prodana M, Bastos AC, Van Groenigen JW, Hungate BA, Verheijen F. Biochar boosts tropical but not temperate crop yields. Environ Res Let, 2017, 12,
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Joseph S, Cowie AL, Van Zwieten L, Bolan N, Budai A, Buss W, Cayuela ML, Graber ER, Ippolito JA, Kuzyakov Y, Luo Y, Ok YS, Palansooriya KN, Shepherd J, Stephens S, Weng Z, Lehmann J. How biochar works, and when it doesn't: a review of mechanisms controlling soil and plant responses to biochar. GCB Bioenergy, 2021, 13: 1731-1764,
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Kadota M, Niimi Y. Effects of charcoal with pyroligneous acid and barnyard manure on bedding plants. Sci Hort, 2004, 101: 327-332,
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Kaur H, Kaushik S. Cellular evidence of allelopathic interference of benzoic acid to mustard (Brassica juncea L.) seedling growth. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2005, 43: 77-81,
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Kloss S, Zehetner F, Dellantonio A, Hamid R, Ottner F, Liedtke V, Schwannigner M, Gerzabek MH, Soja G. Characterization of slow pyrolysis biochars: effects of feedstocks and pyrolysis temperature on biochar properties. J Environ Qual, 2012, 41: 990-1000,
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Kochanek J, Long RL, Lisle AT, Flematti GR. Karrikins identified in biochars indicate post-fire chemical cues can influence community diversity and plant development. PloSOne, 2016, 11,
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Kołtowski M, Oleszczuk P. Toxicity of biochars after polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons removal by thermal treatment. Ecol Eng, 2015, 75: 79-85,
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M. Biochar sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems: a review. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change, 2006, 11: 403-427,
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D. Biochar effects on soil biota–a review. Soil Biol Biochem, 2011, 43: 1812-1836,
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Liebman M, Sundberg DN. Seed mass affects the susceptibility of weed and crop species to phytotoxins extracted from red clover shoots. Weed Sci, 2006, 54: 340-345,
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Liu X, Zhang A, Ji C, Joseph S, Bian R, Li L, Pan G. Biochar’s effect on crop productivity and the dependence on experimental conditions—a meta-analysis of literature data. Plant Soil, 2013, 373: 583-594,
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Lynch JM. Phytotoxicity of acetic acid produced in the anaerobic decomposition of wheat straw. J Appl Bacteriol, 1977, 42: 81-87,
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Lynch JM. Production and phytotoxicity of acetic acid in anaerobic soils containing plant residues. Soil Biol Biochem, 1978, 10: 131-135,
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Lynch JM. Effects of organic acids on the germination of seeds and growth of seedlings. Plant Cell Environ, 1980, 3: 255-259,
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Macías FA, Castellano D, Molinillo JM. Search for a standard phytotoxic bioassay for allelochemicals: selection of standard target species. J Agric Food Chem, 2000, 48: 2512-2521,
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Marambe B, Nagaoka T, Ando T. Identification and biological activity of germination-inhibiting long-chain fatty acids in animal-waste composts. Plant Cell Physiol, 1993, 34: 605-612,
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Mu J, Uehara T, Furuno T. Effect of bamboo vinegar on regulation of germination and radicle growth of seed plants. J Wood Sci, 2003, 49: 262-270,
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Mu J, Uehara T, Furuno T. Effect of bamboo vinegar on regulation of germination and radicle growth of seed plants II: composition of moso bamboo vinegar at different collection temperature and its effects. J Wood Sci, 2004, 50: 470-476,
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Oleszczuk P, Jośko I, Kuśmierz M. Biochar properties regarding to contaminants content and ecotoxicological assessment. J Hazard Mater, 2013, 260: 375-382,
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Olker JH, Elonen CM, Pilli A, Anderson A, Kinziger B, Erickson S, Skopinski M, Pomplun A, LaLone CA, Russom CL, Hoff D. The ECOTOXicology knowledgebase: a curated database of ecologically relevant toxicity tests to support environmental research and risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem, 2022, 41: 1520-1539,
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Pluchon N, Gundale MJ, Nilsson MC, Kardol P, Wardle DA. Stimulation of boreal tree seedling growth by wood-derived charcoal: effects of charcoal properties, seedling species and soil fertility. Func Ecol, 2014, 28: 766-775,
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Prill A, Barton LV, Solt ML. Effects of some organic acids on the growth of wheat roots in solutions. Contrib Boyce Thompson Inst, 1949, 15: 429-435
[63]
Prochazka P (2008) Acute and subchronic phytotoxicity of volatile fatty acids (VFAs). MSc thesis, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
[64]
R Core Team (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
[65]
Rajkovich S, Enders A, Hanley K, Hyland C, Zimmerman AR, Lehmann J. Corn growth and nitrogen nutrition after additions of biochars with varying properties to a temperate soil. Biol Fert Soils, 2012, 48: 271-284,
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Rao DN, Mikkelsen DS. Effects of acetic, propionic, and butyric acids on rice seedling growth and nutrition. Plant Soil, 1977, 47: 323-334,
CrossRef Google scholar
[67]
Reynolds T. Comparative effects of aliphatic compounds on inhibition of lettuce fruit germination. Ann Bot, 1977, 41: 637-648,
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Reynolds T. Comparative effects of aromatic compounds on inhibition of lettuce fruit germination. Ann Bot, 1978, 42: 419-427,
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
Ritz C. Toward a unified approach to dose-response modeling in ecotoxicology. Environ Toxicol Chem, 2010, 29: 220-229,
CrossRef Google scholar
[70]
Ritz C, Streibig JC. Bioassay analysis using R. J Stat Software, 2005, 12: 1-22,
CrossRef Google scholar
[71]
Rogovska N, Laird D, Cruse RM, Trabue S, Heaton E. Germination tests for assessing biochar quality. J Environ Qual, 2012, 41: 1014-1022,
CrossRef Google scholar
[72]
Rombolà AG, Marisi G, Torri C, Fabbri D, Buscaroli A, Ghidotti M, Hornung A. Relationships between chemical characteristics and phytotoxicity of biochar from poultry litter pyrolysis. J Agric Food Chem, 2015, 63: 6660-6667,
CrossRef Google scholar
[73]
Sackett TE, Basiliko N, Noyce GL, Winsborough C, Schurman J, Ikeda C, Thomas SC. Soil and greenhouse gas responses to biochar additions in a temperate hardwood forest. GCB Bioenergy, 2015, 7: 1062-1074,
CrossRef Google scholar
[74]
Sarauer JL, Coleman MD. Biochar as a growing media component for containerized production of Douglas-fir. Can J for Res, 2018, 48: 581-588,
CrossRef Google scholar
[75]
Shen X, Meng H, Shen Y, Ding J, Zhou H, Cong H, Li L. A comprehensive assessment on bioavailability, leaching characteristics and potential risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biochars produced by a continuous pyrolysis system. Chemosphere, 2022, 287,
CrossRef Google scholar
[77]
Somtrakoon K, Chouychai W. Phytotoxicity of single and combined polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons toward economic crops. Russian J Pl Physiol, 2013, 60: 139-148,
CrossRef Google scholar
[78]
Spokas KA, Baker JM, Reicosky DC. Ethylene: potential key for biochar amendment impacts. Plant Soil, 2010, 333: 443-452,
CrossRef Google scholar
[79]
Spokas KA, Novak JM, Stewart CE, Cantrell KB, Uchimiya M, DuSaire MG, Ro KS. Qualitative analysis of VOCs on biochar. Chemosphere, 2011, 85: 869-882,
CrossRef Google scholar
[80]
Spokas KA, Cantrell KB, Novak JM, Archer DW, Ippolito JA, Collins HP, Boateng AA, Lima IM, Lamb MC, McAloon AJ, Lentz RD, Nichols KA. Biochar: a synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration. J Environ Qual, 2012, 41: 973-989,
CrossRef Google scholar
[81]
Thomas SC. Post-processing of biochars to enhance plant growth responses: a review and meta-analysis. Biochar, 2021, 3: 437-455,
CrossRef Google scholar
[82]
Thomas SC, Gale N. Biochar and forest restoration: a review and meta-analysis of tree growth responses. New For, 2015, 46: 931-946,
CrossRef Google scholar
[83]
Thomas SC, Halim MA, Gale NV, Sujeeun L. Biochar enhancement of facilitation effects in agroforestry: early growth and physiological responses in a maize-leucaena model system. Agrofor Syst, 2019, 93: 2213-2225,
CrossRef Google scholar
[84]
Tiilikkala K, Fagernäs L, Tiilikkala J. History and use of wood pyrolysis liquids as biocide and plant protection product. Open Agric J, 2010, 4: 111-118,
CrossRef Google scholar
[85]
Uddin SMM, Murayama S, Ishmine Y, Tsuzuki E. Studies on sugarcane cultivation. Effects of the mixture of charcoal with pyroligneous acid on cane and sugar yield of spring and ratoon crops of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Jpn J Trop Agric., 1995, 38: 281-285
[86]
Ulbright CE, Pickard BG, Varner JE. Effects of short chain fatty acids on radicle emergence and root growth in lettuce. Plant Cell Environ, 1982, 5: 293-301,
CrossRef Google scholar
[87]
Ulbright CE, Pickard BG, Varner JE. Effects of short chain fatty acids on seedlings. Plant Cell Environ, 1982, 5: 303-307,
CrossRef Google scholar
[88]
Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Morris S, Chan KY, Downie A, Rust J, Cowie A. Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant Soil, 2010, 327: 235-246,
CrossRef Google scholar
[90]
Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Software, 2010, 36: 1-48,
CrossRef Google scholar
[91]
Wang W. Literature review on higher plants for toxicity testing. Water Air Soil Pollut, 1991, 59: 381-400,
CrossRef Google scholar
[92]
Wang B, Lehmann J, Hanley K, Hestrin R, Enders A. Adsorption and desorption of ammonium by maple wood biochar as a function of oxidation and pH. Chemosphere, 2015, 138: 120-126,
CrossRef Google scholar
[93]
Wilson K (2014) Justus von Liebig and the birth of modern biochar. Biochar J www.biochar-journalorg/en/ct/5
[95]
Ye L, Camps-Arbestain M, Shen Q, Lehmann J, Singh B, Sabir M. Biochar effects on crop yields with and without fertilizer: a meta-analysis of field studies using separate controls. Soil Use Manage, 2020, 36: 2-18,
CrossRef Google scholar
[96]
Yu JQ, Matsui Y. Phytotoxic substances in root exudates of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L). J Chem Ecol, 1994, 20: 21-31,
CrossRef Google scholar
[97]
Yuan J, Meng J, Liang XEY, Yang X, Chen W. Organic molecules from biochar leacheates have a positive effect on rice seedling cold tolerance. Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8: 1624,
CrossRef Google scholar
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/