Roles of biochars’ properties in their water-holding capacity and bound water evaporation: quantitative importance and controlling mechanism

Huiying Zhang, Yue Cheng, Yinhua Zhong, Jinzhi Ni, Ran Wei, Weifeng Chen

Biochar ›› 2024, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 30. DOI: 10.1007/s42773-024-00317-2
Original Research

Roles of biochars’ properties in their water-holding capacity and bound water evaporation: quantitative importance and controlling mechanism

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Important properties of biochar as an effective soil amendment are its high water-holding capacity (WHC) and inhibition of water evaporation. However, the mechanism and the importance of biochar properties in controlling its own WHC and bound water evaporation remain little known. In this study, wheat straw and pine sawdust biochars were pyrolyzed in N2-flow, CO2-flow, and air-limitation environments at 300–750 ℃, and a series of the produced biochars’ properties were characterized to explore the dominant controlling factors of their WHC and bound water evaporation. The results have shown that with the increasing contents of hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen as well as such ratios as H/C, and (O + N)/C, WHC of the biochars was also increasing while the evaporation of biochar-bound water was decreasing. With an increase in the other studied factors, such as carbon content, pH, and specific surface area (SSA), WHC of the biochars was decreasing, and the evaporation of biochar-bound water was increasing. That was connected with the fact that biochar-nitrogen was mainly in pyridinic and pyrrolic forms, while oxygen was in the form of C = O and C–O bonds. These forms of nitrogen and oxygen could be the receptors of hydrogen bonds to link to H2O molecules. Aliphatic hydrogen with a weak positive charge could be a donor of hydrogen bonds to link to H2O molecules. However, high carbon content, as well as high SSA, indicated more exposed aromatic carbon (hydrophobic sites) that could suppress the binding of H2O molecules. Additionally, high pH indicated that H2O molecules were dominated by OH, which generated strong electrostatic repulsion with the negatively charged nitrogen- and oxygen-containing groups of biochar. It was also shown that the nitrogen-containing groups played a more important role (importance – 0.31) in WHC of the biochar than other parameters, including carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, ash contents, pH, SSA (importance from 0.02 to 0.09). Nitrogen, oxygen, and carbon contents had the most important influence on the evaporation of biochar-bound water in all studied factors. Furthermore, wheat straw biochar produced at low pyrolysis temperatures in N2 atmosphere (with high nitrogen and oxygen contents) had the highest WHC and the lowest evaporation of biochar-bound water. Consequently, it can be suggested that biochar rich in nitrogen can be an effective water retention agent and can improve agricultural soil moisture.

Highlights

Nitrogen-containing groups (pyridinic and pyrrolic nitrogen) played a crucial role in the improvement of biochar water-holding capacity.

Nitrogen- and oxygen-containing groups inhibited the evaporation of biochar-bound water.

Biochar rich in nitrogen and oxygen may be an effective water retention agent to maintain soil moisture.

Keywords

Biochar / Properties / Water-holding capacity / Evaporation of biochar-bound water / Hierarchical partitioning

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Huiying Zhang, Yue Cheng, Yinhua Zhong, Jinzhi Ni, Ran Wei, Weifeng Chen. Roles of biochars’ properties in their water-holding capacity and bound water evaporation: quantitative importance and controlling mechanism. Biochar, 2024, 6(1): 30 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-024-00317-2

References

[1]
Adhikari S, Timms W, Parvez Mahmud MA. Optimising water holding capacity and hydrophobicity of biochar for soil amendment—a review. Sci Total Environ, 2022, 851,
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Adhikari S, Parvez Mahmud MA, Nguyen MD, Timms W. Evaluating fundamental biochar properties in relation to water holding capacity. Chemosphere, 2023, 2023(328),
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Basso AS, Miguez FE, Laird DA, Horton R, Westgate M. Assessing potential of biochar for increasing water-holding capacity of sandy soils. GCB Bioenergy, 2013, 5: 132-143,
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Blanco-Canqui H. Biochar and soil physical properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2017, 81: 687-711,
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Chen Y, Liu B, Yang H, Yang Q, Chen H. Evolution of functional groups and pore structure during cotton and corn stalks torrefaction and its correlation with hydrophobicity. Fuel, 2014, 137: 41-49,
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Chen W, Wei R, Yang L, Yang Y, Li G, Ni J. Characteristics of wood-derived biochars produced at different temperatures before and after deashing: Their different potential advantages in environmental applications. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 651: 2762-2771,
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Chen Y, Syed-Hassan SSA, Xiong Z, Li Q, Hu X, Xu J, Ren Q, Deng Z, Wang X, Su S, Hu S, Wang Y, Xiang J. Temporal and spatial evolution of biochar chemical structure during biomass pellet pyrolysis from the insights of micro-Raman spectroscopy. Fuel Process Technol, 2021, 218,
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Gao W, Lin Z, Chen H, Yan S, Huang Y, Hu X, Zhang S. A review on N-doped biochar for enhanced water treatment and emerging applications. Fuel Process Technol, 2022, 237,
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Gilli G, Gilli P. . The nature of the hydrogen bond: Outline of a comprehensive hydrogen bond theory, 2014 Oxford Oxford University Press
[10]
Gray M, Johnson MG, Dragila MI, Kleber M. Water uptake in biochars: the roles of porosity and hydrophobicity. Biomass Bioenerg, 2014, 61: 196-205,
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Hamidzadeh Z, Ghorbannezhad P, Ketabchi MR, Yeganeh B. Biomass-derived biochar and its application in agriculture. Fuel, 2023, 341,
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Hien TTT, Tsubota T, Taniguchi T, Shinogi Y. Enhancing soil water holding capacity and provision of a potassium source via optimization of the pyrolysis of bamboo biochar. Biochar, 2021, 3: 51-61,
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Ibrahimi K, Alghamdi AG. Available water capacity of sandy soils as affected by biochar application: a meta-analysis. CATENA, 2022, 214,
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Jang HM, Kan E. Engineered biochar from agricultural waste for removal of tetracycline in water. Bioresour Technol, 2019, 284: 437-447,
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Kim P, Johnson A, Edmunds CW, Radosevich M, Vogt F, Rials TG, Labbé N. Surface functionality and carbon structures in lignocellulosic-derived biochars produced by fast pyrolysis. Energy Fuel, 2011, 25: 4693-4703,
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Lai J, Zou Y, Zhang J, Peres-Neto PR. Generalizing hierarchical and variation partitioning in multiple regression and canonical analyses using the rdacca.hp R package. Methods Ecol Evol, 2022, 13: 782-788,
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Lataf A, Carleer R, Yperman J, Marchal W, Vandamme D, Jozefczak M, Cuypers A, Vandecasteele B, Viaene J, Schreurs S. The effect of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock on biochar agronomic properties. J Anal Appl Pyrol, 2022, 168,
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Lazar P, Mach R, Otyepka M. Spectroscopic fingerprints of graphitic, pyrrolic, pyridinic, and chemisorbed nitrogen in N-doped graphene. J Phys Chem C, 2019, 123: 10695-10702,
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Leng L, Xiong Q, Yang L, Li H, Zhou Y, Zhang W, Jiang S, Li H, Huang H. An overview on engineering the surface area and porosity of biochar. Sci Total Environ, 2021, 763,
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Li H, Tan Z. Preparation of high water-retaining biochar and its mechanism of alleviating drought stress in the soil and plant system. Biochar, 2021, 3: 579-590,
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Li S, Shao L, Zhang H, He P, F. Quantifying the contributions of surface area and redox-active moieties to electron exchange capacities of biochar. J Hazard Mater, 2020, 394,
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Liu Q, Li D, Cheng H, Cheng J, Du K, Hu Y, Chen Y. High mesoporosity phosphorus-containing biochar fabricated from Camellia oleifera shells: Impressive tetracycline adsorption performance and promotion of pyrophosphate-like surface functional groups (C-O-P bond). Bioresour Technol, 2021, 329,
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Mao J, Zhang K, Chen B. Linking hydrophobicity of biochar to the water repellency and water holding capacity of biochar-amended soil. Environ Poll, 2019, 253: 779-789,
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Muzyka R, Misztal E, Hrabak J, Banks SW, Sajdak M. Various biomass pyrolysis conditions influence the porosity and pore size distribution of biochar. Energy, 2023, 263,
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Nzediegwu C, Arshad M, Ulah A, Naeth MA, Chang SX. Fuel, thermal and surface properties of microwave-pyrolyzed biochars depend on feedstock type and pyrolysis temperature. Bioresour Technol, 2021, 320,
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Omondi MO, Xia X, Nahayo A, Liu X, Korai PK, Pan G. Quantification of biochar effects on soil hydrological properties using meta-analysis of literature data. Geoderma, 2016, 274: 28-34,
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Oppong Danso E, Monnie F, Abenney-Mickson S, Arthur E, Benjamin Sabi E, Neumann Andersen M. Does biochar particle size, application rate and irrigation regime interact to afect soil water holding capacity, maize growth and nutrient uptake?. J Soil Sci Plant Nut, 2021, 21: 3180-3193,
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Seitz S, Teuber S, Geißler C, Goebes P, Scholten T. How do newly-amended biochar particles affect erodibility and soil water movement?-a small-scale experimental approach. Soil Syst, 2020, 4: 60,
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Singh B, Fang Y, Cowie BCC, Thomsen L. NEXAFS and XPS characterisation of carbon functional groups of fresh and aged biochars. Org Geochem, 2014, 77: 1-10,
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Suliman W, Harsh JB, Abu-Lail NI, Fortuna AM, Dallmeyer I, Garcia-Perez M. The role of biochar porosity and surface functionality in augmenting hydrologic properties of a sandy soil. Sci Total Environ, 2017, 574: 139-147,
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Wang D, Zhang W, Hao X, Zhou D. Transport of biochar particles in saturated granular media: effects of pyrolysis temperature and particle size. Environ Sci Technol, 2013, 47: 821-828,
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Weber K, Quicker P. Properties of biochar. Fuel, 2018, 217: 240-261,
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Werdin J, Conn R, Fletcher TD, Rayner JP, Williams NSG, Claire Farrell C. Biochar particle size and amendment rate are more important for water retention and weight of green roof substrates than differences in feedstock type. Ecol Eng, 2021, 171,
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Wiersma W, van der Ploeg MJ, Sauren IJMH, Stoof CR. No effect of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock type on hydraulic properties of biochar and amended sandy soil. Geoderma, 2020, 364: 114209,
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Wu L, Ni J, Zhang H, Yu S, Wei R, Qian W, Chen W, Qi Z. The composition, energy, and carbon stability characteristics of biochars derived from thermo-conversion of biomass in air-limitation, CO2, and N2 at different temperatures. Waste Manag, 2022, 141: 136-146,
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Xiang Y, Zhang H, Yu S, Ni J, Wei R, Chen W. Influence of pyrolysis atmosphere and temperature co-regulation on the sorption of tetracycline onto biochar: structure-performance relationship variation. Bioresour Technol, 2022, 360,
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Yang C, Liu J, Lu S. Pyrolysis temperature affects pore characteristics of rice straw and canola stalk biochars and biochar-amended soils. Geoderma, 2021, 397: 11097,
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Yang J, Yang H, Wang S, Wang K, Sun Y, Yi W, Yang G. Importance of pyrolysis programs in enhancing the application of microalgae-derived biochar in microbial fuel cells. Fuel, 2023, 333,
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Yu S, Wu L, Ni J, Zhang H, Wei R, Chen W. The chemical compositions and carbon structures of pine sawdust- and wheat straw-derived biochars produced in air-limitation, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen atmospheres, and their variation with charring temperature. Fuel, 2022, 315,
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Zhang J, Chen Q, You C. Biochar effect on water evaporation and hydraulic conductivity in sandy soil. Pedosphere, 2016, 26: 265-272,
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Zhang H, Chen W, Li Q, Zhang X, Wang C, Yang L, Wei R, Ni J. Difference in characteristics and nutrient retention between biochars produced in nitrogen-flow and air-limitation atmospheres. J Environ Qual, 2020, 49: 1396-1407,
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Zhang J, Amonette JE, Flury M. Effect of biochar and biochar particle size on plant available water of sand, silt loam, and clay soil. Soil till Res, 2021, 212,
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Zhao L, Cao X, Masek O, Zimmerman A. Heterogeneity of biochar properties as a function of feedstock sources and production temperatures. J Hazard Mater, 2013, 256–257: 1-9
[44]
Zornoza R, Moreno-Barriga F, Acosta JA, Munoz MA, Faz A. Stability, nutrient availability and hydrophobicity of biochars derived from manure, crop residues, and municipal solid waste for their use as soil amendments. Chemosphere, 2016, 144: 122-130,
CrossRef Google scholar
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China(42077130); Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province(2022R1002003)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/