Current trends in antimicrobial activities of carbon nanostructures: potentiality and status of nanobiochar in comparison to carbon dots
Kulathi Nishshankage, Andrea Breverly Fernandez, Shiran Pallewatta, P. K. C. Buddhinie, Meththika Vithanage
Current trends in antimicrobial activities of carbon nanostructures: potentiality and status of nanobiochar in comparison to carbon dots
The increase in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a massive threat to world health, necessitating the urgent development of alternative antimicrobial growth control techniques. Due to their specific physical and chemical properties, nanomaterials, particularly carbon-based nanomaterials, have emerged as attractive candidates for antimicrobial applications, however, reviews are lacking. This comprehensive review aims to bridge the existing knowledge gaps surrounding the mechanism and significance of nanobiochar (NBC) and carbon nanostructures in the field of antimicrobial applications. Notably, NBC, which is derived from biochar, exhibits promising potential as an environmentally-friendly substance with antimicrobial properties. Its strong adsorption capabilities enable the removal and immobilization of pathogens and pollutants from soil and water and also exhibit antimicrobial properties to combat harmful pathogens. In addition to NBC, carbon dots (CDs) and graphene oxide (GO) have also shown excellent antimicrobial properties. These carbon-based nanomaterials find applications in agriculture for phytopathogen control and post-harvest disease management, as well as in medicine for nanotheranostics and in the food industry for extending shelf life as an eco-friendly alternative to chemicals and antibiotics. However, the long-term toxicity of these nanoparticles to humans and the environment needs further investigation, considering the influence of different physiochemical characteristics on antimicrobial properties and nanotoxicity. Therefore, continued exploration in this area will pave the way for future research and safe deployment strategies of carbon-based nanomaterials in combating microbial threats.
• | Nanobiochar and carbon dots are promising alternatives to traditional antimicrobial methods. |
• | Nanobiochar demonstrates strong adsorption and pathogen immobilization properties. |
• | Carbon dots and graphene oxide show excellent antimicrobial properties. |
Carbon dots / Carbon nanotubes / Nanobiochar / Graphene oxide / Antimicrobial activity
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Baruah J, Sahu D (2022) Comparative studies on carbon dots applications in plant systems. In Carbon Dots in Agricultural Systems (pp. 199–224)
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Dadgostar P (2019) Antimicrobial resistance: implications and costs. Infection and drug resistance, pp.3903–3910
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Gupta RD, Gupta SK (2016) Strategies for increasing the production of oilseed on a sustainable basis. In Breeding oilseed crops for sustainable production (pp. 1–18). Academic Press
|
[] |
|
[] |
Gupta N, Debnath S, Sharma S, Sharma P, Purohit J (2017) Role of nutrients in controlling the plant diseases in sustainable agriculture. Agriculturally Important Microbes for Sustainable Agriculture: Volume 2: Applications in Crop Production and Protection, 217–262
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Kościk I, Jankowski D, Jagusiak A (2021) Carbon nanomaterials for theranostic use. C, 8(1): 3
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Miah G, Rafii MY, Ismail MR, Sahebi M, Hashemi FSG, Yusuff O, Usman MG (2017) Blast disease intimidation towards rice cultivation: a review of pathogen and strategies to control. JAPS J Animal Plant Sci 27(4)
|
[] |
Mishra S, Singh A, Keswani C, Saxena A, Sarma BK, Singh HB (2015) Harnessing plant-microbe interactions for enhanced protection against phytopathogens. Plant microbes symbiosis: applied facets, 111–125
|
[] |
Mittal J, Osheen S, Gupta A, Kumar R (2019) Carbon nanomaterials in agriculture. Nanosci Sustain Agric 153–170
|
[] |
|
[] |
Murmu SB, Mishra HN (2018) Post-harvest shelf-life of banana and guava: Mechanisms of common degradation problems and emerging counteracting strategies. Innovative Food Science Emerging Technologies 49
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Omran BA, Baek KH (2022) Control of phytopathogens using sustainable biogenic nanomaterials: Recent perspectives, ecological safety, and challenging gaps. J Cleaner Prod 133729
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Pratiwi DC, Konhauser KO, Alessi DS (2022) Chapter 12—Biochar nanoparticles: interactions with and impacts on soil and water microorganisms, in Biochar in Agriculture for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals. Tsang DCWYS Ok, editors. Academic Press; p. 139–154.
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
Shafiq F, Anwar S, Firdaus EB, Zhang L, Ashraf M (2023) Nano-biochar: Properties and prospects for sustainable agriculture. Land Degradation and Development
|
[] |
Shahruzzaman M, Hossain S, Ahmed T et al (2022) Chapter 7—Biological macromolecules as antimicrobial agents, in Biological Macromolecules. Nayak AK, AK DharaD Pal, editors. Academic Press p. 165–202
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
[] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |