Enhanced bioethanol production by evolved Escherichia coli LGE2-H in a microbial electrolysis cell system

Cong Wang, Dongdong Chang, Qi Zhang, Zhisheng Yu

Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 4.

Bioresources and Bioprocessing All Journals
Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 4. DOI: 10.1186/s40643-023-00717-5
Research

Enhanced bioethanol production by evolved Escherichia coli LGE2-H in a microbial electrolysis cell system

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Lignocellulose pretreated using pyrolysis can yield clean energy (such as bioethanol) via microbial fermentation, which can significantly contribute to waste recycling, environmental protection, and energy security. However, the acids, aldehydes, and phenols present in bio-oil with inhibitory effects on microorganisms compromise the downstream utilization and conversion of lignocellulosic pyrolysates. In this study, we constructed a microbial electrolysis cell system for bio-oil detoxification and efficient ethanol production using evolved Escherichia coli to overcome the bioethanol production and utilization challenges highlighted in previous studies. In electrically treated bio-oil media, the E. coli-H strain exhibited significantly higher levoglucosan consumption and ethanol production capacities compared with the control. In undetoxified bio-oil media containing 1.0% (w/v) levoglucosan, E. coli-H produced 0.54 g ethanol/g levoglucosan, reaching 94% of the theoretical yield. Our findings will contribute to developing a practical method for bioethanol production from lignocellulosic substrates, and provide a scientific basis and technical demonstration for its industrialized application.

Keywords

Adaptive evolution / Escherichia coli LGE2-H / Lignocellulosic pyrolysate / Microbial electrolysis cell

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Cong Wang, Dongdong Chang, Qi Zhang, Zhisheng Yu. Enhanced bioethanol production by evolved Escherichia coli LGE2-H in a microbial electrolysis cell system. Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 2024, 11(1): 4 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-023-00717-5

References

Arnold S, Moss K, Henkel M. Biotechnological perspectives of pyrolysis oil for a bio-based economy. Trends Biotechnol, 2017, 35: 925-936.
CrossRef Google scholar
Chang D, Yu Z, Islam ZU. Mathematical modeling of the fermentation of acid-hydrolyzed pyrolytic sugars to ethanol by the engineered strain Escherichia coli ACCC 11177. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2015, 99: 4093-4105.
CrossRef Google scholar
Chang D, Islam ZU, Yang Z. Conversion efficiency of bioethanol from levoglucosan was improved by the newly engineered Escherichia coli. Environ Prog Sustain Energy, 2021, 40.
CrossRef Google scholar
Chen L, Wang M, Zhang Z. Application of electric potential improves ethanol production from xylose by active sludge. Biotechnol Biofuel, 2021, 14: 215.
CrossRef Google scholar
Gu J, Li Z, Xie G. Electro-fermentation enhances H2 and ethanol co-production by regulating electron transfer and substrate transmembrane transport. Chem Eng J, 2022, 429.
CrossRef Google scholar
Harrington TD, Mohamed A, Tran VN. Neutral red-mediated microbial electrosynthesis by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Zymomonas mobilis. Bioresource Technol, 2015, 195: 57-65.
CrossRef Google scholar
He AY, Yin CY, Xu H. Enhanced butanol production in a microbial electrolysis cell by Clostridium beijerinckii IB4. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng, 2016, 39: 245-254.
CrossRef Google scholar
Huang H, Yan X, Song S. An economic and technology analysis of a new high-efficiency biomass cogeneration system: a case study in DC County. China Energies, 2020, 13: 3957.
CrossRef Google scholar
Keasling J, Garcia Martin H, Lee TS. Microbial production of advanced biofuels. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2021, 19: 701-715.
CrossRef Google scholar
Kondaveeti S, Min B. Bioelectrochemical reduction of volatile fatty acids in anaerobic digestion effluent for the production of biofuels. Water Res, 2015, 87: 137-144.
CrossRef Google scholar
Kurgan G, Panyon LA, Rodriguez-Sanchez Y. Bioprospecting of native efflux pumps to enhance furfural tolerance in ethanologenic Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2019, 85: e02985-e3018.
CrossRef Google scholar
Layton DS, Ajjarapu A, Choi DW. Engineering ethanologenic Escherichia coli for levoglucosan utilization. Bioresource Technol, 2011, 102: 8318-8322.
CrossRef Google scholar
Li J, Zhang Y, Sun K. Optimization of a cathodic electro-fermentation process for enhancing co-production of butanol and hydrogen via acetone-butanol-ethanol fermentation of Clostridium beijerinckii. Energy Convers Manag, 2022, 251.
CrossRef Google scholar
Li K, Zhang J-W, Li F. Electrochemical control of cell metabolism improves ethanol production of Zymomonas mobilis in an electro-fermentation system. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2023, 11: 2364-2374.
CrossRef Google scholar
Liang L, Liu R, Freed EF. Synthetic biology and metabolic engineering employing Escherichia coli for C2–C6 bioalcohol production. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2020, 8: 710.
CrossRef Google scholar
Martin AL, Satjaritanun P, Shimpalee S. In-situ electrochemical analysis of microbial activity. AMB Express, 2018, 8: 162.
CrossRef Google scholar
Molognoni D, Vega M, de Vrije T. Enhancing butanol production by Clostridium beijerinckii through cathodic electrofermentation approach. J Chem Technol Biotechnol, 2023, 98: 856-864.
CrossRef Google scholar
Mostafazadeh AK, Drogui P, Brar SK. Microbial electrosynthesis of solvents and alcoholic biofuels from nutrient waste: a review. J Environ Chem Eng, 2017, 5: 940-954.
CrossRef Google scholar
Palazzolo MA, Garcia-Perez M. Microbial lipid biosynthesis from lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis products. Biotechnol Adv, 2022, 54.
CrossRef Google scholar
Pandit AV, Mahadevan R. In silico characterization of microbial electrosynthesis for metabolic engineering of biochemicals. Microb Cell Fact, 2011, 10: 76.
CrossRef Google scholar
Park LK-E, Satinover SJ, Yiacoumi S. Electrosorption of organic acids from aqueous bio-oil and conversion into hydrogen via microbial electrolysis cells. Renew Energ, 2018, 125: 21-31.
CrossRef Google scholar
Prévoteau A, Carvajal-Arroyo JM, Ganigué R. Microbial electrosynthesis from CO2: forever a promise. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2020, 62: 48-57.
CrossRef Google scholar
Romans-Casas M, Perona-Vico E, Dessì P. Boosting ethanol production rates from carbon dioxide in MES cells under optimal solventogenic conditions. Sci Total Environ, 2023, 856.
CrossRef Google scholar
Saravanan A, Senthil Kumar P, Jeevanantham S. Recent advances and sustainable development of biofuels production from lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technol, 2022, 344.
CrossRef Google scholar
Sharma J, Kumar V, Prasad R. Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a consolidated bioprocessing host to produce cellulosic ethanol: recent advancements and current challenges. Biotechnol Adv, 2022, 56.
CrossRef Google scholar
Speers AM, Young JM, Reguera G. Fermentation of glycerol into ethanol in a microbial electrolysis cell driven by a customized consortium. Environ Sci Technol, 2014, 48: 6350-6358.
CrossRef Google scholar
Steinbusch KJ, Hamelers HV, Schaap JD. Bioelectrochemical ethanol production through mediated acetate reduction by mixed cultures. Environ Sci Technol, 2010, 44: 513-517.
CrossRef Google scholar
Sugnaux M, Happe M, Cachelin CP. Two stage bioethanol refining with multi litre stacked microbial fuel cell and microbial electrolysis cell. Bioresource Technol, 2016, 221: 61-69.
CrossRef Google scholar
Tao Y, Wang H, Wang J. Strategies to improve the stress resistance of Escherichia coli in industrial biotechnology. Biofuel Bioprod Biorefin, 2022, 16: 1130-1141.
CrossRef Google scholar
Wang X, Yomano LP, Lee JY. Engineering furfural tolerance in Escherichia coli improves the fermentation of lignocellulosic sugars into renewable chemicals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2013, 110: 4021-4026.
CrossRef Google scholar
Wu Z, Wang J, Liu J. Engineering an electroactive Escherichia coli for the microbial electrosynthesis of succinate from glucose and CO2. Microb Cell Fact, 2019, 18: 15.
CrossRef Google scholar
Xie R, Wang S, Wang K. Improved energy efficiency in microbial fuel cells by bioethanol and electricity co-generation. Biotechnol Biofuel Bioprod, 2022, 15: 84.
CrossRef Google scholar
Yu Q, Yang Y, Wang M. Enhancing anaerobic digestion of kitchen wastes via combining ethanol-type fermentation with magnetite: potential for stimulating secretion of extracellular polymeric substances. Waste Manag, 2021, 127: 10-17.
CrossRef Google scholar
Zeng X, Collins MA, Borole AP. The extent of fermentative transformation of phenolic compounds in the bioanode controls exoelectrogenic activity in a microbial electrolysis cell. Water Res, 2017, 109: 299-309.
CrossRef Google scholar
Zhen G, Lu X, Kumar G. Microbial electrolysis cell platform for simultaneous waste biorefinery and clean electrofuels generation: current situation, challenges and future perspectives. Prog Energy Combust Sci, 2017, 63: 119-145.
CrossRef Google scholar
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China(21978287); Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(E2E40503X2)

40

Accesses

3

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/