High solid saccharification using mild alkali-pretreated rice straw by hyper-cellulolytic fungal strain

Garima Dixit, Amita R. Shah, Datta Madamwar, Madhuri Narra

Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2015, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) : 46.

Bioresources and Bioprocessing All Journals
Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2015, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) : 46. DOI: 10.1186/s40643-015-0075-3
Research

High solid saccharification using mild alkali-pretreated rice straw by hyper-cellulolytic fungal strain

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to use traditional mutagenesis to generate hyper-cellulolytic mutants with emphasis on stable, non-spore formers, shorter enzyme producing times and higher saccharification efficiency at high solid loadings. An in-house isolated strain of Aspergillus terreus (At) was identified, fingerprinted and mutated. A sequential process of mutation followed by stringent selection generated mutant At9, which produced optimal cellulase at day 4 instead of day 7, was non-spore former with high stability and grew on a lower pH than parental strain. At9 cellulases were used successfully at high solid loads [up to 25 % (w/v)] in a modified system at 50 °C with reduced hydrolysis times compared to parent strain.

Conclusion

In current work ultra violet (UV) mutagenesis and intelligent screening design combined with growth on a cheap substrate for enzyme production was demonstrated. With this work we present a single organism enzyme system with substantially lower production time and decreased saccharification time at high solid loads.

Keywords

Mutagenesis / Aspergillus terreus / Non-spore former / High solid saccharification

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Garima Dixit, Amita R. Shah, Datta Madamwar, Madhuri Narra. High solid saccharification using mild alkali-pretreated rice straw by hyper-cellulolytic fungal strain. Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 2015, 2(1): 46 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-015-0075-3

References

Chand P, Aruna A, Maqsood AM, Rao LV. Novel mutation method for increased cellulose production. J Appl Microbiol, 2005, 98: 318-323.
CrossRef Google scholar
Durand H, Clanet M, Tiraby G. Genetic improvement of Trichoderma reesei for large scale cellulase production. Enzyme Microbial Technol., 1988, 10: 341-346.
CrossRef Google scholar
Gao J, Weng H, Zhu D, Yuan M, Guan F, Xu Y. Production and characterization of cellulolytic enzymes from the thermo acidophilic fungal Aspergillus terreus M11 under solid-state cultivation of corn stover. Bioresour Technol, 2008, 99: 7623-7629.
CrossRef Google scholar
Goering K, Van Soest PJ (1975) Forage fiber analysis-agriculture research series. Handbook, pp 379
Hansen D, Healy M, Reece K, Smith C, Woods GL. Repetitive-sequence-based PCR using the DiversiLab system for identification of Aspergillus species. J Clin Microbiol, 2008, 46: 1835-1839.
CrossRef Google scholar
Hopwood DA, Bibb MJ, Chater KF, Kieser T, Bruton CJ, Kieser HM, Lydiate DJ, Smith CP, Ward JM, Schrempt H. Genetic manipulation of streptomyces—a laboratory manual, 1985, Norwick: The John Foundation.
Jeya M, Zhang YW, Kim IW, Lee JK. Enhanced saccharification of alkali pretreated rice straw by cellulase from Trametes hirsuta and statistical optimization of hydrolysis conditions by RSM. Bioresour Technol, 2009, 100: 5155-5161.
CrossRef Google scholar
Jorgensen H, Kristensen JB, Felby C. Enzymatic conversion of lingo cellulose into fermentable sugars: Challenges and opportunities. Biofuels Bioproducts Biorefinery., 2007, 1: 119-134.
CrossRef Google scholar
Kaar WE, Holtzapple MT (1998) Benefits from tween during enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Biotechnol Bioeng 59(4):419–27
Krassing HA. Effect of structure and morphology on accessibility and reactivity. Cellulose: structure, accessibility and reactivity, 1992, New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 167-324.
Larsen J, Petersen MO, Thirup L, Li HW, Iversen FK. The IBUS process-lignocellulosic bioethanol close to a commercial reality. Chem Eng Technol, 2008, 31: 765-772.
CrossRef Google scholar
Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. J Biol Chem., 1951, 193: 265-275.
Mandels M, Andreotti RE. Problems and challenges in the cellulose to cellulase fermentation. Proc Biochem, 1978, 13: 6-13.
Marie C, Hugues M, DelphineHuc DC, Frederic Monot NL, Ferreira. Comparative kinetic analysis of two fungal β-glucosidases. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2010, 3: 3.
CrossRef Google scholar
Merhendi H, Diba K, Kordbacheh P, Jalalizand N, Makimura K. Identification of pathogenic Aspergillus species by a PCR-restriction enzyme method. J Med Microbiol., 2007, 56: 1568-1570.
CrossRef Google scholar
Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylicacid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem, 1959, 31: 426-428.
CrossRef Google scholar
Montenecourt BS, Eveleigh DE (1975) Selective screening methods for the isolation of high yielding cellulase mutants of Trichoderma reesei. Adven Chem Ser 289–301
Narra M, Dixit G, Divecha J, Madamwar D, Shah AR. Production of cellulases by solid state fermentation with Aspergillus terreus and enzymatic hydrolysis of mild alkali-treated rice straw. Bioresour Technol, 2012, 121: 355-361.
CrossRef Google scholar
Narra M, Dixit G, Divecha J, Kumar Kiran, Madamwar D, Shah AR. Production, purification and characterization of a novel GH 12 family endoglucanase from Aspergillus terreus and its application in enzymatic degradation of delignified rice straw. Internal Biodeterio Biodegrada, 2014, 88: 150-161.
CrossRef Google scholar
Nevalainen KMH, Palva ET, Bailey MJ. A high cellulase producing mutant strain of Trichoderma reesei. Enzyme Microbial Technol., 1980, 2: 59-60.
CrossRef Google scholar
Saloheimo M, Paloheimo M, Hakola S, Pere J, Swanson B, Nyyssonen E, Bhatia A, Ward M, Penttila M. Swollen in, a Tricoderma reesei protein with sequence similarity to the plant expansions, exhibits disruption activity on cellulosic materials. Eur J Biochem., 2002, 269: 202-211.
CrossRef Google scholar
Saritha M, Anju A, Lata N. Pretreatment of paddy straw with Trametes hirsuta for improved enzymatic saccharification. Bioresour Technol, 2012, 104: 459-465.
CrossRef Google scholar
Seung GW, Seong C, Kyoung HK, Kim HM, Hyyeun JB. Bioethanol production from rice straw by popping pretreatment. Biotechnol Biofuels., 2013, 6: 166.
CrossRef Google scholar
Sukumaran RK, Singhania RR, Mathew GM, Pandey A. Cellulase production using biomass feed stock and its application in lignocellulose saccharification for bio-ethanol production. Renew Energy, 2009, 34: 421-424.
CrossRef Google scholar
Szengyel Z, Zacchi G, Varga A, Reczey K (2000). Cellulase production of Trichoderma reesei RUT C30 using steam-pretreated spruce. Hydrolytic potential of cellulases on different substrates. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 84–86:679–91
White T, Burns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications, 1990, San Diego: Academic Press, 315-322.
Wingren A, Galbe M, Zacchi G. Techno-economic evaluation of producing ethanol from softwood: comparison of SSF and SHF and identification of bottlenecks. Biotechnol Programme, 2003, 19: 1109-1117.
CrossRef Google scholar
Yennawar NH, Li LC, Dudzinski DM, Tsbuchi A, Cosgrove DJ. Crystal structure and activities of EXP1 (Zea m 1), a β-expansion and group-1 pollen allergen from maize. Proc Nat Acad Sci, 2006, 103: 14664-114671.
CrossRef Google scholar
Zadrazi F, Brunnert H. Solid state fermentation of lignocelluloses containing plant residues with Spirotrichum pulverulentum and Dichomitus squalens (Karst). Reid. Eur J Appl Microb Biotechnol., 1982, 16: 45-51.
CrossRef Google scholar
Funding
Department of Biotechnology , Ministry of Science and Technology (IN)(D.O. No. BT/NBDB/22/06/2011)

10

Accesses

4

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/